Hunter Biden unleashes on George Clooney and all Democrats critical of dad Joe in explosive interview
The younger Biden sat down for a three hour-long, very foul-mouthed interview with YouTuber Andrew Callaghan, hosting him in Wilmington, Delaware.
Biden used four-letter words when discussing Clooney and other Democrats who had been critical of his father or helped orchestrate the president's exit from the 2024 race. The anniversary of the senior Biden bowing out of the race was Monday.
'F*** him, f*** him and everybody around him,' the former first son said of Clooney, as he discussed the actor's decision to pen the op-ed that insinuated that the Democratic president was senile.
'I agree with Quentin Tarantino, F***ing George Clooney is not a f***ing actor. He is a f***ing, like, I don't know what he is. He's a brand,' Biden continued. 'F*** you, what do you have to do with f***ing anything? Why do I have to f***ing listen to you?'
Clooney said of the president that 'the one battle he cannot win is the fight against time.'
The actor had seen Biden at a June 15 fundraiser in Los Angeles ahead of Biden's disastrous June 27 debate in Atlanta.
In the op-ed, Clooney divulged that the Biden he saw at the fundraiser was the same one who appalled Democratic voters on the debate stage.
The president's trainwreck debate performance against President Donald Trump heightened calls for the 81-year-old to drop out.
'What right do you have to step on a man who's given 52 years of his f***ing life to the service of this country and decide that you, George Clooney, are gonna take out basically a full-page ad in the f***ing New York Times to undermine the president at a time in which, by the way, what do people care about the most?' he said. 'Why do you think that the Republicans have an advantage over us? Because they're unified.'
Representatives for Clooney did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment.
Throughout the three hour-long sit-down, Biden slammed David Axelrod several times.
Axelrod was former President Barack Obama's longtime political adviser who suggested early in the 2024 cycle that Biden should consider dropping out and allowing the Democrats to have a primary instead.
'David Axelrod had one success in his political life and that was Barack Obama and that was because of Barack Obama not because of f***in' David Axelrod.,' Biden said.
Obama chose Joe Biden to be his running mate during the 2008 election cycle - but there have long been reports about there being rifts between the Obama and the Biden camps.
That was on full display during the interview, when Biden went after the Pod Save America podcasters too.
He mocked the group - made up of four former Obama aides - Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett, Dan Pfeiffer and Tommy Vietor.
Biden called them 'four white millionaires that are dining out on their association with him from 16 years ago, living in Beverly f***ing Hills, telling the rest of the world what black voters in South Carolina really want.'
'The Anita Dunns of the world, who's made 40, 50 million dollars off the Democratic party, they're all gonna insert their judgment over a man who has figured out, unlike anybody else, how to get elected to the United States Senate over seven times,' Biden added.
Dunn served in his father's administration but also worked for Obama.
Biden also mocked Rahm Emanuel, Obama's former White House chief of staff, for having presidential ambitions.
'What a f***ing ...,' Biden said trailing off. 'David Axelrod's going to run his campaign for him.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court blocks North Dakota redistricting ruling that would gut key part of Voting Rights Act
The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a lower-court ruling in a redistricting dispute in North Dakota that would gut a landmark federal civil rights law for millions of people. The justices indicated in an unsigned order that they are likely to take up a federal appeals court ruling that would eliminate the most common path people and civil rights groups use to sue under a key provision of the 60-year-old Voting Rights Act. The case could be argued as early as 2026 and decided by next summer. Three conservative justices, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, would have rejected the appeal. The court also has a separate redistricting case over a second majority Black congressional district in Louisiana. The justices heard arguments in March, but took the rare step of calling for a new round of arguments in their term that begins in October. They have yet to spell out what issues they want discussed. In the North Dakota case, the Spirit Lake Tribe and Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, with reservations 60 miles apart, argued that the state's 2021 legislative map violated the act by diluting their voting strength and ability to elect their own candidates. The case went to trial in 2023, and a federal judge later ordered the use of a map of the area, including the reservations that led to the election last year of three Native Americans, all Democrats, to the Republican-supermajority Legislature. But in a 2-1 ruling issued in May, a three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that only the Justice Department can bring such lawsuits under the law's Section 2. The 8th Circuit also had ruled in an Arkansas case in 2023 that private individuals can't sue under the same provision. More than 90 percent of Section 2 cases have been brought through private enforcement, UCLA law professor Richard Hasen wrote on the Election Law blog. The 8th Circuit rulings conflict with decades of decisions by appellate courts that have affirmed the rights of private individuals to sue under Section 2. The Supreme Court often will step in when appeals courts around the country come to different decisions on the same legal issue. The 8th Circuit covers seven states: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. In the wake of the Arkansas decision, Minnesota and other states moved to shore up voting rights with state-level protections. ___
