LSE refuses cancellation of book launch defending ‘misunderstood' Hamas
A leading university has defended its decision to host the launch of a book that claims Hamas is 'misunderstood'.
The London School of Economics (LSE) claimed it was defending 'free speech' by refusing to cancel the launch of Understanding Hamas and Why That Matters on Monday afternoon.
It comes after the Israeli ambassador to the UK called for the event to be cancelled amid concerns it could 'provide a platform for Hamas propaganda '.
Tzipi Hotovely wrote to Prof Larry Kramer, the vice-chancellor of LSE, asking him to cancel the launch.
In her letter, Ms Hotovely wrote: 'I am deeply concerned that the event is providing a platform for Hamas propaganda – a terror organisation proscribed under United Kingdom law. I worry that by promoting such a book, which sympathises with and justifies the survival and existence of Hamas, will only serve to grow support for a brutal terror organisation among your students and beyond.'
She added: 'The university should not be endorsing this event, let alone organising it through its Middle East Centre.
'Nor should the university allow this event to go ahead on its premises. Therefore, I encourage you to cancel the event.'
The university's Middle East Centre, which is hosting the event on March 10, said the book explores Hamas's 'shift from social and religious activism to national political engagement'.
It added that it 'aims to deepen understanding of a movement that is a key player in the current crisis'.
The event will feature a talk by the book's author and academics researching the Middle East.
An LSE spokesman said: 'Free speech and freedom of expression underpins everything we do at LSE. Students, staff and visitors are strongly encouraged to discuss and debate the most pressing issues around the world.'
They added: 'We host an enormous number of events each year, covering a wide range of viewpoints and positions.
'We have clear policies in place to ensure the facilitation of debates in these events and enable all members of our community to refute ideas lawfully and to protect individual's rights to freedom of expression within the law.
'This is formalised in our code of practice on free speech and in our ethics code.'
Stop the Hate, a Jewish-led direct action group, has asked supporters to write letters to the university to persuade them to cancel the event. It is also planning a protest on Monday at LSE's Middle East Centre.
A spokesman for the Israeli embassy in London said: 'Particularly amid the backdrop of rising levels of anti-Semitism in the UK, including on British university campuses, the platforming of an event that is sympathetic to a proscribed terrorist organisation is especially worrying.
'Universities have a duty to protect their students from hate speech and incitement to violence, and that includes their Jewish students, too. The event should be cancelled. It should never have been allowed in the first place.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer and Farage have doomed Britain to a spiral of decline
The Government's decision to U-turn on the winter fuel allowance is absurd – and, sadly, a big indicator that Reform UK is not going to be the party which breaks Britain out of its spiral of self-inflicted decline. Rachel Reeves plans to restore the WFA to all pensioners with an income up to £35,000 a year. It will then be clawed back from the wealthiest retirees via the tax system. Overall, around 7.5 million older people who missed the payment last year are set to receive it again – at an apparent cost in the region of £1.25 billion a year. Paul Johnson, the Chair of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, puts it well: 'It wouldn't even be in the top 100 of things that I would do with my £1.25bn if I wanted to act on poverty. Almost none of the people impacted by this will be in poverty.' He's right. The Government's decision to means test the WFA removed the payment from some ten million people; of these, its own analysis suggested that only 50,000 or so were placed into 'relative fuel poverty'. And remember, 'relative poverty' is merely an income inequality metric; it doesn't mean someone is necessarily unable to afford heating. Even on the face of it, therefore, Reeves is hosing money at 7.5 million people for the sake of lifting just 50,000 out of 'relative' poverty. But closer consideration of the numbers reveals even deeper absurdities. Take the income requirement of £35,000. From the off, that is only a couple of grand less than the national average wage of £37,430. Why should pensioners on that income receive a fuel payment when working-age people on similar incomes do not? If anything, those working-age people are more deserving of help – for their cost of living is often substantially increased by costs from which many pensioners are exempt. How many of those 7.5 million beneficiaries, for example, are living mortgage-free? Retirees are also exempt from National Insurance, and that has big implications for their real income. Without NICs, that £35,000 becomes about £2,500 a month post-tax; for a working person to be in a similar position, they would need to earn quite a bit more than the average wage (enough to be in the top 37 per cent of earners, or thereabouts). Pensioner poverty was a real problem in 2010, when the Coalition Government first introduced the Triple Lock. But whilst there are some struggling pensioners today, it is absurd that the State continues giving indiscriminate welfare to what has become, on average, this country's wealthiest age cohort. Our pathological inability to cut entitlement spending, even to people who obviously don't need it, is one of the main reasons our country is in such a sorry state. We are all but conducting a controlled experiment in how much of the state can be all but dismantled – prisons, courts, the military – in order to avoid touching the big revenue expenditure accounts. Arresting British decline will require breaking out of this cycle. But it's a prisoner's dilemma for politicians: try to do the right thing, as Theresa May did on social care, and it creates an all-too-tempting opening for opportunistic opponents to exploit – as Labour did then, and as Reform UK has done now. Now forced to govern in the long shadow of wildly unrealistic voter expectations, Labour is probably quietly regretting its game-playing over the 'dementia tax'. If Nigel Farage ever becomes prime minister, and is forced to admit the extravagant savings he claims he can get from abolishing DEI and net zero are for the birds, he may well regret killing off such an obvious cut as the winter fuel allowance.
