logo
Brooklyn Village developers warn county it will forgo affordable housing plan

Brooklyn Village developers warn county it will forgo affordable housing plan

Axios10-06-2025
The Peebles Corporation is warning Mecklenburg County that if it doesn't subsidize affordable housing for Brooklyn Village, the developer will proceed with its original plan to build mostly luxury apartments on the historically significant site.
Why it matters: It's looking increasingly less likely that Peebles will actually redevelop Brooklyn, once a thriving Black neighborhood in Charlotte until it was razed in the '60s and '70s.
A legal battle could ensue if the county wants to reclaim control of the site it sold to The Peebles Corporation for a discount.
Catch up quick: Mecklenburg County sold prime land near Uptown to The Peebles Corporation and its development partner at a discounted rate, expecting they would honor Brooklyn through a mixed-use development that incorporates affordable housing.
But the project has stalled for years because of negotiations and construction delays, which have been blamed on market conditions.
In February, the development team revised its proposal and said it would build 250 affordable housing units — instead of 550 mixed-income units — in part to restore confidence with county commissioners.
The latest: Peebles told the county April 18 it would miss a contractual deadline to demolish a building on the site due to the discovery of asbestos. WFAE reports that the county may use this latest delay as an out from its relationship with Peebles.
In an unprompted email to Axios on Tuesday, Peebles emphasized that it now owns the Brooklyn land. "There is no reversion provision for Mecklenburg County to take it back," the email states.
Peebles also said it scored among the top applicants for a government subsidy to build affordable housing. However, the email claims the city was "insistent" that the county contributed, and the county refused.
Peebles further blamed the county for not disclosing the asbestos. It added that the building is on Phase 2 land for Brooklyn Village, which the developers do not own and, according to the email, do not plan on acquiring within the next decade.
"The County wants BK Partners to pay for and perform an environmental clean-up of a building we do not own," the email states. "They are trying to shift the cost of extensive clean up."
The other side: A letter Mecklenburg County's outside attorney sent to Peebles Corp. in late April, reported by WFAE, reads, "In reality, this is merely a continuation of BKV's ongoing attempts to avoid performing the demolition and removal work it agreed to perform. Clearly, BKV did not proceed diligently because it has been hoping it could evade its obligations."
Mecklenburg County provided Axios with its April 30 response to Peebles but declined to comment further.
The bottom line: The latest email effectively warns the county to approve its request for more funding if it's "genuinely committed to providing more affordable housing."
"Otherwise, we will wait until market conditions improve in Charlotte and then proceed with our original plan," the email states.
What's next: Developers say they expect to meet with the county in the coming weeks to seek a resolution.
Read The Peebles Corporation's statement to Axios in full below:
1. The development team of BK Partners, composed of Conformity Corp and The Peebles Corporation, owns the Phase 1 land.
2. There is no reversion provision for Mecklenburg County to take it back.
3. BK Partners has the right to build luxury apartments, a hotel, office and retail.
4. Current market conditions make construction of any of these uses infeasible economically. This is due to the impact of a global pandemic, the tripling of interest rates and an oversupply of apartments in the market.
5. BK Partners has an obligation to build 10% of any apartments on Phase 1 as affordable.
6. To address the County's and City's need and desire for more affordable housing, BK Partners was willing to build 250 units of affordable housing in two buildings.
7. As is the case for all affordable housing in Charlotte and the nation, a government subsidy is required. We applied for it and scored at the top of the applicants.
8. The City was insistent that the County contribute to their subsidy and the County refused.
9. As to the Board of Education building:
A. It is on the site of Phase 2 which we do not own and do not plan on acquiring in the next 8-10 years.
B. At the County's request two years ago, BK Village agreed to demolish the building under the expectation that there was minimal asbestos.
C. Prior to securing a permit for demolition, an additional environmental study was performed, and extensive friable asbestos was discovered. This extended the timeframe to demolish the building significantly as all the asbestos will need to be removed by hand first. Then demolition will follow.
D. The extensive asbestos in the building increased the demolition costs fivefold and added 6 to 8 months of time to the demolition process.
