
Reduced to rubble: India strikes alleged headquarters of militant groups in Pakistan's heartland
Show Caption
Hide Caption
What's happening between India and Pakistan?
The recent violence between India and Pakistan marks a major resurgence in the fight over the long-disputed region of Kashmir. CBC's Salimah Shivji breaks down what triggered the current conflict.
CBC English
MURIDKE, Pakistan, May 7 (Reuters) - Video footage from the early hours of Wednesday shows a bright flash from the residential Islamic seminary outside Bahawalpur in central Pakistan as India attacked its neighbor in response to the killing of Indian tourists in Kashmir.
The seminary was emptied of its students in recent days as speculation grew that would be targeted by India, but the family of Masood Azhar, founder of the Jaish-e-Mohammed Islamist militant group, was still there, according to the group.
Ten of Azhar's relatives were among 13 people killed in the strike, including women and children, the Pakistani military said. Thousands of people turned out for their funerals at a sports stadium later in the day, shouting "Allah Akbar", or God is Great, and other religious chants.
"(Indian Prime Minister Narendra) Modi's brutality has broken all norms," the group said in a statement. "The grief and shock are indescribable". It said that five of those killed were children and the others included Azhar's sister and her husband. It did not respond to a request for comment on why the family was still at the site.
Azhar, who has not been seen for years, and his brother, Abdul Rauf Asghar, deputy head of the group, did not appear to have attended the funeral prayers. The road to the site was cordoned off after the strike.
Pakistan says it 'reserves the right' to respond after India strikes
India attacked Pakistan after last month's deadly Hindu tourist attack in Indian Kashmir. Pakistani officials say they "reserve the right" to respond.
Further north, around half an hour after midnight, four Indian missiles hit a sprawling complex in Muridke over six minutes, a local government official said.
The attack demolished a mosque and adjacent administration building and buried three people in the rubble.
A sign outside describes the site as a government health and educational complex, but India says it is associated with militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Delhi and Washington blame LeT for the 2008 attack on the Indian city of Mumbai that killed more than 160 people. LeT, which has has denied responsibility for that attack, is banned.
More: Why India attacked Pakistan, its neighbor and nuclear rival
The attack left other buildings in the complex untouched. A local official said that normally there were up to 3,500 staff and students at the site, but almost everyone had been evacuated in recent days as they feared it would become a target.
Hafiz Saeed, leader of LeT and its successor organizations, is in a Pakistani jail since being convicted in 2020, on terror financing charges. He says his network, which spans 300 seminaries and schools, hospitals, a publishing house and ambulance services, has no ties to militant groups.
Delhi said it had conducted pinpoint strikes on the two headquarters of its militant adversaries, part of what it said were nine "terrorist camps" targeted.
"Over the last three decades Pakistan has systematically built terror infrastructure," it said in a briefing on the attacks.
Pakistan said India had hit six sites, killing 26 people and wounding 46, all "innocent civilians".
Officials and experts said India's attack on its neighbor, its most significant in decades, fulfilled a long-cherished goal, but Islamabad warned that it would hit back.
More: Kashmir conflict: A look at how India and Pakistan became nuclear powers
The conflict between India and Pakistan has been confined in recent decades mostly to the disputed mountainous region of Kashmir. But the air strikes in the towns of Bahawalpur and Muridke were seen in Islamabad as a major escalation.
India said seven of its targets were used by Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, both Islamist groups designated "terrorist" organisations by the U.N. Security Council. India launched the attacks in response to the killing of 26 people, mostly tourists in Indian Kashmir last month.
Jaish says that it carries out educational and charity work in Pakistan and its militant activities are only in India. Delhi says that it runs training camps in Pakistan, as well as indoctrination schools, and that it launches militants into India.
For decades Hindu-majority India has accused Pakistan of supporting Islamist militants in attacks on Indian interests, especially in Kashmir. Pakistan denies such support and in turn accuses India of supporting separatist rebels in Pakistan, which New Delhi denies.
