How Israel's strikes on Syria are backfiring
Since the fall of former President Bashar Al-Assad's regime last December, one of the most pressing questions has been whether a new Syrian administration would be able to consolidate its base amid deep ideological and political divisions across the country.
To understand Syria's current political transition, it is essential to examine how the Sweida-centred conflict and Israel's involvement will affect the cohesion of the new administration's support base.
The recent escalation in southern Syria began with clashes between Druze and Bedouin militias, prompting intervention by the Syrian army. Israel then launched air strikes in Damascus targeting critical military installations, including the army's headquarters, with bombing also reported near the presidential complex.
After the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Sweida, clashes continued between Druze and Bedouin groups, deepening divisions and raising serious concerns about civilian safety in the region.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The Syrian army and its key ally, Turkey, have gained extensive combat experience through years of conflict. Together, they played a crucial role in overthrowing the Assad regime and reducing the influence of Iran and Russia in the region.
Israel, which for nearly two years has been committing genocide in Gaza, is closely monitoring these developments and appears intent on using Druze leaders to further destabilise Syria. Its primary objective is to prevent the consolidation of the new Syrian administration, which it views as a threat, particularly given the regime's close cooperation with Turkey.
Shifting tactics
In response to Israel's air strikes on Damascus, and by demonstrating loyalty to the state, tribal groups have effectively become a new frontline for the administration of the interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa. The tribes have employed innovative strategies, such as using urban cover and burning tyres to obscure aerial surveillance, enabling them to advance to Sweida's city centre by Friday.
Israel has not yet been able to carry out an effective intervention, as air strikes are not a practical method of targeting tribal groups situated in mountainous terrain.
From Damascus to Gaza, Israel's doctrine of domination has one fatal flaw Read More »
Syria's new administration has been plagued by questions around how to achieve political consolidation by bridging the internal diversity of its supporters.
This challenge extends beyond the task of integrating groups such as the Kurds -the Democratic Union Party (PYD) and Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF)- and the Druze. The new Syrian administration includes a broad spectrum of ideological and political perspectives that must be effectively engaged, both militarily and politically.
Israel's targeting of Damascus has concerned all supporters of the new Syrian administration, while facilitating greater cooperation at the local level, as demonstrated by the recent tribal operations. This dynamic is helping to ease the internal integration of the regime's supporters.
Druze groups have also sought mediation through Damascus, with some leaders advocating for disarmament and integration within the new Syrian administration. In light of recent developments, these leaders appear to be gaining influence over Israel-aligned figures such as Hikmat al-Hajri. If the Druze successfully integrate, this would have significant implications for the disarmament process of Kurdish forces.
Israel's targeting of Damascus has thus led many supporters of the new Syrian administration to prioritise responding to external threats. The integration of Druze groups into the central administration in Damascus would contribute to the country's national unity, while reshaping the broader power dynamics across Syria.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Al-Azhar's reversal on Gaza exposes a deeper moral crisis in the Muslim world
Nearly two years into a livestreamed genocide, unprecedented in its visibility and impunity, there has still been no meaningful action by world leaders to halt it. Israel's systematic mass murder of Palestinians through both direct and indirect means continues unabated. For weeks, Unrwa, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, has been reminding anyone who would listen that it has three months' worth of food supplies stored just a few miles from Gaza, across the border in Egypt. Egypt - home to the millennium-old Al-Azhar Mosque and university - has, over the years, been instrumental in maintaining Israel's blockade on Gaza's southern border. Today, it is actively contributing to the genocide by preventing the flow of aid in accordance with the wishes of the Zionist regime to the north. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi came to power in a 2013 coup openly backed by Washington and Tel Aviv, so it is hardly surprising that the sense of mutual commitment runs deep. However, Ahmed al-Tayeb, the grand sheikh of Al-Azhar, has in recent years shown a degree of independence from Sisi, even voicing concern for the people of Gaza in periodic public statements. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While lacking political power, he wields considerable symbolic authority as head of one of the world's oldest seats of Islamic religious learning. He thus has the potential to speak not only for the moral conscience of Egyptians, but for that of the entire Muslim umma - if he rises to the moment. None of his statements have been enough to prevent the killing of tens of thousands of people, but for the past 22 months, Egypt's most important religious figure had at least withheld tacit approval of the state's complicity in the genocide. That changed this week when al-Tayeb issued his strongest condemnation of the genocide to date - only to reverse course hours later under pressure from the Egyptian state. Courage rescinded On Tuesday evening, the Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar issued a powerful statement appealing to people of conscience around the world to take immediate action to bring an end to the "barbaric and brutal genocide" being perpetrated by the Israeli occupation. In a long statement that may be read in full here, al-Tayeb was unrelenting in his condemnation not only of the brutality of Israel's "systematic genocide", but also of the silence of the powerful - of governments, and even of the Egyptian state - in allowing it to persist. At a moment when moral backbone is most needed, a rare glimmer of hope from Egypt vanished without explanation It concluded with a "resounding appeal to all free and honourable people of the world to break their silence, take a strong and immediate stance, and pressure their governments and international organisations to open the Rafah crossing and all other possible crossings to allow the entry of humanitarian, medical, pharmaceutical, and food aid". Given that the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing contains the aid trucks and storage facilities where UN supplies have been waiting for months, this could be seen as the sheikh's implicit criticism of the Egyptian state's complicity in Gaza's starvation. But if it was such a criticism, it was not to last. Within minutes, the statement was taken down, shocking and dismaying observers who had seen in it a rare moment of moral clarity. Many took to social media to express their outrage and disbelief. Amid one of the lowest points of this genocide, when moral backbone from leaders is most needed, a glimmer of hope appeared from one of Egypt's few institutions that had shown even a modicum of independence - only to vanish moments later, without explanation. Hours later, Al-Azhar's official media office issued a brief but defensive alternative statement. With spin worthy of a White House press secretary, the post described the removal as an act done "courageously and responsibly before God", claiming it did not wish to undermine Egyptian efforts to negotiate a truce. Moral imperative Reports suggest that the withdrawal of the initial statement came under pressure from the Egyptian state. Of course, there is no evidence that the retraction brought the genocide any closer to an end, nor should any be expected. Sisi has for years clashed with al-Tayeb over matters of religious and moral authority, but he has not had enough political capital to remove him. The grand sheikh has carved out a domain in the spiritual realm that Sisi can complain about, but not control. Yet in a case like Gaza, where politics, religion, and morality are inextricably linked, the religious and moral imperative to speak out in defence of fellow Muslims facing extermination should transcend the political machinations that have enabled this genocide. The dissent from Al-Azhar marked a critical rupture in the region's complicity. Al-Tayeb's retreat is especially stark in contrast to the unwavering stance of another prominent religious figure in the Arab world: the Mauritanian Sheikh Muhammad al-Hassan al-Dadow. A defiant voice On the same day that al-Tayeb issued his now-retracted condemnation of the genocide, al-Dadow posted a five-minute video (translated here) on his social media pages, calling on the world to do everything in its power to bring it to an end. Al-Dadow is among the few senior scholars who have consistently denounced the region's power-brokers for facilitating what he has called a Zionist "final solution" against Palestinians. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Early on in the genocide, he delivered a striking warning that Muslim rulers and their armies, virtually in their entirety, will be held accountable before God for "every drop of blood that has fallen in Gaza" due to their abandonment of its people. It is a message he has repeated since Israel launched its war on Gaza, at times citing the example of Egypt's only democratically elected president, Mohamed Morsi, who helped end the 2012 Israeli assault through determined diplomatic intervention. In a speech delivered in early 2024, al-Dadow argued that any Muslim head of state - whether in Turkey, Saudi Arabia or elsewhere - could do the same, if they wished. His comments are a direct rebuke of Muslim heads of state, whose condemnations of the genocide have been as abundant as they are