E. BK Partners was unaware of the extensive environmental contamination of the building prior to this discovery.
F. Apparently, the County government knew of the contamination but did not disclose this information to us.
10. The Board of Education Building has nothing to do with the schedule of Phase 1, nor does it impact the construction of affordable housing. It is the County government who is trying to leverage the construction of affordable housing to force us to cover the cost of the environmental clean-up of the Board of Education building in exchange for them to support affordable housing on Brooklyn Village Phase 1. We are surprised and disappointed by their approach. However, this is a complicated issue which will need to be addressed at some point.
11. The County wants BK Partners to pay for and perform an environmental clean-up of a building we do not own. They are trying to shift the cost of extensive clean up to BKV Partners.
12. BK Partners does not understand the urgency of the Board of Education building demolition as our original development agreement contemplated it being demolished before we started on Phase 2, which is 6-8 years away.
13. BK Partners has asked the County to allow us to proceed with the affordable housing buildings now and separately work out the issues involving the environmental clean-up.
14. If the County is genuinely committed to providing more affordable housing, it will approve our request. Otherwise, we will wait until market conditions improve in Charlotte and then proceed with our original plan.
15. BK Partners plans to meet with the county in the coming weeks to try and reach a resolution to move forward with the affordable housing.
16. There have been several reports of how we have delayed the project. Here are the facts:
A. The Development Agreement was approved by the county Commission October 2016.
B. The County did not control all of the land in Phase 1 because the City had rights to recover a portion of the land in Phase 1.
C. The County and City did not reach an agreement on the land until 2021.
D. BK Partners acquired the land under Phase 1 for $10 million in 2023.
E. BK Partners immediately commenced demolition and site work on the property as required in the agreement with the County.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Despite federal cuts to higher ed, Mass. free community college presses on, transforming students' lives
Despite federal cuts to higher ed, Mass. free community college presses on, transforming students' lives

Boston Globe

time6 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Despite federal cuts to higher ed, Mass. free community college presses on, transforming students' lives

'Whenever I thought about going back to school, I knew that if, for some reason, I got overwhelmed with work and couldn't go to school, I'd accrue that debt,' Hannigan, 43, told the Globe. 'It's one of the things that dissuaded me from going to school again.' Advertisement Hannigan is now president of the Greenfield Community College student senate, president of the college's permaculture club, and two classes short of graduating with a degree in farm and food systems. With straight As, he hopes to transfer to a four-year college next year. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up His turnaround is thanks to a program called MassReconnect, which launched in 2022, offering free community college to state residents over age 25 who don't have a bachelor's degree. It is the precursor to the state's MassEducate program, which started a year later, offering free community college to all residents. Early data suggest Massachusetts' experiment with free community college has been successful. Enrollment has shot up by Advertisement But while state funding for the programs is ensured for next year, federal cuts to higher education put the long-term feasibility of the program on shaky ground. Many students say their lives have been changed by free community college. 'If it wasn't for free community college, I'd just be working some manual labor job at UMass right now, not even thinking about college,' Hannigan said. Pedro Rentas also didn't see college in his future. When he moved to the United States from the Dominican Republic, he heard friends and family complaining about student loans. 'I was like, 'I'm going to avoid that one,'' he said. But when he heard about MassReconnect, he enrolled the same day. Rentas tore through school, finishing in a year and a half. Immediately after graduating, he applied for a position as a branch manager for Reading Cooperative Bank in Lawrence. His associate's degree came up in the interview; he cinched the job. Today, his salary is nearly double what it was before college. This fall, he's enrolling in the University of Massachusetts Lowell to pursue his bachelor's degree in criminology, with a long-term plan to become an immigration lawyer. But many community college students still face barriers. The state will only pay what's left after a student uses up other financial aid. Since low-income students— many of whom are students of color — already depend on aid like Pell Grants, they're the least likely to benefit from these new programs. That may explain why, according to state data, MassEducate students are more likely to be white and less likely to be Black, African-American, Hispanic, or Latino compared with the overall student population. Advertisement Additionally, the programs cover only tuition and fees. Those costs make up just While the state offers a $1,200 living stipend for low-income students and up to $1,200 for books and other supplies, that still falls short of the roughly 'I've heard stories of students living in shelters, in friends' attics, or in other unstable housing just to stay in school,' Hannigan said. 