logo
Is the international community finally speaking up about Israel?

Is the international community finally speaking up about Israel?

Yahoo19-07-2025
International public opinion continues to turn against Israel for its war on Gaza, with more governments slowly beginning to reflect those voices and increase their own condemnation of the country.
In the last few weeks, Israeli government ministers have been sanctioned by several Western countries, with the United Kingdom, France and Canada issuing a joint statement condemning the 'intolerable' level of 'human suffering' in Gaza.
Earlier this week, a number of countries from the Global South, 'The Hague Group', collectively agreed on a number of measures that they say will 'restrain Israel's assault on the Occupied Palestinian Territories'.
Across the world, and in increasing numbers, the public, politicians and, following an Israeli strike on a Catholic church in Gaza, religious leaders are speaking out against Israel's killings in Gaza.
So, are world powers getting any closer to putting enough pressure on Israel for it to stop?
Here's what we know.
What is the Hague Group?
According to its website, the Hague Group is a global bloc of states committed to 'coordinated legal and diplomatic measures' in defence of international law and solidarity with the people of Palestine.
Made up of eight nations; South Africa, Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia and Senegal, the group has set itself the mission of upholding international law, and safeguarding the principles set out in the Charter of the United Nations, principally 'the responsibility of all nations to uphold the inalienable rights, including the right to self-determination, that it enshrines for all peoples'.Earlier this week, the Hague Group hosted a meeting of some 30 nations, including China, Spain and Qatar, in the Colombian capital of Bogota. Also attending the meeting was UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese, who characterised the meeting as 'the most significant political development in the past 20 months'.
Albanese was recently sanctioned by the United States for her criticism of its ally, Israel.
At the end of the two-day meeting, 12 of the countries in attendance agreed to six measures to limit Israel's actions in Gaza. Included in those measures were blocks on supplying arms to Israel, a ban on ships transporting weapons and a review of public contracts for any possible links to companies benefiting from Israel's occupation of Palestine.
Have any other governments taken action?
More and more.
On Wednesday, Slovenia barred far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and ultranationalist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich from entering its territory after the wider European Union failed to agree on measures to address charges of widespread human rights abuses against Israel.
Slovenia's ban on the two government ministers builds upon earlier sanctions imposed upon Smotrich and Ben-Gvir in June by Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK and Norway over their 'incitement to violence'. The two men have been among the most vocal Israeli ministers in rejecting any compromise in negotiations with Palestinians, and pushing for the Jewish settlement of Gaza, as well as the increased building of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.
In May, the UK, France, and Canada issued a joint statement describing Israel's escalation of its campaign against Gaza as 'wholly disproportionate' and promising 'concrete actions' against Israel if it did not halt its offensive.
Later that month, the UK followed through on its warning, announcing sanctions on a handful of settler organisations and announcing a 'pause' in free trade negotiations with Israel.
Also in May, Turkiye announced that it would block all trade with Israel until the humanitarian situation in Gaza was resolved.
South Africa first launched a case for genocide against Israel at the International Court of Justice in late December 2023, and has since been supported by other countries, including Colombia, Chile, Spain, Ireland, and Turkiye.
In January of 2024, the ICJ issued its provisional ruling, finding what it termed a 'plausible' case for genocide and instructing Israel to undertake emergency measures, including the provision of the aid that its government has effectively blocked since March of this year.
What other criticism of Israel has there been?
Israel's bombing on Thursday of the Holy Family Church in Gaza City, killing three people, drew a rare rebuke from Israel's most stalwart ally, the United States.
Following what was reported to be an 'angry' phone call from US President Trump after the bombing, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office issued a statement expressing its 'deep regret' over the attack.
To date, Israel has killed more than 58,000 people in Gaza, the majority women and children.
Has the tide turned internationally?
Mass public protests against Israel's war on Gaza have continued around the world throughout its duration.
And there are clear signs of growing anger over the brutality of the war and the toll it is taking on Palestinians in Gaza.
In Western Europe, a survey carried out by the polling company YouGov in June found that net favourability towards Israel had reached its lowest ebb since tracking began.
A similar poll produced by CNN this week found similar results among the American public, with only 23 percent of respondents agreeing Israel's actions in Gaza were fully justified, down from 50 percent in October 2023.
Public anger has also found voice at high-profile public events, including music festivals such as Germany's Fusion Festival, Poland's Open'er Festival and the UK's Glastonbury festival, where both artists and their supporters used their platforms to denounce the war on Gaza.
Has anything changed in Israel?
Protests against the war remain small but are growing, with organisations, such as Standing Together, bringing together Israeli and Palestinian activists to protest the war.
There has also been a growing number of reservists refusing to show up for duty. In April, the Israeli magazine +972 reported that more than 100,000 reservists had refused to show up for duty, with open letters from within the military protesting the war growing in number since.
Will it make any difference?
Netanyahu's hard-right coalition has been pursuing its war on Gaza despite its domestic and international unpopularity for some time.
The government's most recent proposal, that all of Gaza's population be confined into what it calls a 'humanitarian city', but has been likened to a concentration camp and has been taken by many of its critics as evidence that it no longer cares about either international law or global opinion.
Internationally, despite its recent criticism of Israel for its bombing of Gaza's one Catholic church, US support for Israel remains resolute. For many in Israel, the continued support of the US, and President Donald Trump in particular, remains the one diplomatic absolute they can rely upon to weather whatever diplomatic storms their actions in Gaza may provoke.In addition to that support, which includes diplomatic guarantees through the use of the US veto in the United Nations Security Council and military support via its extensive arsenal, is the US use of sanctions against Israel's critics, such as the International Criminal Court, whose members were sanctioned in June after it issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on war crimes charges.
That means, in the short term, Israel ultimately feels protected as long as it has US support. But as it becomes more of an international pariah, economic and diplomatic isolation may become more difficult to handle.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Memo: Putin and Netanyahu vex Trump on the world stage
The Memo: Putin and Netanyahu vex Trump on the world stage

