Tender process for Transnet's Durban Container Terminal 2 was rigorous and transparent
Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers
IT HAS been almost two years since Transnet announced International Container Terminal Services Inc. (ICTSI) as the preferred bidder for the Durban Container Terminal 2, and exactly a year after this was reaffirmed by independent third-party financial consultants who verified the rigour and fairness of the tender process.
Yet the implementation of the public/private partnership between Transnet and ICTSI is still in the balance, costing the South African economy billions in lost opportunities. The delay is a result of the losing bidder Maersk seeking to nullify Transnet's awarding of the contract to ICTSI on entirely spurious grounds
The Durban Container Terminal Pier 2 concession process was a rigorous, transparent, and competitive bidding exercises – on par with best-in-class processes that ICTSI has taken part in across the world.
ICTSI is a multinational specialist company that successfully runs port operations across 32 ports in 19 countries. It operates in some of the world's largest and most dynamic economies, including China, Brazil, Indonesia, the Philippines, Argentina and Australia as well in smaller, complex jurisdictions such as Madagascar and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
ICTSI's global revenues for the 2024 financial year rose 15% to $2.74 billion (R50 billion), and net income for the year rose 66% to $849.8 million (R15.54 billion).
In an attempt to subvert the outcome of the bidding process, losing bidder Maersk has not only lodged a legal challenge on meritless grounds, but it also waited almost a year after the announcement was made before launching the challenge.
Hans-Ole Madsen the Regional Head of International Container Terminal Services Inc. says they are ready to implement critical improvements at the container terminal, enhancing the efficiency and reliability of one of South Africa's most important trade gateways.
Image: Supplied
Their argument? That ICTSI should not have passed the earlier Request for Qualification (RFQ) stage based on their own interpretation of one financial metric, a metric that even more to the point was never a pass/fail test in any portion of the process.
The process leading up to the awarding of the container terminal concession was extensive and methodical. It began with a Request for Interest on August 17, 2021, followed by the issuance of a Request for Qualification by the Transnet Board of Directors on February 11, 2022, inviting potential partners for a 25-year special purpose vehicle to operate the Durban container terminal.
The closing date for RFQ submissions was April 12, 2022. During this submission, ICTSI (as well as all interested parties) disclosed its financial standing, including the now-contested solvency metric.
By August 9, 2022, the Transnet Board had evaluated all applicants and shortlisted ten qualified entities, including ICTSI and Maersk's subsidiary, APM Terminals. At this stage, Transnet's auditors had no concerns regarding ICTSI's financial eligibility. The shortlisted bidders were then invited to submit formal proposals.
When the final bids were assessed, ICTSI emerged as the clear winner, offering $618 million (approximately R12 billion) for the concession, while Maersk bid $515 million (R9.2 billion). ICTSI also scored 100% on Transnet's evaluation, compared to Maersk's 83%.
Based on these results, Transnet's Board approved ICTSI as the preferred bidder on April 11, 2023, and the decision was made on July 3, 2023. Maersk was officially notified of its unsuccessful bid three days later, and the announcement was made public on July 18, 2023.
After July 2023, Transnet commissioned external consultants to do a further round of assessment on ICTSI – over and above the legal requirements of the tendering process. The independent third-party consultants, GrowthStone, found that:
'Based on the financial due diligence review, ICTSI is expected to be a robust participant in the Durban Container Terminal Pier 2 private sector participation project. From a financial risk standpoint, the company is in a very strong position to add value to the project while being able to withstand volatilities in both global and local markets through its strong balance sheet, well-diversified business portfolio, and extensive access to capital across a broad range of sources. Coupled with effective capital management practices and a well-crafted gearing strategy, ICTSI is positioned to be a strong and reliable strategic partner to Transnet in the [Durban Container Terminal Pier 2] operation.'
On the basis of this, Transnet reaffirmed ICTSI's selection as the preferred bidder.
Maersk only then filed an urgent interdict on March 11, 2024 based on ICTSI's solvency ratio — some nine months after the final decision had been made and almost two years since the RFQ notice.
Maersk misleadingly framed its challenge as though Transnet had only confirmed ICTSI's bid in March 2024, when in fact, the process had been concluded nine months prior. This legal manoeuvre appears to be nothing more than an attempt to disqualify ICTSI on an arbitrary technicality, disregarding the fact that ICTSI's bid was superior both in financial and operational terms.
