
This man is a U.S. citizen by birth. Why did ICE mark him for deportation — again?
Silvestre, a 47-year-old construction worker, was born in Stockton, but the document listed his birthplace and country of citizenship as Mexico. At the bottom were words that Silvestre didn't understand completely, though well enough: 'Received … on June 26, 2025 at 11:31. Disposition: Expedited Removal.'
'Now I have to be looking over my shoulder,' he said in a recent interview. 'It's hurtful.'
Despite being a U.S. citizen by birth, Silvestre had reason to be paranoid about his status. Remarkably, this was not the first time the government had targeted him for deportation. After Stockton police arrested him for public drunkenness in 1999, Silvestre, then 21, was deported to Nogales, Mexico — twice — under an erroneous removal order.
U.S. citizens cannot legally be deported. An immigration judge finally overturned the removal order in 2004, ruling Silvestre was indeed an American.
It remains unclear why federal authorities created the new expedited removal paperwork. Known as an I-213, it's an internal record of people believed to be deportable created before the government initiates the deportation process.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, said Silvestre was deported in 1999, under President Bill Clinton's administration, because he 'claimed to be a Mexican citizen without any legal status to remain in the U.S.,' an assertion Silvestre denies.
'This individual has no active immigration case and is not a target of ICE,' McLaughlin said. She did not deny that the agency had created the new expedited removal paperwork. Asked if it was created by mistake and whether it had been withdrawn, she did not immediately respond.
'ICE does NOT deport U.S. citizens,' McLaughlin said. 'We know who we are targeting ahead of time. If and when we do encounter individuals subject to arrest, our law enforcement are trained to ask a series of well-determined questions to determine status and removability.'
When the Chronicle told Silvestre on Thursday about DHS' statement, he said he was relieved to learn he is not an ICE target. But he said he wanted to be certain that the removal paperwork had been or will be withdrawn.
'What they did to me was kidnapping,' he said of the 1999 deportations. 'The biggest thing is they humiliated me.' He said he wants the government to tell him, 'We've corrected it, you're an American and we apologize.'
The latest threat of removal for Silvestre came as the Trump administration ramped up its mass deportation campaign of undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers, widening the net to include green card holders and floating the idea of shipping U.S. citizens convicted of crimes to Salvadoran prisons.
But Silvestre's saga — propelled by government failures and complicated by his own struggles with the law — spans across administrations, exemplifying what experts say are due process violations in a deportation system that can ensnare vulnerable people with little understanding of what's happening to them.
Although the immigration detention and deportation of U.S. citizens is illegal, it does happen, according to research, media reports, first person accounts and the U.S. government's federal watchdog agency.
The Government Accountability Office said in a 2021 report that ICE safeguards against wrongfully deporting U.S. citizens are 'inconsistent,' resulting in the agency not knowing the extent to which its officers are arresting, detaining or deporting such people. Moreover, deportation can create a permanent stain, given that a person who is removed can be barred from entering the U.S. again for 10 years.
A 2011 study by Jacqueline Stevens, director of Northwestern University's Deportation Research Clinic, estimated that 1% of people in ICE detention and 0.05% of those deported are U.S. citizens. ICE's own data, which Stevens said is probably an undercount, indicates the agency arrested 674 U.S. citizens from mid-2014 to mid-2020, removing 70.
Most of the wrongfully deported weren't born in the U.S. but obtained citizenship through citizen parents — either at birth or because children under 18 generally become citizens when a parent naturalizes. Many don't have passports. Proving their citizenship in immigration court can involve tracking down their parents' or even grandparents' birth certificates. The deportation of American-born citizens like Silvestre is more uncommon.
'At best, the case is one of gross incompetence,' said Kevin Johnson, a UC Davis immigration law expert. 'The U.S. authorities were not careful with Silvestre's case and still are not being careful.'
Catherine Seitz, legal director of the Immigration Institute of the Bay Area, said she'd heard of cases in which the government deemed birth certificates fraudulent because their holders were delivered by midwives. But to learn of a case with a hospital birth surprised her.
It is concerning that the DHS created new removal paperwork, Seitz said: 'You would think they'd check with the court records. They should be able to see the termination. It could be an indication that they're going too fast and they're not doing their due diligence.'
It was Northwestern's Stevens who unearthed the latest removal paperwork. In 2021, Silvestre had contacted her for help. She filed Freedom of Information Act requests with three Homeland Security agencies on his behalf.
Last month, on June 30, she was checking her inbox when she found that Customs and Border Protection had finally responded to her inquiry. The records, shared with the Chronicle, reveal that immigration officials created the new paperwork for Silvestre's expedited removal, or deportation without a hearing, effective June 26.
Stevens called Silvestre immediately, unsure whether he'd already been picked up. On July 4, he returned her call, and that's when she emailed him the deportation record.