(Writing by Saeed Shah; editing by Philippa Fletcher)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
10 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump raises tariffs on India to 50 percent
Advertisement 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' he posted on his social media platform Monday. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' US companies have scrambled to avoid the new costs of import taxes. Apple on Wednesday afternoon announced a fresh $100 billion investment in domestic manufacturing in an attempt to divert production of critical components for data centers and consumer electronics away from countries targeted by Trump's trade war. The company had already shifted some production of iPhones destined for US markets from China to India. Advertisement Trump has long held that imposing taxes on trade will improve the nation's grim finances and rebalance relationships with foreign nations that he says are taking advantage of the US. He has also used tariffs in recent weeks to try to accomplish foreign policy objectives, dangling threats of new trade barriers to stop skirmishes between Thailand and Cambodia. But consumers often ultimately pay for tariffs through higher prices, even if some of the costs are spread throughout the supply chain. And there are many nations with which the US must trade to secure goods that can't be made or grown at home. Some economists worry that Trump's new trade policy could cause the economy to shrink and rupture certain alliances that domestic producers have relied upon to manufacture cheap goods. Randhir Jaiswal, a spokesman for India's Ministry of External Affairs, wrote in a social media post Wednesday that it was 'extremely unfortunate that the U.S. should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest.' He added that India believes 'these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' and that purchases of Russian oil were 'based on market factors.' India is the United States' 12th-largest trading partner; the two countries have exchanged $78.4 billion in goods from Jan. 1 through June, according to federal data. India also has an informal economic alliance with Russia as part of the BRICS bloc of nations, a group that also includes Brazil, China, and South Africa. Those nations have brought some of Trump's most difficult negotiations over tariffs. The White House has announced frameworks of trade deals with close to a dozen of the country's largest commercial partners. But the administration does not have an arrangement with China, instead extending a temporary truce as talks continue. And Trump imposed 50 percent tariffs on Brazil over the country's anti-corruption investigation into former president Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally of Trump's. Advertisement Trump and Indian Prime Minister Nerendra Modi appeared in recent weeks to be close to their own agreement, but divisions remain on barriers surrounding US agricultural and dairy exports and India's relationship with Russia. New Delhi watchers had hoped that Trump's relationship with Modi would clear remaining obstacles to that deal. Trump in his first term hosted a massive 'Howdy Modi!' rally for the Indian leader in Houston. Modi in 2020 reciprocated with a 'Namaste Trump' rally in Ahmedabad, India. Under former president Joe Biden, the US government was more economically lenient toward India than other nations that maintained ties with Russia after the invasion of Ukraine, and the two nations have worked closely to counter Chinese influence in parts of Asia. Modi was one of the first foreign leaders to visit Trump, announcing plans for new defense and energy partnerships. In June, Trump accepted an invitation from the prime minister to visit India for the next summit of Quad leaders, a four-nation security group comprising the United States, India, Australia, and Japan. But recently Trump has sought deeper ties with Pakistan, India's top rival, even attempting — via social media — to broker a solution between the two countries on the long-disputed Kashmir region. 'The good news is we do have some level of reservoir of goodwill that we've built up, but we are spending that rapidly right now, with the day-to-day antagonism of India, which appears to be focused mainly on getting this trade agreement across the finish line,' said Richard Rossow, the chair on India and emerging Asia economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Advertisement Trump's stance on Russian oil puts New Delhi in a predicament. India has been the top buyer of Russian crude oil since 2023, importing 89 million tons last year, according to data compiled by the shipping data tracking company Kpler. Russian crude accounts for 38 percent of India's oil imports, Kpler data showed. 'I don't care what India does with Russia,' Trump posted on Truth Social last week. 'They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' India also receives 36 percent of its military arms imports from Russia, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, though that dipped from 72 percent between 2010 to 2014.

Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
What to Know About India's Purchases of Russian Oil
President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Aug. 6, raising the tariff rate on Indian goods entering the United States to 50 percent. Trump pointed to India's continued purchases of Russian crude oil as justification for the significant increase in levies on the nation's exports.


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump wields influence over GOP and keeps potential successors vying for his favor
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Speaking with reporters following an executive order signing at the White House, Trump was asked if Vance were the 'heir apparent to MAGA.' Advertisement Q: "Do you agree that the heir apparent to MAGA is JD Vance?" President Trump: "It's too early, obviously, to talk about it but certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point." — CSPAN (@cspan) 'I think most likely, in all fairness, he's the vice president,' Trump said. 'I think Marco is also somebody that maybe would get together with JD in some form. ... It's too early obviously, to talk about it, but certainly he's doing a great job and he would be, probably favorite at this point.' When Trump selected the then-39-year-old Vance over other more established Republicans — including Rubio — as his running mate last year, many theorized that Trump was planning for the future of his political movement, angling for a vice president who could carry MAGA forward. Advertisement Vance has embraced the role at every turn, doing the president's bidding on everything from his relationship with Ukraine to the fight over records related to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scandal. Trump, meanwhile, has not hesitated to give Vance high-visibility assignments. As the White House promotes mid-decade redistricting efforts in Texas — and acknowledges it would like the notion to expand to other states — Vance is expected Thursday to discuss redrawing district lines with Gov. Mike Braun during a trip to Indiana. While there, Vance will also headline a fundraiser for the Republican National Committee, which he serves as treasurer. In June he traveled to Los Angeles trip to tour a multiagency Federal Joint Operations Center and a mobile command center amid clashes between protesters and police and outbreaks of vandalism and looting following immigration raids across Southern California. And earlier this year, Vance was in swing congressional districts in his role as lead cheerleader for Trump's signature tax cut and spending law, an assortment of conservative priorities that Republicans dubbed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' He also lobbied senators on Capitol Hill, working to swing GOP holdouts to support the legislation, and in July cast a tie-breaking vote to get the measure passed in the Senate. He's also taken on a robust role related to foreign policy, holding meetings of his own with world leaders, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a trip to New Delhi, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House. Rubio, who has described Vance as among his closest friends in politics, said on Fox News Channel on Sunday that he felt Vance 'would be a great nominee if he decides he wants to do that.' Advertisement Other Republicans mentioned as possible 2028 contenders are already making the rounds of early-voting states. Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin speaks at a GOP fundraiser in South Carolina this weekend, and Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders headlines an event in that state later this month. Both have taken pains to stay in the president's good graces. Not every Republican contender has gone that route. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who lost the 2016 nomination to Trump, has been visiting early-voting states, too, but he voted against the president's signature legislative measure. And Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp — who has long harbored ambitions to run for president but has a complicated history with Trump — recently said he was sitting out of a Senate race in his state, a decision telegraphed by some as an indication Kemp might be eyeing the 2028 White House race.