Home Office to return Iraqi migrants to 'deter small boats'
It comes after an £800,000 deal last year with Baghdad to help the country crack down on smuggling networks and organised crime.
Earlier this year, Keir Starmer and Iraq's prime minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani agreed to strengthen co-operation on migration.
READ MORE: Nigel Farage claims court ruling removing asylum seekers from hotel as 'victory'
Jarvis (below) signed the agreement during a visit to the UK by Iraq's deputy foreign minister Faud Hussein. The Home Office said the accord would allow the 'swift' return of "illegal" migrants.
Home Office statistics said that since previous deals, the number of Iraqis arriving in the UK by small boat has fallen to 1900 in the year to March 2025, down from 2600 in the previous year.
Jarvis said: 'By working together on security, development and migration challenges, we are building stronger relationships that benefit both our countries whilst tackling shared challenges like organised crime and irregular migration.'
What is the Home Office's policy on small boat returns?
The returns deal is the latest as part of the Home Office's policies to stop small boats crossing the channel.
Similar agreements have already been made with Albania and Vietnam since Labour came into power.
Another deal with France recently came into force, where people who have arrived over the English Channel from the French coast can be returned to the country.
The person will then be exchanged for a "legitimate asylum seeker" in France who can demonstrate a genuine family link to the UK. The number has been capped, but it is hoped it will act as a deterrent to those crossing the Channel.
The latest figures from the Home Office showed 116 people arrived aboard two small boats on August 15.
Jarvis said: 'This visit reinforces the strength of the UK-Iraq partnership and demonstrates our government's commitment to serious diplomacy that delivers real results.
'As someone who served in Iraq, I understand first-hand the importance of building enduring relationships in the region, and the new agreement we have signed is a testament to the trust and co-operation we've built with our Iraqi counterparts.'
READ MORE: How does the UK-France 'one in, one out' asylum deal work?
However, the announcement was criticised by Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp.
He said: 'Over 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the Channel in Labour's short time in power, the worst illegal immigration crisis in our history.
'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals.
'Now they boast about a measly returns deal with Iraq, but barely any small boat arrivals are Iraqi, and most would qualify for asylum anyway. It's a sham designed to look tough while crossings keep soaring.
'Labour has scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos, leaving the British people to foot the bill. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
5 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Fury as train fares could soar by inflation-busting 5.8% next year despite services getting WORSE
Some season tickets could rise by an eye-watering £247 IT'S SO UNFARE Fury as train fares could soar by inflation-busting 5.8% next year despite services getting WORSE Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) TRAIN passengers could face a 5.8 per cent fares rise next year, even though punctuality is the worst since 2020. It would see the price of a Liverpool-to-Manchester annual flexi ticket jump by £120.30 to £2,195.10. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Shadow Transport Secretary Richard Holden says Labour's election promises ring hollow' Credit: Alamy Increases are usually calculated by adding one percentage point to the Retail Price Index figure for inflation — which yesterday hit 4.8 per cent for July. The RPI is calculated by looking at the prices of 700 products and services but also includes mortgage interest payments and council tax. Fare rises could see a Woking-to-London season ticket soar by £247 to £4,507. Meanwhile, punctuality is at its lowest in more than five years. The Office of Rail and Road found trains reached 66.7 per cent of station stops on time in the year to July 19 — the worst since the year to May 2020. Labour is nationalising operators as contracts expire, with South Western Railway and c2c now under public ownership. Ben Plowden of Campaign for Better Transport said: 'The fundamental question for the Government is how to use its role in setting fares policy to deliver a more affordable network and encourage customers.' Shadow Transport Secretary Richard Holden said: 'Labour's election promises ring hollow as passengers are hit with inflation-busting rises on top of cancelled trains, driver shortages and chaos on the network.' The Department for Transport said an update on fares will be released later this year. Peak rail fares scrapped by John Swinney
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour want to use you & your home as cash cows – so council spending can keep spiralling and migrants can keep coming
