Genesis Energy L.P.'s 2024 Schedule K-3 Now Available
A limited number of unitholders, primarily foreign unitholders, unitholders computing a foreign tax credit on their tax return and certain corporate and/or partnership unitholders, may need the detailed information disclosed on Schedule K-3 for their specific reporting requirements. To the extent Schedule K-3 is applicable to your return filing needs, we encourage you to review the information contained on this form and refer to the appropriate federal laws and guidance or consult with your tax advisor.
Genesis Energy does not plan to mail copies of the K-3 to investors. To receive an electronic copy of Schedule K-3 via email, or to request a paper copy be mailed, Genesis Energy, L.P. unitholders may call Tax Package Support toll free at 844-649-0506.
Genesis Energy, L.P. is a diversified midstream energy master limited partnership headquartered in Houston, Texas. Genesis' operations include offshore pipeline transportation, marine transportation and onshore transportation and services. Genesis' operations are primarily located in the Gulf Coast region of the United States and the Gulf of America.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250627521355/en/
Contacts
Genesis Energy, L.P.Dwayne MorleyVP – Investor Relations(713) 860-2536
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Landstar says $3.4M jury verdict, other charges to weigh on Q3
Freight broker Landstar System disclosed several charges that it expects to incur during the third quarter, including $3.4 million in damages stemming from an accident involving its subsidiary, Landstar Ranger. A Wednesday filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission said a Texas jury found Landstar Ranger acted as a broker, not a motor carrier in a 2021 'tragic vehicular accident.' The verdict assigned 15% of the $22.8 million in total monetary damages to Landstar. The remaining 85% of the damages were attributed to truckload carrier MyUniverse, the motor carrier hauling the brokered load. Landstar (NASDAQ: LSTR) previously disclosed the accident in its second-quarter report at the end of July. The company noted the shipment was conducted under 'a non-exclusive truck brokerage contractual arrangement,' and didn't involve one of its business capacity owners, who haul almost exclusively for Landstar. The company said it had already included an 'immaterial accrual' for the accident on its balance sheet in the second quarter and that there is 'no anticipated change to the previously recorded immaterial accrual.' Landstar said all parties are expected to file post-trial motions and that a potential appeals process looms. 'No assurances can be provided as to the probability of success with respect to any potential post-trial motions or appeals relating to the Verdict or the ultimate outcome of any such appeals,' the filing stated. The company also said the decision is unlikely to impact a $12 million 'no claims bonus' program it has in place with third-party insurers. It received the remaining $3 million of the bonus allotment at the beginning of the third quarter 'due to favorable loss experience.' Landstar also disclosed on Wednesday other charges that will be incurred in the third quarter following an annual strategic review. It plans to sell or otherwise dispose of its Mexican subsidiary, Landstar Metro, as the unit 'has not been able to meet the Company's strategic or operational goals and expectations.' It formed the unit in 2017 in conjunction with the acquisition of Fletes Avella. An initial investment of $8.5 million, along with additional investments, pushed the unit's carrying value to approximately $26 million at the close of the 2025 second quarter. Landstar expects to record a noncash impairment charge of $13 million to $17 million, or 28 cents to 37 cents per share, in the third quarter. However, it said the disposition won't adversely affect its cross-border offering. Landstar will also see a $9 million noncash impairment charge (20 cents per share) as it unwinds its Blue TMS platform. The company has decided to conduct TL brokerage services exclusively through its Landstar TMS. It is also writing down a $5 million minority stake (up to an 11-cent-per-share noncash impairment) in Cavnue, a startup focused on improving road infrastructure for autonomous vehicles. Landstar cited previously disclosed risk factors for Cavnue, like its ability to meet performance objectives, raise capital, potential declines in valuation or the business not becoming commercially viable, as reasons that could adversely affect the investment. Shares of LSTR were up 0.6% at 12:04 p.m. EDT on Wednesday compared to the S&P 500, which was up 0.2%. More FreightWaves articles by Todd Maiden: Forward Air posts Q2 EBITDA beat; investors waiting to see if company will be sold GXO encouraged by pre-peak season activity, well positioned for 2026 Lineage says high food prices weighing on warehouse occupancy The post Landstar says $3.4M jury verdict, other charges to weigh on Q3 appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Do Wall Street Analysts Like Valero Energy Stock?
