Inside Austin's Agenda: City Council Member Mike Siegel
Reader and Siegel will discuss the council member's first few months in the role, how local government is responding to recent state and federal policy, and upcoming city council action.
The city of Austin is facing mounting financial pressure as the Trump administration's federal budget looks to make cuts that could impact our city. Local governments around the country are also being asked to comply with the new policy on things like immigration and unions.
Siegel was Austin's former city attorney and provides a unique perspective on what the city can and cannot do in response.
RELATED: Inside Austin's Agenda: What to expect from city council in 2025
They will also discuss upcoming city council actions that could impact you, including recent hearings on building code reform and early budget discussions.
You can watch the episode and every other at the top of this article, on Facebook, on any streaming device through the KXAN+ app, and YouTube. Inside Austin's Agenda goes live every other Wednesday at 3 p.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles defends Jennings settlement, makes the case for reelection
Many candidates describe Charlotte City Council as dysfunctional and lacking in transparency, but as Mayor Vi Lyles seeks a fifth term, she wants to improve that perception. However, she says she's standing by the decision to settle with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief Johnny Jennings. The city is paying more than $300,000 to its top cop after Jennings says he was mistreated by former councilmember Tariq Bokhari during the councilman's quest to secure outer carrier vests. PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Charlotte City Council settles with Chief Johnny Jennings The settlement sparked controversy when the city refused to disclose until Jennings made it public under pressure. Channel 9's Joe Bruno sat down with the mayor to talk about the state of the city and her efforts to secure her fifth term this November. Lyles: 'I believe that we treat people fairly. If you know, in our HR programs, and all of the things that we do, that Johnny isn't any different than other people that we've actually had these kinds of contracts with. I just tell you, by the person that he is, is because he gave the media the story, and it wasn't something that we would have done.' Bruno: 'So the city never would have revealed this?' Lyles: 'We'd have to ask a lawyer that, and I'm not a lawyer today.' She's the mayor today and wants to call herself that a year from now. As she campaigns for another term, she is aggressively backing the sales tax increase for transit. She says she also understands public safety needs to be a priority. Bruno: 'How safe do you consider Charlotte?' Lyles: 'I think it all depends on where you live and what you're doing and whether or not we have a program for you at this time.' She says if given another term, she wants to see the city prioritize addressing homelessness. 'I think the housing of the unhoused is one of the things that we have to tackle pretty immediately,' she said. Her fifth term isn't guaranteed. She's facing four challengers in the Democratic primary, but she says her work isn't finished and she's prepared to make the case to voters. Charlotte's city council primaries are Sept. 9. Early voting began Thursday. Before you head to the voting booth, check out our Political Beat Candidate Guide. We asked every candidate key questions on topics that matter to you. VIDEO: Where you can vote early in Charlotte for the primary election Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ranked-choice voting: Let voters (not parties) rule
In Annapolis, voters may soon get a bigger say in city elections. Members of the Annapolis City Council are considering adopting ranked-choice voting. It may sound new and complicated but it's actually quite simple and has been around since the 1850s, first originating in Denmark. Under ranked choice, voters have the chance to not only pick their top pick for office but to essentially rank their runners-up. How does this make a difference? Imagine a crowded primary race for mayor, for example, where no candidate is likely to win an outright majority of votes. Under the current system, that doesn't matter. The candidate who garners a plurality of votes still wins. But under ranked-choice voting, voters list their second, third, fourth and so on choices, too. And if there's no majority winner, these rankings are factored in — by eliminating the lowest polling candidate and redistributing that individual's second-choice votes and so on. That continues with bottom-listers dropping out until a candidate racks up a clear majority. What's the impact? Potentially profound. Suddenly, there's much less incentive to bad-mouth opponents or to follow party orthodoxy. Getting a shoutout from an opponent is actually helpful. Maryland doesn't have much experience with the system. Currently, Takoma Park is the only municipality where it's in use. But the state sure has a lot of experience with the downside of single voting: electing candidates with as little as 36.2% of the vote (the share Sarah K. Elfreth won in a crowded 22-person primary for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives vacated by U.S. Rep. John Sarbanes last year). Party loyalists aren't wild about ranked choice. They complain it's involved, it only helps the opposing party (whichever one that is) and can even leave the winner of a plurality in the dust if he or she doesn't fare well as a second or third choice in a crowded field. But given ranked choice is in use for statewide races in red-state Alaska as well as Takoma Park (AKA the 'People's Republic of Takoma Park' for its left-leaning politics), you