logo
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from detaining Mahmoud Khalil over pro-Palestinian protests

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from detaining Mahmoud Khalil over pro-Palestinian protests

Time of Indiaa day ago

A U.S. judge stopped the Trump administration from deporting Mahmoud Khalil. Khalil is a Columbia University student and pro-Palestine activist. The administration claimed Khalil threatened U.S. foreign policy. Judge Farbiarz ruled the action likely unconstitutional. He cited First Amendment rights infringement. Khalil's lawyers argued deportation endangered him. The case tests immigrant speech rights.
FILE -- Mahmoud Khalil speaks during a press conference at Columbia University, near the campus in New York, April 22, 2024. A federal judge on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, barred the Trump administration from continuing to detain Mahmoud Khalil. (Bing Guan/The New York Times)
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A U.S. federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot continue detaining or deporting Mahmoud Khalil , a Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist, on the grounds that his presence allegedly threatens U.S. foreign policy interests. The decision, issued Wednesday by Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey, represents a significant legal setback for the administration's efforts to use a rarely invoked provision of immigration law to target student demonstrators.Khalil, a legal U.S. resident and green card holder married to an American citizen, was arrested by immigration authorities on March 8 in the lobby of his New York City apartment building and has since been held in a Louisiana detention facility. The government's case relied on a 1952 law that allows the Secretary of State to expel noncitizens whose activities are deemed a threat to U.S. foreign policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had asserted Khalil's involvement in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University fostered a 'hostile environment for Jewish students' and posed adverse foreign policy consequences.However, Judge Farbiarz found this rationale likely unconstitutional, stating that the administration's actions infringed on Khalil's First Amendment rights and caused 'irreparable harm' to his career, family, and freedom of speech. The judge noted that Khalil's continued detention was not supported by substantial evidence and that similar omissions on green card applications—another basis the administration cited—rarely result in detention.The ruling does not take immediate effect; the administration has until 9:30 a.m. Friday to appeal. If no appeal is filed, Khalil will be eligible for release on a nominal $1 bond. Khalil's legal team welcomed the decision, with attorney Baher Azmy calling it a relief that the court recognized the 'grotesque, vindictive retaliation for his constitutionally protected expression in support of Palestine'.This case follows a pattern, as other student activists swept up in the administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian demonstrations have also challenged their detentions and, in some cases, secured release. The Department of Justice , State, and Homeland Security have not commented on the ruling. Khalil's attorneys have submitted extensive documentation to counter allegations of antisemitism and warn that deportation would expose him to grave danger in Syria or Algeria, where he has roots but faces persecution.The outcome of this case is seen as a landmark test of immigrants' speech rights in the U.S. and could set precedent for how the government handles similar cases involving political activism and foreign policy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rubio warns Iran against targeting U.S. over Israeli strikes
Rubio warns Iran against targeting U.S. over Israeli strikes

The Hindu

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Rubio warns Iran against targeting U.S. over Israeli strikes

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran late Thursday (June 12, 2025) not to respond to Israeli strikes by hitting American bases, saying Washington was not involved. Israel strikes Iran LIVE: Military official says nuclear targets hit; explosions heard across Tehran "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel." Israel announced strikes on Iran, where loud explosions were heard, hours after U.S. President Donald Trump publicly said they should not do so. Mr. Trump had said that Israel would ruin chances for a peacefully negotiated solution, which he said was close. A sixth round of talks over Tehran's nuclear program had been scheduled between the United States and Iran on Sunday in Oman. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," Rubio said, without offering support or criticism of the strikes by the close US ally. "President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners," he said.

US not involved in strikes against Iran, says Marco Rubio
US not involved in strikes against Iran, says Marco Rubio

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US not involved in strikes against Iran, says Marco Rubio

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Following the Israeli strikes on Iran US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was not involved and warned warned Tehran not to respond to the attack by hitting American bases."We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement on Thursday."Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel." Israel announced that it struck Iran hours after US President Donald Trump publicly said they should not do so, adding that Israel would ruin chances for a peacefully negotiated solution.A sixth round of talks over Tehran's nuclear program had been scheduled between the United States and Iran on Sunday in Oman."Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," Rubio said, without offering support or criticism of the strikes by the close US ally."President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners," he said.

Why US judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard in California was illegal
Why US judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard in California was illegal

Hindustan Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why US judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard in California was illegal

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday directing President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to California. The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The White House had no immediate comment on the ruling, but the federal government immediately filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit court. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said Trump overstepped his bounds in ordering the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. ALSO READ| What is 'No Kings' protest? Movement planned against Trump during Army's 250th anniversary parade California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. He argued that the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and wanted the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying that involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response Wednesday. In a broad ruling, the judge determined Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, said that as of Wednesday about 500 of the Guard troops have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. Sherman is commander of Task Force 51, which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles. ALSO READ| No US involvement in Israel's attack on Iran, claim officials Typically the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Trump federalized members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. The lawsuit argued that Title 10 requires, among other things, that the president go through governors when issuing orders to the National Guard. Brett Shumate, an attorney for the federal government, said Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and would have the authority to call in the Guard even if he had not. In a brief filed ahead of the Thursday hearing, the Justice Department said Trump's orders were not subject to judicial review. 'Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation. Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. And courts should not interfere here either,' the department said. 'Our position is this is not subject to judicial review,' Shumate told the judge. Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the constitution, said he disagreed. 'We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' he said. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. ALSO READ| Trump's DC birthday parade could be canceled amid 'No Kings' protest Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles, and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store