
The ramshackle homes in America's 'most miserable city' are selling for peanuts but would you dare live there
A place once dubbed 'America's Most Miserable City' is experiencing a major property boom as investors are snapping up abandoned homes for as little as $15,000.
Gary, Indiana or 'The Steel City,' which was once home to more than 10,000 abandoned buildings after half its population fled, has seen house prices skyrocket from a median of just $15,000 in 2014 to $106,000 this May.
That's a staggering sevenfold increase in a decade for a city where people once simply walked away from homes they couldn't sell.
The city was built around a single steel industry but that has been declining for decades.
Gary ended up victim to deindustrialization, depopulation, drugs, crime.
But now, amid a nationwide housing shortage, investors are taking a second look at properties and there's still massive bargains to be had.
One realtor from XF MANAGEMENT is currently offloading homes at rock-bottom prices to investors willing to take on massive renovation projects.
'The 656 Tennessee address unit is currently under contract and we were only unloading it because we can't get to it with how many projects we have currently on the books,' the realtor revealed to DailyMail.com.
The realtor explained the appeal to investors.
'We realize that Gary, Indiana, isn't the same in terms of both economy or equity accumulation in the real estate category but with the barrier of entry into its inventory of real estate parcels being so low it would be hard for any real investor, developer, builder, to pass on the solid opportunity in building cash flowing assets while the rest of the country is super inflated.'
These aren't move-in ready properties by any stretch of the imagination.
Many homes are boarded up, filled with rubble from collapsed roofs, or charred from fires and arsons.
Some require complete gut renovations with investors pouring tens of thousands into properties that cost just 'peanuts' to snatch initially.
The realtor emphasized the lengths they go to present these distressed properties in the best possible light.
'We even go as far as pouring brand new concrete driveways and sidewalks to present the property better even though we know the city doesn't have that kind of funding just yet.'
Jennifer A. Parham, managing broker with Lighthouse Realty Northwest Indiana, confirmed the market transformation to NWI Times.
The interior of the Ralston Street property needs some serious TLC
'The Gary housing market is most definitely experiencing a resurgence,' she told the outlet. 'Gary was an area hit not only by blight, but hard by the recession as well.
'Over the last few years we have seen numerous investors take advantage of Gary's low value and purchased and held those properties.
'Some flipped them, but overall the last thee years we've seen more consumer investors.
'Those particularly interested in buying back the block and building Gary back up to its long forgotten stature.'
The driving forces behind this boom are stark economic realities elsewhere.
'Currently with inflation, the housing crisis, and current state of inflation, Gary has become a hotbed for Illinois transplants and those who have never left,' Parham continued.
'They find they can get more home for their buck in Gary, and it offsets some of the costs like additional security and/or schooling. More and more professionals are looking to purchase in Gary.'
'They are either looking for older larger homes that they can remodel and customize to their liking, or fully flipped homes which still price very well considering the Northwest Indiana housing market and come with all the amenities.'
Kristene Reyes with JKRB Properties bought her first Gary investment property in 2022 and is now on her third.
She's seen firsthand how challenging these projects can be.
'These projects aren't for the faint of heart,' she told NWI Times. 'You have to have experienced contractors and can run into serious problems, even with the foundation.
'You have to rip the houses out to the studs and it can take a long time. If you've never done it before it can be quite overwhelming. Even just tree removal is expensive. You have to put a ton of money in it.'
But for those willing to take the risk, the rewards can be worth it.
Reyes said some of her tenants are even 'coming from Chicago' where rental prices are rising.
'The market is squeezed. There's a housing crisis where there's not enough homes,' Reyes said.
'In Gary, the homes are just sitting there. This is good for Gary but also making an impact on all of the Region. It's good for the general housing market here.'
Gary - best known as the birthplace of Michael Jackson - was named as America's 'most miserable city' in a 2019 list complied by Business Insider.
In 2024, Gary was home to the highest abandoned home rate in the nation at 31.41 percent, according to analysis from 247WallSt.
