Ukraine curbs autonomy of anti-corruption agencies
Stamping out endemic graft is a requirement for Kyiv to join the European Union as well as to secure billions in Western aid. Independent investigators have in recent months embarrassed senior officials with allegations of corruption.
Amendments passed on Tuesday grant the general prosecutor, appointed by the president, strict control over the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office, several lawmakers said.
The vote drew sharp criticism from the heads of both agencies and a top EU official, and spurred the largest public protests since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022.
It came a day after Kyiv's domestic security agency arrested two NABU officials on suspicion of ties to Russia and conducted sweeping searches into agency employees on other grounds. Critics and the two agencies said the crackdown went too far.
No senior official has publicly commented on the reason for Tuesday's amendments, which would allow the general prosecutor to transfer cases from the agencies and reassign prosecutors.
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, whose party holds a majority in parliament, approved the amendments late on Tuesday. His office did not respond to an earlier request for comment.
NABU chief Semen Kryvonos had urged Zelenskiy not to sign the fast-tracked bill, which he described as an attempt to "destroy" Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure.
After Tuesday's vote, Ukraine's government bonds fell more than 2% on international markets, with the bulk of the $20 billion of debt it restructured last year down over 1 cent at between 45 and 50 cents on the dollar .
Hundreds of Ukrainians protested near the presidential administration in central Kyiv late on Tuesday, with smaller actions taking place in several other cities.
Writing on X, EU enlargement commissioner Marta Kos said she was "seriously concerned" by Tuesday's vote.
"The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back," she said, adding that rule of law was at "the very center" of accession talks.
NABU and SAPO were established after the 2014 Maidan revolution that toppled a pro-Russian president and set Kyiv on a Western course.
The two agencies have stepped up their work during the war, leveling charges against lawmakers, ministers, and a former deputy head of Zelenskiy's administration.
Anti-graft campaigners have been alarmed since authorities charged a top anti-corruption activist this month with fraud and evading military service.
Critics have cast those charges as political retribution for exposing corrupt officials.
The government has also faced criticism for rejecting the candidacy of an economic security chief and current NABU detective who was unanimously backed by an internationally supervised committee.
A Western diplomat familiar with Ukraine's reform effort described the developments as "the most dangerous moment" yet for the independence of anti-corruption authorities.
"The Ukrainian side is testing the limits more and more," the person said, referring to the patience of Kyiv's allies.
Many influential Ukrainians lashed out on social media after Tuesday's vote, saying it was a betrayal of Ukraine's decade-long geopolitical ambition.
Fighting corruption is seen as critical to erasing a legacy of Russian rule, a sentiment echoed at the protest in Kyiv.
Vladyslava Kirstyuk, 18, said memories of her childhood in occupied eastern Ukraine, after Russia's covert invasion in 2014, left a strong impression on her.
"I know what it means for one person to have all the power, when nothing is transparent and everything is working against you," she said.
"I don't want it to be the same for us here."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
8 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Woman raped by her foster father awarded over €300,000 in damages by court
A man who admitted to repeatedly raping his foster daughter over a seven-year period must pay over €300,000 in damages to her, a High Court judge has ruled. Stephen Murray, formerly of Humphreystown, Vallymount, Co Wicklow, was jailed for 11 years in 2022 after pleading guilty to multiple counts of rape, oral rape and sexual assault of Kelly Kemmy. Advertisement The offending occurred between February 2009 and December 2015, when Ms Kemmy was aged between 11 and 18 years old. Ms Kemmy (27), who waived her right to anonymity following Murray's sentencing, subsequently issued civil proceedings against Murray and Tusla, who had placed her in her abuser's care. Ms Kemmy's claim against Tusla, which sought damages for negligence for placing her in the care of Murray, was later settled for €250,000. In February 2024, Mr Justice Paul Coffey ruled in favour of Ms Kemmy in her claim against Murray, which sought damages for personal injuries, and rape, sexual assault, assault, battery, false imprisonment and trespass to the person. Advertisement Murray did not participate in the proceedings, and judgment was made against him in default of appearance. In a judgment handed down on Wednesday, Ms Justice Emily Egan ruled Ms Kemmy should receive damages of €328,000 from Murray. Ms Justice Egan, who characterised the nature and severity of abuse suffered by Ms Kemmy as a 'worst case scenario', said Ms Kemmy should be awarded €578,000 in general and special damages arising from her action against Murray. However, the judge ruled that Tusla and Murray were 'concurrent wrongdoers' in the case, and as such, the €250,000 settlement with Tusla should be deducted from the total award. Advertisement '[Ms Kemmy] suffered damage as a result of the tortious and criminal actions of Murray and that damage was not prevented, interrupted or ameliorated by Tusla, as it ought to have been,' the judge said. An award of €450,000 in general damages reflects 'the nature, severity, timing and duration of abuse and the severity of the injury' toMs Kemmy, Ms Justice Egan said. This award is greater than damages previously awarded for other child sexual abuse cases, the judge said. The judge noted the current upper limit for awards of general damages in personal injuries cases is €550,000. The €128,000 awarded in special damages arises primarily from Ms Kemmy's claims of loss of earnings. Advertisement Referring to Ms Kemmy's evidence in the civil case, Ms Justice Egan noted that it is estimated she suffered hundreds of separate incidents of rape, occurring three to four times a week. Murray's abuse of Ms Kemmy began when she was 11 years old, some seven years after she and two of her siblings were fostered by Murray and his wife. 'For years, [Ms Kemmy's] dignity and autonomy were taken from her, causing her to suffer humiliation, frustration, helplessness, loneliness and despair,' the judge said. It was Ms Kemmy's evidence that Murray told her the abuse was normal but secret, and if she told anyone, 'it would ruin the family', the judge noted. Advertisement Ms Kemmy said she felt trapped, helpless and frightened, and that her shame was so overwhelming she felt she had no one to turn to for help, the judge said. Ms Kemmy reported Murray's abuse to An Garda Síochána in July 2019. After this, she was rendered effectively homeless, and her relationship with her two siblings was 'devastated', the judge noted. Murray would later plead guilty to 14 counts of rape, two counts of oral rape and one count of sexual assault. Ms Kemmy continues to suffer with post-traumatic stress disorder, the judge noted. The judge also said Ms Kenny is a resourceful and intelligent woman, keen to gain security for herself and her young child, and who has ambitions of becoming a social worker.
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia, Ukraine discuss more POW swaps; no deal on ceasefire or leaders' meeting
ISTANBUL, July 23 (Reuters) - Russia and Ukraine discussed further prisoner swaps on Wednesday at a brief session of peace talks in Istanbul, but the sides remained far apart on ceasefire terms and a possible meeting of their leaders. "We have progress on the humanitarian track, with no progress on a cessation of hostilities," Ukraine's chief delegate Rustem Umerov said after talks that lasted just 40 minutes. He said Ukraine had proposed a meeting before the end of August between Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. He added: "By agreeing to this proposal, Russia can clearly demonstrate its constructive approach." Russia's chief delegate Vladimir Medinsky said the point of a leaders' meeting should be to sign an agreement, not to "discuss everything from scratch". He renewed Moscow's call for a series of short ceasefires of 24-48 hours to enable the retrieval of bodies. Ukraine says it wants an immediate and much longer ceasefire. The talks took place just over a week after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened heavy new sanctions on Russia and countries that buy its exports unless a peace deal was reached within 50 days. There was no sign of any progress towards that goal, although both sides said there was discussion of further humanitarian exchanges following a series of prisoner swaps, the latest of which took place on Wednesday. Medinsky said the negotiators agreed to exchange at least 1,200 more prisoners of war from each side, and Russia had offered to hand over another 3,000 Ukrainian bodies. He said Moscow was working through a list of 339 names of Ukrainian children that Kyiv accuses it of abducting. Russia denies that charge and says it has offered protection to children separated from their parents during the war. "Some of the children have already been returned back to Ukraine. Work is under way on the rest. If their legal parents, close relatives, representatives are found, these children will immediately return home," Medinsky said. Umerov said Kyiv was expecting "further progress" on POWs, adding: "We continue to insist on the release of civilians, including children." Ukrainian authorities say at least 19,000 children have been forcibly deported. Before the talks, the Kremlin had played down expectations, describing the two sides' positions as diametrically opposed and saying no one should expect miracles. At 40 minutes, the meeting was even shorter than the two sides' previous encounters on May 16 and June 2, which lasted a combined total of under three hours. Oleksandr Bevz, a member of the Ukrainian delegation, said Kyiv had proposed a Putin-Zelenskiy meeting in August because that would fall within the deadline set by Trump for a deal. Putin turned down a previous challenge from Zelenskiy to meet in person and has said he does not see him as a legitimate leader because Ukraine, which is under martial law, did not hold new elections when Zelenskiy's five-year mandate expired last year. Trump has patched up relations with Zelenskiy after a public row with him at the White House in February, and has lately expressed growing frustration with Putin. Three sources close to the Kremlin told Reuters last week that Putin, unfazed by Trump's ultimatum, would keep fighting in Ukraine until the West engaged on his terms for peace, and that his territorial demands may widen as Russian forces advance.
