logo
Poll suggests GOP budget bill faces nearly 2-to-1 opposition, with many unaware

Poll suggests GOP budget bill faces nearly 2-to-1 opposition, with many unaware

Boston Globe11 hours ago

Advertisement
Since the House's passage of its version of the bill, Senate Republicans have scrambled to emphasize the legislation's economic benefits to voters and pass their version by Trump's deadline of July 4. But most people are not very aware of the legislation, and among those who have heard about the bill, it is unpopular. About two-thirds of the public say they have heard either little or nothing about the bill. Those who have heard a great deal or a good amount about it oppose it by a roughly 2-to-1 margin, 64 percent to 33 percent, with nearly half strongly in opposition.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Opinions on specific aspects of the bill — which includes tax cuts, increased spending on border security, cuts to social safety net programs such as Medicaid, and rollbacks on spending to curb climate change — however, are nuanced, ranging from very popular to very unpopular.
Advertisement
A clear majority of Americans support increasing the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,500 (72 percent) and 65 percent support eliminating taxes on earnings from tips. But 66 percent of Americans broadly oppose cutting federal funding for food assistance to low-income households compared with 23 percent who support this, while 61 percent oppose spending $45 billion on migrant detention centers compared with 24 percent.
About 51 percent oppose ending tax breaks for producing solar, wind, and geothermal energy compared with 31 percent who support it; and 52 percent are against spending roughly $50 billion to complete a wall on the US-Mexico border compared with 36 percent in favor. Other recent polls have found higher support for a border wall when the question was asked without a price tag.
Among the most divisive components of the House-passed package are the size and scope of
cuts to entitlement programs. To deliver on some of Trump's pricey initiatives, the Republican bill plans to significantly cut spending on Medicaid as well as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and other safety net initiatives.
Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Josh Hawley of Missouri have raised alarms about far-reaching changes to Medicaid and its impact on rural health care facilities in their states.
The Post-Ipsos poll finds most Americans agree on new work requirements, with 52 percent saying they support requiring low-income childless adults to prove they are working or disabled to get health insurance through Medicaid, compared with 33 percent who oppose. But Americans are less comfortable with the prospect of people losing coverage under tighter eligibility rules: 44 percent say it's unacceptable for about 8 million people to lose health insurance as a result of these requirements as well as more frequent eligibility verification and state restrictions, while 32 percent say this is acceptable. When the new requirements are not specified, 63 percent say it's unacceptable for 8 million people to lose Medicaid coverage.
Advertisement
The weak acceptability when loss of coverage is mentioned signals an uphill messaging battle for GOP senators, as nonpartisan analyses of the bill show that some parts, such as cuts to Medicaid and food stamps, would harm low-income households financially more than the tax cuts would boost their finances.
Opinions on extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts are mixed. A 71 percent majority supports extending tax cuts for individuals with incomes under $100,000, as do 53 percent when asked about individuals with incomes between $100,000 and $200,000. But support drops to 29 percent for extending tax cuts for individuals with income above $400,000 and to 30 percent for corporations.
Nearly 7 in 10 Americans, including similar majorities of Democrats and Republicans, support raising taxes on individuals making $2.5 million or more, an idea that Trump pitched in May but that House Republicans left out of the bill.
Republican leadership, including House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana and Senate majority leader John Thune of South Dakota, maintains that Trump's legislation would reduce the national debt, but that budget math has yet to add up — as some fiscal hawks have pointed out.
According to analyses from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which the GOP has disputed and sought to frame as partisan and inaccurate, the bill is estimated to add $3 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years. A 63 percent majority of the public says that increase is unacceptable, while 13 percent say it is acceptable, and 24 percent are unsure. Many Republicans balk at the debt increase: 47 percent say a $3 trillion debt increase is unacceptable, while 25 say it is acceptable.
Advertisement
The bill has a narrow path to passage in the upper chamber, but
Trump and Thune have repeatedly reiterated that 'failure is not an option.'
The Post-Ipsos poll was conducted online June 6-10 among 1,167 US adults. The sample was drawn through the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, an ongoing panel of US households recruited by mail using random sampling methods. Overall results have a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Louisiana will likely limit eminent domain for CO2 pipelines
Louisiana will likely limit eminent domain for CO2 pipelines

E&E News

time21 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Louisiana will likely limit eminent domain for CO2 pipelines