ICTSI used a recognised industry method to calculate solvency during the RFQ process, based on market capitalisation, which is widely accepted in financial evaluations. Maersk is now attempting to impose its own choice of definition of solvency—one that would disqualify even some of the world's largest corporations, including Apple, for the same bidding process.
Moreover, financial solvency is just one metric among many used to assess a company's financial capacity to execute a major investment project. ICTSI has a proven track record of running successful port operations globally, and its financial standing is robust. Attempting to reduce its capability to a single financial ratio is both misleading and disingenuous.
The ongoing legal dispute has significant consequences for South Africa's trade efficiency. Transnet is upgrading equipment at the Durban harbour, but the port needs a world-class operator to drive efficiency, transparency, and competitiveness. Unlike Maersk, ICTSI is not vertically integrated into shipping and port operations, making it an impartial player that can fairly serve all shipping lines using the Durban container terminal.
Every delay caused by Maersk's legal challenge impacts South Africa's exporters and importers, stalling much-needed improvements at the terminal. If Maersk succeeds in disqualifying ICTSI in favour of its own bid, Transnet stands to lose R2 billion in investment, an outcome that would be entirely unjustifiable given the integrity of the bidding process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
8 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Apple and pear exports lost R1 billion in 2024 due to Cape Town port inefficiencies
It is not only US tariffs that keep farmers and export agents up at night. The state of the Cape Town port also has them counting apples. South Africa's apple and pear export industry is calling for Transnet to act due to the mounting losses caused by inefficiencies at the port of Cape Town, estimating that delays and logistical bottlenecks have cost the sector around R1 billion in 2024 alone. The Western Cape department of mobility met with Two-a-Day, an apple and pear packing and marketing cooperative, and its logistics partner, Link Supply Chain Management, on Monday for a strategic discussion and site visit to tackle the logistic challenges affecting the fruit export industry. At the meeting, industry role players warned that without urgent intervention, including the fast-tracking of the port's privatisation, the country risks losing hard-won market share in key global markets. 'We work in a complex, time-sensitive value chain. If a vessel to Europe, the United Kingdom, or the Far East is missed, the sale is gone. You do not get a second chance to deliver on time in a programme-driven market. Logistics is the single biggest risk for us right now. 'If we cannot get our product out, everything else, from on-farm innovation to market development, is compromised,' Roelf Pienaar, managing director of Tru-Cape Fruit Marketing, says. ALSO READ: Cape Town port ranked the worst in the world Delays at Cape Town port force diversions to Port Elizabeth, costing money Chris Petzer, operations director at Two-a-Day, explains that port delays often force the business to divert containers to Port Elizabeth at significant cost, simply to keep the supply chain moving and avoid halting harvest and packing operations. 'It is not sustainable, but sometimes it is the only option to prevent greater losses.' Although the Cape Town port's efficiency is slightly improving, according to Chris Knoetze, managing director of Link Supply Chain Management, a fourth-party logistics provider owned by several of the Western Cape's leading fruit exporting companies, including Two-a-Day and Tru-Cape Fruit Marketing, it is still throttling exports. A more effective port with higher productivity will attract more vessels and services, expand capacity and give more reliable shipping options to various export markets. 'Given several interventions, like Transnet's appointment and changes at senior management level, the repair and maintenance of equipment, solving personnel matters, focusing on operational improvement and capital investment in new rubber tyre gantry cranes (RTGs) in Cape Town Container Terminal, we should expect to see a step change in productivity to at least twenty gross crane movements per hour (GCH) or more in the coming months. 'However, the process is still too slow and far removed from the 33 GCH reported by Transnet in November 2012. When port operations are disrupted, it affects product quality, increases costs and damages our credibility with overseas buyers.' ALSO READ: Where are the private sector plans for Cape Town port? Inefficiencies cost apple and pear industry R1 billion in 2024 Knoetze emphasises that inefficiencies have cost the apple and pear industry in the Western Cape an estimated R1 billion in 2024 due to additional storage, trucking and plug-in costs, as well as missed market opportunities when vessels bypass Cape Town. 'We urgently need to fast-track the privatisation of the Cape Town terminal to restore competitiveness.' The Department of Mobility confirmed that it is actively pursuing measures to tackle these constraints. Corrine Gallant, deputy director-general of the Western Cape's mobility department, outlined existing initiatives, including the port of Cape Town's Logistics Development Project Management Unit and plans to revitalise rail infrastructure. 'We are working on the landside and waterside inefficiencies. This includes improving road freight safety and capacity, restoring rail services like the Overberg line and ensuring that the Western Cape's needs are heard at a national level. 