The data found that the population has staggeringly dropped by 18.2 percent from 2010 to 2020, with a population around 67,000.
Mainly known as a hub of the United States Steel Corporation, the city thrived as over 16,000 steel workers flooded the area, making it home to the largest plant in the nation in the 1920s.
When the steel industry began its decline in the 1970s thanks to foreign imports outpacing the domestic steel economy, Gary began crumbling into chaos leading to rising rates of poverty and violent crime in the city.
A median 49 crimes per square mile are recorded there each year, according to Neighborhood Scout.
This dwarfed the national median of 27 crimes per square mile - and it's also a whopping 149 percent higher than the Indiana median of 20 crimes per square mile.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
NHS faces paying more for US drugs to avoid future Trump tariffs
Britain faces paying more for US drugs as part of a deal to avoid future tariffs from Donald Trump. The NHS will review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president', according to documents released after a trade agreement was signed earlier this year. White House sources said it expected the NHS to pay higher prices for American drugs in an attempt to boost the interests of corporate America. A Westminster source said: 'There's an understanding that we would look at the drug pricing issue in the concerns of the president.' The disclosure is likely to increase concerns about American interference in the British health service, which has long been regarded as a flashpoint in trade talks. It comes after Rachel Reeves announced a record £29 billion investment in the NHS in last week's spending review. The Chancellor's plans will drive spending on the health service up towards 50 per cent of all taxpayer expenditure by the mid-2030s, according to economists at the Resolution Foundation. The Telegraph has also learnt that under the terms of the trade deal with America, the UK has agreed to take fewer Chinese drugs, in a clause similar to the 'veto' given to Mr Trump over Chinese investment in Britain. The White House has asked the UK for assurances that steel and pharmaceutical products exported to the US do not originate in China, amid fears the deal could be used to 'circumvent' Mr Trump's punishing tariffs on Beijing. Mr Trump is enraged by how much more America pays for drugs compared with other countries and considers it to be the same issue as he has raised on defence spending. Just as the US president has heaped pressure on European nations to increase the GDP share they allocate to defence, he thinks they should spend more on drug development. An industry source said: 'The way we've been thinking about it and many in the administration have been thinking about it, it's more like the model in Nato, where countries contribute some share of their GDP.' Britain and the US 'intend to promptly negotiate significantly preferential treatment outcomes on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients', the trade deal reads. Pharmaceutical companies are also pushing for reductions in the revenue sales rebates they pay to the NHS under the voluntary scheme for branded medicines pricing, access and growth (VPAG) – a mechanism that the UK uses to make sure the NHS does not overpay. Non-US countries are 'free-riding' Last week, Albert Bourla, Pfizer's chief executive, said non-US countries were 'free-riding' and called for a US government-led push to make other nations increase their proportionate spend on innovative medicines. He said White House officials were discussing drug prices in trade negotiations with other countries. 'We represent in UK 0.3pc of their GDP per capita. That's how much they spend on medicine. So yes, they can increase prices,' Mr Bourla said. Industry sources said there was no indication yet on what the White House would consider to be a fair level of spending. Whatever the benchmark, Britain will face one of the biggest step-ups. UK expenditure on new innovative medicines is just 0.28pc of its GDP, roughly a third of America's proportionate spending of 0.78pc of its GDP. Even among other G7 nations, the UK is an anomaly. Germany spends 0.4pc of its GDP while Italy spends 0.5pc. Most large pharmaceutical companies generate between half and three quarters of their profits in the US, despite the fact that America typically makes up less than a fifth of their sales. This is because drug prices outside of the US can cost as little as 30pc of what Americans pay. Yet, pharmaceutical companies rely on higher US prices to fund drug research and development, which the rest of the world benefits from. A month ago, Mr Trump signed an executive order titled 'Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients', which hit out at 'global freeloading' on drug pricing. It stated that 'Americans should not be forced to subsidise low-cost prescription drugs and biologics in other developed countries, and face overcharges for the same products in the United States' and ordered his commerce secretary to 'consider all necessary action regarding the export of pharmaceutical drugs or precursor material that may be fuelling the global price discrimination'. Trung Huynh, the head of pharma analysis at UBS, said: 'The crux of this issue is Trump thinks that the US is subsidising the rest of the world with drug prices. 