'So even with tuition, fees, and books covered, college still isn't accessible for everyone.' Bahar Akman, managing director of the Hildreth Institute, a Boston-based higher education research group, says that students who don't have additional financial support need to work more hours while in school, 'negatively [impacting] their ability to attend full-time and increase the likelihood of [dropping] out before completion.' It may become more difficult for the highest-need students to find additional support as the Trump administration seeks deeper federal funding cuts. Already, a statewide program to provide wraparound services will receive $700,000 less for the next fiscal year. The cascading effects of other federal cuts, particularly to Medicaid and food assistance, may mean that state lawmakers will eventually be forced to use discretionary funding meant for free community college to cover costs of other social programs. 'While this is a great program for students, it's coming at a time when we are getting this onslaught of federal garbage that is putting the colleges in this tough situation,' said Claudine Barnes, president of the Massachusetts Community College Council and professor of history at Cape Cod Community College. She's already seen cuts to programs that mention DEI. 'At community colleges where we have such a diverse student body, using that to cut funding for the neediest of students is just appalling.' Advertisement Core funding for free community college is safe — for now. In the latest fiscal budget, the Legislature allocated $120 million to fund both programs for the next year. 'We're proud that in a challenging budget year, Massachusetts was able to continue funding one of the most comprehensive free community college programs in the country,' said Noe Ortega, the state commissioner of Higher Education. To address students' unmet needs, schools across the state have begun opening food banks to support the In percent said improved access to food reduced their depression and anxiety. In 2022, Massachusetts launched the Hunger-Free Campus Initiative, which supports food security efforts. The Legislature is now considering Kiara Rosario, a single mother, relied on food support from Roxbury Community College to get through a degree in psychology. She helped to set up the Rox Box, the school's food bank, to assist other students in need. Without state and federal aid, Rosario said she would not have been able to attend college. And without more tailored, individual support from RCC — such as gas cards and a work-study job — she would not have been able to stay enrolled. Advertisement Now graduated, she's hoping to finish her bachelor's in psychology at Boston College, and then to become a social worker. For inspiration, she holds onto how she felt a few years ago, when free community college was first announced. At the time, she was on a Massachusetts Association of Community Colleges advisory committee, which helped to design and implement the program. She was worried the state wouldn't be supportive. 'I had the perspective that the wealthy usually win, so I thought they would go against it,' she said. When it was approved, 'I couldn't believe it, it was our dream. I couldn't believe they were really listening to us.' This story was produced by the Globe's team, which covers the racial wealth gap in Greater Boston. You can sign up for the newsletter . Mara Kardas-Nelson can be reached at

Metco, nearly 60, at crossroads amid search for next leader
Metco, nearly 60, at crossroads amid search for next leader

Boston Globe

time21 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Metco, nearly 60, at crossroads amid search for next leader

