Crew member charged after massive container ship ploughed into Norwegian man's front garden
Norwegian prosecutors have charged a cargo ship's second officer with negligent navigation after he allegedly fell asleep on duty and the vessel ran aground, narrowly missing crashing into a home.
The ship, the NCL Salten, ran aground shortly before 6am on Thursday. No oil spills were reported, and none of the 16 people aboard was injured.
Johan Helberg told Norwegian broadcaster NRK that he'd slept through the whole thing and only woke up when a neighbor started ringing his doorbell.
Images show the ship's red and green bow just meters (yards) from Helberg's house along the Trondheim Fjord's coast.
'I didn't hear anything. I was sleeping seven metres from the bow,' he told Norwegian media NRK.
'It was lucky that it went ashore there. Five metres further south, and it would have entered the bedroom. And that wouldn't have been particularly pleasant.'
Mr Helberg's neighbour Jostein Jorgensen said he woke up to the sound of a ship on the fjord.
'I looked out the window and saw a boat heading straight for shore,' he told NRK. 'I went out and cawed and shouted and whistled without anything happening.'
Mr Jorgensen said he then rushed over to Mr Helberg's house to try to wake him up.
'We woke up to the neighbour loudly ringing the doorbell. 'Haven't you seen the ship?'' Mr Helberg said.
The second officer, whose name was not made public, was the navigator on duty at the time of the grounding, prosecutor Kjetil Bruland Sørensen said in a statement.
The cargo ship had 16 people on board when it ran aground, NRK reports, and no injuries were reported.
Crews on Monday continued to take containers off the ship so it could be more easily removed from the area.
NCL, the shipping company, said it was cooperating with investigators.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Review Geek
19 hours ago
- The Review Geek
Dept. Q Season 1 Review – The best crime thriller of the year?
Season 1 Episode Guide Episode 1 -| Review Score – 4.5/5 Episode 2 -| Review Score – 4/5 Episode 3 -| Review Score – 4/5 Episode 4 -| Review Score – 4/5 Episode 5 -| Review Score – 3.5/5 Episode 6 -| Review Score – 4/5 Episode 7 -| Review Score – 4/5 Episode 8 -| Review Score – 4/5 Episode 9 -| Review Score – 4.5/5 Writing a compelling crime drama that stands out in such a saturated market is not easy. There are so many options to choose from, and with streaming more accessible than ever, competition is fierce. Whether it be the numerous Sherlock spin-offs we get every year, original breakaway hits like Mare of Easttown or one of the many Scandinavian miniseries like The Chestnut Man (honestly, that show is fantastic, add it to your watch-list!), it's hard for newcomers to stand out. In a way, Dept. Q is in an unenviable spot. The story is pretty formulaic and feels like a mash-up of what's come before, and it's also dumped in one hit on Netflix, giving it a bit of a do-or-die flavour. However, beyond its relatively simplistic story is a show that boasts excellent production design, atmosphere, and characterisation — all of which help it stand out from the masses. Created by Scott Frank, the brilliant mind behind The Queen's Gambit, and with a stable foundation coming in the form of the book series as source material, Netflix may just have struck gold with this one — if it can attract a sizeable enough audience. Dept. Q's story whisks us off to the moody, miserable setting of Edinburgh, where we follow Detective Chief Inspector Carl Morck, a brilliant but emotionally scarred officer recovering from a traumatic ambush that left his partner paralyzed and another officer dead. Relegated to a newly formed cold case unit in the police department's basement, Morck assembles a team of misfits to take on an old case involving the disappearance of prosecutor Merritt Lingard, who vanished from a ferry four years prior. As the team delves deeper, they uncover a chilling conspiracy and psychological trauma that test their limits. The episodes interweave the investigation into Merritt's disappearance with Carl's shooting at Leith Park, but it's worth noting that there isn't actually any closure to the shooting. You can see the creators' intention to leave this thread open-ended for a potential second season (which hasn't been confirmed at the time of writing), but it's not too much of a detriment given the way this one ends — and how it's handled. It's very much a secondary plot, and one could argue it's used as a way of exploring Carl's trauma and allowing him to grow as a person. The story regularly jumps between past and present, and early on, we learn what happened to Merritt. The structure of the story then shifts to focus on why and how this occurred rather than drawing out the mystery of whether she's alive. It's an interesting framing device, but unfortunately, it's hard not to feel like the series shows its hand way too early. In fact, anyone who has watched a lot of crime thrillers is likely to figure out what's happening as early as episode 3. Not in complete detail, of course, because the show does work in some lovely twists, but I can't help but feel tighter framing — rather than wide angles and establishing shots — may have been a better option. While the story isn't Dept. Q's strongest asset, the show leans heavily on character work — and that's where it truly shines. Matthew Goode's portrayal of DCI Carl Morck is excellent, adding the right balance of snarky sarcasm, rule-breaking, and anti-authority vibes alongside a darker, more emotionally scarred interior that he's keeping from those around him. Carl has a really solid arc across the season, punctuated by important