
China says Dalai Lama succession issue a 'thorn' in relations with India
Dalai Lama's succession an internal affair, Chinese embassy says
*
India-China relations strained by Tibet issue, embassy says
*
Foreign minister's China trip one of highest-level meetings in five years
NEW DELHI, - The succession of Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, is a thorn in China-India relations, the Chinese embassy in New Delhi said on Sunday, as India's foreign minister prepares to visit China for the first time since deadly border clashes in 2020.
Ahead of celebrations this month for his 90th birthday that were attended by senior Indian ministers, the head of Tibetan Buddhists riled China again by saying it had no role in his succession. Tibetans believe the soul of any senior Buddhist monk is reincarnated after his death, but China says the Dalai Lama's succession will also have to be approved by its leaders.
The Dalai Lama has been living in exile in India since 1959 following a failed uprising against Chinese rule in Tibet, and Indian foreign relations experts say his presence gives New Delhi leverage against China. India is also home to about 70,000 Tibetans and a Tibetan government-in-exile.
Yu Jing, a Chinese embassy spokesperson, said on social media app X that some people from strategic and academic communities in India had made "improper remarks" on the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama.
Yu did not name anyone but in recent days, Indian strategic affairs analysts and a government minister backed the Dalai Lama's remarks on his succession.
"As professionals in foreign affairs, they should be fully cognizant of the sensitivity of issues related to Xizang," Yu said, using the Chinese name for Tibet.
"The reincarnation and succession of the Dalai Lama is inherently an internal affair of China," she said.
" Xizang-related issue is a thorn in China-India relations and has become a burden for India. Playing the 'Xizang card' will definitely end up shooting oneself in the foot."
Indian Parliamentary and Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, who sat next to the Dalai Lama during the birthday festivities a week ago, has said that as a practising Buddhist, he believes only the spiritual guru and his office have the authority to decide on his reincarnation.
India's foreign ministry said on July 4, two days before the Dalai Lama's birthday, that New Delhi does not take any position or speak on matters concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion.
Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will be attending a regional security meeting under the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in Tianjin in northern China on July 15 and hold bilateral meetings on the sidelines.
This will be one of the highest-level visits between India and China since their relations nosedived after a deadly border clash in 2020 that killed at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers.
Late last month, India's defence minister held talks with his Chinese counterpart in China on the sidelines of a defence ministers' meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade body identifies 300 high potential items for US exports
Representative image MUMBAI: Trade body Federation of Indian Export Organisations (Fieo) has identified over 300 "high potential items" for exports to the US, highlighting areas, where the government may want to push for tariff cuts. Overall, Fieo has identified 408 items that are commercially important and strategically stable, accounting for over two-thirds of India's exports to the US. It has suggested trade facilitation and export promotion efforts for these items. The products range from frozen shrimps and pharmaceuticals to smartphones and diamonds, carpets, toilet linen, milled rice, and natural honey. While some of these items have a significant share of India's exports, such as medicines, India has a large share of the market for products like shrimps, accounting for over 40% of American imports. In contrast, an item like honey is a small fraction of India's overall exports, pegged at $86.5 billion last year, but it is again a quarter of all shipments into the US. The list also includes several textiles products, leather goods, footwear, chemicals, engineering goods, and electric and electronics goods, where Indian exporters have traditionally been strong. In its negotiations, the government has already demanded tariff concessions for several products, especially labour-intensive ones. Besides, in several cases, such as shrimps and carpets, based on the reciprocal tariff of 26% earlier announced for India, exports would become less competitive as rivals enjoyed a significant edge. A team of Indian negotiators led by Rajesh Agarwal, special secretary in the commerce department, will hold talks with American officials as part of efforts to get a favourable deal for India before Trump's tariffs kick in from Aug 1. Apart from the uncertainty over a trade deal, especially with India insisting on holding back concessions for several farm goods and dairy products, negotiators face additional challenges with Trump mounting further pressure by threatening additional duties on countries that align with Brics or buy oil from sanction-hit Russia. Besides, a section within the government has said that the tariff demands from the Trump administration are not clear. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- Indian Express
New Delhi has chance to repay Green Revolution debt: Why doing so is in India's interest
