
Looming Strike Points to Deep Seated Problems at YWCA Toronto
A No-Board report was delivered yesterday by the Ontario Labour Relations Board, meaning that more than 250 YWCA workers – members of CUPE 2189 – will be in a legal strike position as of May 22. A strike will impact mental health services for survivors of trauma, employment supports for women looking for work, shelters and housing programs for families facing homelessness, parenting and childcare programs, and more.
'We work with some of Toronto's most vulnerable, women, women identifying people, and families. But the YWCA has made their own workers vulnerable too. This work is mentally, physically, and emotionally exhausting and there is absolutely no reason why we should be pushed into poverty or forced to use food banks doing jobs that save lives,' said Amanda Kinna, a business administrator at the YWCA and president of CUPE 2189. 'Investing in workers with better wages and job security will help improve the services we offer and avoid a strike.'
Many of CUPE 2189 members work second or third jobs to make ends meet. Still, over 70% struggle to pay their bills and 10% regularly use food banks. Most glaringly, the vast majority of members are paid so little as to quality for the YWCA's own rent-geared-to-income housing support programs.
'If women came to us with these salaries, we'd help them find and keep housing. That means that the YWCA knows it's paying us poverty wages, and they are fine with it,' said Kinna. Some YWCA staff earn a little as $38,000 a year. 'The YWCA talks about building a more equitable, feminist society but they only apply that goal to management and the women we serve, not workers.'
CUPE 2189 members saw their wages capped at 1% by the Progressive Conservative government's wage suppressing Bill 124 legislation during a period of skyrocketing inflation. While workers fell further behind, management awarded themselves double digit raises. Faced with reasonable proposals that would help members live in the communities they serve, the YWCA offered workers 2.5%, and a hardship loan.
'I give this job my all but it doesn't give me enough. I have a second job. I work seven days a week. That doesn't leave any time for my own children,' said Elizabeth Legenza, an intake worker with the YWCA for 15 years. 'We love what we do and we don't do it for the paycheque. But that desire to give back cannot be weaponized against us to the detriment of our own families. Our jobs are critical. So is our well-being.'
CUPE 2189 members remain hopeful that the YWCA and their funders will see the justice of investing in their workers when they return to the table on May 15.
Quick Facts:
CUPE 2189 represents roughly 250 workers who staff emergency shelters, violence against women shelters, permanent housing sites, and other programs across Toronto.
A 2024 survey revealed that:
71% of workers struggle to pay monthly bills.
46% of workers have cut back on food each month.
72% of workers can't save money or have drained their savings account.
10% of workers regularly use food banks.
:od/cope491

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

11-07-2025
Judge rejects a challenge to Michigan's decades-long ban on publicly funded abortions
DETROIT -- A judge has rejected a challenge to Michigan's longtime ban on taxpayer-funded abortions for low-income residents, saying a group that brought the lawsuit had no standing to file it. Michigan voters in 2022 approved a sweeping constitutional amendment ensuring a right to abortion. But a ban on most taxpayer-funded abortions has been in place for decades, no matter which political party has controlled the Legislature or the governor's office. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of YWCA Kalamazoo, which pays for abortions sought by women in southwestern Michigan. The group says more than 75% have incomes that would qualify them for state support if Medicaid-funded abortions were allowed. Judge Brock Swartzle of the Michigan Court of Claims dismissed the lawsuit on July 3, saying YWCA Kalamazoo was the wrong party to bring a challenge. 'The YWCA is not an individual and it, as a nonprofit organization, does not have reproductive freedom,' the judge said in an 18-page opinion. 'Further, the YWCA does not provide abortion care and is not directly affected by a law that denies funding for abortions.' Michigan's Medicaid program only pays for abortions to save a woman's life or to end pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. Abortion and related services are available through Medicaid in 17 states, according to the American Civil Liberties Union and the law firm Goodwin Procter, which both represent YWCA Kalamazoo.


The Hill
10-07-2025
- The Hill
Challenge to Michigan ban on taxpayer-funded abortions rejected
A Michigan judge rejected a challenge to the state's longtime ban on taxpayer-funded abortions for low-income residents. The lawsuit argued that the ban had no standing after Michiganders voted in 2022 to pass a constitutional amendment ensuring the right to an abortion. Judge Brock A. Swartzle ruled that the group that filed the lawsuit had no standing to file the challenge. The Michigan American Civil Liberties Union, along with the law firm Goodwin Procter, filed the lawsuit on behalf of the YWCA Kalamazoo, which provides financial help to people seeking abortion care. ACLU Michigan estimates that 77 percent of the people YWCA Kalamazoo provides financial assistance to qualify for Medicaid. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs ask the court to declare the abortion-coverage ban unconstitutional and allow Michigan to join the 17 other states that cover abortion through Medicaid programs. Swartzle argued in his decision that since the YWCA is a non-profit and not an individual, it does not have the legal right to present the challenge. 'The YWCA is not an individual and it, as a nonprofit organization, does not have reproductive freedom,' he wrote. 'Further, the YWCA does not provide abortion care and is not directly affected by a law that denies funding for abortions.' 'Even if it could be considered 'someone' in a corporate sense, there is no allegation there is no allegation that it was penalized, prosecuted, or adversely acted against by the state,' the decision adds. In Michigan, Medicaid only covers abortion in order to save the life of the pregnant person or when the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest. A spokesperson for ACLU Michigan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Associated Press
10-07-2025
- Associated Press
Judge rejects a challenge to Michigan's decades-long ban on publicly funded abortions
DETROIT (AP) — A judge has rejected a challenge to Michigan's longtime ban on taxpayer-funded abortions for low-income residents, saying a group that brought the lawsuit had no standing to file it. Michigan voters in 2022 approved a sweeping constitutional amendment ensuring a right to abortion. But a ban on most taxpayer-funded abortions has been in place for decades, no matter which political party has controlled the Legislature or the governor's office. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of YWCA Kalamazoo, which pays for abortions sought by women in southwestern Michigan. The group says more than 75% have incomes that would qualify them for state support if Medicaid-funded abortions were allowed. Judge Brock Swartzle of the Michigan Court of Claims dismissed the lawsuit on July 3, saying YWCA Kalamazoo was the wrong party to bring a challenge. 'The YWCA is not an individual and it, as a nonprofit organization, does not have reproductive freedom,' the judge said in an 18-page opinion. 'Further, the YWCA does not provide abortion care and is not directly affected by a law that denies funding for abortions.' Michigan's Medicaid program only pays for abortions to save a woman's life or to end pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. Abortion and related services are available through Medicaid in 17 states, according to the American Civil Liberties Union and the law firm Goodwin Procter, which both represent YWCA Kalamazoo. A request for comment from the ACLU was not immediately answered Thursday.