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
UK is drowning in debt but striking junior doctors want huge pay rises – patients died last time before 22% increase
TUESDAY brought yet more grim news for the public finances. The Office For National Statistics revealed that in June, the Government was forced to borrow £20.7billion. 4 4 That was £6.6billion higher than last June — and all this in spite of the £40billion of tax rises announced in last October's Budget. The Government is drowning in debt. Paying interest on its accumulated debts is costing the taxpayer £100billion a year — almost double what we spend on defence. There is little hope of improvement. Economic growth is virtually non-existent, productivity is flat-lining and tax rises are failing to raise as much revenue as the Chancellor hoped, as taxpayers choose to work less hard, rearrange their tax affairs or, in some cases, emigrate. But there is one place where you can be sure the news will not have sunk in: the offices of Britain's public sector unions. Lining pockets In fact, the BMA — which is rapidly inheriting the mantle of the country's most militant trade union from the Rail, Maritime And Transport union — chose the moment to request that its consultant members charge the NHS at least £188 an hour to provide cover during the junior doctors' five-day strike, which begins tomorrow, rising to £313 an hour for weekend work. It could mean some consultants lining their pockets with up to £6,000 this weekend. It isn't hard to see the BMA's logic: it wants to try to break the NHS's finances to force the Government to give in. In spite of the extravagant bills demanded by consultants, the NHS will still not be providing a normal service during the latest walkout. During the last set of strikes by junior doctors — who now demand to be called 'resident doctors' to disguise the fact they are still in training — more than a million treatments ended up being cancelled. Wes Streeting brutally slams Kemi AND Farage and demands Tories say sorry for how they ran the NHS in blistering attack It's been reported that coroners' findings mentioned the strikes in five deaths, but that is almost certainly a gross under-estimate. During the week of one 72-hour strike in March 2023, the ONS recorded 2,247 'excess deaths' — the number of deaths above what might have been expected from the average of the previous five years over that period. Deep down, the BMA's hard men seem to realise the harm that they are causing. Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, the co-chair of the BMA's Resident Doctors' Committee, told Times Radio yesterday that consultants who refused to cancel their normal clinics in order to man A&E departments would be guilty of a 'dereliction of duty'. Yet strangely, he did not seem to want to apply the same term to junior doctors who walk out on strike. We all appreciate what doctors do, of course — yet even miners' leader Arthur Scargill at the height of his pomp was not as unreasonable as the BMA is being. 4 Junior doctors received a 22 per cent pay increase last year and have already been offered an inflation-busting 5.4 per cent this year. Their claim that they need a 29 per cent increase this year to return their pay in real terms to 2008 levels is fallacious. They made that calculation using the Retail Prices Index, a long-discredited measure which has been criticised for exaggerating inflation. Some junior doctors can now earn £100,000 a year, including overtime. What's more, they have a generous pension scheme which involves the taxpayer contributing an extra 20.68 per cent of their pay to their pension pot. When they retire, their pensions will be linked to their lifetime earnings and will be inflation-proofed. Such deals are virtually unknown now in the private sector, where employers make average pension contributions equivalent to just 4.5 per cent of an employee's pay — and where in most cases pension payouts are dependent on the performance of underlying investments. And it is not just the BMA which has lost its grasp of fiscal reality. Public sector unions are living in a parallel, dream universe where there is an infinite pot of money to meet their demands. On their side of the looking glass, workers have a fundamental right to above-inflation pay rises year on year without ever having to improve their productivity. Bankrolled by unions On the contrary, many seem to think they could still enjoy inflation-busting rises if their working week was reduced from five days a week to four. Sorry, but it doesn't work. Societies grow richer by being more productive. And that is something which seems to have eluded Britain's public sector for the past three decades. 4 Astonishingly, according to ONS figures, the average worker in the public sector now produces less than they did when Tony Blair took office 28 years ago. That is an unparalleled era of non-achievement. The unions seem to be counting on the current Government being equally blind to the dire state of the public finances. Starmer's administration has shown itself so far to be a pushover — which is hardly surprising when you consider that the Labour Party is bankrolled by the unions. But no government will be able to ignore for much longer Britain's reckoning with its debts. What happened under Liz Truss was just a foretaste of what is to come if global bond investors lose confidence in the UK Government's ability to repay its dues. When that happens, Britain will be in the situation Greece was 14 years ago when public salaries and pensions had to be slashed to avoid national bankruptcy. Public sector unions will wail all they like, but they would have helped bring the disaster on themselves.