'We cannot afford more costs down the chain. Our focus is on solutions that remove bottlenecks and protect jobs.' ALSO READ: US tariffs: SA sends new proposal but no changes to laws Global shipping bypasses port due to inefficiencies Industry representatives stressed that time is critical and warned that delays in decision-making could see global shipping lines bypass Cape Town in favour of more efficient ports, delaying fruit by one to two weeks and undermining the Western Cape's competitiveness. 'The farmers, pack-houses and exporters are investing in efficiency every day. Now we need the same urgency and commitment at the port, as without it, the entire value chain is at risk,' Gerhard van Heerden, director at Link Supply Chain Management, warns. Isaac Sileku, Western Cape minister of mobility, echoed this and emphasised the need for urgency and structured collaboration with Transnet. 'We cannot afford to be reactive. We must have formal agreements and mechanisms in place so that when bottlenecks arise, we know exactly which button to press. Speed of execution is critical — our farmers and exporters cannot wait years for solutions.' The session concluded with agreement on the need for: Faster execution of port and rail improvement projects. Formal industry-government forums with direct access to decision-makers. Targeted short-, medium- and long-term actions to resolve 'low-hanging fruit' issues and systemic challenges. The Western Cape apple and pear industry contributes significantly to local employment and the provincial economy and stakeholders agreed that improving Cape Town's port efficiency is essential not only for sustaining the sector but also for enhancing South Africa's competitiveness in global fruit markets.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
US tariffs: SA sends new proposal but no changes to laws
The new offer sent by South Africa responds to the issues the US previously raised. South Africa sent off its new proposal to avoid the US tariff of 30% on goods from South Africa exported to the US, but the country is not planning to change the laws that seem to be on the US president's agenda. Parks Tau, minister of trade, industry and competition, said at a press conference on Tuesday that since the 30% unilateral tariff imposed by the US which came into force on 7 August, government has been working on a response anchored on five key elements: continued engagement with the United States to secure a deal and reduce the tariffs; diversification of exports to alternate markets; an economic response package to vulnerable companies and workers; trade defence against import surge and dumping; and demand side interventions. He said regarding continued engagement with the US, cabinet approved that South Africa submits a revised offer as a basis for negotiations. The new offer builds on the previous offer submitted in May and substantively responds to the issues the US raised in the 2025 National Trade Estimates Report. ALSO READ: BEE left out of US trade talks – Minister Lamola SA on top of sanitary measures Tau pointed out that South Africa already addressed sanitary and phytosanitary measures in compliance with the bio-security protocols for: Poultry: South Africa granted market access under the conditional self-ban and self-lifting system to ensure that the US can leverage the tariff rate quota of 72 000 tons already agreed to in 2016; Blueberries: South Africa granted market access for states that are free of fruit fly and agreed to mitigation measures with those states with fruit fly; and Pork: which is open subject to the bio-security requirements. 'Consequently, the USA-Africa Trade Desk informed us that it will be shipping containers of poultry and pork to South Africa in two weeks' time, which is testimony that these issues have been resolved.' Another significant request from the US was that South Africa consider reducing tariffs as a way to address the deficit and tariff disparity with the European Union due to the SADC-EU Economic Partnership Agreement. Tau said South Africa continues consultations with industry and in this regard, in consultation with other members of the Southern African Customs Union, will identify specific lines to respond to this request.' ALSO READ: Government must actively manage fallout from US tariffs with trade crisis committee – BLSA Cabinet endorsed economic response package to US tariffs Cabinet also endorsed the economic response package that includes: The establishment of an export support desk, which will serve as a direct point of contact for affected companies. Tau said, so far, it has helped 23 companies. In addition, the department also initiated meetings with more than 54 South African exporters to the US, focusing on updates on the negotiations, clarifications on tariffs, elements of an economic response package and issues linked to market diversification. Measures to assist companies to absorb the tariff and facilitate long-term resilience and growth strategies to protect jobs and productive capacity in South Africa. A localisation support fund (LSF) for affected companies to contribute to the national effort. The Export and Competitiveness Support Programme (ECSP), which will include a working capital facility and plant and equipment facility to address short to medium term needs across all industries. Working with the department of employment and labour on measures to mitigate potential job losses, using existing instruments within its entities that can be adjusted to respond to the current challenges. After consultations with the Competition Commission, a block exemption for exporters was introduced to enable collaboration and coordination among competitors. A draft block exemption will be published by the end of the week to conclude the process as fast as possible. Information will be available on the department's website. ALSO READ: South Africa has to cast its trade net wider Finding alternative export markets About finding alternate export markets, Tau said the new US tariff on South Africa's exports is a significant policy shift that necessitates a clear and decisive response. 