It was William S Gaud, administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), who coined the term 'Green Revolution'. In a speech delivered on March 8, 1968, Gaud delved on the 'paramount importance of the world food problem' and how countries such as India were addressing it through planting of high-yielding varieties of wheat. This development, he said, had the makings of a new revolution: 'It is not a violent Red Revolution like that of the Soviets…I call it the Green Revolution'. It's the same USAID that has been shut down by the Donald Trump administration from July 1. Among the institutions impacted by the closure of the agency — that oversaw civilian foreign aid and development assistance from the US government — is the Mexico-headquartered International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center or CIMMYT. Synonymous with the renowned agricultural scientist Norman Borlaug, CIMMYT bred the semi-dwarf varieties Lerma Rojo 64A, Sonora 63, Sonora 64 and Mayo 64 that Indian farmers first sowed in 1964-65. Over the next few years, these varieties spread to more countries, heralding Gaud's 'Green Revolution.' While CIMMYT originated from a Mexican government and Rockefeller Foundation-sponsored programme in the 1940s and 50s, USAID became its main funder. It accounted for about $83 million out of CIMMYT's total $211 million grant revenues received in 2024. With the USAID's dismantling, CIMMYT is now looking at India — one of its major beneficiaries — as a potentially significant benefactor. Cold War institutions CIMMYT is to wheat what the Philippines-based International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) — established by the Ford and Rockefeller foundations in 1960 — has been to the other big cereal grain crop. Both were key to the US cultivating soft power and projecting a positive global image, more so during the Cold War. That was the time the US saw the Soviet Union as a threat, and believed that the deteriorating food situation in developing countries could foment political instability and eventual communist takeovers. Increasing cereal grain production in these countries, then, became a geopolitical imperative as part of US foreign policy. With Borlaug's varieties, Indian farmers could harvest 4-4.5 tonnes per hectare of wheat, as against 1-1.5 tonnes from the traditional tall cultivars prone to lodging (bending or falling over) when their earheads were heavy with well-filled grains. IRRI's semi-dwarf varieties, such as IR 8, IR 36 and IR 64, similarly boosted paddy (rice with husk) yields from 1-3 tonnes to 4.5-5 tonnes per hectare with minimal fertilisers, and 9-10 tonnes with higher application. Moreover, they matured in 110-130 days, compared with the 160-180 days (from seed to grain) for the traditional tall varieties. Borlaug was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1970. And it was fittingly for Peace. How India benefited The Green Revolution was seeded in India by CIMMYT and IRRI. Even the blockbuster wheat varieties Kalyan Sona and Sonalika, released for commercial cultivation by Indian scientists in 1967-68, were developed through selections from the progeny of advanced breeding material supplied by CIMMYT. Over time, Indian scientists, led by VS Mathur at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) in New Delhi, came out with their own varieties, particularly HD 2285 in 1982 and HD 2329 in 1985. These raised wheat yields to 5-6 tonnes per hectare. It went up further to 7 tonnes-plus with HD 2967, which IARI scientists — mainly BS Malik, Rajbir Yadav and AP Sethi — unveiled in 2011. In rice, likewise, V Ramachandra Rao and MV Reddy at the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University developed the mega varieties Swarna (MTU 7029) and Samba Mahsuri (BPT 5204), released in 1982 and 1986 respectively. IARI scientists like EA Siddiq, VP Singh and AK Singh also bred improved high-yielding basmati varieties, including Pusa Basmati 1 (released in 1989), 1121 (2003) and 1509 (2013). India exported 6.1 million tonnes of basmati rice valued at $5.94 billion (Rs 50,311.89 crore) in 2024-25. More than 90% of that was from IARI-bred varieties. Borlaug was once asked why the Green Revolution succeeded in India and not in most other developing countries, specifically Africa. He is said to have replied that it was because 'they didn't have institutions like IARI and scientists like MS Swaminathan'. The latter was instrumental in devising the overall strategy and implementation plan for the Green Revolution, with the full support of the then political leadership — from agriculture minister C Subramaniam to Prime Ministers Lal Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi. Significantly, IRRI's chief breeder Gurdev Singh Khush — his IR 36 and IR 64 varieties were planted in 10-11 million hectares (mh) each worldwide during the 1980s and 1990s respectively — was an Indian. So was Sanjaya Rajaram, appointed by Borlaug as head of CIMMYT's wheat breeding programme when he was just 29. The major varieties released during the 1990s in India — PBW 343, WH 542, Raj 3765 and PBW 373 — were all under his leadership. Why India still needs them The accompanying table shows that six out of the top 10 wheat varieties, accounting for over 20 mh out of the roughly 32 mh area sown by Indian farmers in 2024-25, were directly released from CIMMYT material. The only notable indigenously bred wheat variety in recent times has been HD 2967, which covered a record area of 12-14 mh at its peak in 2017-18 and 2018-19. But the varieties released since then are predominantly based on CIMMYT germplasm. CIMMYT and IRRI, to that extent, remain relevant to India, which has a vital stake in both institutions. With the US under Trump adopting a more transactional, if not coercive, approach to foreign policy, India has both scope and reason to step up funding of the global breeding research and development programme. In 2024, India contributed a mere $0.8 million to CIMMYT and $18.3 million to IRRI. 'We should give more, but it must be for basic and strategic research in areas such as identification of new genetic resources for heat and drought tolerance, nitrogen use efficiency traits, gene editing and use of artificial intelligence tools. And it should be collaborative, not at the expense of funding for our own national agricultural research system,' said Rajendra Singh Paroda, former director-general of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Harish Damodaran is National Rural Affairs & Agriculture Editor of The Indian Express. A journalist with over 33 years of experience in agri-business and macroeconomic policy reporting and analysis, he has previously worked with the Press Trust of India (1991-94) and The Hindu Business Line (1994-2014). ... Read More


Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
Your next lawn chair is coming from Vietnam, but it's still kind of Chinese