NO one can say that this government is short of ideas. It is just that every single one of them involves one thing: How to extract even more of our money. 3 3 This week alone has seen a bewildering number of proposals dangled before us, many of which revolve around using our homes as cash cows. One day we learned that Rachel Reeves is considering replacing stamp duty and council tax with a new property tax which would be levied annually on our homes, proportionate to their current value. Then it turned out that actually this new tax wouldn't necessarily mean abolishing council tax — it would run alongside it, raising money from any home sold for more than £500,000. If fact, it transpired that we could face rising council tax bills. Angela Rayner reportedly wants them ratcheted up in more prosperous areas in order to subsidise poorer ones. Then came another suggestion: That higher-value homes might lose their exemption from capital gains tax. It could mean anyone selling a family home having to pay 24 per cent of the profit they have made on their property since they bought it, possibly decades ago. The Chancellor seems to have it in her head that Britain is in the midst of a housing crisis caused by greedy Baby Boomers — those born between the mid- 1940s and 1960s. They have monopolised the housing stock, and therefore she is justified in milking them for all they are worth. It is the same mentality that saw the Bolsheviks blaming the middle classes for every ill and sending them off to the gulags after the Russian Revolution. Is Labour's National Insurance hike a tax on working people? Last year's Budget already meted out punishment for buy to let investors, who were whacked with a two per cent rise in stamp duty. Now Reeves is coming for owner-occupiers too. But it shouldn't take her too much to realise that her proposals would make the housing crisis even worse. If you levy CGT on the sales of family homes, it will act as a huge disincentive for people to sell up and downsize. Why bother, when much of the capital you hoped to release would be gobbled up by the taxman? Punitive taxes on property ownership are just a wealth tax by another name, but they would hit millions of pensioners who are asset-rich but cash-poor. Just because a house has rocketed in value since it was bought in the 1970s doesn't mean that its owner feels wealthy. It is still the same house, whatever it is worth. The real reason for the housing crisis is low rates of house building combined with high rates of migration. 'PUNISHING HOMEOWNERS' When you are building fewer than 200,000 new homes a year but allowing the population to swell by 700,000 a year, it is a recipe for acute shortage. You can't solve that by punishing homeowners. As for council tax, Reeves seems to think that homeowners are getting a free ride. True, it is wrong that in one case a £36million mansion in Kensington was found to have a lower council tax bill than a flat out near Heathrow airport. But overall, council taxpayers have been stung in recent years. According to the Taxpayers' Alliance, the average bill rose by 79 per cent in real terms, ie adjusted for inflation, between 1993/94 and 2023/24. The odd absurdity in the council tax system should not be used as an excuse to push up bills for millions of homeowners. Over the years we have faced higher and higher bills for an ever-lousier service. The more we pay, the more our bins seem to go unemptied and deeper the potholes on our streets. Councils like to blame rising social care costs for their poor finances, but that is only part of the story. 3 Other important factors are poor investments in commercial property made by many councils, and the soaring cost of over-generous local government pension schemes. Freedom of information requests to 300 councils last year revealed that a quarter of what we pay in council tax is disappearing straight into council workers' pension funds. In one case, Basingstoke and Deane Council was found to be paying more into staff pensions than it was raising in council tax. Another reason we are paying more but getting less is lousy productivity. Astonishingly, some councils think the way to right this is to move workers to a four-day week — which they foolishly think will magically lead to them producing more. I have a better idea. Shift unproductive workers on to a zero-hour week. That might just help encourage the rest to put in a bit more effort. 'FLAPPING AROUND' The Government is flapping around for ways of raising extra revenue because Labour backbenchers have made it impossible to cut public spending. Reeves' plan to trim a modest £5billion from the benefits bill was quickly reversed when Keir Starmer realised he could suffer the humiliation of a Commons defeat. That has put an end to Reeves' efforts to balance the books with a combination of spending cuts as well as tax rises. Now, we are just getting the tax rises instead. We are being hammered because Labour MPs refuse to believe there is any such thing as wasteful public spending. Sadly, there is — and it permeates every area of government. But clearly the current government isn't going to do anything about it.
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Epping's win over asylum hotel is glorious but I know where they'll put evicted migrants & it's bad news for some Brits
SHAZAAM! And in one glorious moment, the government's asylum seeker policies lay in complete ruins. Now, they are in BIG trouble. I say a glorious moment — and it is. For years it has quietly infuriated the ordinary people of England that asylum seekers are housed at our expense in hotels. 8 8 8 And even in some cases get gym membership, or hair extensions! And come down every morning to a full English. While you are pouring milk on your last Weetabix and wondering how to feed the kids. It's no use the lefties howling. 'No, no, it's not like that at all! And in any case most of the migrants go for the continental breakfast option. You know, croissants and stuff.' It is EXACTLY like that, as we have seen. Not to mention the stress on local communities who suddenly get a whole bunch of young men from a different culture dumped on them. Not all of the young men being as nice as pie. Anyway, Epping — where the residents protested about migrants in a local hotel — has won its court battle. As a result there will be no more migrants staying in that hotel. Victory! And now lots of other councils have followed suit. They too will be kicking out the illegals. The government is absolutely spitting feathers. The problem now, then, is where are these migrants to go. My suggestion last week was tents. Or South Georgia. Or Rockall. But the Government won't buy that idea, sadly. And this is where we need to watch them very carefully. To see what they come up with. Because it's largely in the south that migrants are held in hotels. In the north of England, because of cheap property prices, they tend to be housed in what are called Houses in Multiple Occupation. 