ACT chooses 'care over cruelty' by raising the age of criminal responsibility to 14
From July 1, children under 14 in the ACT can no longer be charged, prosecuted, or imprisoned under the criminal legal system, except for a limited number of excluded offences.
The change comes as part of a two-stage reform passed in 2023, which first raised the age from 10 to 12 and now to 14. The Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) welcomed the milestone, commending the ACT Government for a decision grounded in research and community wellbeing. 'This reform will keep more children where they belong: in their homes, communities, schools, playgrounds and sports fields, supported to thrive rather than being dragged through court and languishing in youth prisons,' ALS chief executive Karly Warner said. 'Evidence shows the younger a child is at first contact with the legal system, the more likely they are to keep coming back into contact with police and courts and to experience adult imprisonment.
"That's why raising the age of legal responsibility to 14 is a commonsense move not only for children but for all members of our communities.'
While praising the ACT's leadership, Ms Warner urged further reform, calling for the removal of exceptions that still allow children to be criminalised under certain circumstances.
The change follows decades of sustained advocacy from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, health professionals and legal experts, who have long highlighted the harms of early criminalisation, particularly for Indigenous children, who remain disproportionately affected by the system.
A call for national action Advocacy organisations, including Change the Record, the Justice and Equity Centre and the Human Rights Law Centre, also welcomed the reform, and called on all other jurisdictions to follow suit without delay. 'Every child deserves to grow with connection, not be locked up in prison cells,' Jade Lane, Change the Record chief executive, said.
'The ACT reforms are a crucial step toward choosing care over cruelty, especially for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, who are disproportionately targeted by police and the so-called justice system.'
Ms Lane urged other jurisdictions to end harmful, punitive youth justice practices and invest instead in community-led solutions that support young people. 'This change in the ACT signals a well-overdue time to invest in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children to thrive, not trap them in cycles of criminalisation,' she said. Maggie Munn, First Nations director at the Human Rights Law Centre, said the reform sets a precedent for the rest of the nation. 'Our kids deserve to thrive, not be caged in police watch houses and prison cells. This is a positive step forward which means that more children in the ACT will be cared for, rather than pipelined into prison,' Munn said.
'We call on every state and territory government to do the right thing for kids and communities, and raise the age of criminal responsibility to at least 14, with no exceptions.'
Chief executive of the Justice and Equity Centre Jonathon Hunyor told NITV that locking up children cruels their chances and takes them away from positive influences. "What we do is place kids in a situation where they build criminal capital – they go to the university of crime," he said. "They get taught that they're criminals and told that they're criminals – and that's exactly what we produce. "So it's very easy to talk tough and be all hairy-chested about being tough on crime, but the fact is, it's not working, it's never worked, and it's never going to work.
"Unless we actually invest in kids, we invest in communities, we invest in solutions, we're just saying the same stuff over and over again."
Australia still lagging behind international standards Despite the ACT's progress, Australia remains out of step with international human rights obligations. The United Nations has repeatedly called on Australia to raise the minimum age to 14 'without exception,' citing evidence that children aged 10 to 13 lack the developmental capacity to be held criminally responsible. Mr Hunyor said that raising the age is a catalyst for changing systems, taking the emphasis from criminalisation, from police and prisons, to where it can make a difference. "And that's intervening early, supporting children and families from a much younger age than even 10 so that problems that lead them to commit criminal offences don't materialise or, if they do, that kids can get back on the right track," he said. "So it's all the obvious stuff that we should be investing in community services, after school activities, mentoring for young people, mental health support and there's support for families. "We address things like homelessness and a lack of housing, disability supports that we need in our communities
"They're all the things that we know are going to make a difference."
Communities had a right to be angry that government is not investing in them and not investing in people's capacity to do better, Mr Hunyor said. "Instead, we park at the bottom of the cliff, we wait for kids to fall off, we chuck them in the paddy wagon, and we drive them back up and let them out again, and the whole cycle starts again," he said. "It's just a ridiculous approach that we're taking. "And until more people look at the evidence like they are in the ACT, we're not going to get better outcomes."
In NSW, Queensland, and South Australia, the age of criminal responsibility remains at 10.
The former Northern Territory Labor government raised the age to 12 but when the Country Liberal Party swept to power in August last year, one of the first act's of Lia Finocchiaro's new government was to lower it back to 10. Victoria has also kept the age at 10, and while that state has passed legislation to raise it to 12; the change has not yet been implemented and also includes new police powers targeting children as young as 10 and breaks a promise from former Premier Dan Andrews to raise the age to 14 by 2027. Tasmania has committed to raising the age to 14 by 2029, while in Western Australia, the government has voted to raise the age to 14, but implementation is still pending. 'Kids deserve a childhood free from cages and isolation,' Ms Lane said.
