
UN chief's Rohingya refugee camp visit a call to action
The visit of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to the Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh last week has brought renewed attention to one of the world's most protracted humanitarian crises. Guterres, deeply moved by the suffering of the Rohingya, called for their return to Myanmar at the earliest opportunity.
For Bangladesh, which has shouldered the immense burden of hosting nearly a million refugees, this declaration marks a significant diplomatic victory. But how will this be received in Myanmar, particularly by the Arakan Army, which now controls much of Rakhine State?
The Arakan Army, having consolidated power over 11 of Rakhine's 18 townships, is a force that can no longer be ignored. However, its policies toward the Rohingya remain deeply troubling. It has outlawed the use of the term 'Rohingya,' dismissing the community's distinct identity and reinforcing the discriminatory practices of past regimes. Despite its aspirations for international recognition, the Arakan Army's refusal to acknowledge the Rohingya's identity undermines its credibility as a legitimate governing authority.
Guterres' remarks were a clear signal. The world's top diplomat unequivocally stated the conditions the Arakan Army and other Myanmar authorities must meet to gain global legitimacy. The voluntary, safe and dignified return of the Rohingya, with full recognition of their rights and identity, must be a nonnegotiable benchmark.
This message resonates deeply with Bangladesh, where frustrations over the stalled repatriation process have grown. Despite repeated bilateral agreements with Myanmar, no meaningful progress has been made. The failure of the previous repatriation attempts in 2018 and 2019 was a sobering reminder that, without guarantees of safety and citizenship, the Rohingya would remain at risk. Guterres' clear call for repatriation underlines the need for a new approach — one that involves regional cooperation and greater international accountability.
Past repatriation attempts have failed, largely due to Myanmar's unwillingness to provide assurances of safety and citizenship
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim
For Bangladesh, the secretary-general's stance offers renewed diplomatic leverage. Dhaka has long argued that repatriation remains the only sustainable solution. However, past attempts have failed, largely due to Myanmar's unwillingness to provide assurances of safety and citizenship to the returning refugees. Now, with the Arakan Army in control, Bangladesh has an opportunity to recalibrate its approach. Engaging with the group, alongside the national unity government, could prove more effective than relying solely on the junta-controlled administration.
The Arakan Army itself is at a crossroads. If it truly aspires to establish itself as a credible governing authority, it cannot ignore the Rohingya issue. Guterres' visit has made it clear that recognition and legitimacy on the world stage will only come if the group commits to protecting all communities within Rakhine, including the Rohingya. The international community will be watching closely to see whether the Arakan Army takes steps to dismantle discriminatory policies, restore Rohingya citizenship and ensure their safe return.
At the same time, the international community must step up. Mere statements of support are insufficient. Sanctions, diplomatic isolation and targeted pressure on the Arakan Army could compel them to adopt more inclusive policies. Additionally, humanitarian assistance must be expanded, both within Rakhine and in the refugee camps of Bangladesh, to prevent further deterioration of the crisis.
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations and neighboring countries like India and China also have a role to play. While their engagement with Myanmar has often been guided by economic and strategic interests, the moral imperative to address the Rohingya crisis cannot be overlooked. Multilateral pressure, coupled with incentives for inclusive governance, could push the Arakan Army toward constructive engagement on the Rohingya issue.
Multilateral pressure could push the Arakan Army toward constructive engagement on the Rohingya issue
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim
Furthermore, the plight of the Rohingya must remain a priority on the global humanitarian agenda. The camps in Bangladesh, where overcrowding and malnutrition are rampant and education opportunities are rare, represent a ticking time bomb. Without hope of a better future, despair and radicalization could take root. Guterres' visit was a timely reminder that the status quo is unsustainable.
For the Rohingya themselves, the secretary-general's advocacy offers a glimmer of hope. After years of being silenced and marginalized, hearing the world's top diplomat reaffirm their right to return with dignity is a powerful acknowledgment of their struggle. However, words must be translated into action. The Rohingya deserve to see tangible progress toward their safe repatriation and the restoration of their rights.