Advertisement There also are growing parent demands for Metco to hold accountable its participating districts, following a number of allegations of 'We need someone that can speak out against the things that are being done that are wrong, and speak out against things that don't promote education,' said Dorchester mom Vanesa Morales, whose two children have participated in the Metco program. State Representative Christopher Worrell, who graduated from Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School through Metco, said he wants to see the nonprofit and its next leader play a larger role in breaking down racial barriers in the state. 'Metco could be, and should be, bigger than just busing inner city kids to the suburbs,' said Worrell, who has two children attending Newton schools through Metco. 'It should be the main focal point of race relations and be a leader on race relations.' Advertisement Metco (officially the Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity) began in 1966 as a coalition of Boston parents and a handful of suburban school districts who agreed to bus predominantly Black children from the city into wealthier, suburban communities in hopes of obtaining a better academic experience. Today, the Metco program spans 33 communities around the state and enrolls about 3,000 students. (There is also a separate Springfield program for that sends about 100 students to four Western Massachusetts communities.) Since its inception, Metco has had two leaders, including Jean McGuire, who helped found Metco and served as CEO until late 2016, when she said she During Arbaje-Thomas's tenure, the state added about $8 million to the program's annual budget, for a total of nearly $30 million per year in state funding, and changed its enrollment process Related : That plan includes several commitments by member districts, including offering inclusive, antiracist school environments, personalized support for academic and postgraduate success, and equal inclusion in extracurricular activities. A search committee is working with a Advertisement Darnell Billings, 'At this time, no decisions have been finalized regarding the hiring of a new President & CEO. We are continuing to follow a deliberate and thorough process, and additional information will be shared publicly at the appropriate time,' Billings said in a brief email. By several measures, the Metco program is successful. Researchers in separate studies have found students enrolled in suburban districts through Metco perform better academically than their peers in Boston Public Schools. Metco students have had a higher graduation rate than their Boston peers, or the state as a whole, state data show. A greater percentage of Metco students also plan on attending college. A The program 'brings much-needed diversity to suburban districts and makes friendships, dialogue, and learning across race more possible,' the committee's report said. Meanwhile, in suburban districts, achievement gaps among Metco students persist, state testing data show. Domingos DaRosa, a Boston resident whose daughter attends high school in the Concord-Carlisle regional district, resigned last November as the School Committee's Metco parent representative, he said, after administrators and the board failed to listen to Black and Latino students, and didn't address his concerns about achievement gaps. 'The face of Metco Inc. has to be the individual who represents the students' interests,' DaRosa said, referring to the organization by its formal name. Advertisement Daniel Gutekanst, the superintendent in Needham and a member of the Metco Inc. board, said school administrators in member districts are taking reports of racist harassment seriously, and are working to address achievement gaps through the Metco 2.0 effort. 'I acknowledge there are problems, and there are problems in Needham,' said Gutekanst, who declined to speak about the search process. 'I also know there is a commitment among superintendents and Metco directors [in school districts] to really move the ball forward, and really make sure our classrooms are inclusive, that kids feel welcomed, and that they're achieving at high levels.' Several of Nita Holder, who sent her then-13-year-old son to Melrose Veterans Memorial Middle School through Metco in 2023 and 2024, The purpose of Metco is 'not only to support the families of Boston,' Holder said, 'it's to educate the suburban towns and cities about what it means to be a young Black boy, a young Black girl, coming from the city of Boston, and trying to navigate a whole other culture.' John Hilliard can be reached at

Allarity Therapeutics Provides Second Quarter 2025 Update, Highlighting Clinical Progress, IP Expansion, and New Partnerships
Allarity Therapeutics Provides Second Quarter 2025 Update, Highlighting Clinical Progress, IP Expansion, and New Partnerships

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Allarity Therapeutics Provides Second Quarter 2025 Update, Highlighting Clinical Progress, IP Expansion, and New Partnerships