'The president has said he wants to equalise pricing between the US and ex-US. And the way he wants to do it is not necessarily to bring down US prices all the way to where ex-US prices are, but he wants to use trade and tariffs as a pressure point to get countries to increase their prices. 'If he can offset some of the price by increasing prices higher ex-US, then the prices in America don't have to go down so much.' Mr Huynh added: 'It's going to be very hard for him to do. Because [in the UK deal] it hinges on the NHS, which we know has got zero money.' Under VPAG, pharmaceutical companies hand back at least 23pc of their revenue from sales of branded medicines back to the NHS, worth £3bn in the past financial year. The industry is pushing for this clawback to be cut to 10pc, which would mean the NHS would have to spend around 1.54bn more on the same medicines on an annual basis. The Government has already committed to reviewing the scheme, a decision which is understood to pre-date US trade negotiations. A government spokesman said: 'This Government is clear that we will only ever sign trade agreements that align with the UK's national interests and to suggest otherwise would be misleading. 'The UK has well-established and effective mechanisms for managing the costs of medicines and has clear processes in place to mitigate risks to supply.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Estee Lauder chairman emeritus Leonard Lauder dies, company says
June 15 (Reuters) - Estee Lauder (EL.N), opens new tab said on Sunday that its chairman emeritus, Leonard Lauder, has died at the age of 92.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Key GOP senator clarifies heated exchange with Trump aide
By Senator Ron Johnson set the record straight after allegations of a 'shouting match' between him and a top Trump aide emerged from a Thursday afternoon meeting. The Wisconsin Republican reportedly was involved in a 'shouting match' with Trump's White House aide Stephen Miller over the border security funding number contained in the 'big beautiful' GOP spending bill currently being worked on in the Senate. Johnson, a fiscal conservative who has voiced his concerns about the bill's impact on the towering national debt, is a critical vote that the White House wants to secure. The senator cleared the air to the Daily Mail via a statement from his press office Thursday. He did not deny that the spat took place, but any hatchet that came out behind closed doors seemed to have been buried. 'Stephen didn't realize that we didn't have the detailed breakdown in cost, so he explained why the wall was going to be more expensive. Simple misunderstanding, quickly resolved,' Johnson noted. 'We are all huge supporters of Stephen and providing the administration the funding they need to clean up the enormous mess created by Biden and the Democrats,' Johnson added. The impetus of the reported 'shouting match' was when Johnson said Miller's (pictured) border security numbers didn't add up. After the closed door meeting, Johnson told reporters that Miller's justification for additional border funding was enough to convince him, adding 'if anything, we maybe ought to need more' funding. In a May explainer published to his website titled 'The Ugly Truth About the 'Big Beautiful Bill'', Johnson outlined his opposition to the budget bill, primarily on the basis of the sheer cost of the proposed package. The explainer was published on May 12th, before the House of Representatives passed their version of the spending bill just before the Memorial Day recess. 'There's nothing now to justify this abnormal level of government spending. Pathetically, Congress is having a hard time agreeing on a reduction of even $1.5 trillion from that 10-year amount,' Johnson noted at the time. The Wisconsin senator isn't the only one opposed to the eye-popping cost of the House spending package. While he wants to see the President's 2017 tax cuts extended, Paul has portrayed the current $5 trillion in new debt as 'Biden spending levels.' Kentucky Senator Rand Paul (pictured) has shared opposition to the legislation as well, due to the projected new additions to the national debt. While he wants to see the President's 2017 tax cuts extended, Paul has portrayed the current $5 trillion in new debt as 'Biden spending levels.'