futile - empty rhetoric unaccompanied by any meaningful action against Israel. As one social media user, Naks Bilal, responding to the Malaysian prime minister's recent condemnation video, put it: Gaza genocide: How Arab regimes became the enemy within Read More » To be utterly blunt, I'm - in fact I think we're - beyond this now. Heads of nations supporting Palestine with thoughts and prayers, but none willing to send humanitarian military intervention. Forty-eight Muslim-majority countries, 22 Arab states - all afraid of Nato and doing what's right. All the collective firepower to rain absolute hell down on Israel, but they insist on calling this super meeting, and that ultra conference, meanwhile Palestinians are paying $1,000 for flour and being massacred in queues waiting for aid. Save these videos for the next life. Al-Dadow's words also serve as a challenge to Muslim figures like Al-Azhar's grand sheikh, who must recognise his responsibility to speak for the voiceless Palestinians being killed with the complicity of the very government seeking to silence him. There is nothing left for the political class to say - only actions left to take. And for religious authorities like al-Tayeb the time to stand up for Gaza is now. His recent failure to stand up to a Muslim ruler complicit in the Gaza genocide is a sobering reminder that the roots of this crime lie deep within. Genuine courage - not cowardice - is what is needed most to confront the demons of complicity that haunt the Muslim body politic. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Charity Commission launches investigation into UK Lawyers for Israel's charitable trust
The UK's charity regulator is investigating the UK Lawyers for Israel Charitable Trust following complaints about the organisation's conduct. A spokesperson for the Charity Commission confirmed to Middle East Eye that it is investigating the Trust's relationship with UK Lawyers for Israel, a separate non-profit organisation. 'We can confirm that we already have an active case open into UKLFI Charitable Trust,' the spokesperson told MEE. 'Further concerns have been raised with us about the charity, which we will assess as part of the case to determine what, if any, role there is for us as regulator.' The spokesperson clarified that the ongoing case centres on the relationship between the UKLFI Charitable Trust, a registered charity, and UK Lawyers for Israel, which is not a charity and therefore falls outside the commission's regulatory remit. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The commission did not specify how long the investigation will take or what findings, if any, have been produced so far. UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) is a legal advocacy organisation that supports Israel by using legal and regulatory tools to challenge activities and campaigns it views as anti-Israel or unlawful. UKLFI Charitable Trust is the charitable arm of UKLFI, supporting educational and legal initiatives related to Israel and international law. The charity says it focuses on promoting public understanding of legal issues concerning Israel and combating antisemitism through lawful means. The commission's decision to investigate UKLFI Charitable Trust comes amid growing calls to examine the group's charitable status and assess whether it is fulfilling its charitable objectives. UKLFI did not respond to Middle East Eye's request for comment at the time of writing. Pro-Palestine groups have accused UKLFI's advocacy arm of using the law to stifle and silence critics of Israel. Last week, Led by Donkeys, a British political campaign group, projected a video outside the Charity Commission's office calling for an investigation into UK Lawyers for Israel Charitable Trust. The group accused UKLFI of violating charity regulations by engaging in political lobbying and endorsing far-right Israeli politicians, rather than remaining educational or neutral as required by law. Earlier this year, Cage International submitted a complaint to the Charity Commission against UKLFI and the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) over their support for Israel and its war on Gaza. The CAA did not respond to MEE's request for comment at the time of writing. The complaint followed the publication of a report by Cage titled "Britain's Apartheid Apologists", which accused UKLFI and CAA of abusing 'regulatory authorities in Britain to attack and harass' pro-Palestinian voices in the UK. 'UKLFI and CAA are Britain's leading enablers of the livestreamed genocide. They aid regulators like the Charity Commission to stifle free speech and pro-Palestinian activism in the UK," said Anas Mustapha, Head of Public Advocacy at Cage. 'The Charity Commission must end its charity cover used to provide an advocacy infrastructure in support of genocide.' In January, the Charity's Commission said "it is not lawful" for British charities to raise funds or send money to soldiers fighting for the Israeli army. This statement comes after the Commission issued a warning against Chabad Lubavitch Centres North East London and Essex Limited after the charity received 180 complaints for raising money for a soldier fighting for the Israeli army in northern Israel. Since October 2023, the Charity Commission has opened more than 200 regulatory cases related to the war on Gaza. The commission said the investigations involved charities with different positions on the war.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Turkey eyes closer Egypt ties with crackdown on Muslim Brotherhood
