Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
HighlightsGetty Images' copyright lawsuit against Stability AI at London's High Court is poised to set a significant legal precedent regarding artificial intelligence and copyright law. Stability AI is accused by Getty Images of unlawfully scraping millions of its images to train its Stable Diffusion system, while the AI company claims the case addresses issues of technological innovation and freedom of ideas. Legal experts believe that a ruling in favor of Getty Images could impact future copyright protections for AI training practices and influence market practices in the UK regarding AI development.
Getty Images
' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company
Stability AI
begins at London's High Court on Monday, with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI.
The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to "train" its
Stable Diffusion
system, which can generate images from text inputs.
Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion.
Stability AI - which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP - is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights.
A Stability AI spokesperson said that "the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas," adding: "Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression."
Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the U.S. and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago.
WIDER IMPACT
Creative industries
are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material. Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists.
Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI.
"Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI," Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said.
She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits.
Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling "could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Apple faces AI delay, app store scrutiny and rivals' smart glasses push
Apple is facing an unprecedented set of technical and regulatory challenges as some of its key executives are set to take the stage on Monday at the company's annual software developer conference. On the technical side, many of the long-awaited artificial-intelligence features Apple promised at the same conference a year ago have been delayed until next year, even as its rivals such as Alphabet's Google and Microsoft woo developers with a bevvy of new AI features. Those unfulfilled promises included key improvements to Siri, its digital assistant. On the regulatory front, courts in the US and Europe are poised to pull down the lucrative walls around Apple's App Store as even some of the company's former supporters question whether its fees are justified. Those challenges are coming to a head at the same time US President Donald Trump has threatened 25 per cent tariffs on Apple's best-selling iPhone. Apple's shares are down more than 40 per cent since the start of the year, a sharper decline than Google and also lagging the AI-driven gains in Microsoft shares. Apple has launched some of the AI features it promised last year, including a set of writing tools and image-generation tools, but it still relies on partners such as ChatGPT creator OpenAI for some of those capabilities. Bloomberg has reported that Apple may open up in-house AI models to developers this year. But analysts do not believe Apple yet has what technologists call a "multi-modal" model — that is, one capable of understanding imagery, audio, and language at the same time — that could power a pair of smart glasses, a category that has become a runaway hit for Meta Platforms. Google said last month it would jump back into this category, with partners. Such glasses, which are far lighter and cheaper than Apple's Vision Pro headset, could become useful because they would understand what the user is looking at and could help answer questions about it. While Apple has focused on its $3,500 Vision Pro headset, Google and Meta have seized on the smart glasses as a cheaper way to deploy their AI software prowess against Apple in its stronghold of hardware. Meta Ray-Bans all sell for less than $400. Analysts say Apple needs to answer that challenge, but that it is not likely to do so this week. "I'm not trying to replace my phone — this is a complementary thing that gives me more world context, because it's got a camera and it sees what I see, and I can talk to it in natural language," said Ben Bajarin, CEO of technology consultancy Creative Strategies. "Apple is not positioned to do that." To be sure, Apple's rivals are not decisively ahead in smart glasses. Anshel Sag, principal analyst with Moor Insights & Strategy, said Meta's Ray-Bans still lack some features and Google has not yet landed its "Gemini" model in a mass-market pair of glasses yet. "Meta has the undisputed lead, but Google is catching up fast and probably has the best-suited AI for the job," Sag said. "Vision Pro is great, but it's a showroom product that developers can use." But Bob O'Donnell, CEO of TECHnalysis Research, said it remains far from clear that smart glasses will gain wide acceptance. O'Donnell also said it is not certain that Apple is at any particular disadvantage if it partners with a company such as Google, OpenAI or even a smaller firm like Perplexity for core AI technology. So far, O'Donnell said, there is not yet strong evidence that consumers are basing major hardware-purchasing decisions on AI features. "There's an argument to be made that it's OK that (Apple) is behind because, except for the bleeding edge, most people don't care," O'Donnell said.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Blake Lively faces more legal trouble as her beauty brand strikes back with lawsuit - here's what the problem is
