New Mexico lawmakers tackle insurance issues following severe wildfires and floods
Story continues below
Weather: Widespread snow & rain in northern New Mexico
Crime: Video shows moments officers save baby in stolen truck in Rio Rancho
National: Pause on federal grants sparks concern in NM
Don't Miss: Santa Fe police, animal services rescue injured pelican
Rep. Vincent represents Lincoln and Otero counties where the South Fork and Salt Fires destroyed hundreds of homes and businesses last summer.
Vincent said its effects are still impacting residents even today. 'It was just a double whammy as far as getting hit by fires then floods and then they get hit again because they can't seem to get insurance because the insurance companies are not writing policy,' said Vincent.
Story continues below
Weather: Widespread snow & rain in northern New Mexico
Crime: Video shows moments officers save baby in stolen truck in Rio Rancho
National: Pause on federal grants sparks concern in NM
Don't Miss: Santa Fe police, animal services rescue injured pelican
He said without insurance, residents can't get loans. And without policies, realtors can't sell anything, negatively impacting the local economy. Vincent, along with Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, is carrying a bipartisan bill to increase the limits listed in the 'Fair Access to Insurance Requirements', or Fair Plan Act, established in 1969. 'When you're in a situation where you simply can't get insurance due to risk and folks and companies pulling out, this is a state plan that provides a base-level coverage,' said Wirth.
The limit under the law is $350,000 for a private residence and a $1 million for commercial. The new bill would increase the limit to a $1 million for private residences and $5 million for commercial. 'So, the good news is this plan basically pays for itself through premiums,' said Wirth.
They are requesting $50 million from the general fund for the Office of the Superintendent of Insurance.
The pair said there are more bills to come designed to address the root problem which they said can be solved through preventative efforts. 'I'm also really interested in getting dollars to thin our forests. I mean, that's the other issue. We've got forests that go right up to urban areas. Those need to be thinned and taken care of,' said Wirth.
During the Governor's State of the State address, she mentioned a proposal for a state-run insurance program. Her offices said the legislation is still in the drafting stage and would operate independently from the existing F.A.I.R. Act plan. The governor believes 'without accessible fire insurance, entire communities could be wiped out without recourse.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
10 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Bizarre Mail-In Voting Claim Sparks Reactions
President Donald Trump attacked mail-in voting on Monday with an anecdote about one of his own trips to the ballot box that included a very unlikely detail. 'They asked me for my license plate,' he insisted. 'I said, 'I don't know if I have it.' They said, 'Sir, you have to have it.' I was very impressed, actually.' MSNBC Trump didn't mention where this happened, but he has cast his most recent ballots in his adopted home state of Florida, which requires voters to present a photo ID, as well as proof of signature if it's not on the photo ID. MSNBC A license plate doesn't contain a photo or a signature. MSNBC A Florida driver's license has both, and may be what the president was referring to. MSNBC But given his attacks on former President Joe Biden's gaffes, Trump's critics weren't gonna cut him any slack. They fired back on X: If Biden said this it would be on the evening news for days. — Mark Elliott (markmobility@ (@markmobility) August 18, 2025 @markmobility / MSNBC / Via So a couple things…just like Trump I'm a registered voter in here in Florida. As a resident of 20 years. I've voted in more elections than he has within this state. I've never been asked for my license plate to vote. This is both total bullshit and batshit crazy. — The Uncultured Black AristoCAT (@camarawilliams) August 18, 2025 @camarawilliams / MSNBC / Via I honestly can say, I never had to show anyone my license plate to vote. — Machine Pun Kelly 🇺🇦 (@KellyScaletta) August 18, 2025 @KellyScaletta / Via Trump: "When you go to a voting booth... they asked me for my license plate, right? I said, I don't know if I have. And they said, sure, you have to have it. Oh, it's a very impressive actually." Made-up nonsense from Dementia Don, as usual. — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) August 18, 2025 @RpsAgainstTrump / MSNBC / Via