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Vance predicts net negative immigration number in 2025
Vice President JD Vance previewed historic numbers on illegal immigration and promised the administration would ramp up deportations in the future. 'I think in 2025 we will have the first net negative immigration number in about 50 or 60 years in the United States,' he said. The vice president spoke about the issue at an artificial intelligence summit in Washington, DC hosted by the four co-hosts of the All-in Podcast. He addressed criticism that the Trump administration was deporting illegal immigrants at a similar rate as the Biden administration, but said that Biden's numbers were inflated. Under Biden, he explained, any illegal immigrant that was caught crossing the border and immediately removed was counted as an official deportation, but argued that it did not represent a net negative. Trump's 'net negative' numbers of deportation, he explained, were of illegal immigrants who had already entered and settled in the United States. He conceded that some of the president's supporters were dissatisfied by the low deportation numbers, adding that he 'shared' that frustration. The vice president blamed the courts for trying to slow the number of deportations, but appeared optimistic that the increased funding for ICE in the Big Beautiful Bill would help boost the Trump administration's numbers. Trump's immigration czar Tom Homan told the Daily Mail at the White House on Thursday he was hopeful the administration could reach Vance's goal before the end of the year. 'I hope so too but it depends on how quickly we can get the resources in,' he said. 'Great goal ... but I don't know, there's too many factors, how many people we can we get on the streets.' 'Our goal is to arrest everyone we can,' he added. 'Prioritize the criminals, address the nationals security threats.' Vance said there were many voices in the administration who had differing opinions on immigration, but that he sided with the hardliners on the issue. 'Me and Stephen Miller are probably the two most hardline people in the entire administration when it comes to immigration, so there's always more that we can do,' he said, referring to the president's deputy chief of staff who also serves as the president's homeland security advisor. Vance acknowledged the president was sensitive to industries like farms and restaurants who relied in illegal immigration, but that the deportations would continue. 'What the president has said, we're not going to do amnesty in this country, we are actually not going to tell people who have come into the country illegally that they're allowed to break our laws and get rewarded for it,' he said. During the presidential campaign, Vance indicated he wanted to see one million deportations a year, but estimates show the Trump administration could only deport about 500,000 at the current rate. Trump's enhanced focus on deportation has outraged Democrats and immigration advocates who argue that his policies are brutal and inhumane. Reports of masked ICE agents arriving at immigration courts in New York or Home Depot parking lots in California to arrest day laborers has drawn increased criticism. But the vice president pointed to the administration's work to stop drug cartels, reducing the number of missing children at the border and the work of human traffickers. 'When you enforce the nation's border laws, that is the most compassionate thing to do both for your own people but also the people who are illegally trafficked,' he said and added, 'there's nothing discompassionate, there's nothing hateful about enforcing your own borders.' As the vice president appeared at the summit to talk about tech policies and artificial intelligence, he was also sharply critical of tech companies for laying of American workers but still trying to get more work visas for cheap foreign labor. 'I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, "We can't find workers here in America.' That's a [expletive] story,"' he said. He noted that critics of the administration who warned that deporting illegal immigrants would actually hurt the economy and raise inflation were wrong, citing recent economic numbers. 'It turns out that if you put your faith in American workers, you can build great companies, you can build a great economy, tou don't have to build an entire economy on illegal labor, which is what the Democrats told us we had to do,' he said.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trove of Epstein documents cause rift in Maga world – will the files be released?