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Memo: Putin and Netanyahu vex Trump on the world stage

Two foreign leaders have become more vexing to President Trump than he expected: Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Each of them has complicated the political calculus for Trump on the world stage, owing not only to the suffering each of them has imposed on Ukrainians and Palestinians, respectively, but also to their reluctance to change course. The president's shift in attitude has been starkest in relation to Putin, who has resisted Trump's urging to bring down the curtain on the war in Ukraine. Russia started the war by invading its neighbor in February 2022. On Friday, Trump announced he had ordered two nuclear submarines to unspecified 'appropriate regions' in response to 'highly provocative statements' from Moscow. The backstory to that move lies in Trump's declaration earlier in the week, during a trip to Scotland, that he was tightening his deadline for Russia to work toward a ceasefire. The president said he was bringing the time frame down to '10 or 12 days.' Moscow responded with a shoulder shrug, however. A Kremlin spokesperson said the nation had developed 'a certain immunity' to such threats. The sequence of events — and the general tone toward Putin — is a massive difference from late February, when Trump and Vice President Vance berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office for his supposed ingratitude over American assistance. Several times earlier in the year, Trump appeared to blame Ukraine for starting the war. In April, he said of Zelensky: 'When you start a war, you've got to know that you can win the war, right? You don't start a war against somebody that's 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles.' The reason for the recent change in tone is straightforward. Trump wants to bring the war in Ukraine to an end and Putin is not playing ball. Trump has seemed especially irritated about Putin's propensity to have constructive or even friendly phone conversations with the president — only for Russia to launch ferocious bombardments against Ukrainian cities hours later. 'We get a lot of bulls‑‑‑ thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump said in early July. 'He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' One reason for Trump's ire, presumably, is that Putin's recalcitrance places the president in a tough political spot. During last year's presidential campaign, he promised he would be able to bring the war in Ukraine to an end 'within 24 hours.' That promise has proved hollow, and no breakthrough seems close at hand. On the other hand, it seems highly unlikely that Trump will shrug off his long skepticism about U.S. aid to Ukraine entirely. That leaves the president in a kind of uncomfortable limbo, neither ending the war nor shifting the tide in Ukraine's favor. The specifics are very different with Netanyahu. But in that case, too, there are reasons for political discomfort on Trump's part. Trump's relationship with Netanyahu is in some ways even more turbulent than with Putin. The president is extremely pro-Israeli in his overall outlook. In his first term, he moved the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and came up with a 'peace plan' so aligned with Israeli priorities that it was dismissed out of hand even by the comparatively moderate Palestinian Authority. But Trump also fell out with Netanyahu after the Israeli prime minister recognized former President Biden's victory in the 2020 election. His annoyance then led him to air a complaint that the Israeli prime minister had allegedly backed out of what had been originally conceived as a joint operation to kill the head of Iran's Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani. The U.S. went ahead alone, killing Soleimani in January 2020. 'Bibi Netanyahu let us down,' Trump said in late 2023. Trump's actual policies have remained staunchly pro-Israeli in the first six months of his second term, but his tone has pitched in wildly different directions. He nudged the Israelis toward a ceasefire even before he took office — but seemed fairly unbothered when they broke it off in March, blocking all aid from getting into Gaza for more than two months. Trump has talked up the idea of moving the Palestinians out of Gaza, even suggesting transforming one of the most benighted places on earth into some kind of coastal resort. But he also broke early this week with Netanyahu's insistence that there is no starvation in Gaza. Trump averred that he had seen footage of children who 'look very hungry,' adding 'you can't fake that.' On Friday, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and the U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited an aid distribution site in Gaza run by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Witkoff said part of the purpose was to 'help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza.' Back at home, there have been signs that the traditionally staunch support Israel has received from the right is beginning to fray, further complicating the picture for Trump. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) recently became the first prominent Republican to call what Israel is doing in Gaza a 'genocide.' Influential commentators within Trump's base, from Tucker Carlson to podcasters like Theo Von and Joe Rogan, have become more inclined to criticize Israeli policies and their effects. But none of that guarantees that the Israeli prime minister will shift. Among the counterweights are Netanyahu's repeated assertions that the war aim is not only the release of all hostages held by Hamas but 'total victory'; his desire to keep together his governing coalition, which includes extremely hard-line figures from minor parties; and his presumed interest in continuing to delay his long-running corruption trial. Trump could play hardball with Netanyahu more easily than with Putin, given the massive aid the U.S. gives to Israel. But whether he has the urge to do so is widely open to question. For the moment, it seems likely that the Russian and Israeli leaders will cloud Trump's political outlook for some time to come. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

