"He's So Disgusting": Eric Trump Is Being Dragged For Using A Slur When Describing LA Protesters
Eric Trump on Monday was slammed for his use of a highly offensive term during an interview.
President Donald Trump's son ― talking with conservative influencer Benny Johnson — was criticizing people who are protesting the immigration crackdowns by his father's administration in Los Angeles when he described those who had attacked police cars as 'mongoloids.'
Eric Trump describes LA protesters as "mongoloids" pic.twitter.com/o0gPMw0UAk
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 16, 2025
@atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
Merriam-Webster defines the word 'mongoloid' as a dated and 'now offensive' term to describe 'a person affected with Down syndrome.' Critics on social media slammed Trump as 'disgusting' for making the 'dehumanizing' comment.
But "deplorables" led to weeks of tantrums.
— Sally VW (@actorgrrrl) June 16, 2025
@actorgrrrl / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
Related: Well, Well, Well, For The Second Time In 2 Weeks, People Are Letting JD Vance Know EXACTLY How They Feel About Him In Public
Disgusting.Eric Trump calls protesters 'mongoloids' — straight-up slur on national TV.The Trump brand isn't just toxic. It's proudly cruel. When do we say enough?
— AnatolijUkraine (@AnatoliUkraine) June 16, 2025
@AnatoliUkraine / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
nazi talk...
— Lawrence Fitzgerald (@lwfitzgerald) June 16, 2025
@lwfitzgerald / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
Related: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem
He's so disgusting.
— Berngirl (@BGminimom) June 16, 2025
@BGminimom / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
They are all so disgusting. Such a totally disgusting family.
— Mary Ann Lissau (@nose4rose) June 16, 2025
@nose4rose / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
Dehumanizing people is essential to carrying out the next phases.
— AC Tatum (@actatumonline) June 16, 2025
@actatumonline / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
This is the term they used 50 years ago about people who have down syndrome. The whole family are just atrocious human beings.
— Bekah Freitas (@rebekahkfreitas) June 16, 2025
@rebekahkfreitas / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via x.com
This article originally appeared on HuffPost.
Also in In the News: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason
Also in In the News: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week
Also in In the News: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Inside the clashes between Trump and Gabbard
As President Donald Trump privately mulled joining Israel's campaign against Iran this month, one member of his Cabinet sent what he viewed as an audacious attempt to steer him in the opposite direction. At 5:30 a.m. on June 10, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard tweeted a cryptic, three-minute video warning that 'political elite and warmongers' are 'carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers' — and that the world is 'on the brink of nuclear annihilation.' Trump saw the unauthorized video and became incensed, complaining to associates at the White House that she had spoken out of turn, according to three people familiar with the episode — two of them inside the administration and all granted anonymity to describe sensitive dynamics. Her post came a few days after Israel hawks met with Trump at the White House to lobby him to support Israel's attacks on Iran. In the eyes of Trump and some close to him, Gabbard was warning him not to greenlight Israel attacking Iran. Trump even expressed his disapproval to her personally, the three people said. 'I don't think he dislikes Tulsi as a person … But certainly the video made him not super hot on her … and he doesn't like it when people are off message,' said one of the people, a senior administration official. The official added that Trump also doesn't appreciate it when people appear to be correcting him and that 'many took that video as trying to correct the administration's position.' Trump's reaction to the video — which has not been previously reported — underscores a widening gap between a president on the brink of potentially joining Israel's war, and his anti-interventionist intelligence chief, who in the past has been adamantly against the U.S. engaging in new foreign conflicts. Indeed, the man Gabbard endorsed on the campaign trail — who spoke of ending the Ukraine-Russia War on Day 1 and ushering in a new era of peace — is striking a different tone from her now that he's sitting behind the Resolute desk. Those tensions came to the forefront early Tuesday when a reporter aboard Air Force One asked Trump about Gabbard's declaration before Congress in March that Iran was not seeking to build a nuclear weapon. Trump appeared to dismiss her assessment. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump replied. 'I think they were very close to having a weapon.' It's a remarkable change in tone from the way the president once talked about the former Democratic representative from Hawaii-turned-Trump supporter. Last fall, Trump touted Gabbard's backing on the campaign trail. He added her — as well as Robert F. Kennedy — to his Cabinet in part to highlight the ideological diversityof the MAGA coalition. But in recent months, Trump has increasingly mused about nixing Gabbard's office completely, an idea he floated when he gave her the job. In the White House there have been discussions about folding its mandate into the CIA or another agency, according to one of the people familiar with his response to the video and two others familiar with the matter — though it's unclear what that would mean for Gabbard. The Director of National Intelligence serves as the president's principal intelligence adviser and oversees the sprawling U.S. spy community. Gabbard's tweet about nuclear war may have spurred those conversations along. Citing a recent trip to Hiroshima, Japan — where she visited the blast site from one of the two atomic bombs the U.S. dropped to end World War II — the DNI warned in graphic terms of weapons potentially 'vaporizing entire cities.' Her statements were in keeping with the sentiment of many MAGA leaders that