$1,000 Invested in VUG Could Turn Into $50,000
High-flying growth stocks receive a lot of attention, thanks to their high return potential. However, it doesn't take picking generational companies to make good money in the stock market. Broad exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have shown they can also do the trick with enough time on your side.
ETFs allow you to invest in dozens, hundreds, and even thousands of companies with a single investment. And although they may not be as sexy as individual stocks, many go on to outperform the broader market (based on S&P 500 returns). The Vanguard Growth ETF (NYSEMKT: VUG) is a great example of this.
Focusing on large-cap growth stocks, VUG has been a rewarding investment and has the potential to turn a $1,000 investment into $50,000 if it continues at its current rate.
Stability and growth all mixed into one ETF
Large-cap growth stocks have the potential to be the best of both worlds.
On the one hand, large-cap companies (those with a market cap of at least $200 billion) typically have established business models, are market leaders, and are in good financial health. This helps provide a bit of stability because these companies have diversified revenue streams and the resources to weather rough times in the economy.
On the other hand, these companies are still considered growth stocks because of their strong revenue and earnings growth and their considerable expansion and return potential.
Below are the ETF's top 10 holdings:
Company Percentage of the ETF
Apple 11.61%
Microsoft 10.59%
Nvidia 9.04%
Amazon 6.16%
Meta Platforms 4.04%
Broadcom 3.44%
Alphabet (Class A) 3.24%
Tesla 2.95%
Eli Lilly 2.93%
Alphabet (Class C) 2.63%
Data source: Yahoo! Finance.
The ETF is a bit top-heavy, but that's because it's weighted by market cap, and megacap tech stocks have skyrocketed in valuation over the past half-decade or so. The tech sector represents over 58% of VUG.
How a $1,000 investment can turn into $50,000
This ETF doesn't have superpowers that can turn $1,000 into $50,000 overnight, but it does have returns that can do so if they continue.
Since hitting the stock market in January 2004, the VUG ETF has averaged around 10.4% annual returns. Over the past decade, its average annual returns have been an impressive 14.7%.
VUG data by YCharts.
Using 10% and 14% average annual returns, here's how much a one-time $1,000 investment could go to in different numbers of years:
Years Invested 10% Annual Returns 14% Annual Returns
10 $2,580 $3,690
15 $4,150 $7,100
20 $6,670 $13,640
25 $10,730 $26,230
30 $17,260 $50,410
Calculations by author. Values are rounded down to the nearest ten and take into account VUG's expense ratio.
Let compound earnings do the hard work for you
Anytime your investment grows a few times over, it's a good thing, but the real value is created when you continue contributing to VUG instead of a one-time investment.
For the sake of illustration, let's meet in the middle and assume VUG averages 12% annual returns. Here's how your investment could stack up based on how much you add monthly:
Years Invested $100 Added Monthly $250 Added Monthly $500 Added Monthly
15 $50,000 $116,900 $228,400
20 $95,600 $224,700 $439,800
25 $175,800 $414,300 $811,900
Calculations by author. Values are rounded down to the nearest hundred and take into account VUG's expense ratio.
It's important to remember that these are all assumptions and there's no way to predict how VUG (or any stock) will perform going forward. However, the most important thing this shows is just how effective compound earnings can be at creating wealth in the stock market.
What you may lack in a lump sum to invest, you can make up for with consistency and time. Don't underestimate the power of both.
Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF right now?
Before you buy stock in Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to177%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Stefon Walters has positions in Apple and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, and Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Canadian officials trying to work towards tariff trade deal behind the scenes
Watch CTV News' Jeremie Charron says the federal government maintains that negotiations between Canada and the U.S. surrounding trade are still ongoing.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Debate is underway in the U.S. Senate on Trump's big bill, but overnight voting is delayed
WASHINGTON —Debate is underway in the U.S. Senate for an all-night session Sunday, with Republicans wrestling President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts over mounting Democratic opposition -- and even some brake-pumping over the budget slashing by the president himself. The outcome from the weekend of work in the Senate remains uncertain and highly volatile, and overnight voting has been pushed off until Monday. GOP leaders are rushing to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline to pass the package, but they barely secured enough support to muscle it past a procedural Saturday night hurdle in a tense scene. A handful of Republican holdouts revolted, and it took phone calls from Trump and a visit from Vice President JD Vance to keep it on track. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina announced Sunday he would not seek reelection after Trump badgered him for saying he could not vote for the bill with its steep Medicaid cuts. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. It also said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. But other Senate Republicans, along with conservatives in the House, are pushing for steeper cuts, particularly to health care, drawing their own unexpected warning from Trump. 'Don't go too crazy!' the president posted on social media. 'REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected.' All told, the Senate bill includes some $4 trillion in tax cuts, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions in green energy tax credits that Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide, and impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements and making sign-up eligibility more stringent. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. If the Senate can pass the bill, it would need to return to the House. Speaker Mike Johnson has told lawmakers to be on call for a return to Washington this week. Democrats ready to fight all night Unable to stop the march toward passage of the 940-page bill, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress is using the tools at its disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took some 16 hours. Then senators took over the debate, filling the chamber with speeches, while Republicans largely stood aside. 