- Successfully initiated enrollment in advanced Phase 2 ovarian cancer trial - Expanded global IP protection by securing Australian patent acceptance for the stenoparib DRP® companion diagnostic- Secured new service contract with EU biotech for Allarity Medical Laboratory TARPON SPRINGS, Fla., August 15, 2025 -- Allarity Therapeutics, Inc. ('Allarity' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: ALLR), a Phase 2 clinical-stage pharmaceutical company dedicated to developing stenoparib—a differentiated, dual PARP and WNT pathway inhibitor—today reported financial results and provided an update on operational highlights for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. 'The second quarter of 2025 marked a period of strong operational execution for Allarity. Most notably, we continued to advance our lead program, stenoparib, with strong momentum in our new ovarian cancer trial protocol. In parallel, we expanded our proprietary DRP® platform—both through a new commercial agreement granting a non-exclusive global license for our breast cancer DRP to a partner company, and scientifically with the development of a new DRP for the antibody therapy, daratumumab. On the financial front, we maintained a solid cash position and reduced liabilities, including a $2 million reduction in accounts payable and accrued expenses during the quarter. These developments position us well to deliver on our upcoming clinical milestones,' said Thomas Jensen, CEO of Allarity Therapeutics. 'I would also like to take the opportunity to look further back, as I have now been the CEO for just over 1.5 years. I'm struck by how quickly our Company's situation has improved. Just a year ago, we were still working to regain compliance with Nasdaq's listing requirements. At the same time, we had just completed the cleanup of a previously complex capitalization table—which had deterred many prospective investors—and we had committed to a more focused strategy centered solely on the advancement of stenoparib. Thanks to the dedication of our team, the guidance of our board, and the support of our shareholders, we have resolved all compliance and regulatory matters, strengthened our leadership with seasoned management professionals bringing extensive life sciences experience to our board and executive team, and are successfully executing our stenoparib-focused strategy—having launched a refined monotherapy trial protocol, which is now steadily enrolling. In addition, we have advanced the Veterans Administration–funded combination trial of stenoparib and temozolomide in small cell lung cancer, which may provide valuable insights into stenoparib's potential beyond ovarian cancer—a potential we believe could also extend to additional cancer types. Importantly, we have maintained disciplined spending. Therefore, as we present this business update—showing solid progress in the advancement of stenoparib, continued execution of our IP strategy, expansion of our DRP platform, growth in our laboratory activities, and new collaborations with R&D partners—I'm encouraged that Allarity is on the right path toward building greater interest in stenoparib, our unique DRP® technology, and thereby the Company as a whole. I am deeply grateful for the trust and support from everyone who has made this progress possible.' Clinical and Drug Development Progress Early trial enrollment momentum: First patients dosed in the new Phase 2 clinical trial protocol, reflecting strong investigator engagement. The trial focuses on recurrent, platinum-resistant or platinum-ineligible advanced ovarian cancer patients, with the goal of optimizing dose and refining patient selection to accelerate stenoparib's path toward regulatory approval. IBRI research collaboration: Initiated partnership with the Indiana Biosciences Research Institute to conduct advanced molecular and cellular studies clarifying the individual and combined contributions of PARP inhibition and WNT pathway modulation to stenoparib's anti-cancer effects. This work aims to deepen mechanistic understanding, strengthen DRP®-based patient selection, and potentially expand therapeutic opportunities, including in cancers such as colorectal cancer where WNT pathway activation is common. Corporate and Strategic Developments IP portfolio expansion: Received Australian patent acceptance notice for the Stenoparib DRP® companion diagnostic. The acceptance covers 40 claims and marks a key step in Allarity's global strategy to protect the potential international commercialization of its proprietary DRP® platform alongside the clinical development of stenoparib. Allarity Medical Laboratory growth: Signed a new licensing and laboratory services agreement with an EU-based biotech, providing access to select DRP® algorithms for breast cancer and securing laboratory services revenue commitments. DRP® platform expansion: Presented first antibody therapy–specific DRP® for daratumumab in multiple myeloma at AACR 2025, further showcasing the platform's broad applicability across numerous cancer types and drug classes, and its ability to aid in the development of personalized, targeted therapies. Partnering outreach: Participated in Pharma Partnering Summit US (May 14–15, 2025), where CEO Thomas Jensen presented a company overview highlighting stenoparib and the DRP® companion diagnostic platform, and held one-on-one partnering meetings. Board changes: Jesper Høiland appointed to the Board of Directors, succeeding Joseph Vazzano, effective June 30, 2025. Høiland brings more than 30 years of biopharmaceutical industry experience, including senior executive roles at Ascendis Pharma and Novo Nordisk, with a proven track record in global commercialization, corporate strategy, and business development. Executive leadership changes: Jeffrey S. Ervin appointed as Chief Financial Officer effective July 1, 2025, succeeding