Cyborg tadpoles ‘hold clues to origin of autism'
Cyborg tadpoles with electrodes grown into their brains have been created by Harvard scientists to help study autism and schizophrenia.
Tiny flexible electrodes were implanted into tadpole embryos when they were days old, allowing them to completely embed into the central nervous system as the amphibians grew.It is the first time that researchers have shown it is possible to create a device that integrates seamlessly into the brain while it develops.
Usually, scientists implant metal electrodes into mature brains to monitor brain cell activity, but by then, the critical early stages of development are over and the process often causes some neuronal damage.
Neurological conditions such as autism, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia are thought to be 'baked in' to the brain early on, so being able to watch the brain developing could offer vital clues into why they develop.
'Autism, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia – these all could happen at early developmental stages,' said Dr Jia Liu, assistant professor of bioengineering at Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
'There is just no ability currently to measure neural activity during early neural development. Our technology will really enable an uncharted area.
'If we can fully leverage the natural development process, we will have the ability to implant a lot of sensors across the 3D brain non-invasively, and at the same time, monitor how brain activity gradually evolves over time. No one has ever done this before.'
To create the cyborg tadpoles, scientists used soft, stretchy implantable ribbons containing dozens of sensors capable of recording the activity of single neurons in the brain.
The probes were developed at Harvard and are made from a material known as a 'fluorinated elastomer', similar to Teflon, which can live stably in the brain for several months.
It is as soft as biological tissue but can be engineered into highly resilient electronic components that can house multiple sensors for recording brain activity.
The ribbons were implanted on an area of the embryo called the 'neural plate', which is the earliest stage of the nervous system. As the embryo develops, the plate bends into a u-shape, taking the ribbon probes inside.
By the time the neural plate has grown into the neural tube – the basis of the brain and central nervous system – the electronics are completely embedded inside, where they can give a read-out of how the neurons are firing and communicating with each other.
Researchers say the device can record electrical activity from single brain cells with millisecond precision, with no impact on normal tadpole embryo development or behaviour.
By integrating their stretchable device into the neural plate, the researchers showed they could continuously monitor brain activity during each embryonic stage.
'These so-called cyborg tadpoles offer a glimpse into a future in which profound mysteries of the brain could be illuminated, and diseases that manifest in early development could be understood, treated or cured,' Harvard said in a press notice about the new technology.
The research is published in the journal Nature.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
PFAS exposure before birth could put your teen at risk for high blood pressure, study finds
Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being. Prenatal exposure to a class of dangerous, widely used chemicals could be linked to your child having high blood pressure as a teen, according to a new study. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS — sometimes called 'forever chemicals' because they don't fully break down in the environment — are a class of about 15,000 human-made chemicals linked to cancers, endocrine-related conditions and developmental problems in children. New data shows the synthetic compounds could also be linked to a teen's risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life, according to the study published Thursday in the Journal of the American Heart Association. Researchers looked at data from 1,094 children over an average of 12 years. The study team compared measurements of eight types of PFAS chemicals in maternal plasma samples 24 to 72 hours after birth and the children's blood pressure from medical records, according to the study. The kids who were exposed to higher levels of PFAS chemicals in utero were more likely to have higher blood pressure in childhood and adolescence, the research found. The connection was particularly strong in adolescents, male children and Black children, said senior study author Dr. Mingyu Zhang, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The study is observational, meaning that while it shows associations, it cannot prove that PFAS exposure is the cause of the elevated blood pressure, Zhang said. While researchers did adjust for other factors that could be at play, there could be other elements driving the connection between PFAS and blood pressure, he added. That said, the results are strong because this study is one of the largest and most diverse while also using rigorous methods, said Dr. Carmen Marsit, Rollins Distinguished Professor of Research at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health in Atlanta. He was not involved in the research. The topic is important to investigate because if a child has high blood pressure, they are more likely to also have higher blood pressure later on, Zhang said. And that is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the No. 1 cause of death in the United States. The largest effects were shown in adolescents who were exposed to a mixture of different PFAS chemicals during pregnancy compared with those who were not, which implies that there may be a synergistic impact on cardiometabolic health, Marsit said. 