16 arrested after protests outside Epping migrant hotel as ring of steel ramps up around TWO asylum seeker centres And so with the hotel option being closed down, it may be that the Government decides to swamp the north of England with migrants. Because it can do so cheaply. It may think (being pretty stupid) that is the only option. The local councils in the north need to shout out a big fat NO to that notion. These are the areas of the UK that already have the biggest social problems. They are also our poorest regions. The last thing these communities want or need is for boatload after boatload of asylum seekers to be dumped on their doorsteps. I think we can trust the councils run by Reform UK to oppose this idea completely. And so the Government will expect the Labour-run councils to help them out. And that means more and more problems for the Government. Because the voters will see that its Reform which says no to housing illegal asylum seekers. And the Labour Party which says yes. And that will be another few hundred thousand votes lost to Sir Keir Starmer at the next election. In the meantime, we might hope that this all sharpens the Government's concentration a little. And that they step up with more measures to stop the asylum seekers arriving here in the first place. As I said last week, a law that says anyone who tries to come here illegally will be barred from ever being allowed to stay would be the first thing to do. But I bet Labour doesn't have the gonads to do it. YES, inflation is up again. Almost double the Bank of England 's target rate. That means no reduction in interest rates. And further down the line, another cash crisis for the poorest of us. Is there any section of the economy Labour hasn't hurt? GET SET FOR AN EXODUS 8 RACHEL Reeves ' next plan to bankrupt everybody in the country is to put a tax on our homes. Don't forget, we've already been taxed on the money we spent on our homes. Now it is reported that she wants a property tax. But only at the more expensive end of the market. Anything that seems aspirational, anything that rewards hard work – the Chancellor will tax it. Soon we'll be left with a country full of skanks. Because everybody who works hard and saves dosh will have fled. DANGER DOLPHIN A DOLPHIN called Reggie has been attacking women off the Dorset coast. Especially if he sees that they are wearing a wetsuit. He swims up to them and seemingly tries to push their heads under water by jumping on their backs. I suspect it's because he's bored stiff with them making awe-stricken 'oohs' and 'ahhs' whenever he hoves into view. And taking selfies. He's basically saying: 'Go on, shove this on WhatsApp, you ditzy cow.' PANTS FOR PC VICTIM WHILE searching through Lea-Ann Sullivan's bedroom drawer, a copper found a pair of her knickers and quickly put them in his back pocket. The policeman, Marcin Zielinski, resigned from the force and has since been sent to prison. Lea-Ann is not happy, though. She said she is constantly thinking: 'What did he want them for? Why did he take them? What's he going to do with them? How many more people has he done it to?' Well, I could give Lea-Ann the answer to some of those questions. All but the last one, in fact. It is not recorded if PC Perv was allowed to keep the knickers. NAIVE ZOE SO WRONG 8 THERE was a woman on the BBC Newsnight programme who showed exactly why asylum seekers have become such a problem. She was called Zoe Gardner. Probably still is. And she thought the protests against the asylum seekers had been organised by ' Nazis and fascists'. She said a solution to the problem would be to build 'not for profit' homes for ALL of the asylum seekers. And that none of them were 'illegal'. She had a grasp of the subject you might have expected in a reasonably responsive four-year-old child. An absolute halfwit. Naive and hating of her own countrymen. And absolutely certain she was right. KEEP IT FIT FOR MOOR THE Government is proposing to ban the winter burning of heather moorland. Good. Come February the moors near me resemble a warzone. All of this activity to protect one bird – the grouse. The Moorland Association, which represents landowners, says the Government should think again. Controlled burning prevents wildfires, the association says. What rubbish. In fact, the so-called controlled burning can lead to wildfires itself, according to the RSPB. We need to reform the grouse moors. And make them fit habitats for a vast array of wildlife, not just grouse. TWISTS ON THE BORING NAME OLIVER 8 8 OK, so the most popular name for baby boys in the UK is Muhammad. But Oliver is high up on the list too. In fact, everywhere I looked in the country, Oliver was coming out near the top. I think I marginally prefer Muhammad, no offence. Know what the most popular girl's name was? Olivia. Have we lost our imaginations? We'll soon be an entire nation of Olivers and Olivias. If you're about to pup, here are a few suggestions for racy alternatives to Oliver and Olivia, with a bit of back history so you can explain the reasoning to rellies. Sputnik – to commemorate the first satellite. Gnasher – to commemorate Dennis the Menace's dog. PraiseGod Barebones – to commemorate a roundhead politician from the 17th century. Reeves – in homage to our brilliant Chancellor. Bakelite – to honour the first commercially available plastic. Nebuchadnezzar – after the Babylonian king. Ngerulmud – 'because she was conceived when we were on holiday on Palau. It's the capital, you know.'