As premiers push for more immigration power, experts call for a fact-based debate
As premiers push for more immigration power, experts call for a fact-based debate

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As premiers push for more immigration power, experts call for a fact-based debate

OTTAWA — Some premiers say they want to have more local control over the immigration system — but experts say what the system really needs is a national conversation on immigration reform that shores up public support. "Most of the existing policies have been formulated on the fly without any evidence or serious impact evaluations of what the various classes of immigrants are, how they're performing economically and otherwise," said Michael Trebilcock, a retired academic and co-author of two books on immigration policy. "So it's basically research-free." As the premiers and territorial leaders were wrapping up their three-day meeting in Huntsville, Ont., late last month, they called for an increase to economic immigration levels to fill local labour gaps and said they would use their constitutional powers to seize more control over immigration and issue work permits. Ontario Premier Doug Ford later walked back his vow to issue work permits to asylum seekers. "Do I want the whole immigration system on the shoulder of the province? No. Would I like to be treated the same way as Quebec? Yes, and so would every other province and territory," Ford said last Monday. Quebec has its own distinct immigration system through an agreement with the federal government. The province is able to choose who can immigrate to Quebec based on its own criteria, with French language skills being a significant factor. David Piccini, Ontario's immigration minister, said last Monday that the province also wants to see more financial support from Ottawa to help pay for social services strained by a high number of asylum seekers landing in Ontario. Ninette Kelley, a former United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees official and a former member of Canada's Immigration and Refugee Board, said that provincial control over immigration has grown significantly over the last two decades. "They know what their provinces need today, and they want to make sure they get the labour in that is required to meet those demands," she said. "But at the same time, there's been absolutely no evaluation that I can see of how those programs are implemented or what effect they're having." Trebilcock said the premiers' concerns need to be taken seriously because increased immigration boosts demand for health care and other provincial services. He said that it's "disturbing" to see Canadians' support for immigration decline in multiple public opinion polls. He said current immigration policies lack broad support and he believes a comprehensive, public review is needed to rebuild that support through evidence-based policies. "What we see at present is often piecemeal, on-the-fly changes in reaction to particular concerns that have surfaced in the media ... international students, temporary foreign workers," he said. Kelley said that, instead of a multi-year exercise like a national inquiry, a top-to-bottom immigration system review could be conducted quickly with "the right people at the table." Saskatchewan Immigration Minister Jim Reiter told The Canadian Press that he and the other subnational immigration ministers have told Ottawa they want to be seen more as partners in immigration, not stakeholders. "We need more influence in the decision-making of this because so much of the economic stream needs to be targeted depending on the specific needs of each province," Reiter said. The federal government last year slashed the number of slots in the Provincial Nominee Program from 110,000 to 55,000 as part of broader efforts to rein in immigration. The program allows provinces and territories to nominate individuals for permanent residence based on their skills and ability to contribute to the economy. Each province and territory has its own set of program streams targeting different types of immigrants based on factors like skills or business experience. Reiter said provincial immigration ministers want to see the Provincial Nominee Program return to its previous levels. He said that while he understands the need to reduce the number of temporary visas, that shouldn't come at the expense of economic immigrants. "We've had to restrict (the Saskatchewan Immigrant Nominee Program) down to three streams now to a large degree because we just don't have enough spots anymore," Reiter said. Reiter said that of the 3,600 spots Saskatchewan has for its immigrant nominee program, three-quarters have to go to temporary workers, so the province is prioritizing nominees who work in health care and skilled trades. "We've got the largest potash mine in the world being built ... just outside of Saskatoon and that company, BHP, every time we meet with them they raise the issue that skilled trades are an issue. So this is having a detrimental effect on economic growth," he said. Trebilcock said that if provinces are focused on using immigration to strengthen their local labour markets, steps could be taken to make it easier to recognize immigrants' foreign credentials in fields like law and medicine. With federal immigration decisions having provincial consequences, Kelley said, running an effective immigration system requires close collaboration between all levels of government. "So that speaks to the need for really tight co-operation between the federal government and the provincial government and municipalities, both in the setting of levels and in the housing and medical policies that are currently in place so that we can accommodate those who we're letting in," she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 4, 2025. David Baxter, The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store