'Most children will be exposed to multiple different PFAS chemicals, so this is worrisome,' he said. The fact that adolescence is the age when prenatal exposure to PFAS is most linked with higher blood pressure suggests that some of the PFAS chemicals could take a long period of time to show their impacts, Marsit said. A long latency of the effects would mean that people don't just need to worry about reducing exposures, but interventions also need to be developed to prevent the health outcomes in people who were exposed earlier, he added. Not only are PFAS forever chemicals –– they also are everywhere chemicals. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey shows that this class of chemicals can be found in nearly every person in the United States, Marsit said in a previous CNN story. There are things you can do to reduce your exposure, however, he added. Major sources of exposure include food, water, and waterproof or stain-resistant items, Marsit said. Helpful steps include drinking filtered water –– using filters like those listed by the Environmental Working Group –– out of metal or glass containers, he said. Plastics contain PFAS and other toxic chemicals, Marsit said. A focus on fresh food can also help, as packaging for foods are often coated in PFAS chemicals, he added. And avoid using nonstick cookware, opting instead for metal, cast-iron or ceramic pots and pans, he said. Dusting, vacuuming, and washing your hands before eating or drinking can also reduce PFAS exposure, Marsit said. Healthy lifestyle choices can reduce the risk of high blood pressure for children who have been exposed to PFAS, Zhang said. 'These include maintaining a healthy weight, eating a balanced diet, reducing salt intake, and encouraging physical activity,' he added. But ultimately, an individual cannot solve PFAS exposure alone, Zhang said. 'We also need policy-level actions to limit and phase out PFAS use in products and industry, and to strengthen monitoring and regulation of PFAS in water systems,' he added.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Are We Going To Collaborate With AI? And How?
Dharmesh and his call with Sam Altman John Werner What are we going to do with AI? It's a common question, sure, but it's also phrased ambiguously. We'll get back to that in a moment. Within the spiraling complexity of the tech industry, people have many questions. There's a good deal of uncertainty about exactly how our grand experiment with AI will work. Part of that involves the idea that unlike with past technology transformations, a portion of it will simply be out of our control. It goes back to the idea, espoused by people like my friend Jeremy Werthheimer, that we are not exactly 'engineering' LLMs, but 'discovering' them and their capabilities. In other words, how do you 'use' something that can also imitate cognition? Are you using it, or is it using you? And then there's the big question of human sentiment. How do people feel about AI? And is that too general of a question? Tomorrow's Teams Dharmesh Shah One thing you get in this piece from Harvard is that there's more than one way to view AI as a user. Taking the example of students in a younger age group, a cited study found half of them using generative AI, with most common uses being search and brainstorming. The survey, which reached 1500 teens, showed how some people use it to cheat, and others use it in more positive ways. 'Of the teens surveyed, many admitted to using AI to cheat on assignments, homework, or tests,' writes Ryan Nagelhout. 'But while academic integrity remains a concern for both adults and teens alike, many study participants highlighted positive academic experiences they've had with generative AI. AI was called 'the modern approach to learning,' while other teens surveyed pointed out that 'not all kids use it to cheat in school.' So with that in mind, there's a big difference between viewing this technology in a positive way, and viewing it negatively. Going back to the idea of surveys and ambiguity, I recently saw this talk from Dharmesh Shah of HubSpot, where he asked a good number of people: 'How will we compete with AI?' What LLMs are like John Werner As he pointed out, this has two meanings – competing against AI, and competing using AI. I have to admit that when I see the question, I think of it as competing against AI, because of the technology's sometimes confounding powers to do what we do, better. But Shah revealed that in his survey, 66% of respondents saw it the other way, in collaboration, with 34% taking in the question the way that I did. Referencing the year '2 B.C.' or 'before ChatGPT,' he talks about answering questions such as: how does AI work, and where are we going with it? Quoting figures like Geoff Hinton, who has famously become