UK sanctions dozens, including 'gangland bosses', in people-smuggling crackdown
Gang ring leaders, key smugglers, fake passport suppliers, underground banking operators and a company in China accused of advertising its small boats online for the purpose of people-smuggling have all been targeted.
Earlier this week, the government announced new powers under the Sanctions Act to allow the UK to freeze the assets of anyone complicit in smuggling illegal migrants into the country. They can also be banned from travelling to the UK.
Working with the National Crime Agency (NCA), the Foreign Office has now identified individuals and entities it says are involved in smuggling people over the Channel.
2:04
People smugglers and underground bankers
Among those on the new sanctions list are seven Iraqi-linked individuals. Several are accused of helping smuggle migrants across the Channel in the back of lorries. The government said another runs safe houses for migrants in France before they attempt the crossing.
Also sanctioned are three "hawala bankers", people who funnel cash through an underground payment system known as Hawala.
'Gangland bosses' and passport forgers
Two North African gangs operating in the Balkans are also on the list, including the Kazawi gang, which controls people smuggling routes from North Africa into the EU and is known to deal out harsh punishments to migrants who are unable to pay.
The other is the Tetwani gang, known as one of the Balkans' most violent people smuggling gangs, with members reported to hold migrants for ransom and sexually abuse women unable to pay their fees.
Four gang bosses have also been designated, including the leaders of the Kazawi and Tetwani gangs, the Albanian head of a smuggling ring moving people from Belgium to the UK, and a former police translator who became the boss of a large network of corrupt policemen through violence and intimidation.
Two organised crime groups in the Balkans that organise fake passports and forged documents, and six men from the gangs, have also been sanctioned.
0:27
The list ends with Weihai Yamar Outdoors Product Co, a Chinese company which has advertised small boats on an online marketplace as "refugee boats".
They have since removed the reference from their website.
'Landmark moment'
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "This is a landmark moment in the government's work to tackle organised immigration crime, reduce irregular migration to the UK, and deliver on the Plan for Change.
"From Europe to Asia, we are taking the fight to the people-smugglers who enable irregular migration, targeting them wherever they are in the world and making them pay for their actions.
"My message to the gangs who callously risk vulnerable lives for profit is this: we know who you are, and we will work with our partners around the world to hold you to account."
NCA director general Graeme Biggar said the new sanctions powers will complement the work of his agency to "undermine and frustrate" the operational capability of a "wide range of organised immigration crime networks".
The first half of 2025 saw a record number of small boat crossings, with almost 20,000 people making the dangerous journey from January to July - the highest ever in that period, and 48% more than the first half of 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves can raise taxes as much as she likes, but it won't bring in any more money
The IMF has warned Chancellor Rachel Reeves that she must make tough choices to cut the UK's deficit, potentially including some combination of raising taxes on working people, abandoning the pensions triple lock or charging for the NHS. The first of these options – raising taxes – is considered politically the most likely. After all, Labour MPs didn't even agree to cuts to winter fuel payments. It's impossible to imagine them agreeing to cut the NHS, and abandoning the triple lock seems like political suicide. Yet it's highly doubtful whether raising tax rates further will produce any more tax revenue out of the UK economy. Even as matters stand, taxes are scheduled to go higher than they've ever been since World War II, and to be around 37½ percent of GDP for the rest of this Parliament. But that considerably understates the situation. Prior to 2021/22 they'd only ever once been above 35 percent of GDP since the 1950s, in 1969/70, and then for only one year before falling back sharply. Thereafter, until the 2020s, it was rare for them to be above 33½ per cent of GDP. We aren't merely at a record. We are at an out-of-the-park record scheduled to be sustained for an absolutely unprecedented period of time. The chances of the UK economy delivering even the tax levels already scheduled are slim, let alone imagining taxes could be raised a lot further. Yet despite these astonishing record-high taxes, the economy is still running a large deficit of over 5 per cent of GDP. Remember the 'Maastricht Convergence Criteria' requiring budget deficits to be no higher than 3 per cent of GDP? Well, we're way above that. When the deficit exceeded 6 per cent of GDP in the 1990s we had a significant fiscal consolidation under Norman Lamont and Kenneth Clarke. Yet at that time the UK's national debt was under 40 per cent of GDP. Now it's over 100 per cent. Our situation is way worse than it was in the early 1990s. We need a fiscal consolidation to address that 5 per cent deficit. But the current thinking appears to be that all of that deficit cut will come from tax rises. Indeed, possibly more than all of it, because spending will probably go up further. To balance the books we'd need to rise from that record 37½ per cent of GDP spending to over 42½ per cent. Add in a percentage point for further spending rises and we'd be over 43½ per cent or fully 10 percentage points of tax higher than the UK has ever produced on a sustained basis in well over 80 years. One key reason tax takes top out at some point relative to GDP is that they destroy growth. Over the long-term having a high share of tax in GDP damages long-term growth – each 10 per cent rise in tax reduces the growth rate by around 1.2 per cent – which in the UK's case would mean reducing its sustainable growth rate to zero. In the short-term, raising taxes often triggers recessions, bringing down tax revenues. That loss of tax revenues as growth peters out, or outright recession ensues, means that tax-based fiscal consolidations typically don't work. If you have a high deficit, raising taxes is almost never a way to cut that deficit – even if it were a Good Thing to have higher tax in itself, it simply doesn't work in that situation. The normal advice the IMF and similar bodies used to provide in fiscal consolidations was that they should be predominantly spending cuts-based. The IMF often used a rule of thumb of about two thirds spending cuts to one third tax rises. The EU used much the same rule of thumb in the Eurozone crisis era austerity programmes. However, the most successful consolidations – the ones where the deficit falls and stays down, with debt dropping away relative to GDP over time – tend to have higher ratios of spending cuts, of around 75 to 80 per cent to 20 to 25 per cent tax rises. We need at least that ratio in the UK now, if not higher. But that is not what Labour backbench MPs will ever agree to.
