Royal College of Pathologists comes out against assisted dying
The Royal College of Pathologists, which represents medical examiners, has come out against assisted dying.
It said it could not support Kim Leadbeater 's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill because of the role that it was expected to play in the assisted dying process.
Under the Bill, assisted deaths will not be automatically referred to a coroner, which is usual practice for potentially unnatural deaths and when a drug, authorised or otherwise, brings about death.
This will mean that it is for medical examiners to scrutinise assisted deaths.
The professional body that represents them says that they are not qualified to do so and warn that a lack of resourcing means that medical examiners may be pulled away from other parts of their vital work.
Ms Leadbeater on Tuesday defended not involving coroners in the process.
She said there was 'no justification for putting the family and loved ones of the deceased through an unnecessary and potentially traumatic coroner's inquiry' because adequate safeguards were in place.
It comes as the Bill returns to the Commons for a debate on Friday, and a vote on the legislation is expected next week.
Dr Suzy Lishman, senior adviser on medical examiners for the Royal College of Pathologists, said that the college had no position on the 'ethical issues' of legalising assisted dying.
In a statement, Dr Lishman said: 'The college's concerns relate only to the involvement of medical examiners after an assisted death has taken place.
'As part of their scrutiny, medical examiners would need to review the process leading up to the decision to authorise an assisted death and the circumstances of the assisted death, which they are not qualified to do.
'Notification to the coroner following an assisted death would ensure independent judicial review, which is particularly important given the concerns raised by many individuals, organisations and medical royal colleges about the lack of adequate safeguards in the Bill for vulnerable people.
'Lawyers, not doctors, are the most appropriate professionals to review these deaths. The medical examiner system was implemented to detect problems with medical care, not to identify discrepancies or malintent in the legal process required for assisted deaths.'
Dr Lishman also raised concerns about the need of 'significant' training and resources needed for medical examiners to be able to perform the role in the process.
She said that this would risk 'potentially taking medical examiners away from their current important role'.
The Royal College of Pathologists concluded: 'Coronial referral for assisted deaths would be in line with current regulations, with all deaths due to a medical intervention or medicinal product being notified.'
Last year, Thomas Teague KC, the former chief coroner for England and Wales from 2020-24, expressed concern about the lack of coroner involvement in the Bill.
In a letter to The Telegraph, he wrote: 'Since the coroner's jurisdiction affords a powerful deterrent against misfeasance, the public may wonder why the Bill proposes to abandon such a robust safeguard.'
A letter signed by around 1,000 doctors from across the NHS published this week said that the Bill is a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'.
They said: 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups.'
The Royal College of Pathologists is the latest royal college to come out against the legislation, after the Royal College of Psychiatrists voiced their opposition to the Bill last month.
Ms Leadbeater said: 'The Bill does not prevent any assisted death being referred to a coroner, however this would not be required in the majority of cases.
'Coroners investigate deaths that have been reported to them if they think that the death was violent or unnatural, the cause of death is unknown, or the person died in prison or in custody. None of these would apply to a legal, assisted death under the terms of this Bill.
'Eligibility for an assisted death would have been assessed in advance by two independent doctors and a multi-disciplinary panel overseen by a commissioner who would be a High Court judge or retired judge.
'Each of these assessments would be subject to the extensive safeguards contained in the Bill to protect everybody, including the most vulnerable.
'Consequently, most cases would not require a judicial investigation after a person has died, and there would be no justification for putting the family and loved ones of the deceased through an unnecessary and potentially traumatic coroner's inquiry.
'However, in the event of any doubt at all, it would be open to a medical examiner, a family member or anybody with concerns to ask a coroner to investigate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Poorest to benefit from Reeves's spending but tax rises likely, says thinktank
Rachel Reeves's multibillion-pound plan to repair public services will benefit Britain's poorest households most but means tax rises are likely this autumn, according to a leading thinktank. The Resolution Foundation said the extra funding for hospitals, schools and the police announced by the chancellor would provide a valuable 'benefit-in-kind' for households who would gain from the improvements. A middle-income household would gain the equivalent of £1,400 a year on average by the time of the next general election through access to better services, rising to as much as £1,700 for the poorest fifth of households in the country. However, the thinktank warned that Reeves could be forced into further tax increases to maintain higher levels of spending at the forthcoming autumn budget, amid a worsening outlook for the economy and public finances. 'A combination of a weaker economic outlook, an unfunded spending commitment on winter fuel payments, and just £9.9bn of headroom against the chancellor's fiscal rules, mean further tax rises are likely to be needed this autumn,' it said. Reeves used Wednesday's spending review to prioritise funding for the NHS, defence and more than £100bn for long-term capital projects despite leaving some key areas facing a tough squeeze. In a pivotal speech to the Commons setting out Labour's plans up to the next general election, the chancellor said she was taking action to 'renew Britain' after years of underinvestment and austerity measures overseen by successive Conservative-led governments. The Resolution Foundation said the package showed that Britain was turning into a 'National Health State', with health accounting for 90% of the extra spending announced. In a major reshaping of the state, it calculated the NHS was on track to account for half (49%) of all day-to-day public service spending controlled by Westminster by the end of the decade – up from a third (34%) in 2009-10. The thinktank said real day-to-day spending was now rising again in the 2020s by 2.2% a year, after a 0.5% fall per year in the 2010s. However, in the decade prior to that under the last Labour government, spending rose by 4.3% on average each year. While the health service is taking up a larger share of public spending, other areas have faced real-terms budget cuts, including a 16% reduction in real, per-person funding for justice and a 50% decline for housing, communities and local government since 2010. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion However, experts warned that Reeves could face a summer of speculation over tax increases in the run-up to the autumn budget. Mel Stride, the Conservative shadow chancellor, said: 'This is the spend now, tax later review, because [she] knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes.' Labour argues that its plans allocate money that has already been raised, highlighting that the spending review is based on last year's autumn budget and this year's spring statement, when the Office for Budget Responsibility judged that Reeves was meeting her main fiscal rule to balance day-to-day spending with revenues within the fifth year of its forecast. However, economists warned that a weak growth outlook and rising government borrowing costs amid Donald Trump's global trade wars could blow the chancellor's plans off course. This could force the OBR to downgrade its forecasts for the government finances, which would require Reeves to take action to announce spending cuts or tax rises if she wanted to stick to her fiscal rule. Andrew Goodwin, the chief UK economist at the consultancy Oxford Economics, said: 'Considering the government's recent U-turn on winter fuel payments could be a precursor to higher government spending in other areas, it looks increasingly likely that substantial tax increases will be needed.'
