Autonomous vehicles make Arizona roads safer. That's no accident
Arizonans are living in the future, and many in our community may not even know it.
It's become such a part of our everyday lives that you need to look closely to realize there's no one behind the wheel of some cars gliding down streets like Camelback Road and navigating the intricacies of Phoenix traffic at rush hour.
While many other states remain paralyzed by the thought of reconciling technology with older infrastructure, Arizona has done something remarkable: It has embraced rather than shunned self-driving car technology, creating a model rooted in innovation, regulatory humility and the principles of freedom.
This was no accident.
It came from deliberate leadership, according to a new report from the Goldwater Institute, where I work. In 2015, then-Gov. Doug Ducey issued an executive order launching Arizona's experiment in what's been labeled permissionless innovation — the idea that regulatory frameworks should default to openness, transparency and stability.
Rather than allowing bureaucrats to imagine dangers for them to act against, the order required regulators to demonstrate tangible harm before intervening.
The Arizona model — now codified into law — has positioned our state as a leader in innovation while keeping our communities safe by mandating that autonomous vehicle companies meet federal safety standards, respond intelligently to system failures, and maintain full compliance with traffic laws and insurance requirements.
Yet it avoids the reflexive overreach that has plagued other states, where layers of local and state mandates often unintentionally work together to render innovation nearly impossible.
In Arizona, regulatory authority is streamlined at the state level, ensuring safety while avoiding the policy fragmentation that too often creates complicated webs of regulation that stops companies from deploying new technologies before they can even start.
The results speak for themselves.
As of 2024, 13 companies are actively testing and deploying autonomous vehicles across Arizona's roads. Waymo alone has logged more than 20 million autonomous miles in the Phoenix metro area, with peer-reviewed data revealing a dramatic reduction in crashes.
That includes 81% fewer airbag deployments and 78% fewer injury-causing collisions compared to human drivers over the same distance, Waymo reports.
But autonomous vehicles do more than reduce risk on the roads.
Opinion: AI fights fires and drives cars. Soon, it'll do our jobs
For older adults, people who are blind and those with other disabilities, these vehicles can offer long-overdue freedom and independence. When designed with accessibility in mind — and through strategic partnerships with organizations such as the National Federation of the Blind — companies like Waymo are engineering vehicles that do more than drive: they communicate, accommodate and adapt to meet riders where they are.
A freedom once dependent on others can now be self-directed.
Arizona has earned this success by doing the opposite of our neighbors to the west in California, where multiple government agencies impose broad but fragmented permitting regimes and operational limits.
While caution has its place, the way autonomous vehicles will reshape infrastructure, labor markets and public safety cannot be overstated.
According to economist Jim Rounds, Arizona is likely to attract $6.1 billion in research and development related to autonomous vehicles, creating 39,000 direct jobs and potentially $4.3 billion in economic output.
Rounds also estimates, conservatively, that the industry could generate up to $500 million in tax revenue by 2030 if Arizona's supportive regulatory environment remains intact.
If we want to stay ahead of the pack, the impulse to regulate must be disciplined by humility and trust.
Regulation must remain retrospective — based on demonstrable harm — and must continue to be standardized at the state level.
Embracing a freedom-based model for technology will continue to make our lives better. As other states scramble to rewrite regulations for autonomous vehicles at the municipal level, Arizonans can look toward the future, trusting that our framework embraces both innovation and safety on our roads.
And in doing so, it invites the nation to follow our lead by putting on display the success to back it up.