less ebullient after his early work on neural nets, Shah also makes some interesting little points that I think are aimed at insiders, as when he quips that 'the token is what geeks use to charge by the syllable.' I found that funny. AI will give you a better job Dharmesh Shah Here's another part of Shah's talk that I really wanted to focus on. Further on in the presentation, he starts talking about his own origins in a village in India, where, he said, they didn't have a TV, or even a refrigerator. Then he contrasted that with his son's experience as an aspiring author, in which the young man is already involved in what Shah called 'world-building' (a la Minecraft?) a type of brilliant coding that allows him to explore the use of AI in an empowering way. I thought this was a compelling way to talk about how the new generation may coexist with AI. Another way to think about this is to enumerate the biggest fears about AI, like job displacement, ethical concerns regarding privacy, and the slow winnowing away of human intellectual powers. That's balanced against the potential to help society in fields like medicine, and boost productivity across many industries. Let me take a few more phrases from Shah's talk that I think relate. He referenced 'simple interaction, sophisticated action,' a phrase that seems to speak to a balance – a contrast between a seemingly small process, and a meaningful step. He also encouraged humans to 'be curious,' which seems to me to be the right way to encounter the technology. Instead of being fearful, or being mindlessly accepting – be curious, and don't abdicate critical thinking powers. Finally, he asked people to 'dream big, but iterate small' – in other words, have a grand vision, but shepherd it carefully, in deliberate steps, rather than just lurching forward. Because, to some extent, we have to understand the technology well ourselves, to collaborate in the best ways. More than the sum JOHN WERNER To figure out what our approach will be, we first have to engage with the tech, in planned and thoughtful ways. It is all so brand new. Maybe in a few years, we'll have developed a program for building that relationship – or maybe the children will figure it out for us.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Harvard professor fired after refusing COVID shot named to CDC vaccine panel
A former Harvard University professor who said he was fired over his refusal to be vaccinated against COVID-19 has been named to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory panel on vaccines. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, published an opinion piece last year detailing how he was let go by Mass General Brigham, and then consequently from his Harvard faculty position, after he 'objected both publicly and privately to the COVID vaccine mandates.' Kulldorff is among eight new members named by U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, after Kennedy this week abruptly purged all 17 members appointed during the Biden administration. Kennedy characterized the decision to start over with new members as one that would restore public trust in vaccines. The new appointees include individuals who have criticized vaccines and spread misinformation, according to the Associated Press. 'Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028,' he wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece published Monday. 'A clean sweep is needed to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science.' Read more: Mass. doctor ousted by RFK Jr. as part of purge to CDC vaccine advisory committee Before he announced his new panel picks this week, Kennedy said he would appoint credentialed scientists, 'not anti-vaxxers.' Doctors' groups and public health organizations have largely decried the move to oust 17 members ahead of their term ends. The list of all eight new appointees can be found here. Kulldorff co-authored the controversial Great Barrington Declaration in 2020, an open letter penned with two other public health experts in response to the COVID pandemic that advocated for lifting lockdowns for young and healthy people so heard immunity could develop. In 2021, Kulldorff posted on X that 'thinking that everyone must be vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should.' 'COVID vaccines are important for older high-risk people and their care-takers,' he wrote. 'Those with prior natural infection do not need it. Nor children.' The second Trump administration in its vaccine planning has mirrored Kulldorff's opinions: Last month, the FDA announced new COVID shots would no longer be approved for healthy pregnant adults and healthy children. According to his biography, Kulldorff is currently a senior scholar at the Brownstone Institute and a fellow at the Academy for Science and Freedom. He has previously served on scientific advisory committees to the Food and Drug Administration and CDC. Kulldorff did not immediately return a request for comment. Mass. doctor ousted by RFK Jr. as part of purge to CDC vaccine advisory committee Trump cuts threaten 'irreplaceable' Harvard stockpile of human feces, urine A Mass. man bought an illegal depressant online and took his life. The seller will go to prison Boston OD deaths plummeted by 38% last year, lowest in a decade Read the original article on MassLive.