The National
9 minutes ago
- The National
Freedom Flotilla Coalition gives update on Madleen crew detained by Israel
The Madleen was boarded and seized by Israeli forces in international waters early on Monday morning, after crews sounded an alarm after seeing multiple vessels approach and reporting drones spraying a white "irritant" substance on board. The boat arrived in Ashdod port in Israel late on Monday evening, with Israel's foreign ministry attempting to depict the mission as a publicity stunt, branding the Madleen a "celebrity yacht". READ MORE: 20 more Palestinians killed and hundreds injured by Israel near aid points On Tuesday, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) – the humanitarian organisation behind the Madleen – confirmed that four of the 12 activists have been deported, while eight remain in Israeli detention. The crew members were all asked to sign documents consenting to deportation, which the coalition said was under the guise that they had entered Israel illegally. One of those still in detention is Rima Hassan, a French-Palestinian Member of the European Parliament. Earlier on Tuesday, Israel said that Swedish climate and social justice campaigner Greta Thunberg had been deported and had been placed on a flight from Ben Gurion Airport to Paris. The current condition of the 12 Madleen crew members is as follows: Baptiste Andre (France) – Deported Greta Thunberg (Sweden) – Deported Sergio Toribio (Spain) – Deported Suayb Ordu (Turkey) – Detained Mark van Rennes (The Netherlands) – Detained Pascal Maurieras (France) – Detained Reva Viard (France) – Detained Rima Hassan (France) – Detained Thiago Avila (Brazil) – Detained Yanis Mhamdi (France) – Detained Yasemin Acar (Germany) – Detained Omar Faiad (France) – Deported The FFC confirmed that lawyers from human rights organisation Adalah were able to meet with 10 of the 12 crew members approximately 24 hours after the Madleen was intercepted by Israel. Al Jazeera journalist Omar Faiad is represented separately through legal counsel arranged by his network, while French journalist Yanis Mhamdi is represented by private counsel. A statement from the group reads: "Israel is handling the custody of all 12 as though they had entered illegally– even though they were forcibly abducted from international waters and brought into Israel against their will. READ MORE: 'Matter of urgency': Call for David Lammy to protect Madleen crew "Each of the volunteers was given two options: sign documents consenting to deportation, or remain in detention and appear before a tribunal. The FFC had encouraged some volunteers, if given the option, to agree to expedited deportation in order to restore access to communication – including the ability to speak freely and advocate for their fellow participants. "All of them explicitly disputed the claim of unlawful entry in writing, affirming that Israeli law does not apply to them, that their mission was humanitarian in nature, and that both the boat's interception and their detention are illegal." The FFC added that those who refused to sign the deportation documents remain in detention and will appear before a tribunal. The group continued: "Legal counsel will argue that the interception was unlawful, the detentions arbitrary, and that the volunteers must be released without deportation. The legal team will continue to demand that the volunteers be allowed to return to the Madleen and resume their lawful mission to Gaza. "However, we know all too well that there is no justice to be found in Israel's legal system, which functions primarily to legitimise and entrench colonization, occupation, and apartheid." The statement added: "The FFC stands with the Madleen 12. Their detention is unlawful, politically motivated, and a direct violation of international law. The persecution of humanitarian action and the silencing of resistance will not succeed. "The FFC acknowledges that by virtue of their passports of privilege, the Madleen 12 are shielded from the daily brutality and horrendous systemic torture Palestinians endure under Israeli occupation." The group pointed towards evidence from the Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association, a Palestinian NGO, which has said that as of June 4, there are more than 10,4000 Palestinians held captive in Israeli dungeons. The FFC said that of those, "more than 400 are children and more than 3500 are held without trial, charge, or minimal due process".
