
EV Charger Installations Decline Amid Trump Criticism
High-speed charger growth slowed in the first quarter of the year, as stalled infrastructure plans and tariff threats shake investor and automaker confidence.
Charger installation slowdown raises alarm
The growth of high-speed electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the U.S. has hit a major speed bump. Installations dropped more than 21% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the same period last year, according to BloombergNEF analysis of Energy Department data. Analysts say the sharp decline could threaten broader EV adoption just as the U.S. market needs to scale rapidly to meet climate goals and consumer demand.
Volkswagen ID.4 charging in California —
Source: Getty
Politics cast a long shadow over the EV future
The dip in installations comes amid heightened political uncertainty. President Donald Trump has vowed to dismantle much of the Biden-era climate agenda, including the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which provides up to $7,500 in tax credits for EV buyers. Trump's allies in Congress have also proposed eliminating those credits, and his administration has already rolled back auto emissions standards and paused implementation of federally funded charging programs.
2026 Toyota bZ
That has led to a 'negative feedback loop,' says BloombergNEF analyst Ash Wang. 'The uncertainty has automakers scaling back EV investments.'. BloombergNEF has already revised its charging installation forecast for 2025 downward, from 360,000 new chargers to just 285,000.
State-funded projects hit the brakes
Although the bipartisan infrastructure law designated $5 billion for EV charging buildout, some states have halted or delayed projects tied to that money, citing the Trump administration's freeze on implementation. With federal momentum stalled and no clarity on whether tax credits will be preserved, private sector investment has also cooled. Wood Mackenzie analyst Emil Koenig noted that his firm's charging projections are still based on the existing EV credit, but even so, they've lowered expectations. 'If the credit is repealed, it would materially affect our forecast,' Koenig said.
BP America, President & CEO, Orlando Alvarez, left and BP Executive Vice President of Customers and Products, Emma Delaney, right, stand by as Chief Executive Officer, BP Pulse, Sujay Sharma, cuts the ribbon to celebrate the opening of the Pulse Gigahub EV charging station Wednesday, March 20, 2024. —
Source: Houston Chronicle/Tariffs could stall affordable EV rollout
Beyond tax credits and infrastructure, analysts are also eyeing how Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods and foreign-sourced auto parts could further stifle EV momentum. About 35% of EVs sold in the U.S. last year were imported, and even some U.S.-assembled models rely heavily on global supply chains.
Rivian R2 —
Source: Rivian
Rising costs could kill or delay the launch of affordable EVs in the $25,000 range — models that are crucial for mass adoption. 'Any delay in low-cost EV models will also materially set back charging infrastructure deployment,' said Koenig.
Final thoughts
With more than 208,000 public EV charging ports currently online, the U.S. still lags far behind what's needed to support projected EV adoption by 2030. BNEF estimates that nearly 174,000 new charging points need to be added every year just to stay on track, assuming no new policies are introduced.
Without continued federal support, experts warn, EV infrastructure could fall dangerously short, discouraging new buyers and risking a major setback in the transition away from fossil fuels.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's three-word reaction to Musk's reduced DOGE role
Elon Musk has officially stepped down from his role in Donald Trump's administration bringing an end to one of politics' most unconventional partnerships. Musk, 53, joined the Trump administration four months ago to lead the newly created DOGE aimed at increasing governmental efficiency and productivity. Backed by nearly $300 million in political spending to help re-elect Trump, Musk was granted sweeping authority to slash federal bureaucracy and reshape government operations. However, behind the scenes, their relationship was riddled with mistrust and miscommunication. 'Was it all bull[expletive]' Trump reportedly asked, expressing doubt over Musk's pledge to slash $1 trillion in government spending. At first, the relationship appeared strong. Trump regularly praised Musk, calling him '50 percent genius, 50 percent boy' - and at times, '90 percent genius, 10 percent boy,' the Wall Street Journal reported. Musk was a frequent presence at the White House, as the two held long, informal dinners, with the Tesla CEO sometimes confusing Trump with his eccentric humor, according to White House officials. But as Musk began cutting foreign aid, trimming agencies and downsizing the federal workforce, tensions with Trump's inner circle escalated. Musk bypassed top aides, made unilateral decisions, and kept his plans secret - even from the president's chief of staff, Susie Wiles. In addition, Trump's advisers were often blindsided by DOGE's actions, learning about layoffs or data requests through news reports, according to the White House aides. Internal clashes only intensified, prompting Trump to ask Wiles to play a more 'hands-on' role in managing Musk. The SpaceX founder also clashed with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy over air traffic controller cuts and Secretary of State Marco Rubio protested after Musk slashed USAID without consultation. He also reportedly resisted White House vetting for DOGE staff and showed preference for advice from close allies like Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, and Katie Miller, his DOGE lieutenant and Stephen's wife. In the spring, Musk publicly attacked Republican Senator Todd Young, calling him a 'deep state puppet' just as Trump was lobbying him to support Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence. Vice President JD Vance eventually had to intervene, urging Musk to delete the inflammatory post, which he did, but the damage had been done. 