U.S. Trade Representative Greer says U.S. and China to roll back most tariffs
Vice minister of Finance Liao Min, left, gestures toward a journalist at a news conference at the Chinese mission to the World Trade Organization in Geneva, Switzerland, May 11, 2025, alongside Vice Premier He Lifeng and Li Chenggang, vice minister of commerce. (AP Photo)
GENEVA--U.S. and Chinese officials said Monday they had reached a deal to roll back most of their recent tariffs and call a 90-day pause to keep talking to resolve their trade disputes.
Stock markets rose sharply as the globe's two major economic powers took a step back from a clash that has unsettled the global economy.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop its 145% tariff rate on Chinese goods by 115 percentage points to 30%, while China agreed to lower its rate on U.S. goods by the same amount to 10%.
Greer and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced the tariff reductions at a news conference in Geneva.
The two officials struck a positive tone as they said the two sides had set up consultations to continue discussing their trade issues.
Bessent said at the news briefing after two days of talks that the high tariff levels would have amounted to a complete blockage of each side's goods, an outcome neither side wants.
'The consensus from both delegations this weekend is neither side wants a decoupling,' Bessent said. 'And what had occurred with these very high tariff ... was an embargo, the equivalent of an embargo. And neither side wants that. We do want trade. We want more balanced trade. And I think that both sides are committed to achieving that."
Trump last month raised U.S. tariffs on China to a combined 145% and China retaliated by hitting American imports with a 125% levy. Tariffs that high essentially amount to the two countries boycotting each other's products, disrupting trade that last year topped $660 billion.
The announcement by the U.S. and China sent shares surging, with U.S. futures jumping more than 2%. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index surged nearly 3% and benchmarks in Germany and France were both up 0.7%
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
34 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan's Largest Shipbuilders to Come Together as Parent, Subsidiary Amid Tariff Talks
Japan's largest shipbuilder, Imabari Shipbuilding Co., announced Thursday that it will turn the country's second-largest shipbuilder, Japan Marine United Corp. (JMU), into a subsidiary. Imabari will acquire a 60% stake in the company. The move will create a giant corporate group that will control half the domestic market by shipbuilding tonnage. The two companies are looking to compete with Chinese and Korean shipbuilders by scaling up and reducing costs. Cooperation in the shipbuilding sector is also a major theme for Japan's tariff negotiations with the United States. Moves by Japanese companies to improve their competitiveness could help Japan in the negotiations. Imabari Shipbuilding, based in Ehime Prefecture, currently holds a 30% stake in JMU, which is based in Yokohama. The other 30% of JMU shares will be purchased from JFE Holdings, Inc. and IHI Corp., which have funded the company together with Imabari. The acquisition will go through as soon as Imabari receives approval from regulatory authorities in Japan and abroad. JFE and IHI will both see their stake in JMU fall from 35% to 20%. The value of the deal has not been disclosed. Acquiring JMU as a subsidiary 'will create synergy through the merging of our construction capabilities with JMU's technical capabilities in ship design,' said a spokesperson for Imabari. The companies aim to improve production efficiency through economies of scale that will make it cheaper to procure parts. They also hope to boost their development capabilities by combining their technological fortes. Imabari was founded in 1901 and has 10 shipyards, mainly in the Chugoku and Shikoku regions. The company builds various types of ships, including tankers, container ships and large bulk carriers that ferry ore and grain. JMU was formed in 2013 through the merger of JFE's and IHI's shipbuilding subsidiaries. It is known for building vessels, such as destroyers, and has shipyards in Yokohama and Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture. Imabari Shipbuilding and JMU entered into a capital and business alliance in 2020. They established a joint venture in 2021 for ship design and sales and have been working to improve manufacturing efficiency by standardizing parts. Japan was the global leader in shipbuilding in the 1990s, accounting for 40%-50% of the world market by tonnage. However, with the rise of Chinese and Korean builders backed by government support, Japan's share has fallen below 20%. Surrounded by the sea, Japan relies on ships to transport many of its resources and foodstuffs, making shipbuilding key to the country's economic security. The government has decided to help revitalize the shipbuilding industry. In tariff talks with Washington, Japan has proposed cooperation in the field, given that the United States is also seeking to revive its shipbuilding industry.
Japan Today
42 minutes ago
- Japan Today
Japan has no recorded case of fentanyl seized, finance minister says
FILE PHOTO: Japan's Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato speaks during an interview with Reuters at the Finance Ministry in Tokyo, Japan April 17, 2025. REUTERS/Issei Kato/File Photo Japanese Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato said on Friday there have been no recorded cases of synthetic drug fentanyl being seized by the customs department, neither as illegal exports nor illegal imports, in six years through 2024. Kato made the comments at a regular news conference when asked about a Nikkei business daily report this week that a Chinese organization allegedly used a base in Japan to smuggle chemicals to make fentanyl into the U.S. "Japan will continue to take all necessary steps to prevent the smuggling of illegal drugs," Kato said. A key figure in the group registered a company in the city of Nagoya and until at least July 2024 issued instructions from Japan on the delivery of the dangerous opioid and on the management of funds, the Nikkei reported. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Trump's comparison of Iran attack to WWII atomic bombings irresponsible
U.S. President Donald Trump recently justified his country's attacks on nuclear facilities in Iran by likening them to the atomic bombings of Japan in 1945. His statement cannot be overlooked. He should face the reality of the atomic bombings and change his perception. Trump made the remarks during a visit to the Netherlands, stating, "I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war." The atomic bombings by the U.S. military during World War II destroyed two cities and claimed the lives of over 200,000 people. Even today many people continue to suffer from the aftereffects of exposure to radiation from the bombings. Could President Trump not imagine how his words would hurt the feelings of A-bomb survivors? The atomic bombings are not past tragedies that the American president should reference lightly. Trump has previously hailed the development of nuclear weapons as a "remarkable feat," stating that the Manhattan Project "helped end World War II." Forming the background to this stance is justification of the bombings grounded in the view they ended the war and saved many American soldiers' lives. Trump seems to share this view. But the overwhelming support for the bombings at the time has waned, with public opinion divided and criticism growing. Trump's remarks put a damper on this shift in American sentiment. Nuclear weapons are inhumane weapons of mass destruction. Former U.S. President Barack Obama, who called for "a world without nuclear weapons," acknowledged that the United States has a "moral responsibility" to act toward that goal. If the U.S. is to mention the atomic bombings, it must be at a time when it is expressing its resolve to eliminate nuclear weapons. Instead, Trump's comments risk increasing the threat of nuclear proliferation. It would not be surprising if some countries took Trump's comments as expressing the U.S. stance that it would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons in order to bring an end to conflict. This could lead to Iran not giving up on developing nuclear weapons, and North Korea accelerating its development of them. There is also a risk of escalating arms races involving Russia and China. Meanwhile, the Japanese government's response is difficult to understand. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi avoided commenting directly, stating, "The evaluation of historical events should be discussed by experts." The concept of "peace through strength" that Trump wields is dangerous because the use of nuclear weapons could become a concrete option. Even if Japan is protected by the "U.S. nuclear umbrella," it must underscore the inhumanity of nuclear weapons and continue to urge the U.S. not to use them. That is its responsibility as a nation that has experienced atomic bombings in warfare.