'If U.S. citizens, who under the U.S. Constitution have full due process protections, are being detained and deported, that tells us an awful lot about the treatment of other people,' Stevens said, referring to immigrants seeking legal status. Silvestre's case, she said, is like a '900-pound gorilla in a coal mine.'
A minor arrest goes wrong
Silvestre was born on Feb. 16, 1978, at Dameron Hospital in Stockton. His parents, Ernestina and Raul, were working-class immigrants from Mexico. Raul, also a construction worker, was a U.S. citizen through his own father.
By his own admission, Silvestre ran afoul of the law.
Coming of age on Stockton's south side during a time of rampant gang violence, Silvestre said he grew up too fast. The baby of the family, he followed his two older brothers to car shows and hung out with the wrong crowd. He started drinking and smoking marijuana at around 11, tried methamphetamine soon after and was expelled from Franklin High School in 12th grade. He recalled his brothers warning him, 'You're not going to live to see 21.'
At 18, with his father's help, he joined the local laborers union and started working. But before long he got into trouble, drawing a 1998 conviction for possessing meth and carrying a concealed gun without a permit. He was released on probation.
On Super Bowl Sunday in 1999, Silvestre's dad kicked him out and told him he needed to get his life together. He sent the 21-year-old man to stay with his mother — the couple had separated — but on his way, Silvestre recalled, he ran into friends who invited him drinking. By the time he showed up at his mom's house, it was late, he was intoxicated and his family wasn't having it. His mom called the cops, telling him, 'Don't run.'
Police officers took him to San Joaquin County jail, where he was stripped to his boxers and sent to the drunk tank. (He was not charged.) As he was trying to sober up, he said, three men in green uniforms came in and started questioning him in Spanish.
' De donde eres?' they asked. Where are you from? He said he replied in English that he was from Stockton.
'They're like, 'That's not what our paperwork says.''
The men loaded him onto a bus and drove to what Silvestre recognized as the Port of Stockton, the shipping hub on an eastern finger of the delta. Silvestre assumed he was being transferred to prison for violating the terms of his probation. He didn't know it at the time, but the men in green were from the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the agency known as INS that handled immigration before being split into three departments in 2003, including ICE.
In a holding cell, he was surrounded by people speaking many languages. A man handed him a Bible and asked whether he was scared. 'We're being deported,' he told Silvestre, who didn't know what the word meant.
'I ain't scared of nothing,' he recalled saying. He was hotheaded. He'd always been scared of God, but not prison.
Hours later, for reasons neither the Chronicle nor Silvestre nor Stevens could determine, the San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office released Silvestre to Border Patrol, which placed him in deportation proceedings, INS records show.
'The subject was interviewed at the San Joaquin County Jail after his arrest for DUI,' a Border Patrol agent wrote in a document dated Feb. 1, 1999. 'The subject said that he was a citizen of Mexico without immigration documents to enter or remain in the United States. He also said that he entered the United States at a place other than a port of entry to avoid immigration inspection.'
Stevens called the record a 'fiction' contradicted by Silvestre's U.S. birth certificate.
In a warrant for Silvestre's arrest, a Border Patrol agent claimed he was a Mexican national who entered the U.S. illegally near Nogales, Ariz., two weeks earlier — even though a litany of public records showed him to reside in California.
Silvestre remembered a terrible journey south. After he and other men were loaded onto a bus, his stomach started hurting. He needed to use the bathroom badly but couldn't. As the sun rose, they arrived somewhere in Los Angeles.
Shackled, he and the others were ordered onto a plane and flown to Arizona, where Silvestre was placed in a two-man cell with seven other men. His stomach still hurt. He recalled telling a guard he desperately needed to use the bathroom. His hands were in zip ties, so he had no choice but to defecate in his pants.
When a guard returned to his cell and opened the food tray slot, Silvestre spat at him, he said. Soon, he heard the slot open again and felt something hit him in the eye that burned like mace. The door opened and he felt two to three men grabbing him. He was sprayed again, he said, burning his genitals. He felt like he was going to pass out.
Silvestre's next memory is of being at a court hearing, though he remembers little of what happened. According to records, he told the judge he was a U.S. citizen, but the judge deferred to INS. The judge ordered him deported on Feb. 5, 1999.
He was bused to the Arizona-Mexico border, where he was instructed to get out and continue on foot. He said he walked into Nogales, Sonora, hungry, thirsty and cold.
Using the phone at a church, he called his parents and told them he was in Mexico. They were incredulous. His mom asked whether he was really out partying with his friends.
'I'm not lying to you,' he recalled saying.
His father drove to Mexico armed with his son's birth certificate. Rescuing him took two tries: During the first attempt, Silvestre was stopped at the border, detained and swiftly deported. When he tried again, he showed his birth certificate and an officer admitted him.
Detained again
Silvestre found that the ordeal did not end with his return.