LOL. Imagine what this would've sounded like coming out of Biden's mouth. — Sarah Smith (@Hale_Storm) August 19, 2025 @Hale_Storm / MSNBC / Via 'My license plate' — stuff you say when you've never had to drive yourself anywhere Can't wait for @jaketapper 's book about this — The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) August 18, 2025 @TheTNHoller / MSNBC / Via The cheese has slid off the cracker — Tony Michaels 🎙 (@thetonymichaels) August 18, 2025 @thetonymichaels / Via They asked me to point to my name on a printed out list laying on the table. But cool story bro. — Warren (@swd2) August 18, 2025 @swd2 / Via If Joe Biden had said that when he votes, they ask to see his 'license plate', there would've been merciless coverage on Fox News. Heck, even an impeachment countdown clock. But when Donald Trump says something resembling what a nursing home patient would say? Crickets. — Russell Drew (@RussOnPolitics) August 18, 2025 @RussOnPolitics / Via Holy shit. Trump's brain is pure mush at this point. — Common sense progressive (@TheSensibleProg) August 18, 2025 @TheSensibleProg / MSNBC / Via Holy fuck. His brain is gone. — Spiro's Ghost (@AntiToxicPeople) August 18, 2025 @AntiToxicPeople / MSNBC / Via sir, this is a DMV — alexandra j. roberts (@lexlanham) August 19, 2025 Kind of bulky to present your license plate at the voting booth isn't it? — George Wept (@GeorgeWept) August 18, 2025 @GeorgeWept / MSNBC / Via Who here hasn't been asked for your license plate when you vote? 😜 — Marybeth in Florida 🇺🇸🐊 (@marybeth5025) August 18, 2025 @marybeth5025 / Via Do you have to own a car to vote in the US? — Kathy Jackson#3.5% FBPE (@JakajackKathy) August 18, 2025 @JakajackKathy / MSNBC / Via Why on God's name would a voting official ask you for your car's license plate? You don't need to own a car in order to have a license. — James Surowiecki (@JamesSurowiecki) August 18, 2025 @JamesSurowiecki / MSNBC / Via License plate? The metal thingy on the bumper of the car? You sure about that? — THE Bruce St. James (@TheBruceStJames) August 19, 2025 @TheBruceStJames / MSNBC / Via This never has happened in the history of U.S. voting. — Terry Blount (@TBlountNews) August 18, 2025 @TBlountNews / MSNBC / Via License plate? Wow USA has some weird new rules. But sure, ok. — Julie Wright (@reddogcw) August 18, 2025 @reddogcw / MSNBC / Via Yeah it's such a drag having to carry your license plate into the polling center. To save time, I usually back my car up close to the window so they can see my plate and I can get my ballot. 🤪 What a fucking moron. 🤦♂️ #DementiaDon — 😱 Scary Larry 😱 🇺🇦✊🏻🇺🇸🗽 (@aintscarylarry) August 18, 2025 @aintscarylarry / MSNBC / Via I know I always hate having to screw off the license plates from my car when I vote. — Kay 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 💙💙F*CK PUTIN (@katelykeanon) August 18, 2025 @katelykeanon / Via Don't forget to bring a screwdriver next time you go to vote so you can remove your license plate and present in a "very impressive" way at the voting booth! — Mark Raymond (@markraymond) August 18, 2025 @markraymond / MSNBC / Via Bring your license plate to the polls, folks. Trump's orders. — David Pepper (@DavidPepper) August 18, 2025 @DavidPepper / MSNBC / Via After reading the tweet below, should we laugh or cry? 🤣🤣🤣 😢😢😢😢 👇👇👇 — ABerman333 (@ABerman333) August 19, 2025 @ABerman333 / MSNBC / Via
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Oversight Democrat: DOJ plan to release Epstein files in ‘batches' a ‘cover-up'
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said the plan for the Department of Justice to respond in 'batches' to the committee's subpoena for files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein amounts to a 'cover-up.' 'Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up,' Garcia said in a statement Tuesday. 'The American People will not accept anything short of the full, unredacted Epstein files.' Garcia's statement came as the clock struck noon Tuesday, the deadline for the Department of Justice to turn over documents and communications relating to the 'Epstein files' pursuant to an Oversight panel subpoena issued earlier this month. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chair of the panel, said Monday \the DOJ was going through the material, but it would take time to ensure 'identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted.' He said the DOJ would begin to give the committee records pursuant to the subpoena on Friday. 'In a bipartisan vote, the Committee demanded complete compliance with our subpoena,' Garcia said in the statement. 