This experimental drug could help young people with a rare and aggressive form of ALS
An experimental drug could help young people with a rare form of ALS, researchers at New York's Columbia University Irving Medical Center announced on Thursday.
Known as 'ulefnersen,' the therapy showed promise in treating patients with FUS-ALS, which is caused by a genetic mutation in a gene called FUS. The gene provides instructions for making a protein and plays a crucial role in cellular processes. While the mutations are only responsible for between one and two percent of ALS cases, they cause some of the most aggressive forms of ALS that begin in adolescents and young adults.
Fewer than 30,000 people in the U.S. are living with ALS, which is also known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or Lou Gehrig's disease, while 5,000 people are diagnosed each year. The nervous system disease affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, leading to a loss of muscle control that gets progressively worse. The exact cause of the disease remains unknown, but a small number of cases are genetic. There is no cure and it is, eventually, fatal.
'When testing new drugs for ALS, we do not expect to see clinical improvement,' neurologist and scientist Neil Shneider said in a statement. 'What we've seen in one patient is really unprecedented functional recovery. It's surprising and deeply motivating for us, the ALS research community, but also the community of ALS patients.'
Shneider, who developed the drug in collaboration with the biotech company Ionis Pharmaceuticals, published his findings in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet.
Starting as an effort to help a single patient, the case series was small, including just 12 patients who were treated with the drug.
Two of the patients showed a remarkable response to the drug. A young woman who had received injections of ulefnersen since late 2020 regained the ability to walk unaided and to breathe without the use of a ventilator, both previously lost to ALS. The medical center said she has lived longer with this disease than any other known patient with this juvenile-onset form of FUS ALS.
A man in his mid-thirties was asymptomatic when he began treatment, but tests of electrical activity in his muscles indicated that symptoms would likely emerge imminently. However, after three years of treatment, he has yet to develop FUS-ALS symptoms and the abnormal electrical activity in his muscles has improved.
Lastly, the researchers found patients experienced an up to 83 percent decrease in a protein called neurofilament light — a biomarker of nerve damage — following six months on the drug.
'These responses show that if we intervene early enough and go after the right target at the right time in the course of disease, it's possible to not only slow disease progression, but actually reverse some of the functional losses,' said Shneider. 'It's also a wonderful example of precision medicine and therapeutic development based on science and an understanding of the biology of disease.'
While most of the other symptomatic patients did not survive their disease, Shneider said that 'several apparently benefited from the treatment. The progression of their disease slowed, and they lived a longer life as a consequence.'
There were no serious adverse events related to the drug and a global clinical trial is now in progress. At least 25 patients have been treated with the drug around the world, including the dozen in Shneider's case studies. It was first tested six years ago in an Iowa patient named Jaci Hermstad. The drug was originally named for her.
'Now we are eagerly awaiting those results, which we hope will lead to the approval of ulefnersen,' Shneider said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
US government report cited non-existent sources, academics say
A US government report on children's health cited "totally fabricated" studies to back up its findings, academics wrongly listed as the authors of those studies have said. First released on 22 May, the report detailed causes of a "chronic disease crisis" among children in the US. An amended version was issued on 29 May after digital outlet NOTUS found it had used seven non-existent sources. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said there were "formatting issues" and the report would be updated, but it did "not negate the substance of the report". US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, who has promoted debunked claims that vaccines cause autism, leads the department behind the report. It comes on the back of one of US President Donald Trump's sweeping executive orders earlier this year, specifically to "study the scope of the childhood chronic disease crisis and any potential contributing causes". Issued by the Make America Healthy Again Commission, the report concluded that poor diet, environmental toxins, stress, insufficient physical activity and "overmedicalisation" may contribute to chronic illness among American children. But the authors of several studies cited in the report told news outlets they did not write them, and that the studies never existed. Guohua Li, a Columbia University professor who was named as an author of a report on the mental health of children in the pandemic, told Agence France-Presse that the reference was "totally fabricated" and that he does not even know the listed co-author. He was listed as an author alongside Noah Kreski, a researcher at Columbia University, who also denied writing it, telling AFP it "doesn't appear to be a study that exists at all." Katherine Keyes, an epidemiology professor who told news agency Reuters she was also wrongly named as an author, said: "It does make me concerned given that citation practices are an important part of conducting and reporting rigorous science." Another study cited about the advertising of psychotropic medications for youth was not written by the listed author, the university that employs him told AFP and Reuters. The Democratic National Committee accused RFK Jr.'s Department of Health and Human Services of "justifying its policy priorities with sources that do not exist" and using citations that "are rife with errors, from broken links to misstated conclusions". RFK Jr was sworn in as US Health Secretary in February. Since taking office he has cut thousands of jobs in the health department and made plans to introduce placebo trials for all new vaccines. Fact-checking RFK Jr's views on health policy