Turkey has deported an Egyptian citizen accused of membership in the Muslim Brotherhood, Middle East Eye has learned. Mohamed Abdelhafiz, a long-term legal resident of Turkey, was detained at Istanbul Airport on Monday upon returning from a business trip to Africa. The Muslim Brotherhood is proscribed as a terrorist organisation in Egypt and was the subject of an intense crackdown after a military coup there in 2013. Thousands of members and sympathisers of the group fled Egypt in the aftermath of the coup, with many seeking refuge in Turkey. Turkish sources familiar with the case told MEE that a no-entry ban had been imposed on Abdelhafiz, triggering his automatic deportation to a third country. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Ankara typically refrains from deporting individuals to nations where they risk ill-treatment or the death penalty. However, the move suggests the Turkish government has taken an unprecedented decision to move against Abdelhafiz. 'Hasm' movement Egyptian officials accuse Abdelhafiz of being a member of the Hasm movement, which Cairo claims is an armed wing of the Muslim Brotherhood. His detention and deportation coincided with Egypt's announcement on Monday that it had thwarted an attack allegedly planned by Hasm. Turkey flexes muscles with new bunker buster and hypersonic weapons Read More » Last year, Ankara reconciled its relationship with Cairo after years of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. Current Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi led a 2013 military coup that ousted the country's first democratically elected president, Mohamed Morsi. Since then, many Egyptian dissidents who found refuge in Turkey have faced increasing pressure, including the forced closure of TV channels such as Mekameleen, which were compelled to relocate their operations to Europe in 2022. Gulden Sonmez, Abdelhafiz's lawyer, told MEE that Ankara's decision to deport her client to a third country was a mistake. 'He could still be deported to Egypt from a third nation, given that Cairo now has extradition treaties or other agreements with many regional countries to ensure their return,' she said. For this reason, Abdelhafiz's current location remains undisclosed to protect him from further deportation and potential rights violations. There is growing anxiety among Egyptian dissidents living in Turkey, who report an escalating crackdown as part of Ankara's broader anti-immigrant policies. Sonmez concurs, noting that recent developments suggest a deliberate policy of detaining Egyptian citizens and placing them in deportation centres for the foreseeable future. On Monday, Al Arabiya reported ongoing security contacts between Cairo and Ankara regarding the extradition of Muslim Brotherhood members allegedly involved in terrorist activities in Egypt. The channel added that Egypt had provided Turkey with a security file detailing Muslim Brotherhood members 'planning terrorist operations'. Gokhan Cinkara, a regional affairs academic at Necmettin Erbakan University, said that Egypt appears to have reopened the Muslim Brotherhood file, which it had set aside during the recent rapprochement period. 'Security coordination between Egypt and Turkey is critically important in regions such as Libya, Syria and the Gulf,' he told MEE. Haftar rapprochement One key aspect of this cooperation concerns Libya. Khalifa Haftar, the de facto ruler of eastern Libya and a close ally of Cairo, has recently sought to improve relations with Ankara. As part of this realignment, Haftar has reportedly initiated steps to ratify a maritime agreement with Turkey through Libya's House of Representatives, based in Tobruk. If finalised, the move could bolster Ankara's claims in the Eastern Mediterranean, particularly against Greece. Turkey taps Austrian bank for Russian gas payments to skip sanctions Read More » MEE has reported that Cairo is opposed to Haftar's move to ratify the deal. 'While it is difficult to predict what strain the cases of Abdelhafiz and six other wanted individuals might place on Turkey-Egypt relations, it is clear that Turkey wishes to maintain its diplomatic momentum,' Cinkara added. 'At the same time, the ruling AK Party is cautious not to alienate segments of its traditional voter base with such actions.' An Egyptian security official told The National this week that Turkey has so far refused to hand over several high-ranking Muslim Brotherhood members, despite their alleged involvement in violent operations targeting Egyptian officials. Instead, Ankara has opted to restrict their activities within Turkey rather than extradite them to face charges in Egypt. Figures such as Yahya Moussa and Alaa al-Samahi, both named in an Egyptian interior ministry statement, are still believed to be living in Turkey, according to the official.