'Handpicked, partial productions are wholly insufficient and potentially misleading, especially after Attorney General Bondi bragged about having the entirety of the Epstein files on her desk mere months ago.' Comer issued the subpoena to the DOJ pursuant to a Democratic-led motion in a subcommittee in July to seek the 'full, unredacted Epstein files,' which passed with support from three Republicans on the panel. In that same subcommittee meeting, Republicans offered a successful motion to subpoena a swath of former federal officials in the Epstein probe, including former President Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and several former attorneys general and FBI directors. The first of those depositions occurred Monday when former Attorney General Bill Barr, who held the job in President Trump's first term, spoke to the panel. Comer told reporters on Monday that Barr testified he did not know of any information that would implicate Trump. Garcia, though, said Barr during his deposition 'could not clear President Trump of wrongdoing,' calling on Comer to release the full unedited transcript of Barr's deposition to the public. 'We will keep pressing until the American people get the truth — every document, every fact, in full,' Garcia said. 'The administration must comply with our subpoena, by law.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court ‘will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion'
2016 Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says she believes the Supreme Court is poised to overturn its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which effectively legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, and that unmarried same-sex couples 'ought to consider' tying the knot. 'American voters, and to some extent the American media, don't understand how many years the Republicans have been working in order to get us to this point,' Clinton told Fox News host Jessica Tarlov on Friday in a wide-ranging interview on 'Raging Moderates,' the podcast Tarlov co-hosts with Scott Galloway. 'It took 50 years to overturn Roe v. Wade,' Clinton said. 'The Supreme Court will hear a case about gay marriage; my prediction is they will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion — they will send it back to the states.' 'Anybody in a committed relationship out there in the LGBTQ community, you ought to consider getting married because I don't think they'll undo existing marriages, but I fear they will undo the national right,' she said. In July, Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was briefly jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, formally asked the Supreme Court to revisit its Obergefell decision, which celebrated its 10th anniversary in June. The justices have not yet said whether they will take up the case. If Obergefell were overturned, same-sex marriage rights would still be protected by the Respect for Marriage Act, a bipartisan measure signed by former President Biden in 2022 that requires all states and the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states where they are legal. 'Zombie laws' against marriage equality in more than half the nation are unenforceable because of the Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell. The Respect for Marriage Act, introduced after Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said the court 'should reconsider' decisions including Obergefell after overturning the federal right to abortion, prevents state statutes and constitutional amendments banning gay marriage from being enforced on already married couples, but it does not render them entirely obsolete. In addition to Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito has also voiced opposition to the Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell, to which he and Thomas dissented in 2015. Last winter, in a five-page statement explaining the court's decision not to involve itself in a dispute between the Missouri Department of Corrections and jurors dismissed for disapproving of same-sex marriage on religious grounds, Alito wrote that the conflict 'exemplifies the danger' he had long anticipated would come from the ruling. 'Namely, that Americans who do not hide their adherence to traditional religious beliefs about homosexual conduct will be 'labeled as bigots and treated as such' by the government,' he wrote. Public support for marriage equality remains at historic highs, though a May Gallup poll showed support among Republicans slipping to 41 percent, the lowest in a decade. In a separate survey conducted by a trio of polling firms in June, 56 percent of Republican respondents said they support same-sex marriage rights. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