have to wonder if fears of partisan disadvantage are overblown. The New York City mayor's race had ranked choice. It helped New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani win the primary, but he also had a plurality (43.5%), so it didn't change the outcome. What it did cause, observers say, was for Mamdani to 'cross-endorse' fellow progressive candidates. Such teamwork is uncommon but hardly undemocratic. New York didn't choose a socialist-leaning Democrat because of ranked-choice, but did it impact Mamdani's election strategy? Probably. Polls show it engaged his base and broadened participation. And that's somehow a bad thing? Peter Jensen is an editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun; he can be reached at pejensen@ Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Energy prices could be election issue as voters see jump in utility bills
A July 11 post in a Hoboken, New Jersey, parenting group on Facebook pointed to a frustrating trend: "Our utility bill is more than double what it was last month. ... Anything we can do about it?" The post had several dozen replies and most of the commenters said their home utility bills had also risen dramatically. On the campaign trail a year ago, President Trump vowed, "Under my administration, we will be slashing energy and electricity prices by half within 12 months — at a maximum, 18 months," but this year has seen energy prices rising in several states. Residents and governors in five East Coast states are blaming electric supplier, PJM Interconnection. The company is the largest grid operator in the U.S., serving 13 states and 65 million customers. In New Jersey, energy prices increased on June 1, causing a 17-20% jump in residential customers'utility bills. The utility company PSE&G told its New Jersey customers they should expect to see a higher monthly bill of about $183 for the average customer, an increase of $27. PSE&G attributed the price hike to "an increase in energy demand combined with the need for new power generation," which it said "has driven higher supply prices." As a utility, PSE&G pointed out that it doesn't earn a profit on the electric supply, so "these costs are passed through directly to customers." PJM says it is experiencing a rapid increase in energy demand, driven by the power requirements of artificial intelligence, data centers, electrification and a resurgence in U.S. manufacturing. In its latest forecast, PJM forecast a growth in energy demand of 5% over the next 10 years. "We don't have enough newer, more reliable energy sources," said Alex Ambrose, a policy analyst at New Jersey Policy Perspective, a nonpartisan think tank. Ambrose says that renewable sources like wind, solar, and battery are the cheapest and fastest forms of energy to bring online and faults PJM for its reluctance to bring clean energy into the grid: "PJM is also keeping older coal gas plants running, even if they are uneconomical and more expensive." But in an op-ed in NJ Spotlight News, the company blamed a shortfall of energy on "state and federal decarbonization policies and some economic pressures" for closing fossil fuel-based power plants in New Jersey. PJM also said it has a queue of 63 gigawatts of projects — enough to power more than 47 million homes — waiting to be connected by 2026, and an "overwhelming majority" of those projects are renewables. Energy Secretary Chris Wright is starting to worry that high energy prices could hurt Republicans at the ballot box. In a recent interview with Politico, he blamed Democratic policies for "pushing prices up right now," but conceded the political reality that Republicans may suffer in the next elections. "Who's going to get blamed for it? We're going to get blamed because we're in office," he said. New Jersey is poised to be among the first to test the issue in the governor's race this November. "Affordability is the number one issue in this race, and rising energy prices are also at the top of everyone's mind," Ambrose told CBS News. Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic nominee for governor, in July released a statement accusing PJM of "mismanagement" of the grid: "PJM has refused to plug clean, cheap power like solar into the grid, while giving preference to coal and oil." And earlier this month, her opponent, Republican nominee Jack Ciattarelli, wrote in a post on X about "Rebecca in Highland Park," whose electric bill he said had tripled, "to more than $1000." "Why? Because Trenton Democrats, with the approval of my opponent Mikie Sherrill, shut down six electricity generation plants around the state, stopped burning natural gas, and didn't expand our nuclear capabilities in South Jersey," Ciattarelli said. "We can look at how folks are going to vote in this upcoming election, as a reflection on how they're feeling about the country at large," says Ambrose, "This affordability problem is not going away." A Fairleigh Dickinson University poll earlier this month found that 26% of voters blame the utility companies for price hikes, 19% blame Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, and 10% say that energy producers are at fault. Murphy is not running for reelection due to term limits. "Utility bills directly impact elections," says Rob Gramlich, president of Grid Strategies, a D.C.-based energy consultancy firm. Gramlich pointed to the most infamous example of this, the California recall election in 2003, prompted in large part by the state's energy crisis. It cost Democrat Gray Davis the governorship and handed it to Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger. Gramlich indicated he expects energy prices to remain high for the foreseeable future, predicting that "two years from now, we're going to see a lot more policy discussion about it."
