logo
Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk

Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, a Texas Democrat who represents a slice of the Rio Grande Valley along the border with Mexico, won his last congressional election by just over 5,000 votes.
That makes him a tempting target for Republicans, who are poised to redraw the state's congressional maps this coming week and devise five new winnable seats for the GOP that would help the party avoid losing House control in the 2026 elections. Adjusting the lines of Gonzalez's district to bring in a few thousand more Republican voters, while shifting some Democratic ones out, could flip his seat.
Gonzalez said he is not worried. Those Democratic voters will have to end up in one of the Republican districts that flank Gonzalez's current one, making those districts more competitive — possibly enough so it could flip the seats to Democrats.
'Get ready for some pickup opportunities,' Gonzalez said, adding that his party is already recruiting challengers to Republicans whose districts they expect to be destabilized by the process. 'We're talking to some veterans, we're talking to some former law enforcement.'
Texas has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after Democrat Sylvester Turner, a former Houston mayor, died in March.
Gonzalez's district — and what happens to the neighboring GOP-held ones — is at the crux of President Donald Trump's high-risk, high-reward push to get Texas Republicans to redraw their political map. Trump is seeking to avoid the traditional midterm letdown that most incumbent presidents endure and hold onto the House, which the GOP narrowly controls.
Trump's push comes as there are numerous political danger signs for his presidency, both in the recent turmoil over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and in new polling. Surveys from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research show most U.S. adults think his policies have not helped them and that his tax cut and spending bill will help the wealthy.
Republicans risk putting their own seats in jeopardy
The fear of accidentally creating unsafe seats is one reason Texas Republicans drew their lines cautiously in 2021, when the constitutionally mandated redistricting process kicked off in all 50 states. Mapmakers — in most states, it's the party that controls the legislature — must adjust congressional and state legislative lines after every 10-year census to ensure that districts have about the same number of residents.
That is a golden opportunity for one party to rig the map against the other, a tactic known as gerrymandering. But there is a term, too, for so aggressively redrawing a map that it puts that party's own seats at risk: a 'dummymander.'
The Texas GOP knows the risk. In the 2010s, the Republican-controlled Legislature drew political lines that helped pad the GOP's House majority. That lasted until 2018, when a backlash against Trump in his first term led Democrats to flip two seats in Texas that Republicans had thought safe.
In 2021, with Republicans still comfortably in charge of the Texas Statehouse, the party was cautious, opting for a map that mainly shored up their incumbents rather than targeted Democrats.
Still, plenty of Republicans believe their Texas counterparts can safely go on offense.
'Smart map-drawing can yield pickup opportunities while not putting our incumbents in jeopardy,' said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust, which helps coordinate mapmaking for the party nationally..
Democrats contemplate a walkout
Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature, which starts Monday, to comply with Trump's request to redraw the congressional maps and to address the flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people this month.
Democratic state lawmakers are talking about staying away from the Capitol to deny the Legislature the minimum number needed to convene. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton posted that any Democrats who did that should be arrested.
Lawmakers can be fined up to $500 a day for breaking a quorum after the House changed its rules when Democrats initiated a walkout in 2021. Despite the new penalties, state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, who led the walkout in 2021, left open the possibility of another.
'I don't think anybody should underestimate the will of Texas Democrats,' he said.
Texas is not the only Republican state engaged in mid-decade redistricting. After staving off a ballot measure to expand the power of a mapmaking commission last election, Ohio Republicans hope to redraw their congressional map from a 10-5 one favoring the GOP to one as lopsided as 13-2, in a state Trump won last year with 55% of the vote.
GOP sees momentum after 2024 presidential election
Democrats have fewer options. More of the states the party controls do not allow elected partisans to draw maps and entrust independent commissions to draw fair lines.
Some party leaders, such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, are maneuvering to try to find ways around their commissions to counter Texas, but they have few options.
The few Democrat-controlled states that do allow elected officials to draw the lines, such as Illinois, have already seen Democrats max out their advantages.
Trump and his allies have been rallying Texas Republicans to ignore whatever fears they may and to go big.
On Tuesday, the president posted on his social media site a reminder of his record in the state last November: 'Won by one and a half million Votes, and almost 14%. Also, won all of the Border Counties along Mexico, something which has never happened before. I keep hearing about Texas 'going Blue,' but it is just another Democrat LIE.'
Texas has long been eyed as a state trending Democratic because of its growing nonwhite population. But those communities swung right last year and helped Trump expand his margin to 14 percentage points, a significant improvement on his 6-point win in 2020.
Michael Li, a Texas native and longtime watcher of the state at the Brennan Center for Justice in New York, said there's no way to know whether that trend will continue in next year's elections or whether the state will return to its blue-trending ways.
'Anyone who can tell you what the politics of Texas looks like for the balance of the decade has a better crystal ball than I do,' Li said.
Aggressive redistricting also carries legal risks
One region of the state where Republican gains have been steady is the Rio Grande Valley, which runs from the Gulf of Mexico along much of the state's southern border. The heavily Hispanic region, where many Border Patrol officers live, has rallied around Trump's tough-on-immigration, populist message.
As a result, Gonzalez and the area's other Democratic congressman, Henry Cuellar, have seen their reelection campaigns get steadily tighter. They are widely speculated to be the two top targets of the new map.
The GOP is expected to look to the state's three biggest cities to find its other Democratic targets. If mapmakers scatter Democratic voters from districts in the Houston, Dallas and Austin areas, they could get to five additional seats.
But in doing so, Republicans face a legal risk on top of their electoral one: that they break up districts required by the Voting Rights Act to have a critical amount of certain minority groups. The goal of the federal law is to enable those communities to elect representatives of their choosing.
The Texas GOP already is facing a lawsuit from civil rights groups alleging its initial 2021 map did this. If this year's redistricting is too aggressive, it could trigger a second complaint.
'It's politically and legally risky,' Li said of the redistricting strategy. 'It's throwing caution to the winds.'
___
Riccardi reported from Denver.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DNC targets Republicans with ads calling for Epstein files' release
DNC targets Republicans with ads calling for Epstein files' release

