New Mexico lawmakers tackle insurance issues following severe wildfires and floods
NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – It's another blow for New Mexico communities. After fire and floods, companies no longer want to provide insurance for homes and businesses. That has Republicans and Democrats working together for a solution. 'The problem just keeps getting worse and worse and worse,' said Rep. Harlan Vincent, (R-Ruidoso Downs).
Story continues below
Weather: Widespread snow & rain in northern New Mexico
Crime: Video shows moments officers save baby in stolen truck in Rio Rancho
National: Pause on federal grants sparks concern in NM
Don't Miss: Santa Fe police, animal services rescue injured pelican
Rep. Vincent represents Lincoln and Otero counties where the South Fork and Salt Fires destroyed hundreds of homes and businesses last summer.
Vincent said its effects are still impacting residents even today. 'It was just a double whammy as far as getting hit by fires then floods and then they get hit again because they can't seem to get insurance because the insurance companies are not writing policy,' said Vincent.
Story continues below
Weather: Widespread snow & rain in northern New Mexico
Crime: Video shows moments officers save baby in stolen truck in Rio Rancho
National: Pause on federal grants sparks concern in NM
Don't Miss: Santa Fe police, animal services rescue injured pelican
He said without insurance, residents can't get loans. And without policies, realtors can't sell anything, negatively impacting the local economy. Vincent, along with Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, is carrying a bipartisan bill to increase the limits listed in the 'Fair Access to Insurance Requirements', or Fair Plan Act, established in 1969. 'When you're in a situation where you simply can't get insurance due to risk and folks and companies pulling out, this is a state plan that provides a base-level coverage,' said Wirth.
The limit under the law is $350,000 for a private residence and a $1 million for commercial. The new bill would increase the limit to a $1 million for private residences and $5 million for commercial. 'So, the good news is this plan basically pays for itself through premiums,' said Wirth.
They are requesting $50 million from the general fund for the Office of the Superintendent of Insurance.
The pair said there are more bills to come designed to address the root problem which they said can be solved through preventative efforts. 'I'm also really interested in getting dollars to thin our forests. I mean, that's the other issue. We've got forests that go right up to urban areas. Those need to be thinned and taken care of,' said Wirth.
During the Governor's State of the State address, she mentioned a proposal for a state-run insurance program. Her offices said the legislation is still in the drafting stage and would operate independently from the existing F.A.I.R. Act plan. The governor believes 'without accessible fire insurance, entire communities could be wiped out without recourse.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Senate Republicans double down and target clean energy in draft tax bill
Tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, albeit less quickly, under Senate Republicans' latest proposed changes to a massive tax bill. Electric vehicle incentives and other provisions intended to move the United States away from fossil fuels would be gutted rapidly. Senate Republicans cast their version of the bill as less damaging to the clean energy industry than the version House Republicans passed last month, but Democrats and advocates criticized it, saying it would still have significant consequences for wind, solar and other projects. Ultimately, wherever Congress ends up could have a big impact on consumers, companies and others that were depending on tax credits for green energy investments. It could also impact long-term how quickly America transitions to renewable energies. 'They want everybody to believe that after the flawed House bill, that they have come up with a much more moderate climate approach," said Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the finance committee, during a conference call with reporters Tuesday. 'The reality is, if the early projections on the clean energy cuts are accurate, the Senate Republican bill does almost 90%" as much damage as the House proposal, added Wyden, who authored clean energy tax credits included in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act passed during former President Joe Biden's term. 'Let's not get too serious about this new Senate bill being a kinder, gentler approach.' The Edison Electric Institute, a trade association representing investor-owned electric companies, issued a statement applauding the Senate proposal for including 'more reasonable timelines for phasing out energy tax credits.' 