'Reckless and irresponsible,' said Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan. 'A gift to the billionaire class,' said Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Sen. Patty Murray, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. 'In my 33 years here in the United States Senate, things have never -- never -- worked this way,' said Murray, the longest-serving Democrat on the Budget Committee. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. 'Go back home and try that game with your constituents,' she said. 'We still need to kick people off their health care -- that's too expensive. We still need to close those hospitals -- we have to cut costs. And we still have to kick people off SNAP -- because the debt is out of control.' Sanders said Tillis' decision not to seek reelection shows the hold that Trump's cult of personality has over the GOP. 'We are literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids,' Sanders said, while giving tax breaks to Jeff Bezos and other wealthy billionaires. GOP leaders unfazed Republicans are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, and appeared undeterred, even as they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. 'We're going to pass the 'Big, beautiful bill,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman. The holdout Republicans remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. Trump, who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. He threatened to campaign aginst Tillis, who was worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' Later Sunday, Tillis issued a lengthy statement announcing he would not seek reelection in 2026. In an impassioned evening speech, Tillis shared his views arguing the Senate approach is a betrayal of Trump's promise not to kick people off health care. 'We could take the time to get this right,' he thundered. But until then, he said he would remain opposed. Democrats can't filibuster, but can stall Using a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can rely on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome objections. Without the filibuster, Democrats have latched on to other tools to mount their objections. One is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Democrats also intend to use their full 10 hours of available debate time, now underway. And then Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package, a process called vote-a-rama. But Republicans late Sunday postponed that expected overnight session to early Monday. GOP senators to watch As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' Several provisions in the package are designed for her state in Alaska, but some were out of compliance of the strict rules by the Senate parliamentarian. A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vance joined in. Later, Scott said, 'We all want to get to yes.'
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Meta spending big on AI talent but will it pay off?
Mark Zuckerberg and Meta are spending billions of dollars for top talent to make up ground in the generative artificial intelligence race, sparking doubt about the wisdom of the spree. OpenAI boss Sam Altman recently lamented that Meta has offered $100 million bonuses to engineers who jump to Zuckerberg's ship, where hefty salaries await. A few OpenAI employees have reportedly taken Meta up on the offer, joining Scale AI founder and former chief executive Alexandr Wang at the Menlo Park-based tech titan. Meta paid more than $14 billion for a 49 percent stake in Scale AI in mid-June, bringing Wang on board as part of the deal. Scale AI labels data to better train AI models for businesses, governments and labs. 'Meta has finalized our strategic partnership and investment in Scale AI,' a Meta spokesperson told AFP. 'As part of this, we will deepen the work we do together producing data for AI models and Alexandr Wang will join Meta to work on our superintelligence efforts.' US media outlets have reported that Meta's recruitment effort has also targeted OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever; Google rival Perplexity AI, and hot AI video startup Runway. Meta chief Zuckerberg is reported to have sounded the charge himself due to worries Meta is lagging rivals in the generative AI race. The latest version of Meta AI model Llama finished behind its heavyweight rivals in code writing rankings at an LM Arena platform that lets users evaluate the technology. Meta is integrating recruits into a new team dedicated to developing 'superintelligence,' or AI that outperforms people when it comes to thinking and understanding. 'Mercenary' Tech blogger Zvi Moshowitz felt Zuckerberg had to do something about the situation, expecting Meta to succeed in attracting hot talent but questioning how well it will pay off. 'There are some extreme downsides to going pure mercenary... and being a company with products no one wants to work on,' Moshowitz told AFP. 'I don't expect it to work, but I suppose Llama will suck less.' While Meta's share price is nearing a new high with the overall value of the company approaching $2 trillion, some investors have started to worry. Institutional investors are concerned about how well Meta is managing its cash flow and reserves, according to Baird strategist Ted Mortonson. 'Right now, there are no checks and balances' with Zuckerberg free to do as he wishes running Meta, Mortonson noted. The potential for Meta to cash in by using AI to rev its lucrative online advertising machine has strong appeal but 'people have a real big concern about spending,' said Mortonson. Meta executives have laid out a vision of using AI to streamline the ad process from easy creation to smarter targeting, bypassing creative agencies and providing a turnkey solution to brands. AI talent hires are a long-term investment unlikely to impact Meta's profitability in the immediate future, according to CFRA analyst Angelo Zino. 'But still, you need those people on board now and to invest aggressively to be ready for that phase' of generative AI, Zino said. According to The New York Times, Zuckerberg is considering shifting away from Meta's Llama, perhaps even using competing AI models instead. Penn State University professor Mehmet Canayaz sees potential for Meta to succeed with AI agents tailored to specific tasks at its platform, not requiring the best large language model. 'Even firms without the most advanced LLMs, like Meta, can succeed as long as their models perform well within their specific market segment,' Canayaz said.