Bangladesh, too, must continue to advocate for international accountability. The pursuit of justice for the atrocities committed against the Rohingya cannot be sidelined. The International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court remain vital avenues for holding perpetrators accountable and deterring further abuses.
In the end, Guterres' visit was not just a diplomatic gesture, it was a call to action. The Arakan Army faces a pivotal choice: continue down the path of exclusion and repression or embrace the principles of justice and inclusion. The world is watching and so are the Rohingya, who deserve nothing less than a future of dignity and peace. The responsibility lies with the Arakan Army, the national unity government and the broader international community to ensure that Guterres' words are not forgotten. Only through a genuine commitment to the rights and recognition of the Rohingya can lasting peace be achieved in Rakhine State.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Israel Authorizes Controversial Settlement Project that Would Split West Bank
Israel has given final approval on a controversial settlement project that will divide the occupied West Bank in two, Reuters reported. Undermining Palestinian Statehood On Wednesday, Israel's far-right Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, said that the settlement plan, known as the E1 project, will obstruct efforts to establish an independent Palestinian State. 'With E1 we are delivering finally on what has been promised for years. The Palestinian state is being erased from the table, not with slogans but with actions. Every settlement, every neighborhood, every housing unit is another nail in the coffin of this dangerous idea,' he said in a statement. Smotrich announced the plan last week as a response to the recent wave of countries announcing their intention to recognize a Palestinian State at the UN General Assembly in September. The recognition of Palestinian Statehood is part of an international push to advance the two-state solution, which envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, living side by side with Israel. E1 Settlement Project Plans for settlement in E1, an area east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades but was frozen amid US and European opposition that the project could undermine a future peace deal with the Palestinians. The E1 project involves the construction of about 3,400 new housing units in Maale Adumin. Israel has built about 160 settlements, housing some 700,000 Jews, since it occupied the West Bank and East Jerusalem in 1967, according to BBC. Settlement Expansion The international law deems settlements illegal. However, successive Israeli governments have allowed settlements to expand, most notably since the return of Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to power in late 2022. Netanyahu has not commented on the E1 approval announcement. But during a visit to a West Bank settlement on Sunday, he said: 'I said 25 years ago that we will do everything to secure our grip on the Land of Israel, to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, to prevent the attempts to uproot us from here. Thank God, what I promised, we have delivered.' International Condemnation In response to the announcement, the Palestinian Foreign Ministry condemned the plan as it will 'isolate Palestinian communities living in the area and undermines the possibility of a two-state solution.' Similarly, a spokesperson for the German government on Wednesday said that the E1 plan violates international law and 'hinders a negotiated two-state solution and an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank.' The E1 settlement project also faced strong opposition from Saudi Arabia, the UK, and the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, as it will further undermine the two-state solution. Short link : Post Views: 8


Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
UN warns Daesh remains a major threat in Middle East despite leadership losses
NEW YORK CITY: Daesh remains an active and dangerous presence in the Middle East, the UN warned on Wednesday, as the group works to rebuild its operations in Syria and Iraq, even after the loss of senior leaders. Vladimir Voronkov, the UN's counterterrorism chief, told the Security Council that Daesh has maintained its operational capacity in the region and continues to exploit instability, especially in the Badia region of Syria and parts of the country under the control of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham. 'Daesh continues to exploit security gaps, engage in covert operations and incite sectarian tensions in Syria,' Voronkov said as he presented Secretary-General Antonio Guterres's 21st report on the threat posed by the terrorist organization. The group also remains active in Iraq, he added, where it seeks to destabilize local authorities and reclaim influence. The humanitarian and security situations in northeastern Syria remain 'deeply concerning,' Voronkov warned, particularly in the camps and detention facilities that hold suspected terrorists and their families. 