
G7 Finance Ministers Show Unity in Support of Ukraine Against Russia
Top economic policymakers from the United States and other advanced economies agreed on Thursday to continue to support Ukraine and warned Russia of additional sanctions if there was no progress on peace, demonstrating a rare show of unity despite festering tension over tariffs and trade.
Finance ministers and central bankers of the Group of 7 nations continued to blame Russia for the war in Ukraine, despite some initial resistance from the United States, and pledged to provide resources to help Kyiv sustain its economy and pay for its reconstruction. Officials also discussed tightening the price cap that they enacted on Russian oil exports as a measure to further squeeze Russia's economy.
'We condemn Russia's continued brutal war against Ukraine and commend the immense resilience from the Ukrainian people and economy,' they said in a joint statement, or communiqué. 'The G7 remains committed to unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty and independence toward a just and durable peace.'
The statement added that if a cease-fire is not reached, 'we will continue to explore all possible options, including options to maximize pressure such as further ramping up sanctions.'
The agreement on Ukraine culminated after three days of meetings in Banff, Canada, the mountain resort where officials also discussed the risks to the global economy, confronting the threat of China's excess industrial capacity and sanctions policy. The united stance on Ukraine came despite mixed signals from President Trump, who has both threatened Russia with tougher sanctions and indicated a willingness to walk away from Ukraine and open trade ties with Moscow.
The language about Russia in the statement had a softer tone compared with a year ago, when G7 finance ministers assailed Russia's 'illegal, unjustifiable, and unprovoked full-scale invasion of Ukraine.'
During the Biden administration, the U.S. led the development of a policy to use sanctions to cap the price of Russian oil at $60 per barrel. European officials put forward a proposal at the meetings to lower that to $50 per barrel, but no decisions were announced on the future of the cap.
The position on Ukraine came despite deep division among finance officials over Mr. Trump's aggressive approach to trade. The president's decision to slap tariffs on both allies and adversaries has fractured the global economy and created significant uncertainty, increasing the likelihood of a global downturn.
Still, the statement on trade was more muted, generally referencing a desire to address economic 'imbalances' without making a direct reference to concerns about the Trump tariffs.
'International organizations signaled at our last meeting that trade and economic policy uncertainty was high and weighing on global growth,' they wrote in the joint statement. 'We acknowledge that economic policy uncertainty has declined from its peak, and we will work together to achieve further progress.'
Since taking office, Mr. Trump has upended the global trading system with a blizzard of tariffs. He imposed a 10 percent universal tax on almost every trading partner, in addition to 25 percent tariffs on imported steel, aluminum, cars and car parts. He raised tariffs on China to a punishing 145 percent in April before reducing them to 30 percent this month to allow Beijing and Washington to negotiate a trade deal.
In April, Mr. Trump suggested severing economic ties with Canada, which is hosting the meetings this year, when he declared, 'We don't need anything' from America's northern neighbor. Mr. Trump has also repeatedly said that he wants to annex Canada and make it America's 51st state.
The G7 meetings were the first international summit for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who skipped a Group of 20 gathering in South Africa in February amid the Trump administration's opposition to that nation's land policy.
The finance officials raised their concerns with Mr. Bessent over the U.S. tariffs but they did not engage in direct negotiations over trade and there were no announcements of new deals.
'Definitely there will always be tension around tariffs,' said François-Philippe Champagne, the Canadian finance minister, who noted that Canada was America's biggest export market. 'It's quite normal when you meet your biggest customer, that there's a lot to discuss.'
Although the U.S. tariffs pose a major threat to the global economy, policymakers appeared to tread carefully in how they raised their displeasure in an effort to avoid provoking Mr. Trump.
'From the E.U. side, we still see, as always, tariffs creating negative economic effects for the E.U., for the U.S., for the global economy in general,' said Valdis Dombrovskis, the European commissioner responsible for the European Union's economy. 'The U.S. administration is having a somewhat different view or reading of the situation.'
Trade uncertainty from Mr. Trump's tariffs has been weighing on Europe. In its spring economic forecast, the European Commission, the trade bloc's administrative arm, said this week that it expected the gross domestic product of the 20 countries using the euro to grow just 0.9 percent in 2025, down from the 1.3 percent that had been forecast last fall.
