Sunscreens RANKED - from best buys to those to avoid at all costs... as consumer watchdog reveals one 'ineffective' £28 cream could pose safety risk
A £28 sunscreen, marketed as 'perfect for the whole family', has failed a safety test carried out by Which?—despite claiming to be 'especially suitable' for children.
The revelation may have left consumers asking which sun creams they can actually trust.
Consumer watchdog Which? tested 15 popular SPF50 and SPF30 products from high-street names and supermarkets, using strict international safety standards.
Each was assessed for ultraviolet (UV) protection and SPF protection, and rated for ease of use by a panel of volunteers.
Two were labelled 'Don't Buys' after failing key tests, while seven earned a 'Best Buy' status, scoring highest overall.
Another two were also labelled 'great value' options, for offering people a cost-effective option to protect against the sun's UV rays.
To trial the creams, scientists applied a small amount on volunteers' backs, before shining a lamp on the patch to simulate the sun's rays.
The time it takes for the skin to become red was then measured.
In another test, scientists took a sample of the cream and spread it onto a glass plate to measure the absorption of UV radiation directly.
To pass, the sunscreen needed to provide at least one third of the claimed SPF.
For example, a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 will take 30 times longer to damage your skin compared to no protection at all.
Here we reveal the full list of 2025 test results, ranked from most to least effective.
Lidl Cien Sun Protect Spray SPF30
The bargain product was given the 'great value' seal of approval by the watchdog, after the panel found it passed both key tests, was easy to apply and 'smelled great'.
They did, however, note it felt 'a bit greasy on skin' after application.
£3.49 Shop
Boots Soltan Protect & Moisturise Lotion SPF30
Which? said the product offered 'excellent UVA and UVB protection'.
UVA and UVB protection are both crucial in sunscreen because they address different types of harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun, which can raise the risk of skin damage and cancer.
UVB rays are primarily responsible for sunburn, while UVA rays penetrate deeper, causing premature aging and wrinkles.
£5.50 Shop
Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Lotion SPF30
The product passed both SPF and UVA tests. It's only downside, Which? said, was the cost.
£8.65 Shop
Sainsbury's SPF30 Moisturising Lotion
The consumer watchdog had no major concerns with the product it said and provides exactly the level of sun protection that it claims.
£5.75 Shop
Superdrug Solait Sun Spray SPF30
Which? said the product 'delivers on SPF and UVA claims' and 'no major issues' at all.
£5.50 Shop
The factor 30's to avoid
Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30
Price: £3.75/200ml
After testing the product twice, Morrisons sun spray failed to provide the 'claimed level of protection from UVB rays', Which? said.
After informing Morrisons of its results, the supermarket giant told Which? it was looking closely at the data and working with its supplier to carry out additional independent testing.
Ultrasun Family SPF30
Price: £28/150ml
Ultrasun's product passed the SPF test but didn't meet the minimum required UVA level for an SPF30 product in either the initial or repeat test.
Responding to the findings, the company said: 'Ultrasun is fully confident in our testing protocols.
'As an independent brand delivering very high UVB and UVA protection options for over 30 years, our detailed testing processes continue to not only meet but surpass industry standards.
'Our chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available, and our UVB and UVA filters are tested both in-vitro and in-vivo.
'We conclusively support the results of our independent tests which found the Ultrasun Family SPF30 reached a UVB-SPF in vivo of 31.4 and a UVA-PF in vitro of 13.1, which equates to a 92% UVA absorbance.'
Garnier Ambre Solaire Sensitive Advanced Sun Spray SPF50+
Garnier's SPF50 spray passed both tests and was 'easy to apply', the watchdog said.
But it noted, the product—which is sold at the likes of Asda, Boots, Morrisons and Sainsbury's—was an expensive option.
£8.00 Shop
Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Spray SPF50+
One of the most recognisable products on the market, Nivea's SPF50+ spray passed both SPF and UVA tests.
It's only downside, Which? said, was the cost.
£7.00 Shop
Sainsbury's SPF50+ Moisturising Spray Lotion
The watchdog said Sainsbury's spray provides the level of sun protection it claimed it does and there were no major downsides to the product at all.
£5.75 Shop
SPF50+ Children's Recommendations
Childs Farm SPF50+ Sun Cream Fragrance-Free
Which? said the product offers 'excellent sun protection' and passed both key tests.
The sunscreen, sold online on Amazon as well as in Boots, does 'feel a bit greasy', it noted.