'It's time the rest of the country caught up.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
5 minutes ago
- ABC News
DV prevention advocates want animal abuse defined in SA's coercive control laws
In the throes of intimate partner violence, Amber's dogs were more than a comfort. They were her closest confidants and a source of protection. "Looking at my dogs every day ... it shows you that it's not just about you in that situation," she said. As the violence evolved, Amber's "gentle but boisterous" staffies were kept away from her. She said it was "agonising to be separate from them". Amber made the decision to leave, but no shelters could accommodate her pets. She would return to the house to feed and comfort them and was distressed to see the neglect they endured while she was gone. If you need help immediately call emergency services on 000. "[One] had a cut on the top of her head … they weren't being fed adequately, they weren't being walked or stimulated in any way that they were used to," she said. "They'd both lost a lot of weight and would flinch when you'd approach them at times, as if they were scared of being hurt. "And I was putting myself in an extremely unsafe environment." Domestic violence victim-survivors and the Law Society of South Australia want stronger legal provisions for domestic violence against pets. A bill to criminalise coercive control passed South Australia's lower house but has stalled in the upper house. While animal abuse is referenced in the legislation — in an example about being convicted of another offence like animal cruelty — it is not explicitly listed as a form of control. "(Animal abuse) needs to be included within the definition to avoid any possibility that it's not considered as a means of coercive control." When victim-survivor Jennifer Howard left a domestic violence situation she could not take her dogs. "My dogs eventually ended up at the pound and were likely euthanased," she said. To heal and help others in the same situation, Ms Howard founded Adelaide-based charity Safe Pets Safe Families which runs an animal foster program. Speaking at South Australia's Royal Commission into Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence in March — which will hand down its findings this month — Ms Howard explained how she had seen the human-animal bond get weaponised. "I've had some cases where a perpetrator has harmed the pet in front of the victim and said; 'you'll be next' to control them," she said. "That if they don't return home; 'this is what's going to happen' to their animal, so a lot of the time that's what draws people back to the house." A 2024 Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) literature review found it was common for victim-survivors to delay leaving, stay with or return to perpetrators because they could not take their animals. "They have really valid safety concerns for their animals if left behind," co-author and AIFS senior research officer Kylie Butler said. "You often have perpetrators that will try to isolate women and kids from traditional social support (like) family and friends, so the bonds between people and animals can be even more strong in these situations. The government study also found animal abuse was an early warning sign of intimate partner violence. Ms Butler said some victim-survivors believed the abuse would be dismissed by support workers or law enforcement, because it was a pet being harmed and "not a person". "The more people know about it, the more seriously it is taken," she said. The report recommended more animal-inclusive crisis accommodation, for animals to be included in safety planning, and strengthening collaborations between domestic and family violence services and pet foster services with the aim of reunification. It also found more training was needed for police, paramedics and vets in responding to domestic and family violence. "Being aware of this link … being aware of some of those early warning signs that it might be happening, but also knowing what to do then," Ms Butler said. Family Law and Domestic and Family Violence Committee Chair at Women's Legal Services Australia Meaghan Bradshaw said because domestic violence laws were formed by the states and territories, there was "some inconsistency in the way that animal abuse is recognised". "Domestic violence is complex … and it's important that all of the laws recognise the ways that it can occur, which can also include animal abuse," she said. In South Australia, a 2023 draft of the coercive control bill included harming animals in a list of coercive control examples, similarly to legislation in NSW. In New South Wales, "behaviour that causes death or injury to an animal, or otherwise makes use of an animal to threaten a person" comes under the legal definition of domestic abuse. But South Australian Attorney-General Kyam Maher said this was dropped following feedback from advocacy groups, revealing concerns that authorities may see a list of behaviours as exhaustive. "What we don't want to do is … have things excluded and not count as coercive control, because it's any sort of behaviour that seeks to restrict freedoms and any sort of harm that's threatened, including psychological harm that we want captured," he said. "We want to make sure it's as broad as possible." However, after questions to Mr Maher from the ABC he said the state government was considering making the inclusion. With the help of Jennifer Howard's charity, Amber's pets were cared for until she was able to home them again. "[They] are grey and old, which as an animal owner is what you would like," Amber said. Ms Howard and Amber want animal abuse as part of the "broad" definition of coercive control. "If we fail to recognise animals in domestic violence situations, we are failing to save human lives as well," Ms Howard said. "It's such a missing piece of the puzzle." They said more awareness of this risk factor could help end the national domestic violence crisis. "I think that if perpetrators knew the extent of what harming an animal could lead to, not all of them, but I think it would deter some of them," Amber said.
