Chris Packham: Chain yourself to trees or block a bulldozer to save green belt
Chris Packham has urged people to chain themselves to trees and sit in front of bulldozers if the Government's green belt planning reforms go through.
The BBC presenter and campaigner accused Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves of creating a 'culture war' around bats and newts with plans that will line the pockets of developers.
Packham said ordinary people must take radical action to preserve Britain's green belt.
The Government plans to build 1.5 million homes under this parliament, with villages in the green belt stripped of protections against excessive development.
Speaking about the Planning and Infrastructure Bill going through Parliament, Packham said: 'If that Bill goes through, we are in deep trouble, and frankly you need to get your chains out because you will need to be tying yourself to trees and you will be needing to sit down in front of bulldozers because that's the only way we're going to stop it.
'Why this government thinks there aren't people who won't do that, I honestly don't know.
'Why are we tolerating a government which is hell-bent on doing something enormously destructive and dangerous to the things we love most?'
During an appearance at the Hay Festival, in Hay-on-Wye, Powys, Wales, Packham said those who did not want to risk arrest should find their own way of protesting.
'You don't have to sit in the road. You don't have to get arrested. You simply have to shout above the noise and this is a time when we will have to do that.'
He previously presented a television programme called Is It Time To Break The Law? in which he concluded that radical protest is 'the ethically responsible thing to do'.
The Government wants to change the planning rules to speed up the building of housing developments.
Sir Keir and Ms Reeves have vowed to make it easier for developers to push ahead with projects which have been held up by concerns about wildlife.
They have been backed by Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary, who led the way to overhaul green rules that prevent house building in the countryside.
The Prime Minister has said that the Government's new 'common sense approach doesn't allow newts or bats to be more important than the home hard-working people need'.
The Chancellor has said new plans will enable developers 'to focus on getting things built and stop worrying over the bats and the newts'.
Packham said: 'Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer started a culture war against newts and bats, and they chose newts and bats as totemic symbols because these animals are afforded legal protection.'
The Government wants to build homes 'that we don't need, to drive economic growth… through a sector which is one of the most greedy bunch of capitalists that you could ever come across anywhere'.
He pointed to figures shared by Rosie Pearson, of the Community Planning Alliance, showing that there are 1.5 million derelict homes in the UK that could be renovated and tens of thousands of commercial properties that could be repurposed.
'The housing crisis is one of affordability. It's not planning, as the Government says. People can't afford their homes.'
Packham shared a stage at the Hay Festival with Kevin McCloud, the Grand Designs presenter, who said the British have a 'small island mentality' and should follow the lead of countries in Europe where there are successful eco-housing projects with allotments and communal green spaces.
'When people build these days, they talk about the need for space: 'I need a spacious room'. They don't talk about connection – having that view, having that amazing piece of biodiversity outside your window.
'We build these houses on single plots with four walls which is the most inefficient way to build in terms of thermal loss. We build them around the country giving everybody their little fiefdom,' McCloud said.
'What we need to do is send Angela Rayner around Europe for three years. It's a small island mentality that we have. We can't understand what is possible.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Brace yourself for Rachel Reeves's most cynical tax raid yet
Cast your mind back to little over a year ago when Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves came into power and suddenly became very sombre about the state of the nation's finances. Starmer warned that 'things are worse than we ever imagined', and said that the October Budget would be 'painful'. Despite a £40bn tax raid in the Chancellor's maiden Budget, things are still, it appears, just as bleak. Reeves's economic blunders have helped create a funding void that economists warn could require a £30bn tax raid to fill. But still, Labour has doubled down on its naive manifesto pledge not to raise income tax, National Insurance or VAT. So if the Chancellor won't tax 'workers', who will she go after? I'm afraid it's bad news for pensioners and anyone who might be perceived as wealthy. Labour has now reluctantly announced a partial U-turn on its foolish decision to take the winter fuel allowance from 10 million pensioners in an effort to save £1.5bn a year. The Treasury is now reportedly drawing up plans to hand back the payments to lower-income pensioners. I suspect Labour will use the return of the winter fuel payment to justify a tax raid on wealth and retirement income. You want the return of the winter fuel allowance? Well, you'll have to pay for it. Bound by its election pledge, Labour will not be asking workers to pay for it. Instead, what we can expect are more backdoor tax grabs and insidious stealth