With a market cap of $41.4 billion, Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) is the largest independent refiner and marketer of petroleum products in the United States, operating in multiple countries. It operates through three segments - Refining, Renewable Diesel, and Ethanol, producing and marketing a wide range of petroleum-based and low-carbon fuels under brands such as Valero, Beacon, Diamond Shamrock, Ultramar, and Texaco. Shares of the San Antonio, Texas-based company have underperformed the broader market over the past 52 weeks. VLO stock has declined 9.7% over this time frame, while the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has rallied 18.8%. Moreover, shares of the company are up 8.7% on a YTD basis, compared to SPX's 9.8% gain. More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Investing At 'Too-High Purchase Price' Even for 'an Excellent Company' Can Undo a Decade of Smart Investing BitMine Immersion Now Holds 1.15 Million Ethereum Tokens. Should You Buy BMNR Stock Here? Why Archer Aviation's (ACHR) Post-Earnings Tailspin Looks Like a Favorably Mispriced Opportunity Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Looking closer, shares of Valero Energy have also lagged behind the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLE) 5.1% dip over the past 52 weeks. Despite beating Wall Street's Q2 2025 estimates with EPS of $2.28 and revenue of $29.9 billion, shares of VLO fell 4.9% on Jul. 24. The renewable diesel segment posted a $79 million operating loss, a sharp drop from a $112 million profit last year. Additionally, investor sentiment was pressured by news of the planned April 2026 closure of the Benicia refinery, which would remove about 5% of Valero's total refining capacity and 9% of California's crude oil capacity. For the fiscal year ending in December 2025, analysts expect VLO's EPS to drop 16.6% year-over-year to $7.07. The company's earnings surprise history is mixed. It met the consensus estimates in three of the last four quarters while missing on another occasion. Among the 19 analysts covering the stock, the consensus rating is a 'Moderate Buy.' That's based on 12 'Strong Buy' ratings, one 'Moderate Buy,' and six 'Holds.' This configuration is less bullish than three months ago, with 15 'Strong Buy' ratings on the stock. On Jul. 16, Morgan Stanley increased its price target for Valero to $160 and maintained its 'Overweight" rating on the stock. As of writing, the stock is trading below the mean price target of $158.06. The Street-high price target of $186 implies a potential upside of 38.8%. On the date of publication, Sohini Mondal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
San Antonio Buyer Got Sick of Looking At A Lockbox Left For 2 Months and Tossed It In the Trash — Now the Seller's Agent Is Mad And Wants $200
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. When you buy a new home, you expect a few leftovers — maybe a lone nail in the wall, a rogue paint swatch in the junk drawer, or a broken rake hiding in the shed. But one San Antonio homeowner says her housewarming gift was a $200 real estate lockbox dangling from her front two months. She explained on the real estate subreddit that the seller's agent left the lockbox when she closed on her home this summer. At first, she figured it would disappear quickly. "I gave them a week after close and nothing. Then someone came and removed the yard sign but left the lock. So I called and left a vm to pick the lock up. Nothing. Waited another week. Then I removed it from the doorknob and left it by the water spigot out front. Another month passed. Finally I got sick of looking at it and tossed it in the garbage." Don't Miss: Would you have invested in eBay or Uber early? The same backers are betting on . 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Two months after closing, the seller's agent finally came to collect it — only to find it was long gone. The homeowner says the agent told her, "They cost $200," and warned that her broker would be in touch to buy a replacement. Commenters quickly weighed in, with one suggesting, "Tell her you charge $200 a month for property storage, so she owes you $400." Another added, "Don't forget about the labor cost for removing the thing." Some real estate agents joined in, saying that while Supra lockboxes aren't cheap, leaving one on a buyer's door for months is well outside the norm. That raised the question: could she actually be on the hook for the $200? In Texas, the answer leans heavily toward no. The state's property code addresses abandoned property, but mostly in landlord–tenant situations. Once a sale closes, anything left behind — unless the purchase contract says otherwise — is generally considered part of what the buyer now owns. That means the buyer can keep it, toss it, or hand it back, but they're under no legal obligation to store it indefinitely. Trending: Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — Industry rules are stricter. Many local MLS organizations require agents to remove lockboxes within 24 to 48 hours after closing. These aren't laws, but they are professional standards, and violations can lead to fines from the local real estate association. With two months of notice and no contract obligating the buyer to keep it safe, the seller's agent may have more luck finding a new lockbox than finding a legal argument. Of course, not every real estate experience comes with two months of lockbox limbo. Platforms like Arrived let people invest in rental properties without ever scheduling a showing, fielding agent voicemails, or dealing with a $200 hunk of metal on the front door. Instead of managing tenants or tackling surprise headaches, investors buy shares in professionally managed homes and collect passive income — all from a laptop, not a lawn chair in front of an empty water spigot. Still, for those actually buying a home, sometimes the strangest post-closing disputes aren't about major repairs or hidden defects — they're about the little things that overstay their welcome. And in this San Antonio case, that "little thing" just happened to come with a $200 price tag... and a one-way trip to the trash. Read Next: In a $34 Trillion Debt Era, The Right AI Could Be Your Financial Advantage — Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Image: Shutterstock This article San Antonio Buyer Got Sick of Looking At A Lockbox Left For 2 Months and Tossed It In the Trash — Now the Seller's Agent Is Mad And Wants $200 originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