Alexander Epshinsky. Mr. Ervin brings extensive financial and operational leadership experience in the biotechnology and healthcare sectors, having previously served as CEO of IMAC Holdings, where he led the company through its IPO and multiple strategic growth initiatives. Anticipated Clinical Milestones in 2025 Ovarian cancer trial progress: Continued enrollment in new Phase 2 ovarian cancer trial protocol, with initial data expected in 2026. SCLC combination trial launch: U.S. Veterans Administration–funded Phase 2 trial of stenoparib plus temozolomide in recurrent small cell lung cancer should open for enrollment in Q3, with patient recruitment expected to begin during H2 2025. Second Quarter 2025 Operating Results Cash Position: As of June 30, 2025, cash and cash equivalents totaled $17.8 million. The Company implemented a share repurchase plan and used $2.6 million for a stock buyback totaling 2,455,702 shares during the quarter. The Company also reduced accounts payable and accrued expenses by $2 million during the quarter. R&D Expenses: Research and Development (R&D) expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, were $2.3 million, compared to $1.06 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The expense is consistent with planned clinical advancement activities, including the launch of the new Phase 2 ovarian cancer trial. G&A Expenses: General and Administrative (G&A) expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, were $1.8 million, compared to $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. Net Loss: Net loss was $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to $1.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company's net loss was $5.1 million, down from $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. About StenoparibStenoparib is an orally available, small-molecule dual-targeted inhibitor of PARP1/2 and tankyrase 1/2. At present, tankyrases are attracting significant attention as emerging therapeutic targets for cancer, principally due to their role in regulating the WNT signaling pathway. Aberrant WNT/β-catenin signaling has been implicated in the development and progression of numerous cancers. By inhibiting PARP and blocking WNT pathway activation, stenoparib's unique therapeutic action shows potential as a promising therapeutic for many cancer types, including ovarian cancer. Allarity has secured exclusive global rights for the development and commercialization of stenoparib, which was originally developed by Eisai Co. Ltd. and was formerly known under the names E7449 and the Drug Response Predictor – DRP® Companion DiagnosticAllarity uses its drug-specific DRP® to select those patients who, by the gene expression signature of their cancer, may have a high likelihood of benefiting from a specific drug. By screening patients before treatment, and only treating those patients with a sufficiently high, drug-specific DRP score, the therapeutic benefit rate may be enhanced. The DRP method builds on the comparison of sensitive vs. resistant human cancer cell lines, including transcriptomic information from cell lines, combined with clinical tumor biology filters and prior clinical trial outcomes. DRP is based on messenger RNA expression profiles from patient biopsies. The DRP® platform has shown an ability to provide a statistically significant prediction of the clinical outcome from drug treatment in cancer patients across dozens of clinical studies (both retrospective and prospective). The DRP platform, which may be useful in all cancer types and is patented for dozens of anti-cancer drugs, has been extensively published in the peer-reviewed Allarity TherapeuticsAllarity Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALLR) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to developing personalized cancer treatments. The Company is focused on development of stenoparib, a novel PARP/tankyrase inhibitor for advanced ovarian cancer patients, using its DRP® technology to develop a companion diagnostic that can be used to select those patients expected to derive the greatest clinical benefit from stenoparib. Allarity is headquartered in the U.S., with a research facility in Denmark, and is committed to addressing significant unmet medical needs in cancer treatment. For more information, visit Allarity on Social MediaLinkedIn: Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements provide the Company's current expectations or forecasts of future events. The words 'anticipates,' 'believe,' 'continue,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'intends,' 'may,' 'might,' 'plan,' 'possible,' 'potential,' 'predicts,' 'project,' 'should,' 'would' and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements related to the continued clinical development of stenoparib in ovarian cancer and small cell lung cancer, including the initiation of patient enrollment in the Phase 2 trial and a new combination study; the Company's ability to generate data to support regulatory approval; the expansion of the DRP® platform to antibody-based therapies; the potential