deeper U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran clashes could pull America into a regional and even worldwide conflict. But ever since then there's been simmering frustration with Gabbard in the West Wing. The president, after all, notably called former President Barack Obama 'pathetic' in 2016 for visiting Hiroshima, and argued that people shouldn't apologize for anything the U.S. did during WWII. And Trump has 'just been kind of down on her in general,' said one of the people familiar with Gabbard's interactions with the White House, adding that Trump thinks she 'doesn't add anything to any conversation.' Gabbard insisted to reporters Tuesday that she and the president are 'on the same page' on Iran, and a person close to Gabbard denied any tensions between her and the president. As recently as Tuesday, the two were meeting with other top officials in the Situation Room at the White House, and the administration even changed the time of the briefing to accommodate her schedule to ensure she could attend, the person said. The Gabbard ally added that she is fully on board with what Trump is trying to do with Iran, and said she has never let her personal views color the advice she provides to the president — nor has she tried to sway Trump to her own point of view. Asked for comment, White House spokesperson Steven Cheung said the president 'has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team' and insisted that 'efforts by the legacy media to sow internal division are a distraction that will not work.' Vice President JD Vance's team also reached out unprompted Tuesday night to defend Gabbard in a statement, arguing that she is 'an essential member' of the team. 'Tulsi Gabbard is a veteran, a patriot, a loyal supporter of President Trump, and a critical part of the coalition he built in 2024,' he said in a statement. Gabbard argued to reporters on Tuesday that what Trump said about Iran's nuclear program is consistent with her March testimony before Congress. Gabbard said then that even as the intelligence community assessed that Tehran hadn't reinvigorated its nuclear weapons program — findings consistent with assessments shared by senior officials during the Biden administration — Iran's stockpiles of enriched uranium were at their highest levels. 'President Trump was saying the same thing that I said in my annual threat assessment back in March; unfortunately too many people in the media don't care to actually read what I said,' she said. Trump's comments on Air Force One, however, suggest it's not just the media who didn't catch that nuance. The apparent divide has been a source of gossip among people on both sides of the ideological spectrum who are closely following the rising tensions in the Middle East. Israel hawks like conservative talk show host Mark Levin have mocked Gabbard's assessment, suggesting that U.S. intelligence under her leadership has been flat-out incorrect. Some of Gabbard's detractors are now holding up Trump's words to argue that she should get the axe. 'She shouldn't be in that job,' Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton, who had his own falling out with Trump, said Tuesday. Video of Trump's comments about Gabbard on Air Force One have also stirred speculation on Capitol Hill that he has lost trust in her, said one senior congressional aide. Lawmakers of both parties were sharing the video widely among themselves on Tuesday morning, said the aide, who was granted anonymity to share details of private conversations. 'This is not just the hawkish camp,' the person said. 'This is every single member sending it around.' Even people who agree with Gabbard have been worried about her influence waning: On his podcast War Room on Monday, MAGA ringleader Steve Bannon rhetorically asked his guest Tucker Carlson why Gabbard was not invited to what appears to have been a critical Camp David huddle earlier this month, where Trump and senior officials from his CIA director to chief of staff and the vice president discussed how to posture amid Israeli's looming strike. 'You know why … This is a regime change effort,' Carlson answered. Gabbard — who has spoken of losing friends while serving in the military — has in the past been extremely outspoken against such incursions. The former lawmaker has long been 'focused on not getting ourselves into another horrible war we can't succeed in or get our way out of,' said Daniel Davis, a senior fellow at the think-tank Defense Priorities, whom Gabbard tapped to serve in a top job at ODNI but whose appointment was axed following an uproar about his past criticism of Israel's conduct in Gaza. Gabbard's defenders have pushed back on suggestions that she's getting iced out. The intelligence chief, who is a Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army National Guard, was on Army Reserve duty the weekend of the Camp David huddle, according to one person familiar with the matter. The Gabbard ally also said that she has been in the room with the president and vice president throughout deliberations on the Israel-Iran issue, working out of the White House rather than ODNI's office since Israel first started its bombing campaign. Trump, instructed her to reach out to her Israeli counterpart and the Gulf States to be in touch. Gabbard isn't without allies in the administration. Even as she's been savaged by Republicans eager for Trump to enter the fighting fray, Vance took it upon himself to defend her on X on Tuesday afternoon. But what matters, of course, is how Trump himself views her. And while Gabbard is indeed still around the White House, the senior administration official remarked that 'just because you're here doesn't mean that you're doing a great job.' Trump's original decision to nominate Gabbard to serve as his spy chief sparked widespread concern among national security officials and Democrats — and even some hawkish Republicans privately — on Capitol Hill. She has flirted with fringe ideas about the wars in Ukraine and Syria, and has evinced a deep skepticism of the intelligence community she now oversees. After she was confirmed in February, Gabbard carved out an unusually public role for a spy chief, eagerly carrying out the president's agenda and letting the world know about her work for Trump in regular appearances on Fox News and in social