Despite the concern over trade, G7 officials tried to emphasize on areas of agreement instead of focusing solely on flash points.
Mr. Champagne said that his meetings with Mr. Bessent were constructive and cordial.
'We get along very well together,' Mr. Champagne said during his closing news conference.
For his part, Mr. Bessent maintained a low profile at the meetings. He decided against delivering a public speech or holding a news conference, as Treasury secretaries traditionally do at such a summit.
'I had a very productive day,' Mr. Bessent said on Wednesday evening as he got into a car to join his G7 counterparts for a dinner atop Sulphur Mountain.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
20 minutes ago
- News24
Harvard scores a temporary victory in battle against Trump administration ‘vendetta'
A court on Thursday put a temporary stay on Donald Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, as the US president's battle with one of the world's most prestigious universities intensified. A proclamation issued by the White House late Wednesday sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' the order said. Harvard quickly amended an existing complaint filed in federal court, saying: 'This is not the Administration's first attempt to sever Harvard from its international students.' '(It) is part of a concerted and escalating campaign of retaliation by the government in clear retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students.' READ | 'Such a disgrace': Outrage as Trump ramps up attacks on Harvard, Columbia US District Judge Allison Burroughs on Thursday ruled the government cannot enforce Trump's proclamation. Harvard had showed, she said, that without a temporary restraining order, it risked sustaining 'immediate and irreparable injury before there is an opportunity to hear from all parties'. The same judge had already blocked Trump's earlier effort to bar international students from enrolling at the storied university. The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity'. Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who accounted for 27% of total enrolment in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. In its filing, Harvard acknowledged that Trump had the authority to bar an entire class of aliens if it was deemed to be in the public interest, but stressed that was not the case in this action. The president's actions thus are not undertaken to protect the 'interests of the United States' but instead to pursue a government vendetta against Harvard. Harvard filing Since returning to office Trump has targeted elite US universities which he and his allies accuse of being hotbeds of antisemitism, liberal bias and 'woke' ideology. Trump's education secretary also threatened on Wednesday to strip Columbia University of its accreditation. The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt. Unlike Harvard, several top institutions - including Columbia - have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
A West Virginia prosecutor is warning women that a miscarriage could lead to criminal charges
Amid a constantly changing reproductive landscape, one West Virginia prosecutor is warning people who have miscarriages in his state that they could get in trouble with the law. Raleigh County Prosecuting Attorney Tom Truman says that although he personally wouldn't prosecute someone for a miscarriage, he made the suggestion out of an abundance of caution after hearing from other prosecutors. Truman even suggests people might want to let local law enforcement know if they've have a miscarriage. Several reproductive law experts say people around the country have, indeed, faced charges related to miscarriages — but they still wouldn't recommend reaching out to law enforcement. Truman says the idea first came up during a chat with other West Virginia prosecutors at a conference several years ago, and it's been been an ongoing conversation since. The initial conversation was theoretical, since at the time, women in the US still had the constitutional right to an abortion under Roe v. Wade. But some of the prosecutors believed they could charge a person using state laws related to the disposal of human remains. 'I thought these guys were just chewing on a Dreamsicle,' Truman said. But, he added, West Virginia's legal statutes include definitions that are 'pretty broad-ranging.' The way some prosecutors may interpret the law means people who miscarry could face criminal charges, including felonies, he said. 'It's a different world now, and there's a lot of discretion that prosecutors have, and some of them have agendas where they would like to make you an example,' Truman told CNN. 'What's changed is, Roe isn't there anymore, and so that may embolden prosecutors in some cases,' he said. 'I'm just trying to say, 'be careful.' ' Early pregnancy loss is common, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, It happens in about 10 of 100 known pregnancies, often because the embryo isn't developing properly. And some reproductive law experts say it's probably not a good idea to call the police when it happens. 'It's always a mistake to invite law enforcement into your reproductive life,' said Kim Mutcherson, a professor of law at Rutgers Law School who specializes in reproductive justice. Calling police could prompt an unwanted investigation, she says. 