The Hill

time2 minutes ago

  • The Hill

DNC targets Republicans with ads calling for Epstein files' release

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is launching digital ads targeting a dozen Republican-held House districts, calling for the release of files related to financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. One ad features Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) calling the controversy a 'serious issue' and saying that the highest volume of calls to her office have concerned the Epstein files, while another calls out the House GOP with the caption 'House Republicans shut down Congress to bury the truth.' A clip of President Trump standing next to Epstein plays in the background of the latter. Both ads tell viewers to call their representatives and demand that the Epstein files are released. Momentum had been building among Democrats and some Republicans for Congress to vote to force the Trump administration to release the documents related to the case. But House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) announced the body would start its summer recess a day early as Democrats sought to force votes in the Rules Committee to release the files, dividing Republicans. Democrats have sought to use the lingering controversy as a way to go on offense against Trump and the Republican Party, accusing them of protecting pedophiles. The topic of the Epstein files has received significant national attention for a few weeks since the Justice Department memo stating the Epstein didn't have a 'client list,' as has been alleged, and that the department wouldn't release additional documents to protect alleged victims. Trump has expressed frustration at the continued focus on Epstein and called for people to move on, but The Wall Street Journal report that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump that his name appears in the files added a new dimension to the controversy. Being named in the files is not itself an indication of any wrongdoing. Democrats have sought to use the opportunity to go on attack and keep attention on the story. 'Democrats are going to continue to hold the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress accountable for their failure to release the Epstein files and the cover-up that we are witnessing in real time,' said Tim Hogan, the DNC's senior adviser for messaging, mobilization and strategy. 'The American people deserve full transparency, and Donald Trump and his sycophantic enablers are twisting themselves in knots trying to distort the truth.'