clinical benefit of stenoparib; and the Company's financial position and ability to support future operations. Any forward-looking statements in this press release are based on management's current expectations of future events and are subject to multiple risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those set forth in or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks related to clinical development timelines, patient enrollment, trial outcomes, regulatory approval processes, the predictive performance of the DRP® platform, and the Company's ability to secure sufficient funding or partnerships to support its programs, as well as broader risks related to the biopharmaceutical industry and general economic and market conditions. For a discussion of other risks and uncertainties, and other important factors, any of which could cause our actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see the section entitled 'Risk Factors' in our Form 10-K annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') on March 31, 2025, and our Form 10-Q quarterly report filed with the SEC on August 15, 2025, available at the SEC's website at and as well as discussions of potential risks, uncertainties and other important factors in the Company's subsequent filings with the SEC. All information in this press release is as of the date of the release, and the Company undertakes no duty to update this information unless required by law. ### Company Contact: investorrelations@ Media Contact: Thomas Pedersen Carrotize PR & Communications +45 6062 9390 tsp@ ALLARITY THERAPEUTICS, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(in thousands, except for share and per share data*) June 30, December 31, 2025 2024 (Unaudited) ASSETS Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 17,801 $ 19,533 Receivables from ATM sales — 1,416 Other current assets 116 115 Prepaid expenses 1,357 507 Tax credit receivable 1,609 770 Total current assets 20,883 22,341 Non-current assets: Property, plant and equipment, net 322 309 Total assets $ 21,205 $ 22,650 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 4,605 $ 4,182 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 2,977 5,232 Warrant derivative liability — 1 Income taxes payable 81 74 Convertible promissory notes and accrued interest, net of debt discount 1,375 1,350 Total current liabilities 9,038 10,839 Total liabilities 9,038 10,839 Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) Stockholders' equity Common stock, $0.0001 par value (250,000,000 shares authorized); 17,075,338 and 7,302,797 shares issued and 14,619,636 and 7,302,797 outstanding at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively 2 1 Additional paid-in capital 141,209 131,130 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (2,461 ) (354 ) Accumulated deficit (124,018 ) (118,966 ) Treasury stock, at cost; 2,455,702 shares (2,565 ) — Total stockholders' equity 12,167 11,811 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 21,205 $ 22,650 * All common share data has been retroactively adjusted to effect reverse stock splits in 2024 (See Note 1 in our Form 10-Q quarterly report filed with the SEC on August 15, 2025, available at the SEC's website at ALLARITY THERAPEUTICS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(UNAUDITED)(in thousands, except for share and per share data*) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2025 2024 2025 2024 Operating expenses: Research and development $ 2,321 $ 1,058 $ 3,724 $ 3,228 General and administrative 1,812 2,313 3,445 4,383 Total operating expenses 4,133 3,371 7,169 7,611 Loss from operations (4,133 ) (3,371 ) (7,169 ) (7,611 ) Other income (expense): Interest income 237 53 459 53 Interest expense (12 ) (426 ) (69 ) (528 ) Foreign exchange gains (losses) 1,588 (128 ) 1,726 (52 ) Change in fair value of derivative and warrant liabilities — 2,243 1 2,662 Total other income, net 1,813 1,742 2,117 2,135 Loss before income tax benefit (2,320 ) (1,629 ) (5,052 ) (5,476 ) Income tax benefit — — — 4 Net loss (2,320 ) (1,629 ) (5,052 ) (5,472 ) Gain on extinguishment of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock — 31 — 222 Deemed dividend on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock — (71 ) — (299 ) Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (2,320 ) $ (1,669 ) $ (5,052 ) $ (5,549 ) Net loss per common share, basic and diluted $ (0.15 ) $ (3.34 ) $ (0.38 ) $ (21.78 ) Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted 15,543,321 499,303 13,357,266 254,727 Other comprehensive loss Net loss $ (2,320 ) $ (1,629 ) $ (5,052 ) $ (5,472 ) Change in cumulative translation adjustment (1,830 ) (144 ) (2,106 ) (119 ) Total comprehensive loss $ (4,150 ) $ (1,773 ) $ (7,158 ) $ (5,591 ) * All common share data has been retroactively adjusted to effect reverse stock splits in 2024 (See Note 1 in our Form 10-Q quarterly report filed with the SEC on August 15, 2025, available at the SEC's website at Attachment Allarity Therapeutics Press Release - Second Quarter 2025 UpdateError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store