Kerala Healthcare Worker's Homecoming Dreams Shattered In Fatal Ahmedabad Air Disaster
Ranjitha Gopakumar, a 39-year-old healthcare professional from Thiruvalla in Kerala's Pathanamthitta district, tragically lost her life in the devastating Air India plane crash that occurred in Ahmedabad on Thursday. She was among the 241 passengers and crew members who perished when the aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff.
The mother of two had been working as a nurse in the United Kingdom and had returned to India merely four days before the fatal flight. Her homecoming was part of a carefully planned transition to permanently relocate back to her homeland and reunite with her family.
Ranjitha had harbored ambitious plans to abandon her overseas career and resume her government service position in Kerala's healthcare system. She had originally taken leave from the Kerala government health service to pursue enhanced career opportunities abroad, having previously worked in Salalah, Oman, before relocating to the United Kingdom.
Her primary motivation for returning centered on creating a more secure and stable environment for her loved ones. She was actively involved in finalizing construction of a new family residence and planned to bring her children and elderly mother into this improved living situation.
The tragic loss has devastated Ranjitha's immediate family, including her mother Thulassykuttiyamma, her 15-year-old son Indhuchoodan who is currently in Class 10, and her 12-year-old daughter Ithika, a Class 7 student. She also leaves behind two brothers who are now mourning their sister's untimely death.
On the day of the accident, Ranjitha had traveled from Chennai to Ahmedabad via connecting flight, intending to continue her journey to the United Kingdom to collect her employment release documentation before making her permanent return to India.
A family member close to Ranjitha reflected on her final departure, noting her optimistic state of mind and numerous future plans. "She departed with happiness and hope. There were countless plans and so many dreams," the relative shared, highlighting the profound loss felt by those who knew her.
The news of the aviation disaster has sent shockwaves through Ranjitha's hometown community. Neighbors, friends, and extended family members have gathered at the family residence to offer their condolences and provide silent support during this difficult period.
The Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which was bound for London, crashed directly into a medical college hostel building within moments of takeoff on Thursday. The impact triggered a massive fire, creating what aviation experts are calling one of the most catastrophic air disasters in recent history.
Official reports confirm that at least 265 individuals lost their lives in this tragedy, making it a devastating blow to families across multiple countries and communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
33 minutes ago
- The Print
Why do airplanes still crash?
Statistically, flying remains one of the safest modes of transport. But the sight of an aircraft falling from the sky severely dents public confidence. It begs the question: Why do airplanes still crash? The tragic crash of Air India Flight AI171 on 12 June, the deadliest aviation accident in India since the 1996 Charkhi Dadri mid-air collision, has reignited public debate and scrutiny over aviation safety. Aviation accidents are exceedingly rare. The probability of an air accident is roughly 1 in 11 million flights. According to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)'s 2024 Safety Report, 2023 was the safest year in the last five, with a global accident rate of 1.87 per million departures—down from 2.05 in 2022—and a fatality rate of 17 per billion passengers, down from 50 the year before. Global passenger traffic reached 4.2 billion in 2023, with over 35 million departures. Only one fatal accident occurred, involving a turboprop aircraft that claimed 72 lives. The International Air Transport Association (IATA)'s 2024 report confirms this trend, recording 12 accidents, no jet hull losses, and no fatal jet crashes. Yet, when crashes do occur, they are often catastrophic. ICAO data shows that about 80 per cent of accidents involve human factors, 15 per cent stem from technical issues, and 5 per cent are due to environmental conditions such as weather or bird strikes. In many cases, more than one factor is involved, highlighting the complex nature of aviation safety. Human error dominates because aviation remains heavily dependent on human decision-making, especially during critical phases of flight such as take-off and landing. Technical failures, like engine malfunctions or system glitches, are less common, and even when they occur, aircraft redundancies prevent disaster. Environmental factors, such as low visibility, wet runways, turbulence, or bird strikes, can exacerbate existing problems, but rarely cause accidents on their own. Also read: Kanishka to Charkhi Dadri – 6 plane tragedies that shook India before Human error: The dominant factor Human error encompasses a range of issues, from miscommunication to flawed decision-making under pressure. The ICAO defines 'human factors' as the study of human abilities, limitations, and interactions with equipment, procedures, and environments. In the case of AI171, experts have raised concerns over why the landing gear was not retraced by the crew immediately after take-off, as the standard procedure requires. The reason could be technical—such as a loss of hydraulic power caused due to loss of engine thrust, or an electrical malfunction. Or it could be a temporary lapse in decision-making ability under stress. Such errors are rare, but not improbable. The investigation would probe all possibilities. Two factors often overlooked, but crucial to human performance, are training and fatigue. Pilot training Pilot training is the cornerstone of aviation safety, but gaps exist. The 1989 British Midland crash near Kegworth, England, which killed 47 