'These modifications are a step in the right direction,' said the statement from Pat Vincent-Collawn, the institute's interim chief executive officer, adding that the changes balance 'business certainty with fiscal responsibility.' Whether all of the changes will be enacted into law isn't clear yet. The Senate can still modify its proposals before they go to a vote. Any conflicts in the draft legislation will have to be sorted out with the House as the GOP looks to fast-track the bill for a vote by President Donald Trump's imminent Fourth of July target. Notably, many Republicans in Congress have advocated to protect the clean-energy credits, which have overwhelmingly benefited Republican congressional districts. A report by the Atlas Public Policy research firm found that 77% of planned spending on credit-eligible projects are in GOP-held House districts. The clean energy tax credits stem from Biden's climate law, which aimed to boost to the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions and toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. The House version of the bill took an ax to many of the credits and effectively made it impossible for wind and solar providers to meet the requirements and timelines necessary to qualify for the incentives. After the House vote, 13 House Republicans lobbied the Senate to preserve some of the clean energy incentives that GOP lawmakers had voted to erase. Language included Monday in the reconciliation bill from the Senate Finance Committee would still phase out — though more slowly than House lawmakers envisioned — some Biden-era green energy tax breaks. The Senate proposal further 'achieves significant savings by slashing Green New Deal spending and targeting waste, fraud and abuse in spending programs while preserving and protecting them for the most vulnerable,' said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho and chairman of the committee. On the chopping block are tax credits for residential rooftop solar installations, ending within 180 days of passage, and a subsidy for hydrogen production. Federal credits for wind and solar would have a longer phaseout than in the House version, but it would still be difficult for developers to meet the rules for beginning construction in order to receive the credit. At the same time, it would boost support for geothermal, nuclear and hydropower projects that begin construction by 2033. 'The bill will strip the ability of millions of American families to choose the energy savings, energy resilience, and energy freedom that solar and storage provide,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association. 'If this bill passes as is, we cannot ensure an affordable, reliable and secure energy system.' Opponents of the Senate's text also decry domestic manufacturing job and economic losses as a result. 'This is a 20-pound sledgehammer swung at clean energy. It would mean higher energy prices, lost manufacturing jobs, shuttered factories, and a worsening climate crisis,' said Jackie Wong, senior vice president for climate and energy at the Natural Resources Defense Council. The bill would also cancel incentives such as the Energy Efficient Home Improvement credit — which helps homeowners make improvements such as insulation or heating and cooling systems that reduce their energy usage and energy bills — 180 days after enactment. An incentive for builders constructing new energy-efficient homes and apartments would end 12 months after signing. The House's proposed end date for both is Dec. 31. 'Canceling these credits would increase monthly bills for American families and businesses,' Steven Nadel, executive director of the nonprofit American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy said in a statement. The Senate proposal moves up the timeline for ending the consumer electric vehicle tax credit from the end of this year to 180 days after passage. It also cuts the provision that would have extended until the end of 2026 a credit for automakers that had not made 200,000 qualifying EVs for U.S. sale. It would also immediately eliminate the $7,500 credit for leased EVs. This administration has staunchly gone after EVs amid Trump's targeting of what he calls a 'mandate,' incorrectly referring to a Biden-era target for half of new vehicle sales by 2030 be electric. ___

an hour ago
Childhood friend says Minnesota suspect had 'darkness inside of him'
Hours after the shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers over the weekend, authorities asked David Carlson to identify his lifelong friend in a harrowing photograph. Carlson says he had known and trusted Vance Boelter from the time the two played together as children. But he barely recognized the 57-year-old in the surveillance image police showed him of Boelter wearing a flesh-colored mask as he carried out what authorities described as a political rampage. 'The guy with the mask, I don't know that guy,' Carlson said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press, recounting his decades-long friendship with a man he likened to a brother. Boelter's involvement in such an attack, he said, was as surprising to him as 'getting struck by lightning.' 'There was a darkness that was inside of him," Carlson said. "He must have kept it hidden." As authorities piece together Boelter's movements and motivations, Carlson and others are conducting their own inventory of their interactions with the one-time pastor, wondering whether they missed any red flags. Boelter is a married father of five but often stayed at Carlson's home in Minneapolis to shorten his commute to work. In hindsight, Carlson said, Boelter 'was a sick man' and needed help, even if those around him didn't realize it in time. Law enforcement has cautioned the motive could be more complex than pundits might prefer, even as Boelter's own disjointed writings suggest he was hell-bent on targeting Democrats. Boelter has been charged with federal murder and stalking, along with state counts, in the fatal shootings of former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. He is also accused of wounding Democratic Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. At the time of the shootings, Carlson said Boelter had been struggling to find work and was 'disappointed' he wasn't hearing back from people. In February, Boelter abruptly quit his job delivering bodies from assisted living facilities to a funeral home and returned for several weeks to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where he had founded several companies focused on farming and fishing. 