Brian Norman is director of state affairs at the Goldwater Institute, where he leads the institute's nationwide government affairs strategy. Reach him at bnorman@goldwaterinstitute.org.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Waymo put Phoenix innovation on the map. That was the point | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Waymo vehicles set on fire in downtown L.A, as protesters, police clash
As Los Angeles police struggled with another day of unrest in downtown L.A., several Waymo autonomous taxis were set on fire, sending black smoke billowing into the air. The dramatic images were captured during an afternoon of clashes between large groups who were protesting immigration raids by the Trump administration and L.A. police who were trying to maintain order. For some time, protesters blocked traffic on the 101 Freeway before California Highway Patrol officers slowly pushed them back. Police advised residents to avoid the the 101 Freeway through downtown L.A. Images of the Waymo cars on fire on Los Angeles Street were broadcast nationally as Los Angeles has become a flashpoint in the immigration debate. Tires were slashed, windows smashed, and anti-ICE messages spray-painted over the cars, which were parked in a row. Protesters swarmed around the vehicles, tearing the doors off and stomping on the windshields. One man with a mask over his face smashed car windows with a skateboard. Another appeared to use a makeshift flamethrower to set the interior of a car ablaze. Around 5:30 p.m., some people were seen throwing Lime electric scooters into the burning cars, while others stood back. The Los Angeles Fire Department responded to the vehicle blazes while the Los Angeles Police Department warned people to stay away from the area. "Burning lithium-ion batteries release toxic gases, including hydrogen fluoride, posing risks to responders and those nearby," said the LAPD in a statement. Waymo's fleet of electric, self-driving taxis has become a familiar sight on L.A. roads. A spokesperson for Waymo told The Times the company was in touch with law enforcement regarding the incident. After launching in San Francisco and Phoenix, Waymo began serving Los Angeles in November. It attracted an initial wait list of around 300,000 people before becoming available to anyone who downloaded the service's app, a company spokesperson said in January. As of January, Waymo had already driven 1.9 million miles in Los Angeles. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Waymo vehicles set on fire in downtown L.A, as protesters, police clash
As Los Angeles police struggled with another day of unrest in downtown L.A., several Waymo autonomous taxis were set on fire, sending black smoke billowing into the air. The dramatic images were captured during an afternoon of clashes between large groups who were protesting immigration raids by the Trump administration and L.A. police who were trying to maintain order. For some time, protesters blocked traffic on the 101 Freeway before California Highway Patrol officers slowly pushed them back. Police advised residents to avoid the the 101 Freeway through downtown L.A. Images of the Waymo cars on fire on Los Angeles Street were broadcast nationally as Los Angeles has become a flashpoint in the immigration debate. Tires were slashed, windows smashed, and anti-ICE messages spray-painted over the cars, which were parked in a row. Protesters swarmed around the vehicles, tearing the doors off and stomping on the windshields. One man with a mask over his face smashed car windows with a skateboard. Another appeared to use a makeshift flamethrower to set the interior of a car ablaze. Around 5:30 p.m., some people were seen throwing Lime electric scooters into the burning cars, while others stood back. The Los Angeles Fire Department responded to the vehicle blazes while the Los Angeles Police Department warned people to stay away from the area. 'Burning lithium-ion batteries release toxic gases, including hydrogen fluoride, posing risks to responders and those nearby,' said the LAPD in a statement. Waymo's fleet of electric, self-driving taxis has become a familiar sight on L.A. roads. A spokesperson for Waymo told The Times the company was in touch with law enforcement regarding the incident. After launching in San Francisco and Phoenix, Waymo began serving Los Angeles in November. It attracted an initial wait list of around 300,000 people before becoming available to anyone who downloaded the service's app, a company spokesperson said in January. As of January, Waymo had already driven 1.9 million miles in Los Angeles.