£12 Shop
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Coroner's concerns over Cumberland Infirmary staff shortages
A coroner has raised concerns that a woman's death in hospital may be linked to an "understaffed and under pressure" coroner for Cumbria Margaret Taylor issued a prevention of future deaths report to the trust which runs the Cumberland Infirmary in Carlisle, following the death of a document urges the North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (NCIC) to take action after it emerged nurses were looking after 10 patients each instead of the expected six on the day Sarah Kathleen Hill trust said it "fully accepted" the coroner's findings and had implemented "learning points" raised in the report. The report said Mrs Hill, 78, had been admitted to hospital last November with gallstones, but a procedure to remove them only partly became increasingly unwell in the following days and collapsed while going to the same day she had an unwitnessed fall "at a time when she was meant to be closely observed", Ms Taylor said in her Hill became unresponsive and died the day after the fall. 'Understaffing not unusual' An inquest into her death held last month concluded she died as a result of "recognised complications of a necessary medical procedure".Ms Taylor said the evidence heard "revealed matters giving rise to concern about the standard of nursing care" that Mrs Hill raised concerns about the patient being left alone in a side room where she could not easily be checked on, adding there was a lack of evidence to suggest a falls risk assessment had been undertaken and a lack of frequent recorded observations warranted by Mrs Hill's Taylor added: "I was advised that the ward was understaffed and under pressure."She said although understaffing had been flagged, no help arrived on the ward."The evidence presented to me was that this was not an unusual situation on the ward," she said.A spokesman for NCIC offered their condolences to Mrs Hill's family."We fully accept the findings from the coroner and have implemented the learning points raised in the report," they trust must respond to the coroner's concerns by 22 July, detailing which actions it intends to take to address them. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
General Medical Council reviewing 35 Nottingham maternity cases
The body that regulates doctors says it is looking into complaints from 35 families who have shared concerns about Nottingham's maternity services.The city's two NHS hospitals are at the centre of the largest inquiry into NHS failings since the health service was founded in 1948, being led by Donna Ockenden, after hundreds of babies died or suffered harm.The General Medical Council (GMC) told the BBC it was also looking to talk to 33 other families about their maternity cases in organisation said investigations into the 35 family cases were at different stages. To begin with it "triages" cases with an initial assessment to check that allegations fall within the scope of the organisation's cases then move into the investigation stage where the GMC looks into cases further. This may involve gathering evidence, interviewing people and examining are a range of possible outcomes, including no further action, a warning or, where there is evidence of impaired fitness to practice, the case may be passed on to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) for a a case is proven, the tribunal can impose a range of sanctions, which can include ordering retraining or suspension from the medical register. The ultimate sanction is for someone to be removed from the register, sometimes described as being "struck off " which would bar someone from working as a doctor. Last weekend the GMC and the regulator of nurses and midwives, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) . apologised to harmed families for not responding quicker to the Nottingham maternity organisations plan to have surgeries in Nottingham where people can give information to both regulators about professional conduct they would like to be examined. The NMC told the BBC it currently has 12 family cases referred to it relating to Nottingham maternity cases mentioning 38 names of health professionals. Fourteen of those individuals were being investigated and would have been alerted to that, while the rest are concerns undergoing what are described as "screening checks" before a decision is made on whether to progress to a formal investigation. Harmed families in Nottingham have been pressing for greater individual accountability over maternity failings. A police investigation named Operation Perth is ongoing which will consider whether criminal charges should be brought against any individuals or whether there is a case of corporate manslaughter for Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (NUH) to answer. The Care Quality Commission has successfully prosecuted the trust twice over the deaths of four babies. NUH has said it has an ongoing maternity improvement programme and is co-operating with the police and regulators.
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Assisted dying: How did my MP vote on Friday 20 June?
MPs have voted to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales after their final debate on the change in the months of deliberation and scrutiny, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was backed by 314 votes to 291, a majority of were given a free vote on the issue, meaning parties did not instruct them what to third reading of the bill was the last opportunity for MPs to approve or reject it. The majority in favour has more than halved since MPs first backed proposals to legalise assisted dying in England and November they supported it by 330 to 275, a majority of to that, it had been almost a decade since the House of Commons had voted on the issue, deciding in 2015 to reject the "right to die" bill now passes to the House of Lords for further scrutiny. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was introduced by Labour MP Kim proposed letting terminally ill people end their life if they:are over 18, live in England or Wales, and have been registered with a GP for at least 12 monthshave the mental capacity to make the choice and be deemed to have expressed a clear, settled and informed wish, free from coercion or pressurebe expected to die within six monthsmake two separate declarations, witnessed and signed, about their wish to diesatisfy two independent doctors that they are eligible - with at least seven days between each assessment MPs make case for and against assisted dying bill, as campaigners waitHow could assisted dying laws change? The bill has since been amended following the committee and report stages, where it was scrutinised line by line by key changes included dropping the requirement for a High Court judge to approve assisted dying applications, replacing it with a three-person panel featuring a senior legal figure, psychiatrist and social changes explicitly prevent doctors from discussing assisted dying without other options, such as palliative care, psychological support or symptom management. The amended bill also says independent advocates should be provided for people who have learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions.A separate bill on assisted dying is being considered in Scotland and passed an initial vote at Holyrood in May 2025 but is subject to further debate and changes before a final March, the Isle of Man was the first part of the British Isles to approve assisted it remains illegal in most countries, more than 300 million people now live in countries which have legalised assisted Australia, New Zealand, Spain and Austria have all introduced assisted dying laws since 2015.