'White House officials picked up the pieces,' a Trump adviser said. The relationship further frayed when Musk involved himself in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race. Despite warnings from Trump's team that his candidate, Brad Schimel, would lose, Musk insisted polling showed otherwise, and after Schimel's poor town hall and overwhelming loss, Trump distanced himself from the race. Behind the scenes, Musk was also pushing back against Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, calling them dangerous for the global economy. He called business leaders to lobby against them and told advisers Trump was receiving bad advice. Though Trump stood firm on tariffs, Musk grew increasingly irritated - especially after learning Musk received a classified Pentagon briefing on China. It was the most frustrated they'd seen him, two administration officials said, with Trump questioning whether it was a conflict of interest due to Musk's defense contracts. Meanwhile, Musk grew more absent from the White House. Initially present five to seven days a week, his visits dropped to three, then to only occasionally. At a cabinet meeting earlier this spring, Musk shocked officials by venting about how much damage his political role was causing to Tesla. Musk claimed the officials 'had no idea' how much damage was being done to his cars, a witness said. Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly responded saying she would prosecute every criminal they could catch, the Wall Street Journal reported. By May, Trump learned Musk's departure was imminent - but not the exact timing, which was later revealed in a social media post. Musk told aides he needed to 'get some heat off me and my companies,' amid a sharp decline in Tesla profits and setbacks at SpaceX. Despite the turmoil, Trump requested a final 'friendly farewell' meeting in the Oval Office on Friday, with the president claiming, 'Elon is not really leaving. He's going to be back and forth. DOGE is Done,' former Trump advisor Steve Bannon told the Daily Mail on the day of Musk's departure, tying up the Elon-run effort. As Trump bid farewell to Musk in the Oval Office, the billionaire wore a shirt describing himself as the 'Dogefather,' indicating his desire to be remembered as the father of a political movement he hoped would continue. 'This is not the end of DOGE but really the beginning,' he said, promising that the DOGE team would only get stronger. The president agreed. 'Elon's really not leaving, he's going to be back and forth i think ... it's his baby,' Trump said. Today, DOGE employees have been sent to different departments, and are quietly working within the system. Some of them view themselves as more missionaries than mercenaries, and even as Musk's public role fades, they expect the work to go on. The work of cutting government waste and dismantling the 'administrative state,' one of Bannon's biggest priorities, would continue in the Office of Management and Budget which is 'where DOGE is housed' to begin with, he said. OMB director, Russ Vought, who helped co-author Project 2025, remains engaged with the efforts, but ultimately the traditional hierarchy of the federal government has snapped back into place. Some of Trump's most visible cabinet members view the DOGE brand as a net positive, as they have worked to implement it into their departments.


Geeky Gadgets
22 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
The Ultimate Guide to AI Tools What's Worth Your Money
What if the tools you rely on today could work smarter, faster, and more intuitively—saving you hours every week? With the explosion of AI tools flooding the market, the promise of greater productivity has never been more enticing. Yet, the sheer number of options can feel overwhelming, and not every tool delivers on its claims. From privacy concerns to hidden limitations in free versions, finding the right AI solution often feels like navigating a maze. Whether you're a professional juggling tight deadlines or a creative looking to streamline your workflow, understanding which tools are truly worth your investment is no longer a luxury—it's a necessity. In this comprehensive how-to by Rick Mulready, you'll uncover the strengths, weaknesses, and unique features of five leading AI tools: ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok. What makes this guide stand out is its focus on helping you weigh value for money against your specific needs—whether it's privacy, versatility, or seamless integration with existing tools. You'll also gain insights into how these platforms handle tasks like brainstorming, coding, or managing large-scale projects. By the end, you'll not only know which tools deserve your attention but also feel empowered to make an informed decision that aligns with your goals. After all, choosing the right AI tool isn't just about saving time—it's about unlocking your full potential. Top 5 AI Tools Compared ChatGPT: A Versatile Powerhouse ChatGPT, created by OpenAI, stands out as a highly versatile AI tool capable of handling a wide range of tasks. From brainstorming ideas and analyzing documents to reasoning and even generating images, ChatGPT offers robust functionality. The paid version significantly enhances its utility with a 1-million-token context window, making it particularly effective for extensive research and long-term projects. The free version, while functional, is more restrictive, offering a smaller context window and limiting users to 10 messages every 3 hours. A notable