Louisiana lawmakers last week approved new limits on carbon capture projects seizing private property, defying the oil sector in a long-simmering fight that has divided Republicans historically aligned with the oil and gas industry. Under S.B. 244 — an omnibus of natural resources policies that Republican Gov. Jeff Landry is expected to sign — builders of pipelines to carry carbon dioxide for storage could use eminent domain powers only if their project is registered as a 'common carrier' serving the public. In most circumstances, the restriction would bar the use of eminent domain for carbon pipelines serving only a single company. The bill would remove language in Louisiana law that recognizes greenhouse gas sequestration as a public benefit, another move aimed at limiting developers' power to build across private lands over owners' objections. Bill supporters say it would leave the question of public benefits to judges presiding over expropriation cases. Advertisement The bill also would make it more difficult to seize land for underground carbon storage. Under current state law, a developer must obtain the rights to lease 75 percent of a storage project's acreage before it can force the use of the rest. The bill would raise the threshold to 85 percent.

Members clash over increasing their own security
Members clash over increasing their own security

Politico

time24 minutes ago

  • Politico

Members clash over increasing their own security

Presented by Programming note: We'll be off tomorrow but back in your inboxes on Friday. IN TODAY'S EDITION:— Lawmakers debate personal safety resources— Thune's slippery megabill timeline— GOP holds first hearing on Biden's decline Lawmakers confronting a rise in political violence are grappling over whether to use more tax dollars for their own protection, even as Republicans search for deep cuts across the federal government. That question will be tested next week, when the House Legislative Branch appropriations bill funding the operations of Capitol Hill gets marked up, Katherine and Nicholas Wu report. Top congressional Democrats are pushing for more money for both Capitol Police and for a program that provides funding for lawmakers' personal security after the weekend shootings of state lawmakers in Minnesota. Some Republicans are also calling for a funding boost. Only a select few leaders in each chamber have 24/7 security, while rank-and-file members have little day-to-day protection unless they've been deemed to be under an active threat. Some members, like Rep. Tim Burchett, want more widespread coverage. There's one problem: Some lawmakers have been reticent to take advantage of the resources that are already on offer. They can use official office funds to buy security equipment and take advantage of a program providing security upgrades for lawmakers' primary residences. Capitol Police also offer to coordinate some in-district events with state and local police departments. But while more than half of House lawmakers last year participated in the home security program, hundreds of thousands of dollars in security resources were left unspent, with those not enrolled citing either lack of interest or a feeling that the paperwork and approval process was too burdensome, according to two people familiar with the initiative. Others are simply wary of additional safety measures that would restrict their freedom of movement and interactions with the public (not to mention intrude on family life). 'I don't want to have security on me. I'm a very private person. I like to go outside and be by myself,' said Sen. Markwayne Mullin, who chairs the Appropriations subcommittee that funds Capitol Police. Even so, the Capitol security budget could grow to new heights. The USCP budget request for fiscal 2026 is $967.8 million — a 22 percent boost over current levels. With lawmakers now calling for even beefier security post-Minnesota, the budget for the relatively small force could soon top $1 billion. GOOD WEDNESDAY MORNING. Are you the one who deleted the 'Hilltern Barstool' Instagram account that followed a bunch of House Democrats and Melania Trump? Email us, we have even more questions: ktullymcmanus@ mmccarthy@ lkashinsky@ and crazor@ Follow our live coverage at the Inside Congress blog at THE SKED The House is out. The Senate is in session and will vote to end debate on Rodney Scott's nomination to be commissioner of Customs and Border Protection and on the confirmation of Olivia Trusty to be a member of the FCC at noon. The Senate will vote on Scott's confirmation at 1:45 p.m. — Armed Services will have a hearing on the president's fiscal 2026 budget request for the Defense Department with testimony from Secretary Pete Hegseth at 9:30 a.m. — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer will have a news conference on the tax portion of the GOP megabill at 10 a.m. — Judiciary will have a hearing on the 'Biden cover-up' with testimony from former Trump press secretary Sean Spicer at 10:15 a.m. — Foreign Relations will vote on various nominations, including Andrew Puzder to be ambassador to the EU and Howard Brodie to be ambassador to Finland, then have a hearing on the 2025 NATO Summit at 10:30 a.m. — Commerce will have a subcommittee hearing on modernizing America's railroad network with testimony from Association of American Railroads President and CEO Ian Jefferies at 10 a.m. — Energy and Natural Resources will have a hearing on the president's fiscal 2026 budget request for the Energy Department with testimony from Secretary Chris Wright at 10 a.m. — HELP will have a hearing on various nominations, including former Rep. Anthony D'Esposito to be inspector general for the Labor Department and Andrea Lucas to be an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission member at 10 a.m. — Appropriations will have a subcommittee hearing on the president's fiscal 2026 budget request for the Army, with testimony from Secretary Daniel Driscoll at 10:30 a.m. — Intel will have a closed door hearing at 2:30 p.m. The rest of the week: The Senate and House are out of session and will return Monday. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Thune's slippery megabill timeline Rank-and-file Republican senators' revolt over GOP leaders' megabill changes is threatening to derail Senate Majority Leader John Thune's goal to pass it next week, Benjamin Guggenheim and Jordain Carney report. Even as the White House pushes to get the bill to Trump's desk by Independence Day, Vice President JD Vance told Senate Republicans Tuesday the ultimate deadline to get it to Trump's desk is the August recess. If all goes well, Republicans would quickly wrap up parliamentarian work this week and have a draft of the full bill by Monday. GOP senators and aides are tentatively preparing for an initial procedural vote next Wednesday or Thursday, which would set up final passage that weekend. But that depends on leaders striking deals on key policy disputes; Sen. Ron Johnson predicted if the bill is brought to the floor next week in its current state, 'it will fail.' Chief among the disputes: Hospital executives are joining 'Medicaid moderates' in digging in against Senate Finance's proposed overhaul of the health care program, even as Trump dispatched Vance and CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz to the Hill Tuesday to allay senators' concerns. Oz argued that lowering the cap on state provider taxes — which the House wants to freeze and the Senate wants to reduce to 3.5 percent from 6 percent — won't 'influence the ability of hospitals to stay viable.' Thune backed him up, casting the Senate's proposed Medicaid changes as 'important reforms.' But Sen. Josh Hawley, who's alarmed about the potential impact to rural hospitals, isn't backing down. He spoke with Trump about the Medicaid changes Tuesday and skipped GOP senators' lunch with Vance and Oz, dismissing the latter as 'not a decision-maker.' Vance met Monday with another senator with Medicaid concerns, Susan Collins, though they both declined to share details of the chat. Another problem for Thune: Several GOP senators are seeking to further soften Finance's proposed rollback of clean energy credits, aiming to give more time for hydrogen and solar power to qualify for the federal incentives in Democrats' 2022 climate law, our Josh Siegel and Kelsey Tamborrino report. Sens. Shelley Moore Capito, Jim Justice and Bill Cassidy expressed surprise Tuesday about the committee's harsh treatment of the hydrogen credit. Johnson confronts dueling Iran resolutions Dueling bipartisan resolutions over the worsening Israel-Iran conflict are giving Speaker Mike Johnson some wiggle room on a politically thorny issue. Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna introduced a privileged war powers resolution that would block U.S. involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran. But Reps. Brad Sherman and Claudia Tenney introduced a competing resolution Tuesday that would reaffirm U.S. support for Israel's strikes. Sherman and Tenney's resolution gives Johnson an alternative to Khanna and Massie's attempt to force a vote on Trump's war powers. Republican leaders could also move to short-circuit Khanna and Massie's effort in House Rules, as they did with Democratic efforts to reverse Trump's global tariffs. Meanwhile, in the Senate, Tim Kaine is looking to force a floor vote on his own privileged resolution barring U.S. involvement in Iran as soon as June 25, he told our Joe Gould. Asked Tuesday whether he supports it, Schumer hedged: 'I believe Congress and Senate Democrats, if necessary, will not hesitate to exercise our authority.' But Sen. John Fetterman, a staunch Israel supporter, said he'd oppose it outright. Kaine is still looking for Republican support. One prospect, Sen. Rand Paul, was noncommittal Tuesday. Hawley, a non-interventionist who discussed the conflict with Trump on Tuesday, said he won't back Kaine's resolution because 'I don't think the president needs pre-clearance to do one-off military strikes.' POLICY RUNDOWN FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: PAYGO FLY A KITE — Democrats in both chambers have issued warnings about automatic cuts to Medicare as part of their messaging fight against Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill.' Now Senate Republicans are pushing back. A new letter from CBO Director Phillip Swagel sent Tuesday in response to questions from Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham casts doubts on whether the megabill would actually trigger 'sequestration' under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act. 'Since enactment in 2010, sequestration has not been triggered under S-PAYGO,' Swagel wrote in the letter obtained by POLITICO. S-PAYGO was meant to impose budget discipline, but Congress has never let cuts under the law go into effect — usually by using creative math to exclude the deficit effects from the 'scorecard' or simply acting to exclude or delay the effects. Neither the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (passed by Republicans) nor 2021 American Rescue Plan (passed by Democrats) resulted in automatic cuts despite large increases in the federal deficit. CRYPTO HEADS TO THE HOUSE — The Senate passed landmark cryptocurrency legislation in a bipartisan vote Tuesday after months of negotiations, delivering a major win for Trump and industry lobbyists, our Jasper Goodman reports. But the bill that would establish the first U.S. regulatory framework for stablecoins faces an uncertain fate in the House, where Republicans are weighing changes and considering packaging it with a broader measure to divvy up regulation of digital assets between market regulators. That could be more difficult to advance in the Senate due to its complexity. Democrats who battled the stablecoin bill in the Senate aren't dropping their resistance. They believe the legislation doesn't do