people, was partly attributed to pilots' unfamiliarity with a new aircraft variant. Similarly, the 2018 and 2019 Boeing 737 MAX crashes (346 deaths) exposed deficiencies in training on the MCAS automated system. Modern training emphasises simulation, crew resource management (CRM), and handling automation. Still, the 'startle effect' triggered by unexpected real-world contingencies can overwhelm even the most experienced pilots. The only antidote is realistic and repeated training for time-critical emergencies. Experience alone offers no protection against failure. Crew fatigue Crew fatigue is another critical factor. Long-haul flights, irregular schedules, and tight turnarounds can impair cognitive function, slow reflexes, and cloud judgement. Studies estimate that fatigue contributes to 20 per cent of aviation incidents. In the 2009 Colgan Air Flight 3407 crash (50 deaths), fatigued pilots failed to respond to a stall warning. While aviation regulators like the United States' FAA and India's DGCA impose duty-hour limits, enforcement varies. In 2024, DGCA proposed new Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) norms to align with global practices. However, under pressure from airlines, implementation was postponed indefinitely. Pilot unions approached the Delhi High Court, which directed the DGCA to enforce the revised norms. These updated rules, which offer slightly better working conditions, are yet to be implemented. Also read: Pilots flying your planes are stressed, sleep-deprived. 'It wasn't as intense earlier, now it's chaos' Technology's role in enhancing safety Technology has transformed aviation safety. Modern aircraft are built with multiple redundancies and are designed to operate safely even if key systems, like an engine, fail. Fly-by-wire controls and modern autopilot systems allow for more precise and safer flight operations. Digital cockpit displays offer real-time system-diagnostics, besides navigation and communication information. Key safety innovations include: Traffic Collision Avoidance Systems (TCAS): Alerts pilots to nearby traffic, preventing mid-air collisions. Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning Systems (EGPWS): Warns pilots of terrain risks to reduce controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents. Flight Data Recorders (Black Boxes): Store critical data to support accident/incident investigations and improve standard operating procedures. Automated Weather Radar: Helps pilots avoid turbulence and storms. Despite these advances, technology isn't infallible. The AI171 crash occurred just 35 seconds after take-off, suggesting that under specific conditions, even advanced systems can fail so fast that recovery becomes impossible. Manned vs unmanned: Could drones be safer? Could unmanned aircraft, like military drones or future autonomous passenger jets, eliminate human error? In theory, yes. AI-powered autonomous systems don't suffer from fatigue, distraction, or stress. They don't need sleep or frequent training, and regulatory compliance can be built into the code. Cargo drones tested by companies like UPS and Amazon have shown promising reliability in controlled environments. But transitioning this technology to passenger aviation is a massive leap. Human pilots are still unmatched in their ability to improvise during unanticipated emergencies—as demonstrated by Captain Sully's (Chesley Sullenberger) miraculous Hudson River landing, which saved 155 lives. AI struggles with unpredictable scenarios such as rare mechanical failures or complex air traffic control (ATC) instructions. Public trust is another barrier. Passengers may hesitate to board pilotless planes. Imagine hearing: 'I am your captain speaking. I am working from home today.' Cybersecurity risks, such as hacking or failure of communication with ground stations, also merit consideration. Although unmanned military drones have lower crash rates than manned fighter jets (US Air Force data shows Predator drones crash at 7.5 per 100,000 hours vs 15 for F-16s), passenger aviation demands near-zero failure rates. For now, hybrid systems—where human pilots oversee AI-assisted operations—appear to offer the most plausible middle ground. Conclusion: Keeping aviation safe Flying remains extraordinarily safe. The crash of AI171, while devastating, is an outlier in an industry that has steadily reduced accident rates over decades. From the Wright brothers' fragile biplane to today's high-tech cockpits, aviation has evolved by learning from past tragedies. Technology has bolstered safety. Regulations have grown stronger. Training has become more rigorous. But the AI171 crash exposes persistent vulnerabilities. Human factors, including fatigue and training gaps, demand stricter oversight. India, now the world's third-largest domestic aviation market, must match growth with safety. The DGCA must institute and enforce crew rest standards reflective of the high stress environment they operate in. Similarly, maintenance protocols must be followed rigorously. Tendency to continue operating aircraft with prolonged unserviceabilities under minimum equipment list must be curbed. Airlines must foster a culture where crew can report safety concerns without fear. Unmanned flights may one day reduce human error, but for now, the focus should be on refining human-machine collaboration. The survival of Ramesh Vishwaskumar in AI171, against astronomical odds, reminds us of aviation's resilience, as well as its fragility. Flying remains safe. But to keep it that way, we must never stop improving. Group Captain Ajay Ahlawat is a retired IAF fighter pilot. He tweets @Ahlawat2012. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
Economic Times
36 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Air India Dreamliner bound for Delhi returns to Hong Kong after technical snag