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rocky road ahead for Brailsford and Ineos as questions remain amid Tour doping investigation
As Tadej Pojacar stood on the Champs-Élysées podium, celebrating his fourth victory in the Tour de France, the man who led British cyclists to multiple yellow jerseys and numerous Olympic gold medals had already flown home to Monaco. Not that long ago, a Dave Brailsford-led success in the Tour de France was almost routine. From 2012 to 2019 when riders from Team Sky, and later Ineos, won seven titles in eight years, Brailsford was at the heart of it all. Ask anyone closely involved with British Cycling's Olympic programme, and more specifically, the Tour de France, who drove the standards, who led the charge when times got tough, who raised the mood when morale was low, and they will almost always respond: 'Dave.' Brailsford was once the performance guru who transformed the fortunes of British cyclists, yet his trumpeted return to the Tour caravan this year unravelled as an anti-doping investigation related to a member of his Ineos Grenadiers team took the headlines away from their two mountain stage wins. Last Thursday afternoon, the team confirmed in a statement that David Rozman, a long-term member of their staff, had left the Tour after the International Testing Agency (ITA) launched an investigation into alleged messages he exchanged with the subsequently convicted German doping doctor Mark Schmidt, in 2012. Since the first time that Rozman's name was published, when the Tour arrived in Châteauroux on 13 July, Brailsford has refused to comment on a story that had first made headlines in June in a German documentary that identified the team but not the Slovenian carer. His team's management – it subsequently transpired – had in fact known about the ITA's interest in Rozman since April, and in their most recent statement said that the matter had then been subjected to 'a thorough review by an external law firm'. But one thing that Brailsford made clear as this year's Tour began was that he didn't want to talk about doping. And for three weeks, he was as good as his word. In fact, it turned out, he didn't want to talk on the record at all. Meanwhile, his team's communications on the Rozman allegations adhered to a now-familiar script stating that the team had 'acted responsibly and with due process', while rolling out another well-worn line reiterating their commitment to 'its zero-tolerance policy'. Three weeks is a long time at the Tour de France. For a man who used to love holding court, expounding his theories of marginal gains, it's also a long time to keep stumm. It now feels an age since Brailsford's comeback to the race, after his troubled sojourn at Manchester United, was hailed by his colleagues as a masterstroke. 'We have welcomed him back with open arms,' the team's chief executive, Johan Allert, said on the eve of the race. 'He's a not-so-secret weapon for us to use. It's great to have him back.' 'We all love having him back and feel honoured that he's here,' the sports director, Zak Dempster, said. His initial comments – off record – outside the team bus in Bayeux, reflected his long absence from the Tour. There was a lot of catching up to do, he insisted, but he would be happy to talk later in the race. Yet despite multiple attempts by the Guardian to arrange an interview, he has declined to speak publicly. Even the team's success on this Tour has been clouded by the past; Thymen Arensman's first stage win in the Pyrenees was followed by the 25-year-old being asked awkward questions about his knowledge of the Rozman allegations that dated back to when he was 13. 'I don't really know to be honest, you'll have to ask management,' he said. Even then, Brailsford still declined to go on record. Attempts by the Guardian to persuade him to comment, in Bayeux, Montpellier, Valence and even on the penultimate evening of the race, did not succeed. But then the 61-year-old has seemed diminished during this year's Tour, unsure of himself. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion By his own admission, the demands of the race have changed and, aside from Arensman's two wins, neither he nor his team have been able to keep up. A once-dominant Brailsford-led team exist in the shadow of Pogacar and have done since 2020, when the Slovenian rider stormed to his first yellow jersey. Many are now wondering why, with the Rozman story already brewing, Brailsford returned to the Tour. He had hoped for a calm, controversy-free comeback to the French race, one where he could observe performance, inspire his riders, audit management and still have time for his usual morning bike ride. But he didn't get it. In Le Mont-Dore, when a group of reporters sought to question him on the Rozman allegations, he responded: 'No comment.' When the questions continued the response was: 'Fucking come on guys.' Rozman, too, has not responded