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Tested: Tesla Model Y Juniper As Robotaxi
Here's some breaking news: the 2026 Tesla Model Y 'Juniper' with Full Self Driving is a robotaxi. Maybe Tesla can't call it that but that's what it is. And Waymo may have met its match. I had the 2026 Model Y for the 48-hour test drive (which Tesla just began offering) this past week in Los Angeles. The new Model Y, which hit Tesla stores in February, comes with Full Self-Driving (Supervised) version 13.2.9. But the fact that it's supervised didn't stop me from using it, in practice, unsupervised as a robotaxi, i.e., going door to door without intervention. As background, I've tested the Juniper Model Y FSD now three times: two test drives when it arrived at Tesla stores in March-April and now a 48-hour test drive. On most excursions it has gotten me door to door without intervention (see video below). That is, I just punch in the destination address and let the Model Y drive. I'm a passenger – not unlike Waymo, which I've also used many times in the Beverly Hills-West Hollywood area (more on Waymo comparison in video). Here's the short version. The new Model Y Juniper with version 13 of FSD is pretty damn close to a Tesla robotaxi and Waymo. Yes, I had to occasionally intervene but many trips in the vehicle are intervention-free = robotaxi. And, yes, it makes mistakes but so does Waymo. No FSD errors on the Model Y Juniper with v13.2.9 I've experienced have been dangerous or egregious. Mostly things like driving too slowly or taking a convoluted route to my destination (the latter is a mistake Waymo also makes). The Model Y with FSD version 13 is a vast improvement over the Model 3 I tested about a year ago. As just two examples, the Model Y took me from my home to a Supercharger location about 10 miles away intervention-free. I did nothing but sit there and witness the drive. At the end of the return trip, it took a route that I would not have chosen to take. But human taxi drivers do that too. It also took me to a Starbucks about 8 miles away intervention-free. That trip too was very similar, if not exactly the same as, what I've experienced in a Waymo Jaguar I-PACE in downtown Los Angeles. The only thing that I've found annoying is occasional speed limitations. On some short stretches of road near my home it slows to 25 mph and won't go faster unless I intervene. Tesla FSD is often compared unfavorably to Google's Waymo. That may have been true in the past. But not anymore. I use Waymo a lot in Los Angeles, as I said above. Though Waymo is amazing, it also makes mistakes. But its biggest shortcoming is its range limitations, i.e., geofencing (see this map). Los Angeles is a very big place and most of LA county is off limits to Waymo. Tesla's FSD doesn't have that problem. That is both a boon and a bane for Tesla – the latter because it's a huge challenge. But I see Tesla meeting the challenge in most cases. I will give Waymo this. In the geofenced area I use (Century City / Beverly Hills / West Hollywood) it is more refined and more confident than Tesla FSD. In some cases, more adept at avoiding and getting around obstacles. But Tesla is almost there. And, again, Tesla FSD has a huge advantage in that it is not limited to small restricted areas. I've spent a lot of time testing General Motors Super Cruise. As well as Ford's Bluecruise and Rivian's Highway Assist. Super Cruise does what it says it does. It very competently takes over the driving duties on the highway. But it ain't Tesla FSD. It won't do local roads. It's not a robotaxi. And that's the bottom line. FSD is not foolproof or flawless. And a Bloomberg story this week makes that clear. In that case, an older version of FSD was blinded by the sun, resulting in fatalities. And I've been in a Tesla when FSD missed seeing a community gate, which, without intervention, would have resulted in an accident. That was in a previous version of FSD. But it doesn't mean it can't happen again. That said, GM's SuperCruise, based on my experience, also makes the rare risky mistake. As do other ADAS (Advanced Driver Assist System) from other EV manufacturers that I've tested. Over the past year, I've tested ADAS on EVs from General Motors (Super Cruise), Rivian (Highway Assist), Ford (Bluecruise), and Tesla. My take is that the benefits of an ADAS outweigh the risks. In 2024, there were 39,345 US traffic fatalities. Needless to say, practically all involved human drivers. And that increasingly means distracted drivers using their smart device. Unlike humans, an ADAS does not get distracted. The larger picture is that, on balance, a Tesla with FSD – and any reputable ADAS for that matter – makes the roads safer. As long as the driver is paying attention and can take over when the ADAS fails. The latter unfortunately is a big if because some drivers see it as an invitation to text or nap. So, what about a robotaxi where there is no driver to intervene? As stated above, of course there's risk. But there is a much bigger risk with the average car driven by the average distracted human. With the explosion of personal devices, more and more people are distracted while they drive as they engage in things like texting – and even web browsing – while driving. I see people staring down at their devices while driving every day in Los Angeles. Those people are much more dangerous than any ADAS-controlled car. And those people would benefit greatly from an ADAS. The upshot is, an ADAS, such as Tesla FSD and robotaxi, does not get distracted and is laser-focused on the road. Humans often are not.