logo
How The Republican Student Loan Plan Compares To SAVE And IBR

How The Republican Student Loan Plan Compares To SAVE And IBR

Forbes29-04-2025

UNITED STATES - APRIL 29: Chairman Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Mich. gavels the House Educaiton Committee to ... More order for the markup of the Fiscal 2025 Budget Resolution on Tuesday, April 29, 2025. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Republican lawmakers have proposed a massive overhaul of the student loan system, both in how families will pay for college, and how borrowers will repay their student loans.
The key student loan repayment proposal involves reducing the number of repayment plan options to two: a standard fully-amortized plan and an income-based repayment plan dubbed the 'Repayment Assistance Plan' (RAP).
Designed with a flat income-percentage model and child-based deductions, RAP would replace existing income-driven repayment plans for new borrowers. The legislation also phases out forgiveness after 20 or 25 years for a 30-year timeline, with interest and principal subsidies to prevent runaway balances.
However, in side-by-side comparisons, RAP often leads to higher total payments, especially for low-income borrowers. While the SAVE plan is likely dead due to court injunctions, it would have offered lower monthly bills and faster forgiveness, particularly for those with smaller loans or incomes near the poverty line.
Even compared to the existing IBR Plan, the RAP is not a compelling alternative.
It's important note that the RAP Plan, and the new standard repayment plan, would only go into effect for loans originated after July 1, 2026. So existing borrowers would likely keep their plans, with the exception of those in SAVE - who will likely have to choose an eligible repayment plan when the forbearance is over.
It's also important to note that this is just the main proposal right now. This could change before it's signed into law.
Here's a look at how the RAP compares.
There are two new repayment plan options: the standard plan, and the RAP.
The standard plan would have equal monthly payments that would fully pay off your loan over a set period of time. That time period would be based on the loan amount:
In some cases, especially for higher income/high loan balance borrowers, this plan may be a better option that the RAP.
The RAP calculates your monthly student loan payment based on your Adjusted Gross Income, with a subtraction of $50 for each child you have. It has a minimum monthly payment of $10 per month.
Here's how your monthly payment is calculated, depending on your AGI. First, take a percentage of your annual AGI (with a flat $120 per year if your AGI is less than $10,000):
Then, you divide the applicable base payment by 12 (to convert it to a monthly amount). And if you have children. you can subtract $50 for each dependent child.
If the result of this calculation is less than $10, your minimum $10 payment applies.
However, there is no negative amortization with the RAP. So, if your payment doesn't fully cover the interest, it's waived each month.
Furthermore, there is a principal reduction feature to help borrowers make progress on their loans. If your payment reduces your principal balance by less than $50, the government adds an extra reduction to your principal, up to $50 or your payment amount (whichever is less). So, no matter what, your loan balance will not grow, and your principal balance will decrease by $50/mo.
To assess how RAP performs, four borrower scenarios illustrate the differences across monthly payments, forgiveness timelines, and total repayment. We included the SAVE plan in the comparison, because although it's unavailable, it was the Biden Administration's attempt at changing student loan repayment and so it's useful to see how it would have compared.
It's important to note that these estimates assume the same income over the repayment period. In reality, most borrowers will see their incomes increase over time, both increasing their potential loan payment, and increasing the likelihood of paying off the loan.
AGI: $25,000
Children: 2
Loan balance: $30,000
RAP: $10/month, $3,600 total over 30 years
IBR/SAVE: $0/month, $0 total over 20–25 years
Here, RAP imposes mandatory payments where IBR and SAVE do not. Despite RAP's interest and principal subsidies, the $10 floor multiplies over three decades.
Borrowers on SAVE not only avoid monthly payments, but also benefit from full interest subsidies and earlier forgiveness.
It's important to note that if this borrower was going for Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), all plans would have provided loan forgiveness after 10 years. But RAP would have still be the costliest due to the $10 minimum payment.
AGI: $60,000
Loan balance: $30,000
RAP: $250/month, paid off in 20 years, $60,000 total
IBR (new): $311.75/month, paid off in 13 years, $50,191 total
SAVE: $217.63/month, paid off in 27 years, $70,512 total
In this case, all plans eventually repay the loan.
SAVE would have offered the lowest monthly bill, but the longest repayment period.
IBR has the highest monthly burden but results in the lowest overall cost. RAP falls between the two.
Again, all of these plans are PSLF eligible, and for PSLF borrowers, the RAP would be the better choice since SAVE is no longer an option.
AGI: $80,000
Children: 2
Loan balance: $80,000
RAP: $366.67/month, $132,001 over 30 years
New Standard (20-Year): $527.52/mo, $126,604.80 over 20 years
IBR (new): $343.92/month, $82,541 over 20 years
SAVE: $182.54/month, $43,810 over 20 years
Here, RAP's flat-rate formula requires higher payments and a longer timeline, even as interest subsidies limit negative amortization. While the payment is close to the IBR payment, the amount paid over the life of the loan would have been significantly less due to the shorter time period.
The SAVE plan would have been the most affordable by a wide margin due to its generous income exemption and earlier forgiveness.
AGI: $180,000
Children: 1
Loan balance: $200,000
RAP: $1,450/month, paid off in 27 years, $469,800 total
New Standard (25-Year): $1,167.60/mo, $350,280 over 25 years
IBR (new): $1,244.50/month, $298,680 over 20 years (with forgiveness)
SAVE: $1,116.75/month, $268,020 over 20 years (with forgiveness)
While all plans prevent negative amortization, RAP stands out for its high total cost. Despite paying off the loan without forgiveness, RAP's extended timeline and high flat payment result in the largest overall burden.
In this case, the new standard plan has the lowest monthly payment (excluding SAVE). It's important to note that you would have paid less under IBR, even with a higher monthly payment, due to the longer repayment term of RAP.
However, since the standard plan is not an PSLF eligible plan, for borrowers pursuing PSLF would be stuck in the RAP at higher monthly payments, but a shorter 10 year loan timeframe.
RAP's 30-year forgiveness window is a key policy difference and a major source of higher total costs for borrowers. Unlike SAVE, which would have forgiven small balances in as little as 10 years, RAP stretches out payments even when the monthly amount is minimal.
In the first example, a borrower paying just $10 per month under RAP ends up contributing $3,600 over 30 years, despite never earning enough to pay more. Under SAVE or IBR, that same borrower would pay nothing.
In higher-income cases, such as the borrower earning $180,000, the forgiveness period may not matter. RAP's required payment is large enough to fully repay the debt within 27 years. Yet, even in these cases, the total repayment is higher than it would have been under SAVE or IBR due to the larger monthly obligation.
RAP's design abandons discretionary income formulas, replacing them with a flat percentage of AGI that rises with earnings. Child deductions lower payments, but don't eliminate them. While it may help for some borrowers, it's also more complex to calculate in many ways.
The plan's interest subsidies and principal payments help manage balances, but the extended term means borrowers will likely pay more over time unless their income is high enough to repay the debt before the 30-year mark.
Current borrowers should retain access to IBR, depending on legislative outcomes. But for new borrowers starting in the fall of 2026, RAP could become the default, along with the new standard plans.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bernstein Maintains a Market Perform Rating on Etsy (ETSY), Sets Price Target at $45
Bernstein Maintains a Market Perform Rating on Etsy (ETSY), Sets Price Target at $45