ABC News
5 minutes ago
- ABC News
Just a week out from a parliamentary deadline, both Labor and Greens sticking to their guns
During every AFL trade week, there are a couple of deals that go down to the wire. One club boss insists their player is so skilled that there's no way they'll be traded, at least unless they get a bounty of draft picks or some good players in exchange. The other club boss says they value the player but can't pay the king's ransom being demanded. Occasionally, the gulf between the teams is so great that no deal can be struck. Other times, one club caves and pays too much, or accepts below-market value for their prized player. But mostly, after weeks of posturing and chest beating, both clubs agree to meet somewhere in the middle, usually right before the trade deadline. Tasmanian politics is in its own trade week era — and at the moment, the protracted negotiations are between Labor and the Greens. Labor needs the Greens to agree to their motion of no-confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff's government, and provide confidence in a Labor minority government. In return, the Greens want Labor to throw some policy concessions their way. Maybe start with matching the Liberals' ban on greyhound racing and go from there. So far, there has been the same amount of bluster you'd expect from AFL trade week. Labor insists it won't do a deal with the Greens, it won't compromise on its values and doesn't expect those it is negotiating with to do so either. But if it forms government, it will consider each idea for policy change on its merits, through a "sensible policy framework". Labor has mostly opted for the "greater good" argument — that the mostly progressive crossbench would be better off under a Labor Party that independents and Greens share some core values with, such as integrity, fixing the budget, health and housing. It's asking whether the crossbench really wants to leave the Liberals, and new Treasurer Eric Abetz, in charge of the state's finances. Especially when it could have Labor and its would-be treasurer, respected independent MLC Ruth Forrest. And whether the Greens really want to trust a premier that it voted no-confidence in just two months ago. The Greens so far have told Labor Leader Dean Winter to buzz off, and to come back when he's serious. Greens Leader Rosalie Woodruff drew a big line in the sand on Tuesday. Unless Labor offers up more than it is at the moment, she said the Greens cannot support Mr Winter as premier. Dr Woodruff reeled off a range of policies she would like movement on: ditching the proposed Macquarie Point AFL stadium, stronger environmental laws, and increasing the royalties paid by the salmon and mining industries to repair the budget. And in a classic trade-week manoeuvre, she pointed out Labor's weakened bargaining hand — that the guy doing the negotiating failed to win a quota in his own right in the seat of Franklin, while his party suffered a 3.1 per cent swing against it. And that while Labor doesn't need every individual crossbencher on board, it cannot form government without the Greens. The Greens also have the benefit of time. They can reject Mr Winter's bid for power now, tell their supporters they've extracted a greyhound racing ban from a Liberal party that just a month ago was telling the industry how valued it was, and will consider a further no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff if he doesn't do what he has promised or makes decisions that outrage them. They know Labor are likely to come back and want to form government if they're unsuccessful this time. But if the Greens vote for Mr Winter to become premier now, they know it will lead to a partnership that will be awfully hard to end. The Greens see they're giving Mr Winter a blank cheque to govern if they side with him this time. And Dr Woodruff continues to argue the party will not do that without claiming some prized assets in return. We're fairly and squarely in the chest-beating part of trade week. A week out from deadline, both parties are sticking to their guns. But which end scenario will play out on Tuesday when parliament resumes? Will the Greens and Labor remain so far apart that neither bends — and Mr Rockliff remains premier? Will Labor concede enough that the deal becomes palatable to the Greens? Or will the Greens decide that when push comes to shove, they would prefer the Labor Party in charge over Mr Rockliff? After all, Dr Woodruff used her election night speech to point out the Greens have much more in common with Labor than the Liberals. With five days until deadline day, there's still plenty to play out. And while the Greens have displayed a willingness to return to the negotiating table, Dr Woodruff put plenty of caveats on her lack of support, starting every sentence with a "for now", or "at this stage". The scene is set for a tense and highly anticipated return of the state parliament. And despite all the bluster, every possible scenario remains on the table.
ABC News
5 minutes ago
- ABC News
Man charged over Mount Waverley deaths of man and woman in graffiti-covered unit
A man has been charged with two counts of murder after police found the bodies of a man and a woman in a unit in Melbourne's south-east. Dozens of police, including members of the Critical Incident Response Team, were called to Mount Waverley after callers to triple-0 reported a disturbance at the Adrienne Crescent home about 9.55pm on Monday. Police were told a man had arrived at the unit and yelling could be heard coming from inside. Officers who attended found the bodies of a 39-year-old woman and a 50-year-old man. The Homicide Squad's Detective Inspector Dean Thomas on Tuesday described the discovery as traumatic and said counselling and support would be offered to officers and to neighbours in the unit block. A 34-year-old man was found with two large dogs at Westall Railway Station a few kilometres away several hours later The man, who is of no fixed address, was interviewed on Monday and has since been charged with two counts of murder. He will appear before Melbourne Magistrates' Court today. The unit where the altercation occurred was covered in graffiti, including the words "karma", "betrayal" and "enough is enough". Police said they believed the accused knew the deceased man. Detectives and forensic officers remained at the scene throughout Tuesday, with a large section of Adrienne Crescent blocked off while investigations were carried out.