moments at the start and end of the show that feel like mirrors of the same incident, sandwiched around a lot of growth and exploration of inner demons. The series also flirts with the idea of a romance between Carl and his therapist, Rachel, but to be honest it's not handled particularly well. The banter between them is quite strong though, which only makes the decision to half-heartedly pursue this angle all the more baffling. However, one of the more interesting players here is Alexej Manvelov's portrayal of Syrian character Akram. He's very much the dark horse of the ensemble and bounces off Carl really well across the 9 episodes. Rounding out the trio is Rose. While she starts out as a bit player, she becomes more deeply involved in the investigation as the episodes progress. She has her own trauma to process, and the show handles this well — letting her development unfold in a way that never overshadows the main mystery or feels tacked on. The rest of the supporting cast do well in their roles, and it's just as well because many of the sets are quite uninspired, despite being dressed well. We're largely working with dingy interiors — and that's by design. This is a dark, gritty crime thriller that's less interested in sweeping vistas (despite a few establishing shots showing off Scotland's gorgeous natural landscapes) and more focused on the gritty details of the case itself. In that respect, Dept. Q establishes itself as a comfortable and relatively straightforward thriller, with enough red herrings and twists to try and keep you guessing until the conclusion. Again, your mileage with this one will probably vary, but this is not a show to binge in a single day. The episodes are long and often padded with proper investigative work. The investigation can — and does — go down wrong paths or take unexpected turns, often as a way of developing characters or helping them learn lessons. At one point, for example, Rose believes she's managed to link a bird insignia to a past case, tying everything together with a neat little bow. In reality, this is a big reach — and she's called out for it. These little moments aren't insulting to viewers or presented as wasted time; rather, they serve as lessons for our team — reminders to stick to the basics and avoid assumptions. Another time, Carl chooses Rose to butter up a male constable, bluntly leaning into the femme fatale angle. Again, it's a small inclusion, but one that feels grounded in the way these sorts of interviews might realistically play out. Episodes 8 and 9 work in tandem to tie up loose ends, deliver key flashbacks, and clarify any lingering mysteries surrounding the Merritt Lingard case. There are a few clichés that pop up along the way, but they're easy to overlook. Even with its issues, Dept. Q is a solid crime thriller. It's clearly been designed as a springboard to try and capture a bigger audience hungry for a consistent series that can run for many seasons to come. It's gritty, grounded, and boasts some strong characterisation. Based on what's here — and the way the season ends — there's definitely more fuel in the tank, with Dept. Q standing out as one of the best crime thrillers of the year.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Dept Q review – this excellent crime drama is a grimy, gothic treat
It must be so galling for an actor to be blessed with just the right face for one kind of part. Galling for good actors anyway. Pretty sweet for the others – 'You need a face someone would definitely kill for? Put this useless hunk/babe in there and just move the scenery round them.' Matthew Goode is, nomenclaturally and otherwise, one of the former, but cursed with a face best described as 'modern patrician' and has therefore been the first port of call for just about every period drama there has been for the last 20 years. He's been in everything from Brideshead Revisited (as Charles Ryder) on the big screen, to Downton Abbey (Henry Talbot) and The Crown (where at least he got to play that bounder Lord Snowdon) on the small one. Judging by the relish with which he seizes the chance to play contemporary and ignoble in his new outing, the psychological thriller Dept Q, he must have been going quietly mad with frustration throughout. Goode takes the part of detective Carl Morck in this excellent adaptation by Scott Frank (The Queen's Gambit, plus innumerable hit films as a credited writer or uncredited rewriter) of the Danish crime novelist Jussi Adler-Olsen's bestselling series of the same name. Morck may have a flair for the job, but he is a terrible man and colleague. After his ceaseless arrogance gets a young uniformed officer killed, and his own partner paralysed by a bullet that then passes through Morck's own neck, he is put on long-term leave and must wrestle, possibly for the first time in his egocentric life, with the idea of his mortality. This is accompanied with a rising guilt that he fights every step of the way; watching the latter perfuse his soul as the nine episodes unfold is at least as compelling as the dense, twisty, cleverly structured and hideous plot playing out above it. When Morck returns unwelcomed to work, he is assigned to head a new department (the Q of the title). It is set up to investigate cold cases, in the hope of providing good optics for the troubled Edinburgh police force (granite and gothic are subbed in for snowy Nordic bleakness, which works a treat) while they work on unyielding new ones, including the search for Morck's attacker. His new office is located in the dank, grimy basement beneath the station, so that's Morck told. Oh, and he also turns out to be the entire department, as his boss allocates its supposed