
BTecs: What are they and how are they graded?
What are BTec Firsts and BTec Nationals?
A BTec, which stands for the Business and Technology Education Council, is a practical qualification. Courses are assessed through exams, regular coursework and projects, and sometimes placements.BTec Firsts are Level 2 qualifications, meaning they are equivalent to GCSEs. Students often take a mixture of the two. They can be helpful for people trying to get into further education colleges.BTec Nationals are Level 3 qualifications, so can be taken alongside or instead of A-levels.They are studied over one or two years.Research suggests one in four students use them as a route into university, while others gain occupation-specific skills and go straight into employment.
How are BTecs graded?
BTecs are graded on a scale:Starred Distinction/Distinction Star (D*)Distinction (D)Merit (M)Pass (P)Some BTecs are worth two or three A-levels.Students normally receive their results on the same days as A-level and GCSE students, but some receive them before this.
Who takes BTecs?
There are approximately 280,000 students studying at least one Level 3 applied general qualification, according to the Sixth Form College Association.A further 200,000 are estimated to be doing BTec Firsts and other BTec qualifications.Health and social care and applied science are among the most popular BTecs. Other subjects include construction, electrical engineering and art and design.BTec Nationals can be sat by any age group. In fact, most are taken by those over the age of 22 as they develop practical career skills.They are particularly popular among white working class students, according to research by the Social Market Foundation think tank.Other vocational courses are available in the UK, including National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs), TechBacs, Cambridge Technicals and Scottish Vocational Qualifications (SVQs).
How are BTecs changing?
In 2020, there were more than 12,000 vocational qualifications at all levels, offered by more than 150 awarding bodies, according to Ofqual, which oversees qualifications in England.Plans by former Conservative governments to streamline post-16 education had meant many BTecs and other Level 3 courses were due to lose their funding, to make way for T-levels.However, the Labour government paused and reviewed the plans, and has since announced that 157 qualifications will no longer be scrapped as planned.They include "key courses" in "important sectors", the DfE said, such as agriculture, engineering, manufacturing and health and social care.Some have had funding confirmed until July 2026 and others until July 2027.The government also confirmed that more than 200 qualifications with "with low or no enrolments" would still have funding withdrawn from 1 August 2025.Sarah Hannafin, head of policy at school leaders' union NAHT, said that "for A-levels and T-levels to be the only two qualification pathways post-16 would have failed to meet the needs and ambitions of many students".The government has confirmed the rollout of T-levels will continue.In the first three years, T-levels have faced delays, high dropout rates and an exam board being fined £300,000 over "major failings" with the papers.What are T-levels and what are the grades worth?What is an apprenticeship and how much are apprentices paid?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Entain cashes in on online betting surge as Club World Cup reels in players
Coral and Ladbrokes owner Entain has revealed a surge in online gaming as popular sporting events such as Wimbledon and the men's football Club World Cup reeled in punters. The sports betting giant reported total net gaming revenues – the amount of money the company pockets after paying out winnings to customers – of £2.6 billion for the first six months of the year, excluding its operations in the US. This was 6% higher than the same period a year ago, at constant currency rates. The increase jumped to 8% in the UK and Ireland, the company's biggest market, while online sales in the region surged by a fifth year-on-year. Both the volume of players and the value of sales increased, which Entain said reflected an improved experience for customers as well as previous changes to gambling rules starting to level out. The company had previously warned about the impact from regulatory changes in the UK which were designed to make betting safer for consumers. The FIFA Club World Cup final, which saw Chelsea beat PSG, was the most bet-on football match of 2025 for Entain's brands, with strong engagement coming from Brazil, Spain and the US. Interest in horse racing surged with the Royal Ascot and the Epsom Derby Festival both among the most bet-on competitions, while Wimbledon Tennis and the Women's Euro football tournament were also drawing in bets. Entain nonetheless reported a pre-tax loss of £96 million for the first half, swinging from a £13.7 million profit the prior year which the firm said was driven by one-off costs. On an underlying basis, earnings before tax, interest and other costs came in at £583.4 million for the period – 11% higher than last year. The company said it was now expecting higher sales growth for the year than its previous outlook, with online net gaming revenues forecast to rise by 7%. Annual underlying earnings are estimated to be between £1.1 billion and £1.15 billion.


Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British watch dealers hit by Trump's trade war with Switzerland
British watch dealers have been caught in the crossfire of Donald Trump's trade war after US tariffs on Switzerland wiped out demand for luxury timepieces. Sellers of second-hand Swiss watches said American customers were no longer buying from them after Mr Trump imposed a 39pc tariff on goods imported from Switzerland. Tom Bolt, who runs the watch dealership Watch Guru, said demand from US customers had been 'killed', adding: 'I have offered approximately £2.5m of watches in the last three weeks. Not one sale.' Mr Bolt warned that customers were 'just saying that until this whole tariff thing gets sorted out, they can't be doing it'. The tariffs, which rose from a previous rate of 10pc to 39pc earlier this month, apply to Swiss-made products, meaning buyers of used watches still have to pay them even if they order them from the UK or other countries. Adrian Hailwood, a watch industry expert and founder of The Watch Scholar, said: 'Even if I'm sending it from the UK, I have to say the origin of the goods is from Switzerland, and therefore they accrue a tariff. 'It doesn't matter where it's coming from in the world and this is why it really hits the pre-owned market. Once they're sold out of Switzerland, they could go to Australia, Japan, the UK – but if they're then being bought by US dealers or consumers, they have to pay tariffs because they're Swiss goods. 'The whole watch industry has been scratching its head as to what possibly can be done.' With a reputation for high-quality craftsmanship, Swiss-made watches have long been coveted by wealthy people across the world, with brands including Rolex, Omega and TAG Heuer. Manufacturers can only call their goods 'Swiss-made' if 60pc of the value of the final product was made in Switzerland. Americans are the biggest global customers of Swiss watches, making up about 17pc of Switzerland's total watch exports by value, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. However, Mr Trump has cited Switzerland's high trade deficit with the US as the reason why he has imposed such steep tariffs on the country. Jordan Beer, who runs the watch dealer Watches of Henley St, added: 'We've not exported one [watch] in the last two or three weeks to the US, which is relatively unusual for this time of year. 'I would say in general it's down from the US since all the tariffs started being floated around, regardless of whether it was 10pc on UK exports or [the recent higher tariffs on Swiss goods].' He added that Mr Trump's trade war was slowing the speed at which items make it through customs in the US and that he had been forced to warn customers of delays. Mr Bolt said he believed the high tariffs on Swiss watches could lead to an increase in goods being smuggled into the US. He said: 'What [customers will] do is, they'll say, 'Listen, send the watch to Hong Kong' because there's no import duties in Hong Kong. And the next time they're there, they'll pick it up and then they'll smuggle it back to their country.'


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Costa Coffee is accused of 'shameless attempt to game the system' after promising customers free drinks in return for good reviews
Costa Coffee has been accused of being 'shameless' after one of its branches promised customers free drinks in return for them leaving positive reviews. The outlet in Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, had propped up a sign which offered 'any medium size drink for free' if customers showed proof that they had given the store a rating of nine or ten in a feedback email. It is unclear whether such reviews were for internal or external use, but the chain, which is Britain's largest, has now come under fire for seemingly going against new consumer guidance. Shocked at witnessing the sign on his visit to the branch, Mark Shaw posted a picture to X and wrote: 'Dear Costa Coffee, love to hear your thoughts on this. Surely it makes a total mockery of your reviews.' In response, the company's official account, which has almost 275,000 followers, replied: 'Ooh that's quite cheeky, drop us a DM so we can chase this up Mark?'. The branch has taken the sign down. The branch's offer comes after the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 was published in April, which outlined strict details on how it is unlawful for 'fake reviews' to be posted. A 'fake review' is described as being a 'consumer review that purports to be, but is not, based on a person's genuine experience'. Martyn James criticised Costa for encouraging customers to leave positive feedback in exchange for a reward, saying such reviews should only be 'given freely, without incentive or manipulation'. It is unclear whether such reviews were for internal or external use, but the chain, which is Britain's largest, has now come under fire for seemingly going against new consumer guidance He told The Telegraph: 'Given that review sites are now covered by law, this frankly outrageous attempt to game the system is as shameless as it is forbidden. As customers, we all need to question reviews until the new rules are fully enforced. 'How can you trust reviews when they've bribed someone? I've no problem with them encouraging you. If your service is good you don't need to bribe anyone to do it.' Consumer law solicitor, Dr Jennifer Obaseki, also told the newspaper that while 'no one is likely to sue for a "lost coffee opportunity', that consumer watchdogs take a 'dim view' of promotions which officer incentives in return for feedback. Fines of up to £300,000 or 10 per cent of a company's global turnover can be brought forward if infringements are found under the new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act. A Costa Coffee spokesman said: 'We are aware of a sign that was displayed in one of our franchise stores, which was put up without approval and does not reflect company policy. 'As soon as we became aware of the sign, we asked the store to remove it, which they have done.'