logo
Trolls say I'm so big that I should be dead – but here's why I'd rather be size 24 than take fat jabs

Trolls say I'm so big that I should be dead – but here's why I'd rather be size 24 than take fat jabs

The Sun29-05-2025

TUCKING into her Chinese takeaway with the family, the then 14-year-old Beckie Bold suddenly drop- ped her knife and fork in shock.
'I'll give you £50 if you lose weight,' her aunt told her, eyes full of judgment.
5
5
Despite being so stunned, Beckie agreed and within two years had shed 7st.
Fast forward 12 years, Beckie is now 26 and a size 24. She is one of the UK's most prolific ' fatfluencers ', with more than 50,000 followers on social media.
'When you're told from such a pivotal age that you should lose weight, it sticks,' she says.
'I starved myself to get that £50, and growing up, I suffered with eating disorders as a result. Now I'm part of the body-positive, plus-size community and I want people to know you can be fat and healthy.
'I know first hand that being skinny doesn't equal health or happiness.'
While 5ft 2in Beckie might try to put a positive spin on being bigger, Health Secretary Wes Streeting is insisting the NHS 'get with the times'.
He says it should speed up the roll-out of weight-loss jabs such as Ozempic and Mounjaro, following research that suggests they could reduce the risk of heart attacks and cancer, and help people live longer.
It could take 12 years to distribute Mounjaro to 3.4million peopl e who are eligible, but Mr Streeting believes the service 'can, and should, go faster'.
But Beckie, of Conwy, is adamant she will not go down that route.
'I would never take Ozempic or any of those fat jabs,' she says.
Weight Loss Jabs - Pros vs Cons
'They're so scary. I've seen many people online who have taken these jabs and ended up with nerve damage or other serious side effects.
'No one seems to know or care about that. Everyone's so focused on getting skinny.
'There's no long-term data to show what this can do. People who take this stuff are basically guinea pigs.'
Despite research showing the weight issu e in the UK is reaching epidemic levels, with 64.5 per cent of adults in England overweight or living with obesity, Beckie says: 'There's no obesity 'crisis'.
'The Government believes that people who are obese, as calculated on the very outdated BMI scale, will cost them money and that's what they care about.'
Beckie does not believe it should be accelerating the roll- out of fat jabs, either. 'I don't understand why the Government is seeing it as such a big deal,' she argues.
'Why is it such a priority for people to lose weight when we have got so many bigger things going on in the world?
KEYBOARD WARRIORS
'There's still this old narrative that everyone who is overweight is automatically un- healthy, that people who are plus-size cost the NHS money.'
As an influencer, Beckie — who refuses to weigh herself — gets trolled daily.
'Keyboard warriors tell me I shouldn't exist because of my weight,' she says.
'One guy told me I'd die of heart failure within two years.
'These trolls don't think fat people should be on this Earth.
'People tell me I don't know what a salad looks like and that I should take weight-loss injections.'
According to the latest ­figures from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, the UK could save £52billion by 2050 if weight-loss medication was given to 15million overweight people.
'I think saving money is a big reason as to why they're doing it,' says Beckie. But that's crap.
'I was the most unhealthy I've ever been at my thinnest.
'Everyone believes that if you're skinny, then you're fine.'
5
Despite multiple studies linking obesity with a catalogue of life-threatening health conditions, from heart disease to cancer and diabetes, Beckie refuses to accept a connection.
'There's no correlation between health and weight, but so many people believe that this is the case, that's why they fear being fat,' she says.
'And that's why these quick-fix jabs are so popular.
'But they can eat away at fat and muscle mass and can leave people looking so gaunt. How is that healthy?'
'QUICK FIX JABS'
Beckie also believes people who truly need the jab will be overlooked for those who want it for cosmetic reasons.
'I know that some people do get them because they might have diabetes and the jabs may help to reduce that,' she says.
'But all you hear is, 'I want to get skinny'. And it's scary.'
Beckie is particularly aggrieved because she suffers from lipoedema, a condition that causes a painful build-up of fat in her arms, legs and body.
Yet she claims she cannot get treated on the NHS.
Beckie says: 'Lipoedema surgery is actually classed as cosmetic surgery on the NHS, so despite the fact this is a lifelong, ­painful condition, they won't treat it.
'Yet they will give out these weight-loss jabs to pretty much anyone who wants them for cosmetic reasons. It really p***es me off.'
Another reason Beckie is so down on the jabs is the effect they have on her business.
There's no correlation between health and weight, but so many people believe that this is the case, that's why they fear being fat.
As a ' fatfluencer ' she regularly posts videos of herself munching on McDonald's and modelling plus-size outfits, which helps her rake in money through clothing brand deals.
But with weight-loss jabs surging in popularity — in March alone, 1.5million people used them, according to market intelligence company IQVIA — many of her peers have switched teams, becoming 'jabfluencers'.
She explains: 'It's quite disheartening, because so many of those in the plus-size community, who always promoted body confidence, have started using the jabs.
'They have a huge platform already, based on teaching people to love themselves. But now they're talking about weight- loss jabs and using their pages for before and after pictures.
'They want to be skinny, no matter the health impacts.
'Because of that, being a plus-size influencer now feels like a constant battle.
'We're shouting from the rooftops about body acceptance, but since the jabs it feels like more and more people are turning on the body-positive community. And brands are starting to go back on their word about representation.
'Now, you rarely see plus-size people modelling. Half of the 'fatfluencers' aren't fat any more. It's really sad.'
5
Beckie is adamant she will not stop spreading her body-confident message.
She says: 'My content is all about larger women having body positivity and eating what they like.
'I am vegan but I'll eat a McDonald's McPlant whenever I want. And if I want a ­Chinese takeaway, I'm getting a Chinese. I'll happily gobble up veg chow and sweet and sour tofu balls.
'I never calorie count or anything like that, because I think it's super-toxic.' And Beckie, who is single, insists she is the proof that larger people can be healthy.
Despite her lipoedema and the chronic pain that comes with it, she claims she is in good health.
'I post videos of me at the gym to prove it,' she says. 'I think every person who is able-bodied should eat well and exercise. It's a way to feel good about yourself, regardless of size.
'I do have chronic conditions now but that's not due to my weight. It's due to my body.
'I really believe 'overweight' doesn't mean unhealthy — and I wish our politicians would see that too.'
Everything you need to know about fat jabs
Weight loss jabs are all the rage as studies and patient stories reveal they help people shed flab at almost unbelievable rates, as well as appearing to reduce the risk of serious diseases.
Wegovy – a modified version of type 2 diabetes drug Ozempic – and Mounjaro are the leading weight loss injections used in the UK.
Wegovy, real name semaglutide, has been used on the NHS for years while Mounjaro (tirzepatide) is a newer and more powerful addition to the market.
Mounjaro accounts for most private prescriptions for weight loss and is set to join Wegovy as an NHS staple this year.
How do they work?
The jabs work by suppressing your appetite, making you eat less so your body burns fat for energy instead and you lose weight.
They do this my mimicking a hormone called GLP-1, which signals to the brain when the stomach is full, so the drugs are officially called GLP-1 receptor agonists.
They slow down digestion and increase insulin production, lowering blood sugar, which is why they were first developed to treat type 2 diabetes in which patients' sugar levels are too high.
Can I get them?
NHS prescriptions of weight loss drugs, mainly Wegovy and an older version called Saxenda (chemical name liraglutide), are controlled through specialist weight loss clinics.
Typically a patient will have to have a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, classifying them as medically obese, and also have a weight-related health condition such as high blood pressure.
GPs generally do not prescribe the drugs for weight loss.
Private prescribers offer the jabs, most commonly Mounjaro, to anyone who is obese (BMI of 30+) or overweight (BMI 25-30) with a weight-related health risk.
Private pharmacies have been rapped for handing them out too easily and video calls or face-to-face appointments are now mandatory to check a patient is being truthful about their size and health.
Are there any risks?
Yes – side effects are common but most are relatively mild.
Around half of people taking the drug experience gut issues, including sickness, bloating, acid reflux, constipation and diarrhoea.
Dr Sarah Jarvis, GP and clinical consultant at patient.info, said: 'One of the more uncommon side effects is severe acute pancreatitis, which is extremely painful and happens to one in 500 people.'
Other uncommon side effects include altered taste, kidney problems, allergic reactions, gallbladder problems and hypoglycemia.
Evidence has so far been inconclusive about whether the injections are damaging to patients' mental health.
Figures obtained by The Sun show that, up to January 2025, 85 patient deaths in the UK were suspected to be linked to the medicines.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves to promise investment in ‘renewal' as she unveils spending plans
Reeves to promise investment in ‘renewal' as she unveils spending plans