The National
9 minutes ago
- The National
David Lammy urged to intervene as Madleen seized by Israel
Israel has said it has begun to deport 12 activists whose Gaza-bound aid boat was seized in the Mediterranean on Monday. Israel's Foreign Ministry shared a photo of crew member Greta Thunberg on a plane, saying that she was heading for France before continuing to Sweden. The Madleen was also carrying French member of the European Parliament, Rima Hassan. Adalah, a legal rights group in Israel representing Thunberg and the other activists, said the Swede, two other campaigners, and a journalist had agreed to be deported, but other activists who refused deportation were being held in detention, with their case set to be heard by Israeli authorities. READ MORE: Freedom Flotilla gives statement as Israel 'illegally seizes' Madleen Apsana Begum, who was suspended from Labour after she voted against keeping the two-child benefit cap last year, has written David Lammy saying it is a "matter of urgency" that the UK upholds its responsibilities to protect UK-flagged ships. She added the UK must fulfil its obligations under international law and protect those on-board to prevent "unlawful interference, such as threats or use of force by a foreign power". Her letter said: "A UNHRC report into Israel's interception of a similar aid vessel in 2010 set out evidence of 'wilful killing' and an 'unacceptable level of brutality', concluding that a 'serious of violations of international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law were committed by Israeli forces during the interception of the flotilla and during the detention of passengers in Israel prior to deportation'. (Image: House of Commons) "It was particularly disturbing that in 2010, nine of those on board the ship were killed, and 30 more were wounded." She went on: "I urge you as Foreign Secretary to take immediate action to ensure that Israel, the UK's ally, ceases any hostility towards this UK unarmed civilian vessel, acts in accordance with its international obligations and ensures the human rights and safety of everyone on board." Israeli naval forces seized the boat early on Monday about 125 miles off Gaza's coast. It had been in international waters sailing under a UK red ensign, meaning it was under UK jurisdiction. After being illegally seized, the boat arrived in the Israeli port of Ashdod on Monday evening. The activists were attempting to deliver a "symbolic" amount of aid to Gaza in defiance of Israel's naval blockade to highlight the humanitarian crisis there. READ MORE: 'Good case' Israel breached international law with Madleen seizure Israel's Foreign Ministry tried to portray the voyage as a public relations stunt, saying on social media that 'the 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel'. Sabine Haddad, a spokesperson for Israel's Interior Ministry, said the activists who were being deported on Tuesday had waived their right to appear before a judge. Those who did not will face one and will be held for 96 hours before being deported. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Tuesday that one of the detained French activists signed an expulsion order and will leave Israel on Tuesday for France. The other five refused. He said all the activists received consular visits. Adalah said that Israel had 'no legal authority' to take over the ship because the group said it was in international waters and it was headed not to Israel but to the 'territorial waters of the state of Palestine'. Amnesty International said Israel was flouting international law with the naval raid. Heidi Matthews, a professor specialising in international criminal law at York University in Toronto, Canada, told The National that as the naval blockade on Gaza is 'unlawful', there are several points of law that the Israeli forces have breached by capturing the Madleen. As well as France and Sweden, citizens of Brazil, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Turkey were on board the Madleen. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), the activist group operating the yacht, said in a statement on Monday night that it expected any of the passengers who refused the deportation orders to be transferred to Ramle prison, near Tel Aviv. The FFC said the Madleen was carrying baby formula, food, medicine. Israel says its blockade on Gaza is necessary to prevent weapons from reaching Hamas fighters there. On Sunday, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz warned that Israel would act against any attempt to breach the blockade. The FFC has argued that the sea blockade is illegal, characterising Katz's statement as an example of Israel threatening the unlawful use of force against civilians and "attempting to justify that violence with smears". The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