Live Events Ahmedabad crash Air India flight AI315, operating from Hong Kong to Delhi, returned to Hong Kong after the pilot detected a possible technical issue mid-air, ANI reported on flight, operated by a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, had departed Hong Kong for its scheduled aircraft landed safely in Hong Kong. Meanwhile, the nature of the technical concern is yet to be Dreamliner aircraft is now undergoing checks, Reuters reported citing sources.(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)According to tracking data on Flightradar24, flight AI315 took off from Hong Kong at 12:16 p.m. and landed just over an hour comes amid Indian aviation sector's woes piling up following the Air India flight crash in Ahmedabad that happened on Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was en route to London from Ahmedabad when it crashed shortly after taking off from the airport and rammed into a doctors' hostel of BJ Medical College in Gujarat's were 242 people on board the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, including 230 passengers and 12 crew members. Of the passengers, 241 died in the crash. The lone survivor, identified as Vishwashkumar Ramesh, a British national of Indian origin, sustained injuries and is undergoing treatment.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Air India crash victim families upset by slow recovery efforts
Frustration mounts among relatives of those lost in the Air India crash in Ahmedabad, as they grapple with slow DNA identification and limited information. With only one black box recovered, families anxiously await news, while authorities expedite the identification process. The airline and government offer compensation and support, but the emotional toll remains immense for grieving families seeking closure. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Relatives of people feared dead or missing after last week's crash of an Air India Boeing Co. 787 jet have become frustrated by a lack of information about the cause of the disaster and slow-moving recovery one of two flight data 'black boxes' have been recovered by investigators, and most victims' identities are still awaiting DNA testing. A final death toll is still pending, with 80 of the dead having been positively identified through DNA samples and 33 bodies turned over to grieving relatives, according to a report from the Press Trust of India.'We're expediting the DNA matching process to hand over the bodies to their respective relatives,' Dr. Rajnish Patel, an official with a local hospital in Ahmedabad, said Sunday. 'We're trying our best to facilitate the process and bring closure to the families.'Aviation authorities have been combing through the wreckage of Air India flight AI171 to determine why the aircraft lost momentum shortly after takeoff Thursday and plunged into a densely populated residential area in the western city of Ahmedabad. All but one of the 242 people aboard were killed, along with an untold number of victims on the ground at the crash of the B.J. Medical College were having lunch in their hostel dining hall when the jet loaded with fuel smashed into the building and exploded. Many family groups have gathered at the site, anxiously seeking more details about the accident and word about the whereabouts of loved Tushar Thakur, a young woman in her late 20s, said she's still waiting for news about her mother, who was working at a canteen at the medical college.'We're poor, so no one seems to care about keeping us informed,' said Payal, her voice cracking with emotion. 'We're in shock, unable to eat or drink. Who needs compensation when we've lost our loved ones?'Air India will be paying the equivalent of roughly 21,000 British pounds ($28,500) to each of the families of the deceased and to the survivor, the carrier said. This is in addition to the some 85,000 British pounds announced by Air India owner Tata Owess, 35, flew from Australia upon learning of the tragic loss of his sister-in-law, Nusrat Jahan, in the crash. Despite the challenging circumstances, Owess expressed a measure of satisfaction with response and outreach efforts by the airline and government. But his deceased relative has yet to be identified with DNA matching.'We have no choice but to wait, given the magnitude of the tragedy,' he facilitate the DNA sampling process, local officials said 12 teams are working in shifts, conducting DNA testing around the clock. But some of the collection efforts have been chaotic, with at least one instance of the remains of more than one person being found in a single body Gujarat state health department has deployed over 855 health personnel, including 100 healthcare workers, at a trauma center near the crash site. The team includes regular hospital staff and supplementary manpower specifically deployed for emergency response. Counseling support also has been provided to the affected families to help them cope with their loss.'Determining the total death toll will take time,' Alok Kumar Pandey, the Gujarat government's commissioner of relief, said Sunday. 'We kindly request your patience as we work diligently to identify the victims and notify their families.'Experts from Boeing and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, as well as several civil aviation authorities, have surveyed the location. Efforts by some of those directly impacted to learn more have been frustrated by the slow trickle of information being released by the government. India's aviation ministry has held only one press briefing since the have been shuttling remains to a mortuary complex near the site of the crash. On Sunday it was crowded with anxious families eagerly awaiting news about their loved ones. A steady stream of dignitaries, including local ministers and senior police officers, have visited the site to pay their respects and promise to help with search and recovery of those waiting weren't satisfied with those pledges, criticizing government authorities for what they see as a lack of coordination and timely updates.'We've been waiting for over 72 hours for any news,' said Rohit Patel, who lost his nephew and niece-in-law in the crash. 'I'm inundated with calls from my family and community, asking for updates. What am I supposed to tell them?'