These are the names that were reportedly in Epstein's birthday book
These are the names that were reportedly in Epstein's birthday book

Axios

time2 minutes ago

  • Axios

These are the names that were reportedly in Epstein's birthday book

The Trump administration is pushing back on more media reports on his inclusion in a leather-bound album celebrating disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday. The big picture: President Trump is suing the Wall Street Journal and owner Rupert Murdoch, challenging a report about a "bawdy" birthday letter bearing Trump's name in the book that Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly collated in 2003. Now, the WSJ has published a report naming other public figures it says were in the book. Separately, the NYT reported on a signed message—"To Jeff — You are the greatest!" signed "Donald" and dated "Oct '97"—inscribed in Epstein's copy of the book "Trump: The Art of the Comeback." For the record: Steven Cheung, a White House spokesperson, told the NYT, "This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the WSJ, "The Wall Street Journal is writing yet another defamatory story about the President of the United States about an alleged letter they don't even have because the President never wrote it." Driving the news: The WSJ's latest report focuses on other figures it alleges contributed to the birthday book that a lawyer representing some of Epstein's victims told MSNBC was part of his estate. New WSJ birthday book allegations A note in Epstein's 2003 birthday book — which the WSJ reports was written in former President Clinton's "distinctive scrawl" — could allegedly be seen in this passage: "It's reassuring isn't it, to have lasted as long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and [illegible word], and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends." The former president's spokesperson Angel Ureña referred Axios to a statement he gave a month before Epstein was found dead in his New York cell after being charged in 2019 with the sex trafficking of minors. The statement said Clinton had not spoken with the disgraced financier "in well over a decade." Trump's and Clinton's names allegedly appeared in the "friends" category of the book, along with other notable names while others appeared in categories such as "Science," "Brooklyn" and "Family." Wall Street billionaire Leon Black's name also appears in the "friends" section with a handwritten poem that was signed off with "Love and kisses," according to the documents reviewed by the WSJ, noting a representative for the Apollo Global Management co-founder declined to comment. The poem allegedly "included the acronym "V.F.P.C." with an asterisk that said it stood for "Vanity Fair Poster Child," a reference to a magazine profile of Epstein that was in the works." Black's spokesperson did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. Nathan Myhrvold, a billionaire and former Microsoft executive, is also accused of submitting a letter that included "photos of a monkey screaming, lions and zebras mating, and a zebra with its penis visible." The letter that ended with a typed "Nathan" wrote that he was submitting photos from a recent trip to Africa as they "seemed more appropriate than anything I could put in words," said the letter, according to the WSJ. A spokesperson for Myhrvold told the outlet he doesn't remember being involved in such a letter and that as a wildlife photographer he "regularly shares photos of and writes about animal behavior." He only knew Epstein due to TED conferences and donations to scientific research, the spokesperson added. When asked if Myhrvold was aware of Epstein's criminal conduct when he sent the letter, a spokesperson for Myhrvold told Axios "absolutely not." Fashion designer Vera Wang"joked about putting Epstein on 'The Bachelor' and suggested they go on a shopping trip," the WSJ alleges. Representatives for Wang did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment Friday. Former Blair government minister Peter Mandelson, now the U.K. ambassador to the U.S., allegedly called Epstein "my best pal" in his letter. Mandelson could not immediately be reached for comment, but he has previously said he regrets ever meeting Epstein, being introduced to him by Maxwell, a daughter of the late media baron Robert Maxwell, and he regrets "even more the hurt he caused to many young women." Zoom in: Also allegedly on the "friends" list were then-New York Daily News owner Mort Zuckerman, and attorney Alan Dershowitz, who previously represented Epstein. When asked for comment on a "mock-up of a 'Vanity Unfair' magazine cover with mock headlines" linked to him, Dershowitz told the WSJ, "It's been a long time and I don't recall the content of what I may have written." Asked about how well he knew Epstein, Dershowitz told Axios that "I was his lawyer and academic colleague at his seminars. " Meanwhile, the NYT reports it reviewed a contributor list for the birthday album and found the names of businessman Alan Greenberg and physicist Murray Gell-Mann, both of whom have since died. The name of then-Victoria's Secret owner Leslie Wexner was also reportedly in the book, which Epstein's brother Mark Epstein told the Journal that he remembers Maxwell collating.