rises. These will be, for all intents and purposes, tax rises that ultimately hurt households. Angela Rayner's demands to force more of us to pay the 45p in the pound rate of income tax and to reinstate the pension lifetime allowance can surely not be off the table. The Tory deep freeze on tax rates across the board will almost certainly be extended, dragging more workers and pensioners into higher tax brackets that consume more of their wealth. Aspiration and prudence will ultimately be the victims of this relentless tax drive that now means hard work no longer pays. The Government has already shown that it holds ideology above reason. Its capital gains tax raid will blow a £23bn hole in the public purse. Its inheritance tax assault on farmers risks a food crisis and will also cost the Treasury £2bn. Its vindictive attack on private schools is already proving to be a bad idea, and its talk of taxing the wealthy has triggered an exodus of millionaires whose taxes we desperately need. Fresh tax rises are only inevitable because of Labour's mismanagement of the economy. It has splurged on the wasteful public sector and punished the productive private sector. Now it is throwing billions at the North because it is scared of Reform UK. We can only hope that the Government has learnt lessons from its early months in power and will start to undo the damage. The winter fuel U-turn suggests so, but its blind stubbornness over farmers and blinkered tax pursuit of hard-earned wealth suggests otherwise. If the economy does improve, Labour needs to rescind its tax grabs and incentivise money-making and growth. It's patently obvious that you cannot tax your way to prosperity. Britain can hardly afford to have a Chancellor who is learning on the job. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
A council proposed a Tesla factory. It got a torrent of anti-Musk abuse
When friends Neon and Zane started a campaign to stop Tesla from building a battery recycling factory on a small block in their local area, they suspected that strong views about the company's billionaire boss might help sway local opinion. But they had no idea how much, or how far, anti-Elon Musk sentiment had spread beyond the epicenter of his influence in the United States, where until recently he caused chaos in federal workplaces as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. Neon and Zane, who asked to use aliases to avoid doxxing by Musk supporters, say the main aim of their campaign, 'Trees Not Teslas,' was to preserve about 60 trees on the site, in Tonsley, an area south of Adelaide, Australia's driest state capital. 'We're struggling for designated green spaces … and it's just an insult to try and take away the one bit that's left within the Tonsley area,' said Neon, who used to live near the site and still works in the vicinity. When the local council published the results of its community consultation on the proposal, which allows the land to be sold for redevelopment, it contained hundreds of inflammatory anti-Musk comments or outright slurs. A search showed 229 references to 'Nazi,' 'Nazism' or other, similar phrases, to give an indication of the tone. With his high profile, confrontational statements and postings on social media, Musk has become a lightning rod for people across America and around the world opposed to the policies of US President Donald Trump's administration. The Tesla CEO is now engaged in a very public bust-up with Trump, that's unfolding in real-time on rival social media platforms, watched by a global audience. Musk's former close partnership with Trump took a toll on Tesla sales. Global deliveries plunged 13% in the first three months of this year, the largest drop in its history, as backlash against Musk and growing competition took a bite out of demand for its vehicles. Of the proposed factory in Tonsley, a suburb managed by the Marion Council, one comment from the public consultation said: 'You and I both know it's getting torched every few months because of the Nazi implications. You really want that bought (sic) up every single meeting?' Some respondents referred directly to the arm gesture Musk gave in January at Trump's post-inauguration rally that commentators likened to a fascist salute. At the time, Musk wrote on his social media platform X: 'The 'everyone is Hitler' attack is sooo tired.' But the memory appeared to stick with Tonsley residents and a staggering 95% of over 900 replies to the council survey rejected its plans to prepare the land for sale. However, Marion Council passed it anyway and sent it to the state government for approval. CNN has reached out to Tesla for comment. It may seem unusual that residents in a small Australian city might have issues with Musk, given their distance from his policies and decisions. And it's especially unusual given South Australia's past positive experience with the billionaire entrepreneur. In 2017, Musk offered to build the world's most powerful battery to solve some of the state's power woes within 100 days, or it would be free. And he did. South Australia is now leading the country in terms of renewable energy and is on track to hit its target of 100% net renewables by 2027. Backed by the state government, Tesla and a local power company have created a virtual power plant fitting Powerwall battery systems on homes across the state. The idea is that all the batteries would band together to support the grid in times of high demand. However, the proposed Tesla plant in Marion would not generate any power – it would be used to recycle Tesla batteries and provide a showroom for Tesla's electric vehicles (EV), sales of which have fallen in Australia. Figures from the Electric Vehicle Council show Tesla sales nationwide nearly halved in the year to May 2025. Felipe Munoz, senior analyst at auto market research firm JATO Dynamics, says that's partly due to the wait for the Model Y. It finally arrived in Australia in May, sending Tesla sales soaring 122% last month compared with the same period a year ago. Marion Council Mayor Kris Hanna says anti-Musk sentiment had intruded on a standard council consultation, which was simply about finding a use for contaminated land 'that will probably never be a recreational space again.' The site is contaminated by trichloroethylene, known as TCE, a solvent that can cause cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is banned in the United States. 