media posts and interviews with right-wing media stars. She revoked the security clearances of dozens of the president's political enemies and critics, maligned some of the officials that work beneath her and fired two top officials who oversaw the production of an intelligence assessment that undercut Trump's justification for the mass deportation of migrants from Latin America. But there were signs that she may be on her own path, according to some in the administration. For one, her very visit to Hiroshima perplexed the White House, according to one of the aforementioned administration officials. The intelligence chief appears to have tacked on a trip to the city as she paid a visit to a Marine Corps air station in Iwakuni, close to Hiroshima, after attending the Shangri-La dialogue in Singapore. But the White House has questioned whether the trip was relevant to her role as Director of National Intelligence, even as the Gabbard ally said the Japan trip was coordinated and approved by the NSC. As Gabbard navigates the politics of Trump's White House, she may also be thinking ahead to what might come next. In a recent podcast interview with former Fox News host Megyn Kelly in May, Gabbard didn't rule out running for president in 2028. 'I will never rule out any opportunity to serve my country,' Gabbard said. If Trump decides to join Israel in attacking Iran, that could complicate her calculus of serving in the administration. Jack Detsch contributed to this report.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration demands action from 36 countries to avoid travel ban
Advertisement It is the latest step by the Trump administration to crack down on those who overstay their visas and tying U.S. entries from certain countries to potential national security risks. Trump has said some countries have 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. Some countries condemned the travel restrictions and vowed reciprocal actions, while some resettlement groups say the ban sows division. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce declined to comment on the specifics in the cable, which was first reported by The Washington Post. She confirmed that the administration wanted nations to improve their own vetting processes for passport holders, accept their nationals deported from the U.S. and take other steps to ensure their citizens are not a threat to the U.S. 'We're looking at providing a period of time, (where if countries) don't get to that point where we can trust them and they've got to change the system, update it, do whatever they need to do to convince us that we can trust the process and the information they have,' she said. Advertisement It was not immediately clear if the ban would be imposed on countries that commit to making improvements and are making progress in addressing them but fail to meet the benchmarks within 60 days. The South Sudan is already subject to a separate travel ban imposed by the State Department, which has revoked the visas of most South Sudanese already in the U.S. President Donald Trump this month enacted a travel ban on 12 countries and imposed restrictions on seven others, although no previously issued visas have been revoked. His proclamation instead banned issuing new visas to citizens of the 12 countries. That ban included Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Heightened visa restrictions will apply to citizens of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The 36 countries identified in the new cable are: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Advertisement
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
2,000 more National Guard troops being deployed to Los Angeles, Pentagon says
Another 2,000 California National Guard troops are being deployed to the Los Angeles area, the Defense Department announced Tuesday. It comes amid the Trump administration's ongoing immigration crackdown in the region, which has sparked a series of contentious protests in downtown L.A. over the past few weeks. U.S. Northern Command said in a statement that the troops were being activated under the Title 10 law, which President Trump previously invoked when he first announced on June 7 that he was deploying National Guard troops to L.A. in response to the demonstrations. The soldiers will "support the protection of federal functions, personnel, and property in the greater Los Angeles area," USNORTHCOM said in a statement. The decision was at the direction of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, officials said. USNORTHCOM did not elaborate on what prompted Hegseth to expand the troop count. The troops will join about 4,100 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines who are already deployed in L.A. Ahead of their arrival, the new batch of soldiers are "completing training on de-escalation, crowd control, and use of the standing rules for the use of force in advance of joining the federal protection mission," USNORTHCOM said. Mr. Trump's initial memo ordering the deployment says the troops are in L.A. to "temporarily protect" Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as well as other federal personnel and federal property. Local and state officials have heavily criticized Mr. Trump's move, arguing that local law enforcement were able to handle the protests, some of which turned violent, and saying the deployment of federal troops to city streets has only served to inflame the situation in L.A., a city with a large and diverse immigrant community. The downtown protests were in response to a series of immigration raids throughout Los Angeles. The president's deployment of federal troops domestically using Title 10 is now facing a legal challenge from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who filed a lawsuit calling the move a "power grab" and arguing that California National Guard troops were placed under federal control without Newsom's permission. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco briefly and temporarily blocked the National Guard deployment last week. However, hours later, an appeals court halted Breyer's ruling. On Tuesday, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit heard arguments in the case over whether Mr. Trump exceeded his authority when he invoked Title 10. and contributed to this report.
