&w=3840&q=100)
Lancashire to honour Farokh Engineer, Clive Lloyd with Old Trafford stands
Engineer played for Lancashire for close to a decade while former West Indies captain Lloyd was with the club for two decades, making indelible contributions to the history of club.
Sources told PTI that the stand-naming ceremony could be held on day one of the Test match that starts July 23. England lead the five-match series 2-1 after three high-intensity games.
"It is a fitting honour for the both legends of the club," said the source.
In 175 matches between 1968 and 1976, the 87-year-old Engineer made 5942 runs, took 429 catches and effected 35 stumpings for Lancashire.
Two-time World Cup-winning West Indies skipper Lloyd, on the other hand, transformed the fortunes of the club after arriving as an overseas player in the early 1970s.
When the Mumbai-born Engineer made his Lancashire debut, the club had not any major title for more than 15 years but he helped them lift the Gillette Cup four times between 1970 and 1975.
Both Engineer and Lloyd would be immortalised in Lancashire history later this week. Interestingly, Engineer doesn't have a stand named after him at Brabourne Stadium where he played most of his cricket.
"They were incredible times, and Old Trafford was a marvellous place to be. People would come for miles to see us play," Engineer had told the club website a few years ago.
"From the Old Trafford dressing room we could see Warwick Road railway station and before the game we would see packed trains emptying the passengers on the platform. We could hear the chanting and the excited chatter and laughter," he recalled.
Engineer also remembered receiving fan mail during his heydays.
"It was amazing, our lockers would be stuffed full of requests for autographs and invitations to parties. Everyone in England was talking about that great team, names like Clive Lloyd, Harry Pilling, Peter Lever and Ken Shuttleworth," he said.
"That buzz lasted for years and we were the most famous one-day team in the land." After retirement, Engineer made Manchester his home and continues to live here till date. Former India captain Dilip Vengsarkar, who is here on a personal visit, is also expected to attend the ceremony alongside the senior officials of the club.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
BCCI to have 'honest conversations' with Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma; 2027 World Cup uncertain: 'Both will be pushing 40'
When Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma announced their retirements from T20I cricket together shortly after India won the T20 World Cup last year, many felt it was a conscious call to stretch their Tests and ODI careers. Then, a couple of months ago, when both called time on their Test careers – within a span of five days – it was believed that they took the decision to ensure they are fit and ready for the 2027 World Cup – the only limited-overs ICC tournament they have yet to win together. However, it now seems that the road to the World Cup in South Africa in two years' time is easier said than done. With the Indian team transitioning and transitioning quickly in Tests, the same pattern may apply to the ODI fold as well. This means that with more youngsters stepping up, it is far from given that Kohli and Rohit will feature in the World Cup. Virat Kohli, left, and Rohit Sharma no longer have the long rope(AFP) The year 2023 would have been the perfect setting for Kohli to win the ODI World Cup for a second time and for Rohit to win his first. However, the disappointing result – losing to Australia – in the final has left behind an unfulfilled dream for two of Indian cricket's biggest stalwarts. A recent Cricbuzz report stated that Rohit is going full throttle to ensure he is fit and in shape for the next World Cup, whereas Kohli confirmed that his next big goal is to win the World Cup during an RCB event, which took place just before the start of IPL 2025. But the BCCI, it seems, has different plans. Rohit and Kohli are no longer certainties for the World Cup, and the decision-makers are set to discuss their future with them. "Yes, it will be discussed soon. We still have more than two years for the next World Cup (November 2027). Both Kohli and Rohit will be pushing 40 by then, so there has to be a clear plan ahead for the big event as our last win was in 2011. We also need to try out a few youngsters in time," a source told PTI. How many ODIs between now and the World Cup? Besides age, a huge factor that may prove to be an obstacle for Kohli and Rohit is the limited amount of game time. Until the end of 2026, India is scheduled to play 27 ODIs scattered between Tests and T20I series, and with Kohli and Rohit playing sporadically, and only in ODIs, could prevent them from finding their groove fully. The next time an Indian Playing XI would feature Kohli and Rohit in their Playing XI is in October, when India tour Australia for three ODIs and five T20Is. Once that's over, India play three ODIs against South Africa in November and three more against New Zealand in November-December. This gap may not be too long, but for cricketers who are at the wrong end of their 30s, it isn't the most ideal scenario to be in. The decision to play the 2027 World Cup won't be forced – neither from the BCCI nor from Kohli and Rohit. At the end of the day, a final call will be taken after considering whether the two still find a place in India's ODI scheme of things. "Look, both Kohli and Rohit have made huge contributions to white ball cricket for the team and the sport in general. They have achieved almost everything. So, I don't think anybody is going to force their hand, but there will be some honest and professional conversations before the next ODI cycle starts to see where they stand mentally and physically. It depends on that," the source added.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Bumrah didn't win a Test. Siraj likes being a leader…': Indian pacers get contrasting reviews after England series