In May, hundreds of workers at a furniture factory here got a nice surprise. Their Chinese bosses were giving them a nearly 45% raise. Factory owner Ren Li said so many other Chinese factories were moving to Vietnam to avoid high U.S. tariffs that he needed to give his workers a big increase to keep them from getting poached. 'They just flood in," Li said of Chinese companies. 'And that will cause a tsunami." For factory owners, the economic logic is simple. Goods made in China generally face tariffs of 40% to 50% when imported into the U.S. Vietnam is a relative bargain after President Trump this month announced a new tariff rate of 20%, upholding expectations that Vietnam would get more-lenient treatment. Western buyers such as Lowe's and Hasbro have promised to cut their exposure to China. The rush to produce in Vietnam and other lower-tariff countries, far from wiping China off the map, keeps Chinese companies at the center of the export trade. Chinese businesspeople typically have the edge when it comes to building factories anywhere in the world—even in the U.S. 'They have all the technology, all the know-how," said Le Hong Hiep, a senior fellow at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute think tank. 'It will take them less time to set up factories in Vietnam than for local companies to develop their own capabilities." Outdoor furniture awaits shipment in Thai Nguyen. The factory's Chinese owner counts some of America's biggest retailers among its customers. The Hanoi airport on a recent visit was clogged with Chinese workers and managers coming to collect their visas. For Trump administration officials, that isn't exactly the desired outcome of a trade war. In trade talks, the U.S. has called on Southeast Asian nations to take a hard line on economic ties with China, including by stopping Chinese companies from setting up manufacturing and export operations in their countries. The goal is to reduce U.S. dependence on Chinese companies regardless of where they are located. But for the first half of this year, China—including Hong Kong—was responsible for more than 800 new investment projects in Vietnam, far more than any other country. Much of the investment was concentrated in manufacturing. Li is the founder of Letright Industrial, one of China's largest outdoor-furniture manufacturers with a customer list that includes Walmart and Lowe's. His factory in Thai Nguyen, near Hanoi, first opened in 2021 and today employs around 1,200 workers making lounge chairs, coffee tables and sofas. A set of six pieces can retail at American stores for around $700 to $2,000. Teams of U.S. buyers have visited recently to tour the factory and review their products. On the factory floor, laborers use laser-welding tools to construct sofa frames. Others hunch over waist-high tables, hand-weaving wicker chairs. With faux-natural materials popular in the U.S. this season, a team of workers uses brown spray paint to make metal chairs resemble wooden ones. Workers at the Vietnam facility have received training from their Chinese counterparts as production moves across the border. At the company's testing center, a machine slams a heavy weight into the seat of a finished chair more than 10,000 times, to prove its durability. Anticipating demand from U.S. clients, the company is building a second factory here a 10-minute drive away and is hiring hundreds more workers while trimming the workforce at its home base in Hangzhou, China. Teams of Chinese welders and weavers have been dispatched to train the Vietnamese. The company's ambitious goal: move 100% of U.S.-bound production to Vietnam this year, up from 30% last year. But getting work done in Vietnam is tougher than in China, and the first factory has yet to turn a profit. The intense heat and humidity of the region saps worker productivity, especially because furniture factories don't have high enough margins to use air conditioning in their high-ceilinged factories, says Li. 'The hot weather makes them very sleepy," said Li of his workers. He said they also don't have air conditioning at home, so they don't rest well during Vietnam's summers. The work culture in Vietnam is different from China. Chinese workers are known to show up at 7 a.m. in the hopes of getting started early and earning extra commissions. In Vietnam, workers tend to stick to standard hours. Employees at the Thai Nguyen complex have benefited from wage hikes as rival Chinese companies seek to ramp up hiring in the area. Luke Lu, who heads the company's North American sales, said the company's Vietnamese workers operate at a more deliberate pace when weaving wicker furniture. The company recently introduced extra pay for highly efficient workers, but Vietnamese workers remain about 30% less productive than Chinese workers, Lu said. In China, every raw material can be easily acquired. But in Vietnam, materials such as certain metal pipes used in chairs and fabrics for seat cushions need to be imported from China. When ports fill up, parts can be trucked over the Chinese border, five hours away. Trump has pledged a double tariff rate of 40% on foreign goods, including Chinese goods, transshipped through Vietnam, without specifying what counts as transshipment. Lu said some 70% of the materials that go into the company's Vietnam-made furniture are sourced locally, and it is working to find Vietnamese producers for the rest. Li said not all companies operating abroad should be considered transshippers. 'He has to separate the good people from the bad people," Li said of Trump. Overall Lu estimates that it is about 10% to 15% more expensive to produce outdoor furniture in Vietnam compared with China—which gives Vietnam the edge for U.S. exports, assuming Trump doesn't throw any more tariff curveballs. 'We already invested a lot here, and expanded production," said Lu. 'We just want things to be stable." Li said he was better off than some fellow Chinese manufacturers because he started planning the shift in Trump's first term. He recalled attending an Asia-Pacific leaders' summit in 2017 in Da Nang, Vietnam, where Trump took the stage and unleashed a fiery speech accusing China of cheating the U.S. on trade. 'Trust between the U.S. and China is getting less and less," Li said. Write to Jon Emont at