'South Africa accelerated its diversification efforts of export markets and enhanced competitiveness to mitigate the economic impact of losing preferential trade access. 'The diversification is a strategic imperative to ensure our economy is more resilient to economic shocks. This is not a plan B but a plan A for long-term resilience and competitiveness. 'We are committed to strengthening our relationships, particularly under the African Continental Free Trade Area, to build regional resilience. We will also continue the work we started with our European partners towards enhancing our trade and investment relations in a manner that unlocks sustainable growth and development and entrenches South Africa in new supply chains.' He added that government is also looking at Asia, including Japan, Vietnam and Thailand, the Middle East and India. 'We are pursuing these markets because we see growing demand, existing negotiations and a positive reception to South African products. 'This is not just about trade numbers but directly linked to job protection. Diversification is about protecting rural livelihoods and sustainable agricultural growth for our people.' ALSO READ: 'It's just gone' – Trump's tariffs cost SA company R750m overnight High-level negotiation team ready to talk about US tariffs A high-level negotiation team, including the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition and the Department of Agriculture, has been identified to engage the US, Tau says. 'Our goal is to demonstrate that South African exports do not pose a threat to US industries and that our trade relationship is in fact complementary. 'While the US is our third largest trading partner after the EU and China, South Africa is the 43rd export destination for the United States and accounts for 0.25% of total US imports and therefore not a threat to US production. 'In addition, the US market accounts for about 4% of our total agriculture exports, or R9.8 billion ($537 million) of our total agricultural exports, an increase of 104% from 2018.' Turning to protecting domestic industry against import surge and dumping, Tau pointed out the unilateral US tariffs do not only apply to South Africa. The US tariffs also affect over 130 trading partners and many of the US orders that now face prohibitive restrictions will seek other 'outlets', he said. 'In addition, chronic overcapacity observed in the world markets for key product markets like steel, glass, subsidised agricultural products, solar and automotive vehicles will make this search incessantly harmful for our domestic industry.' ALSO READ: US tariff an existential threat for a third of metals and engineering sector SA ready to protect its industry, Tau says 'Therefore, South Africa stands ready to make use of its trade remedy measures to safeguard and protect its industry, within the prevailing agreements of the World Trade Organisation. This will involve the consideration and use of anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard measures to protect the domestic industry which may be affected by trade deflection and/or diversion.' Speaking about demand side interventions to leverage the buying power of local consumers, private sector and government, Tau said Proudly South Africa will intensify outreach with corporates and retailers through its online store and Market Access Platform (MAP) procurement tool targeted at the private sector to support increased domestic sales of products, with future export capability of the online platform to be used to assist with export market diversification.
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
SA to offer US new deal to avoid 30% tariff
PRETORIA - South Africa will offer a "generous" new trade deal to the United States to avoid 30-percent tariffs, ministers said on Tuesday. Washington on Friday slapped the huge tariff on some South African exports, the highest in sub-Saharan Africa, despite efforts by Pretoria to negotiate a better arrangement to avoid massive job losses. The ministers did not release details of the new offer but said previously discussed measures to increase imports of US poultry, blueberries and pork had been finalised. "When the document is eventually made public, I think you would see it as a very broad, generous and ambitious offer to the United States on trade," Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen said at a press briefing. Officials have said the 30-percent tariff could cost the economy around 30,000 jobs. "Our goal is to demonstrate that South African exports do not pose a threat to US industries and that our trade relationship is, in fact, complementary," Trade Minister Parks Tau said. The United States is South Africa's third-largest trading partner after the European Union and China. However, South African exports account for only 0.25 percent of total US imports and are "therefore not a threat to US production", Tau said. Steenhuisen said US diplomats raised issues related to South African domestic policies, which was a "surprise given the fact we thought we were in a trade negotiation". The two nations are at odds over a range of policies. US President Donald Trump has criticised land and employment laws meant to redress racial inequalities that linger 30 years after the end of apartheid. "Things like expropriation without compensation, things like some of the race laws in the country, are issues that they regard as barriers now to doing trade with South Africa," he told AFP on the sidelines of the briefing.