Former Australian cricketer Brad Haddin delivered an honest assessment of India's 2-2 series draw against England as he suggested that the current team has proved that it can play with Jasprit Bumrah. In the high-voltage five-match Test series, India won at Edgbaston and the Oval, notably on both occasions, Bumrah was rested for workload management. In his absence, Mohammed Siraj stepped on occasions and powered India to crucial wins with his lion-hearted effort with the ball. He turned the tide at the Oval with his five-wicket haul as India emerged victorious by 6 runs to level the series. Mohammed Siraj led the Indian pace attack in the absence of Jasprit Bumrah at the Oval.(PTI) Bumrah played three Tests in the series, and he claimed 14 wickets, including two five-wicket hauls, while Siraj, who took part in all matches, finished as the highest wicket-taker with 23 scalps. Haddin stated that Bumrah didn't win any Test matches for India on the England tour. "India, they can take a lot out (this) that they can still play without Bumrah. His life goes on if the other bowlers find a way. They have got so much talent over there in India. But he didn't win a Test match," Haddin said on YouTube channel LiSTNR Sport. Meanwhile, the former Aussie wicketkeeper heaped massive praise on Siraj for leading the attack in Bumrah's absence. He remarked that Siraj relishes the big stage and thrives when the pressure is at its peak. "I think Siraj likes being the leader of the attack. He is one of those guys that he wants the ball in big situations. Yes, he makes mistakes, but he doesn't shy away from wanting the occasion. If you have players like that who aren't afraid to make mistakes, who can get under the skin of opposition because of the way that they want to be in the game, they are the guys you want," He added. 'No way in the world Siraj didn't want to bowl every over' Siraj picked up three wickets on Day 5 at the Oval when India needed four wickets to win as Haddin emphasised how he wanted to bowl every over to help his team win the match. "He wanted the ball in that last hour of play. There's no way in the world he didn't want to bowl every over to win the game. He dropped the catch. That's a bad miss, your details got to be better there when you are catching that. But that also didn't define him by the Test match. We are not going to talk about that catch now," he concluded.
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
A young Indian team travelled to England light but returned heavy with wins, lessons & a captain for the future
The irony is palpable. When India embarked on their tour of England without Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and R Ashwin — three of their modern giants — with the news that Jasprit Bumrah would play only three of the five Tests and with Shubman Gill leading the Test team for the first time, expectations were suitably lowered. When a team is in transition — and it is fair to say that, save for Mohammad Siraj, the fastbowling unit lacked experience — a steep learning curve is to be expected. Add to the mix B Sai Sudarshan, Karun Nair, Washington Sundar and Dhruv Jurel, who had little to no Test experience, and a five-Test series away in England quickly became a daunting assignment. So much so that an advert did the rounds to catch the eye: 'Team India seekhne nahi, sikhane jaa rahi hai.' And so it panned out. This team was not there to learn, but to school the sceptics on what was about Gill the captain, of whom little was known beyond his white-ball exploits, there were enough questions around Gill the batsman. After all, an average in the low 30s was not something he could be proud of after being given the run he had. The talent and ability were clearly there, and the selectors were sitting on Gill for the long haul. Gill delivered in style. For some players, added responsibility comes with an opportunity to be themselves, to express themselves more fully. As Gill scored his (and the team's) runs, he ensured that he had the authority he needed to get the most out of his band of men. Tactically, Gill was far from perfect. There were times when he let the game drift, and his tendency to rely heavily on the quick bowlers, conditions notwithstanding, meant that the class of Ravindra Jadeja sometimes went underutilised with the ball. Gill was neither Kohli-aggressive nor Rohit-relaxed. He was his own man, being different things at different times. It's early days, but on the evidence so far, India won't be looking for another all-format captain for a very long time to home, Jadeja has been the answer to all of India's balance questions. He runs through opposition batting when there is assistance, can keep one end bottled up if his captain needs control, and contribute properly with the bat lower down the order. But, overseas, there was the nagging feeling that his bowling could be blunted by conditions and his batting wouldn't stand up consistently enough. With a hundred and five half-centuries, Jadeja laid to rest any doubts about his place in the scheme of things. He may be getting along in years, but he has never been more valuable to the Test set-up than there are selections that buck conventional wisdom, the question of who had the final say arises. Gautam Gambhir, the coach, is a strong-willed character, and while it did appear as though Gill was given a free hand on the field, there was the suggestion that Gambhir imposed himself on the selection of the playing eleven. Had the result gone another way, on the back of a string of losses, these doubts would've grown louder. But, with India winning two Tests by picking teams that seemed to defy both playing to strengths or an all-out push for 20 wickets, it became clear that the coach's belief in his squad's depth and ability to compete at the highest level was spot on. Gambhir will know that it won't always be so. And fans will still be left asking how India went five Tests without giving Kuldeep Yadav a look there was one chink that was woefully exposed in England, it was the challenge that has dogged India for the longest time. With Nitish Kumar Reddy injured, there was no other batsman capable of contributing 12- 15 overs of seam up in an innings. India have backups for most roles, but when it comes to seamers who can bat, or batsmen who can allow the primary fast bowlers a breather, the cupboard is as bare as ever. This meant bolstering the lower order with Shardul Thakur, something that did not pay off even on paper, given how little he was used with the ball. Going forward, Gill, with help from the coaching staff, will have to identify either a player or two who can fit the bill, or three different combinations that allow them to stay in the hunt for 20 wickets without leaving the tail an exceptionally long one