when approached directly for comment. Answers, it appears, must wait until the ITA investigation concludes. The team, and Brailsford, have been under this microscope before: their medical consultant in 2012, Geert Leinders, was banned for life for doping violations at a previous team; UK Anti-Doping ended a 14-month investigation into the contents of an infamous Jiffy bag delivered to Bradley Wiggins at the 2011 Critérium du Dauphiné because there was no evidence to support a conclusion; Wiggins's use of TUEs in 2012 which was exposed by Russian hackers and which a select committee report deemed inconsistent with the philosophy of 'winning clean' sparked further scrutiny, while Chris Froome had an adverse analytical finding for salbutamol which was over-turned in 2018. The team doctor, Richard Freeman was struck off and later banned for four years for possession of a banned substance and lying to anti-doping authorities. Team Sky, Ineos, Wiggins and Froome have consistently denied any wrongdoing. However, in the context of what we were told by Brailsford before any of the questions around the team's ethics arose of his core beliefs in winning clean, of transparency, of accountability, and of course, of zero tolerance, the latest allegations against Rozman raise further questions over his stewardship. Brailsford remains a director at Manchester United, and the head of Ineos Sport. Despite the investigation into Rozman, he is understood to be defiant, insisting all possible vetting procedures and ethical practices were in place. The Tour has now ended and the spotlight moved on. The questions, however, will not. On the road, despite Arensman's two stage wins, the problems within Jim Ratcliffe's cycling franchise remain, just as much as they do within Old Trafford. A lack of identity and direction and an inability to challenge in Grand Tour racing in the age of Pogacar have now taken hold. Ineos Grenadiers are as far away from winning the Tour as they have ever been. Geraint Thomas, the team's last athletic connection with the days of British Cycling and Team Sky, will retire in September. Brailsford needs a marquee name to replace him. Having failed to secure Olympic champion Remco Evenepoel, he will need to look elsewhere. An unhappy Jonas Vingegaard might be a good place to start.
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Putin's deadly response to Trump's new ultimatum: Russian bombs kill 20 including 16 in strike on a prison hours after Donald told Kremlin to end war in 10 days
At least 20 people were killed and more than 40 others wounded in a series of overnight Russian missile strikes across Ukraine, officials said on Tuesday. It comes just hours after Donald Trump warned Vladimir Putin to end the war within ten days or face crippling new sanctions. The heaviest bombardment hit the Zaporizhzhia region, where eight strikes were carried out, including one that hit a prison, according to Ivan Fedorov, head of the region's military administration. In a post on Telegram, he said: '16 people were killed, 35 were wounded. The premises were destroyed and nearby houses were damaged.' Missiles also rained down on the Dnipropetrovsk region, where several more people were killed and injured in multiple attacks, officials said. A strike on the city of Kamyanske killed two people, wounded five others and damaged a hospital, according to regional governor Sergiy Lysak. Another attack on the region's Synelnykivsky district left one person dead and several more wounded, he said. In a separate incident in Velykomykhaylivska on Monday night, 'a 75-year-old woman was killed. A 68-year-old man was wounded. A private house was damaged,' Lysak added in another Telegram post. In southern Russia, a Ukrainian drone strike killed one person, according to local authorities. 'A car was damaged on Ostrovsky Street. Unfortunately, the driver who was in it died,' said Yuri Slyusar, acting governor of the Rostov region. The attacks came as Ukrainian forces continue efforts to repel Russia's summer offensive, which has pushed into areas that have been largely spared since the early stages of the full-scale invasion in 2022. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, blasted the strikes, saying it was 'another war crime' committed by Russia. Writing on X, he said: '(Russian President Vladimir) Putin's regime, which also issues threats against the United States through some of its mouthpieces, must face economic and military blows that strip it of the capacity to wage war.' Over the weekend, the Russian army announced it had 'liberated the settlement of Maliyevka' in the Dnipropetrovsk region, just weeks after it seized the first village in the area. The strikes followed remarks by former US President Donald Trump, who on Monday warned Moscow it had just days to bring the war to an end. He said Russia had 'about 10 or 12 days' to stop the conflict in Ukraine or face tough sanctions.