'The secretary-general's concern about stockpiles of weapons falling into the hands of terrorists has, unfortunately, materialized,' he said. In Afghanistan, Daesh-Khorasan continues to pose one of the most serious terrorist threats to Central Asia and beyond, through ongoing attacks against civilians, minority groups and foreign nationals, while leveraging dissatisfaction with the de facto authorities. Despite the ongoing threats in the Middle East, Africa remains the region experiencing the highest intensity of Daesh-related activity, Voronkov said, with violence escalating in West Africa and the Sahel. There has been a resurgence of Daesh in the Greater Sahara, while Daesh-West Africa Province has emerged as a key source of propaganda that is attracting foreign fighters, primarily from within the region. In Libya, arrests have revealed the logistical and financial networks linked to the group and connected to the Sahel. In Somalia, a large-scale Daesh attack in Puntland early this year involving foreign fighters prompted a military counteroffensive that killed 200 militants and resulted in more than 150 arrests. 'Though weakened, Daesh still benefits from regional support networks,' Voronkov said. Assistant Secretary-General Natalia Gherman, executive director of the Counter-Terrorism Committee's Executive Directorate, or CTED, echoed the concerns. She noted that Daesh-Somalia's role as a global logistical hub has been growing recently, though counteroffensives had degraded some of its operational capabilities. Daesh continues to exploit instability in Africa, she added, where more than half of the world's terrorism-related fatalities now occur. In the Lake Chad Basin region, for example, the group has received foreign money, drones, and expertise on improvised explosive devices. Gherman also highlighted the growing use by Daesh of emerging technologies and financial innovations, as terrorist groups increasingly leverage encrypted platforms, artificial intelligence, and cross-border financial systems to raise funds, spread propaganda and recruit new members. In response to these evolving threats, CTED has visited countries across Europe and Africa, including Somalia, Chad, Cameroon, Hungary and Malta, to assess local capacities and provide tailored support. The EU-UN Global Terrorism Threats Facility has helped implement legislative reforms and capacity building in countries such as Iraq, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria and Tajikistan. Voronkov urged member states to invest more in long-term strategies for prevention, rather than focusing only on killing or capturing the leaders of terrorist groups. He said effective counterterrorism efforts must address the root causes of radicalization, while complying with the requirements of international law. He raised concerns in particular about detention camps in northeastern Syria, where tens of thousands of people, mostly women and children, continue to be held in unsafe and undignified conditions, risking further radicalization. Gherman said that CTED is helping states address such challenges through the adoption of principles for tackling the use of drones, financial tech and artificial intelligence for terrorism purposes. Despite the geopolitical and resource-related constraints, both of the officials emphasized the need for sustained international collaboration on the issue. 'The persistence of the threat posed by Daesh, despite national and international efforts, underscores the urgency of sustained global counterterrorism cooperation,' said Voronkov.


Leaders
3 hours ago
- Leaders
Most Americans Support Palestinian State Recognition: Poll
A new Reuters/Ipsos poll has found that a majority of Americans back the international recognition of a Palestinian State. According to the poll, 58% of Americans believe that every UN member state should recognize Palestine as a country, while only 33% disagree. The Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted over 6 days, weeks after several countries, including France, the UK and Canada, declared they would recognize the State of Palestine in September. It also took place as Hamas accepted a new Egyptian-Qatari ceasefire proposal, while Israel was considering the Palestinian movement's response. The proposed deal includes a 60-day truce during which a number of Palestinian prisoners will be freed in return for half of the remaining 50 Israeli hostages. Gaza is enduring a widespread starvation, amid warnings that Palestinians in the enclave are on the brink of famine. This has led several European nations, as well as Britain, Canada and Australia, to say that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached 'unimaginable levels.' In the light of this, most of the respondents to the Reuters/Ipsos poll see that the US should take action to mitigate the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. 65% of Americans say that the US should help people who are facing starvation in Gaza, with only 28% disagreeing. Meanwhile, 59% of Americans believe that Israel's military response in Gaza has been excessive. The war in Gaza has so far claimed the lives of over 62,100 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Furthermore, malnutrition-related deaths have reached 296 Palestinians, including 112 children. Israel is pressing ahead with a plan to expand its military campaign in Gaza, including the full takeover of Gaza City and displacing its people to the south of the enclave. Short link : Post Views: 7