Rhyl Journal

time34 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Reeves to promise investment in ‘renewal' as she unveils spending plans

The Chancellor is expected to announce big increases in spending on the NHS, defence and schools as part of a spending review set to include £113 billion of investment thanks to looser borrowing rules. She will also reveal changes to the Treasury's 'green book' rules that govern which projects receive investment in an effort to boost spending outside London and the South East. Arguing that this investment is 'possible only because of the stability I have introduced' after the October budget, Ms Reeves is expected to say her spending review will 'ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities'. She will say: 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people. 'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' Among the other announcements expected at the spending review is £39 billion for affordable homes over the next 10 years as the Government seeks to meet its promise of building 1.5 million homes by the next election. The Treasury said this would see annual investment in affordable housing rise to £4 billion by 2029/30, almost double the average of £2.3 billion between 2021 and 2026. A Government source said: 'We're turning the tide against the unacceptable housing crisis in this country with the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation, delivering on our plan for change commitment to get Britain building.' The Chancellor has also already announced some £15.6 billion of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7 billion for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. But the spending review is expected to set out tough spending limits for departments other than health, defence and education. Although Ms Reeves is reported to have agreed to an above-inflation increase in the policing budget, this is thought to have come at the expense of cuts in other parts of Home Office spending. And sources close to London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan have expressed concern that the spending review will have nothing for the capital. Ahead of the spending review, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5% is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments or further tax rises to come in the budget this autumn. The Chancellor has already insisted that her fiscal rules remain in place, along with Labour's manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.'