'I thought it was a mistake for him to quit his job,' Carlson said. 'I didn't think he was going to get anywhere with the Congo.' But the life change was in keeping with Boelter's impetuous 'mentality to always go to the extreme,' Carlson said, recalling a time in the 1990s when Boelter was captured by security forces after sneaking into Gaza to preach Christianity on a trip to Israel. 'That's how crazy Vance is,' Carlson said. 'He wasn't supposed to be there.' Years earlier, after becoming a Christian, Boelter 'burned all of his belongings,' Carlson said, including karate and martial arts weapons and anything else that distracted from his religion. Boelter graduated in 1990 from an interdenominational Bible college in Dallas, earning a diploma in practical theology in leadership. The Christ For The Nations Institute said in a statement it was 'aghast and horrified" to learn the suspect was among its alumni, saying 'this is not who we are.' The church Boelter attended outside Minneapolis has not responded to emails from AP but issued a similar statement condemning the shootings as 'the opposite of what Jesus taught his followers to do.' Boelter, who worked as a security contractor, offered a glimpse of his opposition to abortion in a 2023 sermon he gave in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, saying "they don't know abortion is wrong in many churches.' 'He wasn't a radical cultist," Carlson said. 'He was just a regular Christian and kind of outspoken.' Boelter was unrestrained when it came to his distaste for Democrats, Carlson said, but that rhetoric never seemed threatening. Carlson and another friend, Paul Schroeder, told AP they never heard Boelter talk about abortion or any of the officials who were targeted. The FBI said Boelter 'made lists containing the names and home addresses of many Minnesota public officials, mostly or all Democrats.' 'It wasn't like, 'We gotta stop them, man,'' Carlson said. 'But it chills me to think he was in his room writing that stuff in my house.' Boelter would go to a shooting range occasionally but was not fanatical about firearms, another friend, Paul Shroeder said. 'I thought he was just collecting them for self-defense," Carlson said. "It was 1,000 miles away from stalking people and killing them.' Carlson said he awoke Saturday to an alarming text message from Boelter, who warned he was 'going to be gone for a while,' and 'may be dead shortly.' Carlson initially thought his friend was suicidal and went to check his room. He said he was so concerned he called police, who 'at first didn't seem too interested" before quickly connecting the messages to the shootings. 'Why throw your whole life away? God, he's so stupid," Carlson said. "He had everything.'

an hour ago
Man charged with killing prominent lawmaker could face a rarity for Minnesota: the death penalty
MINNEAPOLIS -- The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty. Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty. It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters. In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the U.S. courthouse in St. Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history. Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. 'Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options,' Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets, including officials in other states. Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea. On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison. Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates. President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions, more than the administration of any other president in modern history. The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd. At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged 'there's a tension' and said federal officials 'can speak for themselves.' Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday. As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors. 'Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts,' said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. 'Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here.' Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant U.S. attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors. 'There's no doubt that it's complicated,' Osler said. 'And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling.' If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: 'a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas.' After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held. Thompson told reporters that the federal case 'does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere.' Boelter's next federal court appearance is June 27. He does not have any further appearances scheduled in state court. 'There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is,' Osler said.