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. may stop government scientists from publishing in top journals
May 29 (UPI) -- U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this week that he may no longer allow government scientists to publish research in top medical journals. Kennedy made the statement on a podcast called The Ultimate Human, on which he called the journals "corrupt" and said they were controlled by drug companies. "We're probably going to stop publishing in The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and those other journals," Kennedy said. All three journals are known for publishing peer-reviewed studies and are widely read by health professionals around the world. JAMA and The Lancet each get more than 30 million visits to their websites every year. The New England Journal of Medicine reaches more than 1 million readers weekly, in print and online, The Washington Post reported. None of the journals responded right away to Kennedy's comments. Kennedy said he wants HHS to create its own journals instead. They would "become the preeminent journals, because if you get [NIH] funding, it is anointing you as a good, legitimate scientist." But some public health experts strongly disagreed. "Banning NIH-funded researchers from publishing in leading medical journals and requiring them to publish only in journals that carry the RFK Jr. seal of approval would delegitimize taxpayer-funded research," Dr. Adam Gaffney, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, told The Post. Gaffney also warned that drug approvals rely on science. While saying it's important to guard against commercial interests, he warned that Kennedy's plans - along with funding cuts and anti-vaccine views - could hurt public health. On the podcast, Kennedy also criticized government agencies under HHS, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health and Medicare and Medicaid offices. He described them as "sock puppets" for the pharmaceutical industry. The podcast came out shortly after Kennedy announced his department would stop recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women, bypassing CDC guidance. Last week, the administration also released a new "Make America Health Again" report that challenged common views in medicine, including on vaccines. The Post said the report included misleading information and claims not backed by strong evidence. In April, a U.S. attorney sent a rare letter to the journal Chest, questioning its editorial policies. Critics said the move threatened freedom of speech, The Post reported. Meanwhile, NIH funding has dropped by more than $3 billion since January, and many top universities are losing out on funding for research. Kennedy has also led a major staff reduction at HHS, with about 20,000 federal workers cut - affecting almost every part of the agency, The Post said. The cuts and funding freezes have led some U.S. scientists to consider leaving the country for jobs elsewhere. Countries like France, Germany, Spain and China are now actively recruiting American researchers. More information The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England has more about the role of journals. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Study reveals decline in mental health among US mothers
A new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine reveals a troubling decline in mental health among mothers in the United States. Researchers at Columbia University and the University of Michigan found the percentage of mothers reporting 'excellent' mental health dropped sharply from 2016 to 2023. Using data from nearly 200,000 mothers in the National Survey of Children's Health, a nationally representative survey of households with children, researchers tracked health trends among women with children under 18 years old. Most of the mothers were over 30. Notable findings included a drop in the percentage of mothers reporting 'excellent' mental health, from 38 percent in 2016 to 26 percent in 2023. Reports of 'excellent' physical health also declined, from 28 percent to 24 percent. Additionally, the number of mothers rating their mental health as 'fair/poor' increased from 5.5 percent to 9 percent. 'Although high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality have been well documented, national data on the health status of mothers beyond pregnancy and the first year postpartum is lacking,' said Jamie Daw, an assistant professor of health policy and management at Columbia's Mailman School of Public Health. The study revealed that the decline in mental health started before the COVID-19 pandemic and was observed across nearly every socioeconomic subgroup examined. Researchers warned the impact extends beyond the mothers themselves, citing links between poor parental mental health and increased risks of developmental delays, behavioral issues and other challenges among children. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.