'If they then decide, 'no, it actually wasn't a miscarriage, this was somebody who took pills,' or whatever sort of thing that they want to conjure up, then all of a sudden it goes from 'here's this poor woman who had a miscarriage' to 'here's a person who we're going to start to prosecute,' ' Mutcherson said. 'I understand the idea that caution is better than being caught up in something that you weren't anticipating, but it is difficult for me to imagine any circumstance in which I would think it was safe for someone who miscarried to call the police,' she added. Abortion is illegal in West Virginia, but there are exceptions in the case of a medical emergency or a nonviable pregnancy, or if the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest. Kulsoom Ijaz, senior policy counsel with Pregnancy Justice, a nonprofit focused on the civil and human rights of pregnant people, said she doesn't believe there is anything in West Virginia law that criminalizes miscarriage. 'I think the law is pretty clear,' she said. 'There's nothing in the law that says someone can be charged with a crime in connection to their pregnancy loss or their conduct during pregnancy, or for how they respond to that pregnancy loss or miscarriage or stillbirth.' The fractured landscape of reproductive rights that came about in the wake of the Dobbs decision, the US Supreme Court ruling that revoked the federal right to an abortion, has increased the risk that a pregnant person can face criminal prosecution for a variety of reasons, not just a miscarriage, according to a report from Ijaz's organization. Between June 2022 – when Dobbs was handed down – and June 2023, there were more than 200 cases in the US in which a pregnant person faced criminal charges for conduct associated with pregnancy, pregnancy loss or birth, according to Pregnancy Justice. The number is most likely an undercount, Ijaz said. In West Virginia, there were at least three cases related to pregnancy prosecutions. In one, the state's Supreme Court found that the state could not levy criminal child abuse charges against someone for their prenatal conduct, which included substance use during pregnancy. Even with the strict abortion ban in place, Ijaz said, 'there are still protections for pregnant people.' In states like Alabama that have fetal personhood laws that give fertilized eggs, embryos and a fetus the 'same rights as you and I,' Ijaz said, it's a little different. 'We've seen people get prosecuted and face decades of incarceration for substance use during pregnancy, because that fetus that they're carrying is seen as a child,' she said. Last year in Ohio, a woman who had a miscarriage at home was charged with a felony on the advice of the Warren City Prosecutor's Office, but a grand jury dismissed the case. Ijaz said that she doesn't think there is an appetite for these kind of cases among the public but that no matter where someone lives, inviting the law into their life right after a miscarriage is ill-advised. The legal landscape for reproductive justice 'seems to almost be changing on a daily basis' – and generally not in favorable ways for pregnant people, said Brittany Fonteno, CEO of the National Abortion Federation, a professional association for abortion providers. 'The laws, the rhetoric, the culture in which we are living in within the US has become so incredibly hostile to people who experience pregnancy,' she said. 'I think that the intersection of health care and criminalization is an incredibly dangerous path,' Fonteno added. 'As a country, we should be supporting people and their ability to access the health care that they need, rather than conducting intrusive and traumatic investigations into their reproductive lives.' Fonteno recommends that people who experience pregnancy loss reach out to a qualified medical professional rather than law enforcement. 'While we are living in a very different country than we were pre-Dobbs, I believe still that this is an individual experience and a health care decision,' she said. 'Most providers believe that as well.' Mutcherson also says that the reproductive justice landscape in the US is 'scary' for people who are pregnant, who want to get pregnant or who have bad pregnancy outcomes. If there's any silver lining to the discussion about criminalizing miscarriage, she said, it's that it's good for people to know that such things can happen. 'Women have been criminalized for their pregnancies for decades, frankly, so to the extent that there is a wider and broader conversation about what it means to treat an embryo or a fetus as a person, and the ways in which that diminishes the personhood of somebody who was pregnant, that is in fact a valuable thing, right?' Mutcherson said. 'Maybe this is actually going to bring us to a better space.'


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
American Vanguard: Q1 Earnings Snapshot
NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. — NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. — American Vanguard Corp. (AVD) on Friday reported a first-quarter loss of $8.5 million, after reporting a profit in the same period a year earlier. On a per-share basis, the Newport Beach, California-based company said it had a loss of 30 cents. Losses, adjusted for non-recurring costs, came to 24 cents per share.