Often, he said, he woke up terrified in the middle of the night, not knowing where he was. He felt nobody believed his account of what had happened. He was left with almost no proof except for a flimsy wristband that immigration officers put on him in detention. He began to feel suicidal and used drugs heavily.
As years passed, he kept working, but also partying and getting into trouble. In 2004, his mother told him he needed to change his life. He decided to move to Arizona, where he found a job packing vegetables.
One weekend that year, believing he was safe because five years had passed, he joined a friend from work on a weekend trip to Mexico, where they had pizza and beers. Upon trying to reenter the U.S. with his birth certificate and California ID, he was once again detained and held in Yuma, Ariz.
'Silvestre is a citizen and national of Mexico and of no other country,' ICE records from the time state. 'He does not have nor has he ever had documents with which to enter, live, work or stay in the United States.' ICE moved to deport him, alleging he was falsely claiming to be a U.S. citizen.
ICE made the claim even though, two years earlier, the agency had run Silvestre's fingerprints after an arrest and correctly determined that Silvestre was who he said he was, records show.
From detention in Yuma, Silvestre called his mother, who rushed to free him. She handwrote and notarized an affidavit in Spanish, stating, 'I am sending the evidence proving that my son Miguel Silvestre was born in the United States, in the city of Stockton, California.'
Silvestre spent two weeks in detention before an immigration judge ruled on March 24, 2004, that he was indeed a U.S. citizen — and ordered him released. Homeland Security terminated deportation proceedings the same day.
Back in California, Silvestre returned to more familiar problems. Later in 2004, he was convicted of carjacking with a gun and went to prison for three months. He bounced in and out of jail, as well as addiction treatment. Last year, his older brother accused him of threatening him, resulting in criminal charges. Silvestre maintains he's innocent.
'The truth is, it doesn't matter if this guy was a mass murderer,' said Johnson, the UC Davis law professor. 'He could go to prison and be punished but you couldn't deport him, as long as he's a citizen.'
Though there is no evidence, Johnson said it's likely that racial and class profiling played a role in Silvestre's deportation. 'It's hard to imagine,' he said, 'the same kind of mix-up with a John Smith who goes to Pacific University.'
In 2021, the Government Accountability Office reported that ICE policy did not require officers to update the citizenship field in their data systems after identifying evidence that a person could be a U.S. citizen. In Silvestre's case, the original 1999 mistake that seeded his long predicament was apparently unremedied in immigration records.
In 2015, Silvestre said, he sobered up and devoted himself to God. But his mother's death in 2023 plunged him into grief that he hasn't recovered from.
When he learned about the latest deportation paperwork, he said he felt suicidal. He got into his car and started driving recklessly, hoping police would pull him over. But then he sensed his mom was watching over him. 'Calm down, go back to your room, and go to sleep,' he heard her say. So he did.
For 21 years, Silvestre hasn't left the country, fearful of being barred again. A drawstring bag that he carries everywhere contains his birth certificate, along with the immigration judge's order affirming his citizenship.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
India's Modi shares ‘good call' with ‘my friend' Putin after Trump tariffs
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday shared that he held a 'very good and detailed conversation with my friend President Putin,' as President Trump has ramped up tariff threats this week against New Delhi for Russian oil purchases. Modi, in a post on X, also said he thanked the Russian president for the latest updates on the Ukraine war. 'We also reviewed the progress in our bilateral agenda, and reaffirmed our commitment to further deepen the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. I look forward to hosting President Putin in India later this year,' the Indian leader said. Trump on Wednesday announced he would increase tariffs on India by 25 percent over its purchases of Russian oil, bringing the total tariffs he has imposed on New Delhi to 50 percent. The 25 percent increase is on top of a 25 percent 'reciprocal' tariff Trump announced on India last week, which was set to take effect Thursday. India has remained defiant, souring U.S. relations with a key bulwark against China, as well as close personal relations between Trump and Modi. 'They're buying Russian oil, they're fueling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy,' Trump said of India during a Tuesday interview with CNBC. India has volleyed back with claims of American hypocrisy; past U.S. administrations encouraged the India-Russia energy trade to help stabilize global markets, and both the U.S. and Europe continue to spend billions on Russian energy and commodities. India also says Russian energy is crucial to ensuring a stable domestic supply. 'In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' an Indian foreign ministry spokesperson said in a statement Monday, responding to Trump's tariff threats. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' it added. The increased tariffs on India would take effect late this month. However, Trump has also threatened broader 'secondary tariffs' on countries that trade with Russia. A senior U.S. official said this week that additional sanctions were expected Friday, even as Trump has raised the idea of a direct meeting with Putin, if he's willing to stop the war. Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, returned from talks with Putin in Moscow this week with the framework of a ceasefire proposal, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. As of mid-week, Rubio said Russia and Ukraine remained too far apart for a meeting. However, both U.S. and Russian officials have suggested an in-person summit could occur as soon as next week. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday said Russia appeared more likely to agree to a ceasefire than previously. 'Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire — the pressure is working,' Zelensky said during an address. 'But the key is to ensure they don't deceive anyone in the details — neither us, nor the United States.'