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
This is the best budget anti-ageing cream, according to our reviews
Proving that premium-quality beauty doesn't have to cost a bomb, plenty of brands have made it their USP to deliver efficacious skincare at a sub-£20 price – think CeraVe, Byoma, The Ordinary and Weleda. Arriving on the scene in 2018 and impressing beauty editors time and time again, The Inkey List is known for its monochrome minimalist packaging and fast-acting formulas. Aiming to simplify overcomplicated skincare regimes, the brand's products span eye creams (see its cult caffeine formula), serums, moisturisers and even haircare (its scalp treatment is a bestseller). When it comes to anti-ageing, the brand is at the top of its game with its roster of affordable retinol serums, plumping collagen formulas and oat cleansing balms – but it's the bio-active ceramide repairing and plumping moisturiser that steals the show. Securing a spot in our review of the best anti-ageing creams, the formula was hailed as the best budget buy by our critic. Nourishing and firming, the moisturiser strengthens the skin's barrier to minimise the look of common signs of ageing (fine lines, wrinkles and uneven skin tone). Packed with skincare benefits and costing less than £20, here's why The Inkey List's repairing and plumping moisturiser deserves a spot in your own bathroom cabinet. 'The Inkey List's latest anti-ageing cream ticks all the boxes of another buzz-worthy product from the accessible beauty brand,' wrote our beauty critic. Boasting next-generation bio-active ceramides as the leading ingredient, its hardworking formula aims to strengthen the skin barrier through multiple layers. 'For instant gratification, the beautifully rich and creamy texture is also infused with gransil blur, which delivers a soft-focus effect – 'blurring' fine lines and imperfection,' they added. After just a month's use, their complexion felt 'smoother, well-nourished and firmer to the touch'. Plus, the formula is suitable and effective on all skin types, and it can be used as a night cream, too. Tick, tick, tick.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Palestine activist's prison wait for trial 'outrageous'
The mother of a man charged in relation to an alleged break-in at the UK site of an Israel-based defence firm has said it is "outrageous" that he faces 21 months in prison before his case goes to Plastow, 34, is one of the 'Filton 18' accused of taking part in a Palestine Action protest at an Elbit Systems UK factory in Filton, Bristol last Plastow is still awaiting his trial which is scheduled for April next year. His mum, Jane Plastow, believes it is the longest anyone has been held in prison pre-trial on protest-related Judicial Office told the BBC it could not comment on individual cases. An earlier court hearing was told that during the incident a vehicle was driven into the doors of buildings and two responding police officers and a security guard were with many of the rest of the group, Mr Plastow, from Manchester, is charged with criminal damage, violent disorder and aggravated burglary which he denies. The Home Office has previously told the BBC: "The CPS has decided that there is sufficient evidence to submit to the court that these offences have a terrorism connection."However, none of the 18 have been charged with terror Systems UK is run separately to Israel-based Elbit Systems. It previously told the BBC that claims the facilities supply the Israeli military are "completely false".An Elbit Systems UK spokesperson told the BBC it will not comment on an ongoing legal process."I think [for Mr Plastow] there's a great sense of helplessness and hopelessness," Ms Plastow said."There have been lots of people locked up as political prisoners in Britain recently, there is Palestine Action and Just Stop Oil - but nobody has been locked up longer than my son and some of his comrades." 'Gross overreach' Ms Plastow said her son applied for bail, promising the judge that he would stay with his mother and wear an electronic tag."We had discussed the most onerous terms, it basically amounted to house arrest," Ms Plastow said she offered to pay £50,000, from a recent inheritance, but he was denied bail."My son has never been violent. It is a gross overreach," Ms Plastow added."The idea that at the moment it looks like he will be locked up for 21 months is outrageous."