enough to safeguard national security, protect consumers or crack down on Trump and his family's conflicts of interest with the industry. Sen. Elizabeth Warren told Lisa it's 'likely there will be significant changes' in the House so 'this is just step one in a long process.' SENATORS DIG IN ON RESCISSIONS — Republicans will hold a hearing next Wednesday on the White House's rescissions package, our Jennifer Scholtes reports. Collins, the Senate's top appropriator, told Jennifer she wants 'an in-depth hearing so that everybody knows exactly what is proposed and what the justification is.' OMB Director Russ Vought will testify, our Sophia Cai reports. The package — which asks Congress to rescind over $9 billion in previously appropriated money — narrowly passed the House last week. But senators have raised concerns about clawing back money for public media and specific foreign aid programs such as PEPFAR (a core issue for Collins). Sen. Mike Rounds told Calen Tuesday he wants to 'handle the public radio issues on our Native American reservations' and 'see what we can do to retain PEPFAR.' Sen. Dan Sullivan said he's considering an amendment 'that could help very rural stations without funding the left-wing NPR content.' Collins is deferring to GOP leadership on a markup. Congress has until July 18 to act on the rescissions request or the appropriated money goes out the door. REPUBLICANS PROBE BIDEN 'COVER-UP' — Congressional Republicans will hold their first hearing today on President Joe Biden's mental decline, our Hailey Fuchs writes in. No Biden associates will appear before the panel co-chaired by Sens. Eric Schmitt and John Cornyn. Instead, the hearing will include testimony from former Trump administration officials — including former press secretary Sean Spicer, who was there during the chaotic launch of Trump's first administration, and former deputy assistant to the president Theo Wold. The committee's top Democrat, Sen. Dick Durbin, plans to give an opening statement and immediately leave the hearing, a spokesperson said. Sens. Adam Schiff and Peter Welch told Calen Tuesday that they'd follow Durbin's lead. THE MEGABILL'S SURPRISING DYNAMIC SCORE — The House-passed GOP megabill would add $2.8 trillion to the U.S. deficit over a decade when considering economic effects, the Congressional Budget Office estimated on Tuesday, Jennifer reports. That's a surprise: Usually the 'dynamic' score for tax-cutting bills shows a lower fiscal impact due to the resulting growth. But this score came in higher than the $2.4 trillion increase the nonpartisan scorekeeper found in its prior analysis, thanks to higher interest rates spiking debt service costs. Needless to say, this is complicating GOP efforts to play down the costs of the bill. FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: DEM AGS ON THE HILL — Four Democratic attorneys general will testify to congressional Democrats on Monday about their litigation against the Trump administration in a so-called shadow hearing, Hailey writes in. It's the latest effort to elevate the party's efforts to thwart Trump's agenda in Washington, as the Democratic base demands a more aggressive confrontation with the White House. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Andrea Campbell of Massachusetts, Kwame Raoul of Illinois and Matthew J. Platkin of New Jersey will testify. Ellison is expected to speak about the political violence in his state after the shooting of two Minnesota state lawmakers and their spouses. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: THE BEST OF THE REST Democrats Preview a New Attack: Trump's Pardons Are Majorly Expensive, from Riley Rogerson at NOTUS 'A Direct Attack on Women': Lawmakers Demand Labor Secretary Preserve the Women's Bureau, from Julianne McShane at Mother Jones CAPITOL HILL INFLUENCE Michael Marn is now a senior manager for federal affairs at the Computer and Communications Industry Association. He was previously a legislative assistant to Sen. Marsha Blackburn and a policy analyst for Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck. SPOTTED — Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman was in the Senate basement on Wednesday, Hailey writes in. The billionaire and GOP megadonor was a confidant to Trump during his first term and supported his 2024 presidential bid — after condemning the Capitol riot and calling for a peaceful transfer of power in 2021. GOP GROUP DEFENDS IRA INCENTIVES — Built for America is pouring another $1.5 million into ads urging six Republican senators — Todd Young, Dave McCormick, Thom Tillis, Jerry Moran, John Cornyn and Finance Chair Mike Crapo — to preserve green credits under Democrats' 2022 climate law, POLITICO influence reports. The ads build on the group's initial $2 million buy targeting the president and his inner circle over Republicans' push to gut the incentives. JOB BOARD Lexi Hamel has been promoted to senior adviser for Rep. Mike Simpson. She continues as his comms director. Grace Evans has been promoted to be comms director for Sen. Katie Britt. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Reps. Andy Ogles, Jenn Kiggans and Paul Tonko … former Rep. Jerry McNerney … former Sens. Jay Rockefeller and Mike Johanns … David Drucker … CNN's DJ Judd … Robert O'Brien … Axios' Nick Johnston … House's Kate Knudson … Will Kinzel … Narric Rome … Daniel Epstein … POLITICO's Isabel Delgado and Amber Ebersohl … Hattie Hobart of Nature Is Nonpartisan … Dina Powell McCormick … SKDK's Ajashu Thomas TRIVIA TUESDAY'S ANSWER: Joe Bookman correctly answered that John F. Kennedy was the first presidential candidate to appear on late night television when he joined Jack Paar's Tonight show. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Mia: This past Sunday was Father's Day. Name the former member of Congress who is the only person to have been both the son and the father of a U.S. president. The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@