Royal College of Pathologists comes out against assisted dying
Royal College of Pathologists comes out against assisted dying

Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Royal College of Pathologists comes out against assisted dying

The Royal College of Pathologists, which represents medical examiners, has come out against assisted dying. It said it could not support Kim Leadbeater 's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill because of the role that it was expected to play in the assisted dying process. Under the Bill, assisted deaths will not be automatically referred to a coroner, which is usual practice for potentially unnatural deaths and when a drug, authorised or otherwise, brings about death. This will mean that it is for medical examiners to scrutinise assisted deaths. The professional body that represents them says that they are not qualified to do so and warn that a lack of resourcing means that medical examiners may be pulled away from other parts of their vital work. Ms Leadbeater on Tuesday defended not involving coroners in the process. She said there was 'no justification for putting the family and loved ones of the deceased through an unnecessary and potentially traumatic coroner's inquiry' because adequate safeguards were in place. It comes as the Bill returns to the Commons for a debate on Friday, and a vote on the legislation is expected next week. Dr Suzy Lishman, senior adviser on medical examiners for the Royal College of Pathologists, said that the college had no position on the 'ethical issues' of legalising assisted dying. In a statement, Dr Lishman said: 'The college's concerns relate only to the involvement of medical examiners after an assisted death has taken place. 'As part of their scrutiny, medical examiners would need to review the process leading up to the decision to authorise an assisted death and the circumstances of the assisted death, which they are not qualified to do. 'Notification to the coroner following an assisted death would ensure independent judicial review, which is particularly important given the concerns raised by many individuals, organisations and medical royal colleges about the lack of adequate safeguards in the Bill for vulnerable people. 'Lawyers, not doctors, are the most appropriate professionals to review these deaths. The medical examiner system was implemented to detect problems with medical care, not to identify discrepancies or malintent in the legal process required for assisted deaths.' Dr Lishman also raised concerns about the need of 'significant' training and resources needed for medical examiners to be able to perform the role in the process. She said that this would risk 'potentially taking medical examiners away from their current important role'. The Royal College of Pathologists concluded: 'Coronial referral for assisted deaths would be in line with current regulations, with all deaths due to a medical intervention or medicinal product being notified.' Last year, Thomas Teague KC, the former chief coroner for England and Wales from 2020-24, expressed concern about the lack of coroner involvement in the Bill. In a letter to The Telegraph, he wrote: 'Since the coroner's jurisdiction affords a powerful deterrent against misfeasance, the public may wonder why the Bill proposes to abandon such a robust safeguard.' A letter signed by around 1,000 doctors from across the NHS published this week said that the Bill is a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. They said: 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups.' The Royal College of Pathologists is the latest royal college to come out against the legislation, after the Royal College of Psychiatrists voiced their opposition to the Bill last month. Ms Leadbeater said: 'The Bill does not prevent any assisted death being referred to a coroner, however this would not be required in the majority of cases. 'Coroners investigate deaths that have been reported to them if they think that the death was violent or unnatural, the cause of death is unknown, or the person died in prison or in custody. None of these would apply to a legal, assisted death under the terms of this Bill. 'Eligibility for an assisted death would have been assessed in advance by two independent doctors and a multi-disciplinary panel overseen by a commissioner who would be a High Court judge or retired judge. 'Each of these assessments would be subject to the extensive safeguards contained in the Bill to protect everybody, including the most vulnerable. 'Consequently, most cases would not require a judicial investigation after a person has died, and there would be no justification for putting the family and loved ones of the deceased through an unnecessary and potentially traumatic coroner's inquiry. 'However, in the event of any doubt at all, it would be open to a medical examiner, a family member or anybody with concerns to ask a coroner to investigate.'

Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in
Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in

ED Miliband was accused of 'rewriting history' yesterday after he claimed scrapping winter fuel was about stopping millionaires getting payments. The bungling Net Zero Secretary tried to justify Labour's original decision to strip the handout by suggesting the pensioners who would've missed out were all rich. 2 2 But some of them earned as little as £12,000 per year. Mr Miliband said: 'The principal question was, the richest in our society, should they get the winter fuel payment, should millionaires, should the richest get the winter fuel payment? 'I think the answer for most people to that is no.' The Net Zero Secretary's desperate bid to explain scrapping winter fuel payments – before the decision was partially reversed – was blasted by senior Tories, who accused him of spouting a 'pack of lies'. Shadow Energy Secretary Andrew Bowie told The Sun: 'Red Ed is even more out of touch than we thought if he thinks people will believe this pack of lies. 'The economy is worse off than when they found it - taxes higher, unemployment higher and living standards lower. 'He is just trying to rewrite history to try and cover up Labour's embarrassing U-turn.' Meanwhile, a flagship Net Zero plan has been spared ahead of next week's spending review — to opponents' dismay. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has ensured his £13billion warm homes scheme will not be downgraded after negotiations with the Treasury. Chancellor Rachel Reeves decided not to cut the cash which allows heating upgrades through better insulation, solar panels and heat pumps.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store