Blake Lively apparently is at the heart of multiple controversies lately. Blake Lively's beauty business is going through a lot of trouble. Family Hive LLC , her company, just filed a trademark lawsuit and is also dealing with the fallout from a well-known harassment case. Lively is having a rough time both personally and professionally. Her business is trying to protect its name, but sales are falling and she is still in legal trouble with co-star Justin Baldoni . Why is Blake Lively's brand suing another company? Blake Brown , Blake Lively's growing hair care company, is in a trademark fight with a company based in Utah. According to recent court filings, Utah-based businesswoman Kimberlie Hamner, the owner of the Beauty by Blake trademark, is being sued by Lively's company, Family Hive LLC. The haircare brand Blake Lively is fighting to stop the competition's "Beauty By Blake" trademark. According to the lawsuit, consumers may become confused by Hamner's trademark because it is too similar to Blake Lively's brand name, as quoted in a report by the Blast. Live Events The Blake Brown product line was formally introduced at Target this summer, but the trademarks were all submitted in 2023 and are still pending approval. Notably, following Blake Lively's filings, Hamner submitted her Beauty by Blake trademark application in September 2024 with the intention of marketing "cosmetic oils" and "serums for cosmetic purposes." What did the court documents reveal? Leo M. Loughlin, the lawyer for Family Hive, stated in the document that was obtained by the Daily Mail that the competing trademark presents a likelihood of confusion and has the potential to damage the Blake Brown brand. He added that Hamner has "no connection whatsoever" to Family Hive and that his products could give consumers the false impression that the company is associated with or supports them. ALSO READ: As Musk exits, DOGE employees are being booted from offices; many fired staff now being rehired How has the lawsuit with Justin Baldoni affected her business? Following her sexual harassment lawsuit against Justin Baldoni in December 2024, Blake Lively's hair-care brand saw a sharp decline in sales, reportedly falling by as much as 78%. This latest lawsuit comes at a challenging time for her business endeavors. The brand was once thought to be worth $100 million, but it is now predicted that Blake Brown will make less than $15 million in total sales in 2025. Lively's brand is still growing in the beauty industry, but the actress is currently balancing her business endeavors with courtroom drama. It's obvious that Blake Brown's future could be as complicated as a bad hair day, especially with trademark tensions escalating. FAQs What is Blake Lively's beauty brand suing for? Her company claims that another brand's name, Beauty by Blake, is too similar and could confuse customers. Is Blake's business struggling? Yes, sales have decreased significantly, particularly since her lawsuit against actor Justin Baldoni made headlines. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Luxury skincare expansion: L'Oreal acquires majority stake in Medik8; announces 1 billion Euro deal
Cosmetics maker L'Oreal agreed to acquire a majority stake in British skincare brand Medik8, in a strategic move to strengthen its presence in the booming skincare market. The French beauty giant announced the deal on Monday, though financial terms were not disclosed. The transaction, which sees UK-based private equity firm Inflexion selling its majority holding, reportedly values Medik8 at around 1 billion Euro, according to a source familiar with the matter. Inflexion will retain a minority share, while L'Oreal has secured the option to eventually buy out all remaining shareholders, Reuters reported. 'We are delighted to welcome Medik8 to the L'Oréal family. As a premium skincare range, with high levels of proven efficacy at an accessible price point, Medik8 perfectly complements our existing skincare portfolio,' Cyril Chaupuy, president of L'oreal Luxe said. 'This acquisition further strengthens L'Oreal's luxe portfolio, adding a premium science-backed skincare brand with a proven track record of success, with strong potential for global growth,' the company said in a statement. L'Oreal will begin consolidating Medik8's sales once the transaction officially closes. The acquisition is expected to be finalised in the coming months, pending regulatory approvals and standard closing conditions. Simon Coble, CEO of Medik8 also expressed excitement on the brand's behalf. 'I am delighted to be joining forces with a company which shares our vision for the brand's future growth and whose core values align with our deep commitment to science, innovation and above all, results without compromise. I look forward to the next stage in Medik8's journey, as we work together to bring our innovative products to a wider audience.' Founded in the UK, Medik8 has built a loyal customer base with its vitamin A-focused anti-ageing creams and serums. The brand is seen as a natural fit for L'Oreal's luxury division, which includes skincare and fragrance names such as Lancome, Aesop, and Miu Miu. Last year, sales in L'Oreal's luxe segment grew by just 2.7%, its weakest performance across divisions, as inflation pushed consumers toward more affordable alternatives. However, the unit scrored better than rival LVMH's beauty arm. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