drawback is ChatGPT's tendency to 'hallucinate,' or produce inaccurate or fabricated information. Privacy is another critical factor—by default, user conversations are used to train OpenAI's models, though opting out is possible. For those concerned about privacy, a temporary chat option is available. If you frequently require advanced features or extended access, upgrading to the paid version is a practical choice. Claude: Ethical AI with Privacy at Its Core Anthropic's Claude AI emphasizes ethical design and privacy, making it a standout option for users who prioritize data security. Claude excels in nuanced conversations, content creation, and coding tasks. Unlike many competitors, it does not use user data for training by default, offering stronger privacy protections. Its context window, while substantial at 200,000 tokens, is smaller than some alternatives, and it lacks the ability to generate images. The free version of Claude is limited in scope, which makes the paid plan more appealing for users who require advanced coding support or seamless integration with Google apps. If maintaining privacy and ethical AI practices are your top priorities, Claude is a compelling choice that aligns with these values. AI Tools : What's Worth Your Money? Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in AI tools comparison. Google Gemini: Multimodal AI for Complex Tasks Google Gemini is a multimodal AI tool that integrates seamlessly with Google's ecosystem, making it a natural fit for users already relying on Google apps. Its standout feature is a 1-million-token context window, which is particularly useful for processing large documents. Additionally, Gemini supports multimodal capabilities, allowing it to handle and generate content across various formats, including text and images. Despite its strengths, Gemini has notable limitations. It struggles with creative content generation and often delivers responses that lack personality. Accuracy issues and limited features in the free version further detract from its appeal. Privacy is governed by Google's policies, requiring users to opt out of data usage for training purposes. Gemini is best suited for users who frequently work with large documents or rely heavily on Google's suite of applications. Perplexity: Quick, Citation-Supported Searches Perplexity distinguishes itself with its focus on real-time information retrieval and search results backed by citations. This feature makes it an excellent choice for users who need quick, reliable answers supported by credible sources. The paid version unlocks access to advanced AI models, further enhancing its capabilities. However, Perplexity has its limitations. It lacks depth in research responses and restricts free searches to just three per day. Privacy concerns also arise from its default query logging, which users must manually disable. Perplexity is particularly well-suited for professionals or academics who require frequent, citation-supported searches to inform their work. Grok: Real-Time Insights for X Users Grok is uniquely tailored for users of X (formerly Twitter), offering real-time insights and a distinctive, edgy personality. It excels in providing up-to-date social media data, making it a valuable tool for users who rely on such information. However, its niche focus limits its broader applicability, and its accuracy can sometimes be inconsistent. Additionally, its limited integrations restrict its utility for users seeking a more versatile AI tool. Privacy is another consideration, as users must opt out of data usage for training purposes. A private chat option is available for those who prioritize confidentiality. Grok is best suited for heavy X users who value real-time data integration and social media insights for their specific needs. How to Choose the Right AI Tool Selecting the right AI tool depends on your unique requirements and priorities. Each tool offers distinct advantages and limitations, making it essential to evaluate how their features align with your goals. Below is a breakdown of the key strengths of each tool to help you decide: ChatGPT: A versatile option for brainstorming, research, and extended projects. Best for users who need advanced features and frequent access. A versatile option for brainstorming, research, and extended projects. Best for users who need advanced features and frequent access. Claude: Prioritizes privacy and ethical AI design. Ideal for coding tasks and users who value strong data protections. Prioritizes privacy and ethical AI design. Ideal for coding tasks and users who value strong data protections. Google Gemini: Excels in handling large documents and integrates seamlessly with Google apps. Best for users working within the Google ecosystem. Excels in handling large documents and integrates seamlessly with Google apps. Best for users working within the Google ecosystem. Perplexity: Perfect for quick, citation-backed searches. Suited for professionals and academics needing reliable, real-time information. Perfect for quick, citation-backed searches. Suited for professionals and academics needing reliable, real-time information. Grok: Designed for X users who rely on real-time social media insights. Best for niche use cases involving social media data. Making an Informed Decision No single AI tool can meet every need, so understanding your priorities is crucial. Whether you value versatility, privacy, multimodal capabilities, or real-time insights, there is an AI tool designed to support your objectives. By carefully assessing your workflows and the features most relevant to your tasks, you can confidently choose the AI solution that best aligns with your goals. Media Credit: Rick Mulready Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
Jordan Bardella dismisses speculation over his sexuality
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.