Black America Web
18 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Arkansas Schools Blocked From Displaying Ten Commandments In Classrooms
Source: dlewis33 / Getty You know, for a group of people who love to tout how much they love the Founding Fathers, the Republican party sure loves ignoring the separation of church and state. A federal judge issued a ruling on Monday blocking several Arkansas schools from displaying the Ten Commandments in classrooms. According to CNN, U.S. District Judge Timothy L. Brooks' ruling is limited to the four districts where the parents who filed the case reside. The parents argued that the displays violated their constitutional rights and forced students to observe a religion favored by the state. 'Why would Arkansas pass an obviously unconstitutional law?' Brooks' ruling read. 'Most likely because the state is part of a coordinated strategy among several states to inject Christian religious doctrine into public-school classrooms.' Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed a law earlier this year mandating that public schools display the Ten Commandments. The law went into effect this week as Arkansas students prepare to return to school. While Brooks' ruling blocked the law from being enforced in four sizable districts, the displays will still be up in Arkansas's other 233 school districts. Can't even front, I didn't think Arkansas was big enough to have that many school districts. We care about your data. See our privacy policy. 'The court saw through this attempt to impose religious doctrine in public schools and upheld every student's right to learn free from government-imposed faith,' John L. Williams, the ACLU of Arkansas' legal director said in a statement. 'We're proud to stand with our clients — families of many different backgrounds — who simply want their kids to get an education.' While it's currently unclear if the ACLU will move to expand the block to include all Arkansas school districts, a spokesperson for the ACLU of Arkansas told CNN that 'it is clear from this order and long-established law that all should refrain from posting' the Ten Commandment displays in classrooms. Arkansas isn't the only state with laws mandating the display of the Ten Commandments in classrooms, as Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma have all passed similar laws. A federal judge also blocked the Ten Commandments from being displayed in Louisiana schools. The issue of religious displays in public classrooms is largely expected to go before the Supreme Court as a result of the cases filed against these laws. Considering that the conservative supermajority in the Supreme Court has made several questionable rulings expanding executive power, limiting the injunction power of federal judges, and straight up reversing a woman's right to choose, it's sadly questionable whether they would move to erase the separation of church and state. In a perfect country, religious freedom would mean every American is free to practice whatever religion they choose without worry of persecution or favoritism by the state. Yet many of the Supreme Court's rulings regarding religious freedom have leaned towards allowing Christians to actively discriminate against LGBTQ people, or allow employers to deny health insurance coverage for contraceptives that go against their religious values. The growing trend of laws mandating Christian doctrine be taught and displayed in schools is yet another sign of Christian Nationalism's creep into America's political system. Christian Nationalism believes that America was founded as a Christian nation and its laws should reflect Christian values. Of course, since this is the Republican party we're talking abou,t those 'Christian Values' aren't loving your fellow man, being kind to the poor, but instead revolve around controlling women's bodies and persecuting anyone who dares to be 'woke.' I'm just saying, it's kind of funny they're standing ten toes down on the Ten Commandments being displayed in schools despite voting for a noted adulterer, habitual liar, whose domestic policies effectively steal from the working class to pay the rich. That doesn't sound too Christ-like to me. SEE ALSO: Federal Court Rules No Ten Commandments Display In Louisiana Schools Louisiana Is The 1st State To Indoctrinate Students By Requiring The Ten Commandments In Public Schools SEE ALSO Arkansas Schools Blocked From Displaying Ten Commandments In Classrooms was originally published on

USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump officials spared contempt ruling over Venezuelan deportations
The administration had deported hundreds of Venezuelan migrants under a centuries-old wartime law. NEW YORK - A U.S. appeals court on August 8 overturned a lower court's ruling finding probable cause to hold Trump administration officials in contempt of court over their handling of the deportations of hundreds of Venezuelan migrants under a centuries-old wartime law. The Venezuelans were deported to a maximum security prison in El Salvador built to hold terrorists. More: Judge weighs disciplinary action for DOJ lawyers in Venezuelan deportations U.S. District Judge James Boasberg said on July 24 he may initiate disciplinary proceedings against Justice Department lawyers for their conduct in a lawsuit brought by Venezuelans challenging their removal to a high-security Salvadoran prison in March. Boasberg, a prominent Washington, D.C., judge who has drawn President Donald Trump's ire, said during a court hearing that a recent whistleblower complaint had strengthened the argument that Trump administration officials engaged in criminal contempt of court by failing to bring deportation flights back to the United States. Contributing: Zachary Schermele, USA TODAY