funds to the cash-strapped officers above ground. Gradually, he assembles a motley crew to help him. It includes: cadet Rose (Leah Byrne), recovering from a breakdown and hoping get away from the desk duty she has been given; Morck's partner DI James Hardy (Jamie Sives), operating from his hospital bed; and Syrian refugee and former police officer Akram Salim (Alexej Manvelov), who picks their first case – the disappearance four years ago of ambitious young advocate Merritt Linguard (Chloe Pirrie). For the audience, her story – which I think stays the right side of voyeuristic, though it is occasionally a close call – runs in parallel to the main, though the claustrophobic may have to watch some of it through their fingers. It is all fantastically well, and rigorously, done. The pacing has a leisurely confidence that some may find a touch slow, but allows for a character-first approach, creating a richness that amply rewards initial patience. Soon, we are immersed in a narrative that involves a missing necklace, a brutal historic beating, the perils of isolated village life, urban horrors and institutional failings ranging from simple incompetence to outright corruption. Plus a plentiful dash of the mental, emotional and physical suffering human beings are capable of inflicting on one another, in the name of love, revenge or just for the sheer fun of it. The performances – which also include Mark Bonnar as Linguard's unsettling boss and Kelly Macdonald as Morck's unfortunate but mandated police therapist, Dr Irving – are all first rate. (Goode, as the bearded, gaunt, increasingly haunted detective, is the blackly shining centrepiece.) The script is sharp and lean, and especially good at channelling Morck's spitting sarcasm. Writers Chandni Lakhani and Stephen Greenhorn enable the audience to thrill to his keen and ever-whetted edge while also making us sympathise with the colleagues who would rejoice to see him head over the side of the same ferry from which Linguard supposedly fell. A slightly harrowing treat, but a treat all the same. Dept Q is on Netflix
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Fraudster who was found to have killed his wife for a £4.4million insurance payout years after being cleared of murder is jailed... but not for her death
A fraudster who was found to have unlawfully killed his wealthy wife in Denmark has been sentenced to two years in prison but not for his partner's death. Donald McPherson was originally cleared of the murder of Paula Leeson when a judge directed a jury in 2021 to find him not guilty through a lack of evidence. Ms Leeson drowned in the swimming pool at a remote holiday cottage in Denmark booked by McPherson for a summer break in 2017. A civil case brought by Ms Leeson's family last September concluded that the 47-year-old mother-of-one's death was not accidental and that McPherson had unlawfully killed his wife, hoping to cash in on life insurance policies worth £4.4 million he had secretly taken out. The High Court judge found that McPherson compressed his wife's neck in an arm lock until she was unconscious. Danish authorities initially treated the death as a tragic accident, though she had suffered 13 separate external injuries. Her husband of three years McPherson has always denied any involvement in his wife's death and claimed he had found her there, fully clothed and unconscious, during their Scandinavian weekend mini-break In January this year, McPherson was found to be in contempt of court when he failed to disclose assets. However, a civil case brought by Ms Leeson's family last September concluded that the 47-year-old mother-of-one's death was not accidental and that McPherson had unlawfully killed his wife, hoping to cash in on life insurance policies worth £4.4 million he had secretly taken out Once they were husband and wife, and without Ms Leeson's knowledge, he started paying £460 a month in life insurance premiums, despite his huge debts. Months after their wedding, he forged a new will and trust documents which would give him control of MS Leeson's finances if she died. Judge Mark Cawson KC said in a judgment in February, published on Wednesday, that the contempt is 'so serious that only a custodial sentence will suffice'. He sentenced McPherson to two years in prison, adding he will only serve half of that in the event that he complies with the asset disclosure order. Last April, the High Court in Manchester was told that McPherson was 'a serial liar' who had been convicted of 32 offences of fraud or dishonesty in New Zealand, Germany and the UK. The court was played recordings of McPherson's phone calls to a string of insurers in which he checked he would receive a pay-out in the event of her death. Mr Cawson continued: 'In these circumstances, there is simply no basis for any discount being given on the basis of the defendant being of good character. He is plainly a man of bad character.' Ms Leeson's family run a successful skip and plant hire business in south Manchester, which Ms Leeson helped to run, and where she first came into contact with McPherson, who claimed to be a successful property developer. McPherson had taken out multiple secret life insurance policies on his wife before her death, worth £3.5 million alone. Despite running out of money, he was paying about £500 a month on insurance policies. McPherson was described at a previous court hearing as a 'Walter Mitty' who had changed his name multiple times and whose previous wife and their child died in a house fire, while his 32 convictions span 15 years in three countries. At the time of the High Court judge's ruling in September, he was believed to be living somewhere in the South Pacific.