Ahead of shutdown deadline, Democrats face a dilemma on spending
Ahead of shutdown deadline, Democrats face a dilemma on spending

Boston Globe

time2 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Ahead of shutdown deadline, Democrats face a dilemma on spending

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republicans pushed through legislation this month Advertisement 'It is no secret the path to advancing more of our bills is going to be harder because of the unprecedented, partisan rescissions bill that Republicans just passed,' said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. 'It is extremely frustrating to see so many of the colleagues that have worked with us to pass funding bills turn around and vote to rip away the funding that we all agreed on.' Advertisement Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, told reporters recently that the appropriations process 'has to be less bipartisan,' infuriating Democrats who said the comment poisoned the well as they worked with Republicans to put together spending bills. Because those bills must pass to keep the government running, spending deals have historically been bipartisan products that can draw enough support to clear a Senate filibuster, forcing lawmakers in both parties to set aside their most incendiary proposals and broker a compromise. In a blowout 90-8 vote this week, most Senate Democrats voted to open floor debate on the chamber's first spending bill of the year, a typically less contentious measure covering military construction projects and veterans programs. Some other less divisive bills could potentially be added to the package. But Democrats are keeping a close eye on Republicans and the White House. In a sign of their wariness about the coming funding fight, House and Senate Democratic leaders and senior Democratic members of the Appropriations Committee from both chambers met privately in Schumer's office this week to plot and make sure they were on the same page. For now, Democrats appear ready to let the process play out. Murray called some of the initial spending bills advancing through the Senate 'solid, compromise bills that reject the truly draconian cuts proposed by President Trump and House Republicans.' 'No one wants a shutdown, and the way we avoid that shutdown is by working together,' she said. Advertisement A major priority for Democrats is winning assurances from Senate Republicans that they will not again agree to allow the Trump administration to cancel spending after Congress approves the bills. Without some commitment in place, Democrats say it is uncertain whether they can back the spending measures. 'It is not clear to me there is a way to get over that hurdle,' said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., a member of the Appropriations Committee. At the same time, House Republicans are advancing funding bills setting drastically lower spending levels than their counterparts in the Senate. Republicans on the Appropriations Committee in that chamber this week approved a spending bill that would slash the budget for foreign aid and the State Department by 22%. Still, some conservatives in the House have complained the spending bills they are advancing do not do enough to cut spending. The foreign aid bill provided billions more for some international programs than the president had requested, and rejected his calls to gut global broadcasting initiatives. 'I like the president's budget; I think he did a good job with it,' said Rep. Andrew Clyde of Georgia, a Republican on the appropriations panel. 'I think we should hold to those levels.' House Republicans on the committee also voted to strip out a provision they had included in the measure that would have made it more difficult for the White House to cancel spending in the future. With a potential funding impasse coming this fall, Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the majority leader, has already begun the political effort to pin the blame on Democrats if the government shuts down. Thune, who has pledged to bring spending bills to the floor after Democrats refused to do so in recent years, shrugged off Democratic worries over the administration cuts. Advertisement 'The Democrats have indicated, because they're so upset over the rescissions bill last week -- which, by the way, cut one-tenth of 1% of all federal spending -- that somehow they can use that as an excuse to shut down the appropriations process and therefore shut down the government,' he said. 'We think that would be a big mistake, and hopefully they will think better of it and work with us.' This article originally appeared in .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store