‘The reality we live in:' Lawmakers consider what they'd sacrifice for safety
‘The reality we live in:' Lawmakers consider what they'd sacrifice for safety

Politico

time28 minutes ago

  • Politico

‘The reality we live in:' Lawmakers consider what they'd sacrifice for safety

Congressional lawmakers are once again grappling with the reality of persistent and escalating political violence — and facing a dilemma about whether to pour more tax dollars into their own protection. On the Capitol grounds, they're surrounded by layers of security and a police force that was dramatically overhauled after the riots of Jan. 6, 2021. But back home in their districts, members of the House and Senate are feeling increasingly exposed following the shootings in Minnesota that killed a state representative and her husband; wounded a state senator and his wife; and revealed a list of other elected officials who might have been harmed had the suspect not first been apprehended. It all has predictably rattled both Democrats and Republicans in Washington, many of whom responded by making new demands for more money and resources for security. A bipartisan Senate duo of Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Dave McCormick (R-Pa.) made the case for additional lawmaker security funding at a Tuesday morning briefing with the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and U.S. Capitol Police, according to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. Across the Capitol, House Democrats held a briefing Tuesday afternoon to hear from law enforcement officials and get walked through available resources, according to three people familiar with the discussion. And Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee sent a letter to the House Administration Committee calling for an expansion of what House members are allowed to spend on security expenses, including on 'around the clock' security personnel instead of only during 'official conduct and representational duties' — restrictions he called 'inadequate.' Recent events have also prompted fresh questions about what can be done and how much money is actually necessary to alleviate the risks that come with being a public figure. The answer is enormously complicated. Ultimately, lawmakers are divided over welcoming — and paying for — the kinds of additional safety precautions that would inevitably restrict their freedom of movement, limit their interactions with regular people and intrude on their family life. Unlike the senior most leaders who have 24/7 security details, rank-and-file members are typically left to their own devices unless they are deemed to be under active threat by Capitol Police. 'I feel like the law enforcement — they're doing their best to protect us. I try to make good, common-sense decisions,' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said after his chamber's Tuesday morning security briefing. 'But you just can't get locked down. You just got to press on.' 'I don't want to have security on me. I'm a very private person. I like to go outside and be by myself,' added Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), who chairs the Senate appropriations subcommittee that funds Capitol Police. Consider two programs the House and Senate Sergeants-at-Arms and the Capitol Police have spent years trying to promote to members: one for security updates at lawmakers' primary residences and another to coordinate local and Capitol Police resources for in-district events. So far, Capitol Police have mutual aid agreements with more than 100 state and local police departments around the country to do this type of work, according to former chief Thomas Manger, who departed last month. But that's still just a fraction of what would be needed for every member to have access to seamless security coverage in their home state or district, with local departments reimbursed by the agency. More than half of all House lawmakers last year took advantage of the home security program, but those who didn't enroll cited either a lack of interest or a feeling that the paperwork and approval process were too burdensome, according to two people familiar with the administration of the initiative, granted anonymity to speak candidly about it. That left hundreds of thousands of dollars in the House Sergeants-at-Arms budget unspent. The extent to which recent events might be changing lawmakers' thinking will be tested next week, when the House Legislative Branch appropriations subcommittee is scheduled to meet to consider its bill to fund the operations of Capitol Hill. In a spending cycle where Republicans in both chambers are looking for deep cuts, lawmakers will have to decide if their own security is worthy of further investment — and what that security might look like. Manger, in his final budget proposal to House and Senate appropriators, asked for an allocation of $967.8 million for fiscal 2026, a 22 percent boost over the current funding level which was set in fiscal 2024. The Capitol Police budget has already increased more than 70 percent since Jan. 6. And with some lawmakers calling this week for even more resources for member security, the budget for the relatively small force could top $1 billion for the first time this year or next. Top House Democrats, for instance, have asked Speaker Mike Johnson to boost funding for security through what's known as the Member Representation Allowance, which each House member receives to fund basic office expenses including payroll. Increasing the MRA would allow lawmakers to increase security capabilities without taking away money that pays staff salaries. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said he supports additional resources for member security but stressed that it must be implemented in a way that is 'unobtrusive and non-interfering' with lawmakers' work. 'I have no intention of changing the way I live or do my job, because accessibility is part of who I am as a public official,' Blumenthal continued. 'But I understand how people are scared.' Capitol Police have poured significant financial resources over the last four years into overhauling their intelligence operations and expanding the assessment teams that handle the growing threats against lawmakers. Blumenthal said he wants those capabilities further ramped up, saying right now serious threats are too often 'discounted as a prank or a joke.' Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) made a similar case, arguing there would be value in having more tools to identify individuals who are 'going beyond the normal bickering that you find on social media, getting to the point where they appear to be more dangerous or making actual accusations or threats to individuals that they might at some point act on in the future.' Reps. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) and Joe Morelle (D-N.Y.), the chair and ranking member of the House Administration Committee, on Tuesday wrote to the Justice Department requesting that an assistant U.S. attorney or a special assistant U.S. attorney be assigned 'to each of the 94 federal districts to, at least on a part-time basis, investigate and prosecute threats against Members of Congress.' Some lawmakers also continue to push for increased security and Capitol Police protection at their homes in the aftermath of the attackon then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband at their San Francisco residence in Oct. 2022. Capitol Police have tried to build strong working relationships with local departments to counter threats, swatting attempts and problems at town halls or other events — hoping that local law enforcement can help fill the gaps in protection faced by members of Congress when they're back home. The force opened several satellite offices in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 riots, too, in part to respond to increased threats to lawmakers outside of Washington. The department reported more than 9,400 threats against members in 2024, and a good number of those were deemed credible enough to require temporary protective details for rank-and-file lawmakers who otherwise would not be entitled to them. In a statement, a Capitol Police spokesperson said the force would keep doing its work: 'We continue to closely coordinate with the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms to enhance security for Members of Congress. Their partnerships, along with assistance from local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies across the country, are extremely important to keep everyone safe. 'For safety and security reasons, we will not discuss those details,' the spokesperson said, 'but we will continue to focus on continuing intelligence sharing with our partners and providing proactive enhancements.' But Manger lamented in an interview days before his retirement that, 'We're always robbing Peter to pay Paul to put that together,' referring to the need to urgently assemble Capitol Police details for members under threat. Mullin conceded that no matter what choices lawmakers make, worries of political violence will continue to be a way of life. 'I operate right now with a tremendous amount of death threats on us. I mean, if you go to my house, I have bulletproof glass on the bottom part of my house. … We have cameras everywhere. We have security dogs,' said Mullin. 'It is, unfortunately, the reality we live in.' Lisa Kashinsky contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store