The Rupert Lowe fracas shows Reform won't survive

Telegraph

11-03-2025

Rupert Lowe joins a long line of high-profile Faragean fallings-out; Farage vs Alan Sked, Farage vs Robert Kilroy-Silk, Farage vs Godfrey Bloom, Farage vs Suzanne Evans, Farage vs Douglas Carswell, Farage vs Ben Habib. Now it might just be that Nigel is unlucky: a figure cursed to walk through life only ever encountering the awkward and uncharitable and so being subjected to a litany of painful clashes.
Or we could apply what I have come to call 'Markle's Law': if you spend your whole life falling out with people then the common problematic factor, on the balance of probability, is not going to be everybody you happen to meet, but you.
Speaking to Dan Wootton on Monday evening, Lowe, the now-independent MP for Great Yarmouth, described the campaign against him as 'unfair and un-Christian'.
Of course, it is possible that an investigation will find wrongdoing. While we cannot prejudge, details and timing of the allegations look sketchy. We are supposed to believe that the party reported Lowe to the police three months after the alleged crime took place; coincidentally one day after he publicly criticised Farage.
Though allegations of office bullying were not directed at Lowe himself, the initial Reform statement appeared to give the impression that he had personally mistreated staff. Lowe's entire parliamentary team have since signed a heartfelt letter denying the allegations and describing their boss as a decent man. They also insist, oddly, that they have never been contacted as part of any parliamentary investigation.
Here, Reform may be exhibiting behaviour it would normally condemn; cancellation without due process, even calling the coppers over some alleged hurty words.
In a television interview, Richard Tice, Reform's deputy leader, implied that Lowe might not be welcome back in the party, even if his innocence were proved. Mr Farage insisted on TV that on the '29 February' Lowe was 'informed' about a 'parliamentary investigation' into allegations against him. Not only does Lowe deny this, but there wasn't actually a February 29 this year. So as hatchet jobs go, it's not the most convincing – and many party members remain unconvinced. The whole thing smacks of amateurism; more Fanny Cradock than Francis Urquhart.
Lowe claims that Reform insiders have briefed journalists that he has early-onset dementia; which Farage may have alluded to in a Telegraph article, describing Lowe as a 'different person' from the one he knew in the Brexit Party days. As someone who spends prolonged periods of time caring for a parent with Alzheimer's, this greatly offended me. It's a serious, hideous condition, not something to be opportunistically chucked around for score-settling purposes.
Since entering the Commons, Lowe has earned a reputation as a committed MP. The reporter Christian Calgie points out that 'by removing the whip from Lowe, Reform UK's total parliamentary activity since the general election has fallen by 46 per cent'. Every party needs its thinkers, its details-men and women.
A common complaint from Reform insiders is that under Farage and chairman Zia Yusuf, the party operates in a brittle, presidential style. Yet UK politics is not, and has never been, presidential. If Reform wishes to form a government, as it insists, they will also need 100 plus ministers to govern, without (so far) a single peer in the Lords. In short, the party cannot exist as a private fiefdom, or a talking-shop for airing grievances without solutions.
Lowe's defenestration threatens the party's hopes of professionalisation in more ways than one. What serious person would want to join and run as a candidate, when their life could be so visibly detonated?
Moreover, it is hard to convince those furious about the conduct of recent politics that you are different and worth voting for when you immediately resort to the sort of rats-in-a-sack scrapping, at which the Tories and Labour excel, as soon as you gain even a handful of MPs.
A party that can only accommodate one strong personality will struggle to assemble a cabinet.
Labour, for all its faults, is generally loyal and members will go out to bat for each other even when they're manifestly in the wrong.
Angela Rayner quite possibly loathes the PM but manages to keep it as professional as she can. Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick may never quite be BFFs, but Badenoch wisely gave her leadership rival a prominent role, unleashing him as an attack-dog against the Government. On balance, it's better to have effective people onside than airing their grievances from afar.
Now, more than ever, there is a need for the sort of accountability that Lowe provided in the House. The assault on British farming proceeds apace. Labour are still ducking scrutiny of the Chagos deal. Bridget Phillipson's loathsome schools bill will soon return to the Commons to continue its assault on educational standards. Migrant crossings and hotel-use are rising under this Government; a reminder of what Reform should be talking about.
Yet it has chosen now to launch a botched internal coup. Over in No 10, Keir Starmer and chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and must be rubbing their hands with glee.