A trove of documents related to the child sexual abuse offender Jeffrey Epstein are at the center of a splinter between Donald Trump and his rightwing allies. While campaigning, Trump said he would release the so-called 'Epstein files,' the trove of documents about criminal investigations into his former friend, who died in jail by hanging in 2019. But since taking office, Trump has appeared to have broken that promise, rankling ardent Maga allies who have spent years calling for the documents' release. Epstein knew powerful people of all political persuasions and counted them as friends. Releasing the documents has become a rallying cry to reveal more details about Epstein, including how he made his money, and the extent of involvement by those who supported him in his criminal activity, especially those with wealth and political sway. Earlier in July, the US justice department said it would not be releasing more documents, saying it could harm victims and insisting there was not a 'client list'. Democrats have seized on the schism on the right, calling for Congress to compel the release of the documents and calling out Trump's hypocrisy. Congress may intervene to obtain the documents. This week, a Democratic-led effort to subpoena the justice department for Epstein-related materials was passed by the House oversight subcommittee, but the leaders of the House GOP have also blocked other efforts to release the documents. The federal government has a 'truckload' of documents from and about Epstein related to his criminal cases, according to Pam Bondi, the US attorney general. This includes his flight logs for private planes and contacts, which is sometimes referred to as his 'black book' – which has already been publicly posted online. A memo released by the justice department in July said the agency searched through its databases, hard drives and physical areas to find Epstein-related information, locating 'more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence'. Within those files were images and videos of Epstein and his victims, some of whom are minors, and more than 10,000 downloaded videos and images of 'illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography'. Some documents related to Epstein are under court-ordered seals. For instance, a federal judge this week denied a request from the justice department to unseal grand jury transcripts in a south Florida criminal investigation. Some of those that were once sealed have been unsealed, including some unsealed in early 2024 that identified names of people included in depositions and motions who previously were listed as John Does. 'Much of the material is subject to court-ordered sealing,' the justice department memo said. 'Only a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial, as the seal served only to protect victims and did not expose any additional third parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing.' There are also serious concerns about identifying victims if some documents are released. The department said Epstein had harmed more than 1,000 victims, some minors, all of whom 'suffered unique trauma'. 'Sensitive information relating to these victims is intertwined throughout the materials. This includes specific details such as victim names and likenesses, physical descriptions, places of birth, associates, and employment history,' the memo said. In its memo, the department says there was no 'client list,' despite it being a longtime claim and rallying call for those embedded in the Epstein case, especially on the right. 'There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions,' the memo says. 'We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.' Julie K Brown, an investigative journalist with the Miami Herald who has been uncovering the Epstein case for years, said earlier this year that there was 'no Jeffrey Epstein client list. Period. It's a figment of the internet's imagination – and a means to just slander people.' In an interview with the Atlantic, Brown said the list idea was a 'red herring' that seems to have been born out of a phone directory Epstein's girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, compiled, often referred to as the 'black book'. People such as Trump and other celebrities were in the directory, but so were Epstein's gardeners, barbers and others, Brown said. After Epstein's death by suicide, Trump shared a tweet that claimed the Clintons were involved in his death. He also told reporters at the time that he had questions about whether Bill Clinton went to Epstein's infamous island. While campaigning for the 2024 election, Trump said, when asked, that he would declassify the Epstein files, though he prioritized them below files about September 11 and the John F Kennedy assassination. 'You don't want to affect people's lives if there's phoney stuff in there, because there's a lot of phoney stuff with that whole world,' he said then. Bondi said earlier this year that the justice department would be releasing a list of Epstein's clients, telling Fox News that it was 'sitting on my desk right now to review' – though she later said she was talking about case files and not a client list. The department released some information, dubbed a 'first phase of files', to rightwing influencers, though those files did not contain much new information. Trump has grown increasingly angry at those calling for the files to be released, and dismissed the entire ordeal as 'boring' and a 'hoax,' something that 'nobody cares about'. 'I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax,' he wrote on Truth Social on July 16. Recent reporting by the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal said that the justice department briefed Trump that his name and the name of other well-known people were found as the department searched through the files. The Journal said Trump's name 'appeared multiple times'. Trump is known to be a one-time friend of Epstein's. His name's inclusion in the documents does not mean he was a party to any of Epstein's criminal activity. Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew are expected to be named among the documents, as both were known to be in Epstein's circles to some degree. Elon Musk, the world's richest man who was a Trump cheerleader until the two fell out, tweeted in early June amid a fight over the Trump tax bill that Trump 'is in the Epstein files' and 'that is why they have not been made public'. He has since deleted the tweet. There are many legitimate questions that the files could shed light on about Epstein and his circle. How Epstein made his money is still of much interest, as is how he financed his extensive sex-trafficking operation. Often referred to as a financier, he had massive wealth, owning expensive real-estate including two private islands, and a private jet. Ron Wyden, the Democratic senator from Oregon who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate finance committee, told the New York Times that four major banks had 'flagged more than $1.5bn in transactions – including thousands of wire transfers for the purchase and sale of artwork for rich friends, fees paid to Mr Epstein by wealthy individuals, and payments to numerous women'. Questions still swirl over potential ties to the intelligence community. Bondi told reporters: 'To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you on that.' Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett denied Epstein was an Israeli agent, a frequent claim made without evidence. 'The accusation that Jeffrey Epstein somehow worked for Israel or the Mossad running a blackmail ring is categorically and totally false,' Bennett said. And suspicion over the manner of Epstein's death is still in the mix. The justice department released an 11-hour video of jail footage in the hours before and after his death, though one minute of footage was missing, leading to further scrutiny. Bondi has said that missing footage is because the Bureau of Prisons was resetting video. There is also much to be discovered on how Epstein was able to evade justice for so long. Brown, the Miami Herald reporter, told the Atlantic her 'one nagging question' goes back to 2008, when the justice department decided not to fully go after Epstein after local and state authorities first were looking into his crimes. 'Who were the people behind that in the beginning?' Brown said. 'Because if they had done their jobs, of all these people in 2006, 2007, and 2008 – if all those people working for us, the American public, had done their jobs, we wouldn't be sitting here right now. A lot of those victims would've never been victimized.'