'The problem with that is, not only, for example, children playing in the dirt, but also the fumes which can rise up from underneath the earth. Sealing it with a bitumen car park or a building is a solution,' said Hanna. The site has been fenced off from the public since 2016. The locals say that, even if they can't use it, the mature trees offer a refuge for birdlife in an area almost devoid of tree canopy. More importantly, according to the Conservation Council of South Australia, the mature trees are helping to contain the contamination. 'The removal of trees puts that site at greater risk of the leakage of those contaminants into the groundwater and obviously then impacting on human health more broadly,' said Kirsty Bevan, the group's CEO, who added Tesla's promises to plant 59 saplings on the site weren't good enough. 'We are proposing that further research needs to be undertaken at that site, and remedial measures need to be put in place,' she said. 'I think that the site improvements we're looking for would come with a forest of trees.' Of the anti-Musk campaign, Bevan said: 'I don't let my personal opinions of people I've never met before interfere with being a voice for nature.' Hanna, the mayor, said councilors heard the opposition but voted 8-3 to pass the proposal because it would create 100 jobs, a 'huge number' for the area. A new business would also pay local taxes, easing the burden on residents during a cost-of-living crisis, Hanna said. 'To have a substantial new factory come into the area is very significant, and it's adjacent to a high-tech manufacturing area, which we developed in the place of an old car plant. So, it actually fits in very well to have a factory that recycles electric batteries,' Hanna said. One of the dissenting councilors, Sarah Luscombe, said she voted against the proposal because the community had sent clear and consistent feedback that they wanted more trees, and the council's own strategic vision is for a 'livable, sustainable community.' 'The people that I've spoken to in the community are just sick and tired of seeing their interests overshadowed by those of large corporations,' Luscombe said. 'More and more, we're seeing communities just saying, 'Well, hang on, I do want to have a say here, and I do want my views to be counted.'' In recent months, Tesla cars and showrooms have been vandalized in multiple countries by critics venting their anger over Musk's support of far-right parties in Europe, and other policies. Hanna said the council had received 'vitriolic correspondence' since approving the proposal, but he wasn't concerned about a violent backlash against the Tesla factory or council members and wouldn't be drawn on his own views on Musk. 'I'm speaking as a mayor, and I don't actually take any political or ideological stance,' he said. 'I just try and make life beautiful for the people in my area.' South Australian Local Government Minister Joe Szakacs told CNN in a statement that he will follow the 'usual process' to determine if the land should be approved for sale. 'Our Government welcomes investment and job creation in South Australia and is proud of its commitment to deliver 100 per cent net renewables by 2027,' he said. Any sale would require the land's owner to submit a development application and decontaminate the site to the standards set by state authorities. South Australia's Environment Protection Authority said it's held preliminary talks with the council and the developer. Addressing legacy contamination is often complex, costly and time-consuming, it added. Neon and Zane organized a snap rally outside the Marion Council building on Wednesday calling for the state government to reject the re-zoning application. More than a dozen protesters held signs, including one that said, 'Elon Musk can get [redacted].' They're determined to keep Tesla out of their area and are unmoved by the promise of more jobs. 'They're going to be jobs on contaminated land in a company that's contaminated by Elon Musk,' said Neon. 'Ninety-nine out of the 117 pages in their report were negative comments about Elon and the proposal. How can you ignore that? And if you do, you're not representing the people, you're just being bought by business.'
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Reform UK's Momentum Stalled by Departures, By-Election Defeat
Nigel Farage's recent run of political success stalled after his insurgent Reform UK suffered a pair of high-profile departures and came third in a Scottish election that it had hoped might prove its broader appeal. The right-wing party saw its chairman, Zia Yusuf, quit on Thursday, saying 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time.' He was followed by Nathaniel Fried, who had been appointed to run Reform's DOGE-style cost-cutting efforts in local councils just a week earlier.
