
Pupils punished for incorrect uniform due to cost pressures, charity warns
Nearly two in five (38%) parents said they struggle to pay for the school uniform their child needs, according to the poll for The Children's Society.
The survey, carried out by Censuswide in June, found 42% of parents said school uniform was not more affordable this year (2024/25) compared to the previous academic year (2023/24).
It comes as the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords, includes a proposal to cap the number of branded uniform items schools in England can require.
The survey found 44% of parents said their children have faced negative outcomes for wearing the incorrect uniform, or for not having a required item, as the uniform is unaffordable.
Around one in eight (12%) said their child had received a detention for uniform breaches, while 9% had been placed in isolation, and 8% had been excluded.
The poll found 15% of parents said their child had not been able to participate in lessons and 12% were not able to participate in extracurricular activities due to incorrect uniform.
Mark Russell, chief executive at The Children's Society, said: 'Punishing children for circumstances outside their control is deeply unjust.
'Every child should be able to attend school without fear of detention, isolation, or exclusion because of uniform costs their families cannot afford.'
Nearly four in five (78%) parents believe there should be a specific limit on the number of branded uniform items that schools can require, the survey found.
New legislation proposes to cap the number of branded uniform items schools in England can require (PA)
The charity is calling on the Government to implement proposals set out in the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill to introduce a limit of three branded items of school uniform to help families.
Mr Russell added: 'At a time when many families are already struggling to afford the basics, we can't let the cost of school uniforms make life even harder for children.'
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'The experiences reflected in this survey are worrying, and demonstrate just how tough the financial position is for some families who face having to make impossible decisions.
'Most schools – in our experience – are acutely conscious of cost pressures on families and work hard to support the many children in our country who live in difficult financial circumstances.
'We support the Government's intention of limiting the cost of uniforms – though we think this would be better achieved with a monetary cap rather than specifying the number of branded items that are allowed.'
Ahead of the committee stage debate on the Bill in the House of Lords on Thursday, schoolwear retailers have repeated warnings that the proposed cap of three branded school uniform items could increase costs for families.
Matthew Easter, chairman of the Schoolwear Association, said: 'We have repeatedly tried to engage with ministers in a constructive way to warn of the risks of this policy backfiring – harming the very families it's meant to help, and putting small community businesses and local jobs at risk.
'A blunt, one-size-fits-all cap will only drive-up costs and reduce access to essential support.'
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'School uniforms can create a sense of community and belonging for children but they shouldn't cost the earth.
'Through our Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill we are capping the number of costly branded uniform items – putting money back into the pockets of working families as part of our Plan for Change.
'Whilst it might upset those who profit from branded items, it's clear from the Children's Society research that we have the backing of parents. It means schools can continue to benefit from a cohesive uniform, while parents can shop where suits their budget.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
15 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'

ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The public is sick of the Government's failure to tackle illegal migration
SIR – The Home Office is said to be furious that migrants can no longer be housed at the Bell Hotel in Eppi ng (report, August 20), after the council was granted a temporary injunction by the High Court. This fury is hardly surprising, as it means that the Home Office will have to come up with an idea to stop the boats that actually works. At the very least, it will have to speed up deportation proceedings. This will probably be a complete and utter surprise to the Government, but the British public is heartily sick of its inertia and reluctance to stop illegal immigration. Charles Penfold Ulverston, Cumbria SIR – Local councillors are acting in the interests of the people they represent and in the na tional interest ('Other councils expected to submit their own legal challenges ', report, August 20). Government ministers should try it. Gary F S Knight Colchester, Essex SIR – Not taking effective action, with or without good reason, seems to be the stock in trade of the Home Office. In July, you reported on the progress of a dinghy escorted by the French Navy to the point in mid-Channel where our Border Force 'taxi' was waiting. The French even demanded the return of the life jackets loaned to the illegal migrants, so that they might be reused. If the Home Office has a policy, it is clearly not 'to smash' these gangs. Wilfred Attenborough Lincoln SIR – With 50,000 illegal migrants needing to be accommodated somewhere in the UK, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, must now be back at square one. She might look at sites like RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire, which was decked out at great expense under the Tories and then closed before housing anyone. Put simply, the 'one in, one out' scheme doesn't reduce the numbers coming to our shores. This Government, already short of ideas, has run out of road. Immediate deportation of illegal migrants back to the country they first arrived at is now the only option. Jonathan Williams Pickworth, Lincolnshire SIR – Last Sunday, hundreds of citizens gathered in Ashington, Northumberland, to protest against housing illegal immigrants in the area. In a statement posted on Facebook, Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, admitted that public services are crumbling, and ended by saying: 'But let's be clear: the people responsible for this decline are not those fleeing war or persecution. They are not the vulnerable seeking sanctuary.' Would that be sanctuary from war-torn France, perhaps? Ian Burns Storrington, West Sussex