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bernstein Maintains a Market Perform Rating on Etsy (ETSY), Sets Price Target at $45

Bernstein SocGen Group maintained a Market Perform rating on Etsy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ETSY) with a price target of $45 on June 5. The analysts observed that growing investor confidence and potential short covering led Etsy shares to climb 32% since last month. A young woman shopping for a vintage fashion item online. Bernstein analysts noted that the upward momentum in Etsy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ETSY) stock is due to stronger alternative data indicating a slowdown in the annual decline of Gross Merchandise Sales in May. This data demonstrates an optimistic outlook for Etsy's growth, particularly compared to its prior lower trading multiples. The stock has gained significant ground, rising 16.15% over the last week and 16.37% so far this year. Although the main driver of this upward swing in the stock remains unclear, the analysts commented that lower traffic for Temu, an Etsy competitor, in May could be a catalyst. They also said that possible changes in products listed at Etsy could be behind this positive trajectory. The report pointed to stronger credit card spending in May and a rise in monthly app usage for Etsy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ETSY), which coincided with Temu witnessing a 43% drop in active users year-over-year. Although the analysts acknowledged that their data might not perfectly match Etsy's reported Gross Merchandise Sales, the overall signals suggest things are moving in a positive direction. Etsy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ETSY) runs global online marketplaces that bring together buyers and sellers through its main platform, Etsy, as well as Reverb for musical instruments and Depop for fashion resale. While we acknowledge the potential of ETSY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read Next: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids
Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

By Jane Ross and Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Helmeted police in riot gear turned out on Friday evening in a tense confrontation with protesters in downtown Los Angeles, after a day of federal immigration raids in which dozens of people across the city were reported to be taken into custody. Live Reuters video showed Los Angeles Police Department officers lined up on a downtown street wielding batons and what appeared to be tear gas rifles, facing off with demonstrators after authorities had ordered crowds of protesters to disperse around nightfall. Early in the standoff, some protesters hurled chunks of broken concrete toward officers, and police responded by firing volleys of tear gas and pepper spray. Police also fired "flash-bang" concussion rounds. It was not clear whether there were any immediate arrests. An LAPD spokesperson, Drake Madison, told Reuters that police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted several locations, including a Home Depot in the city's Wetlake District, an apparel store in the Fashion District and a clothing warehouse in South Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles City News Service (CNS). CNS and other local media reported dozens of people were taken into custody during the raids, the latest in a series of such sweeps conducted in a number of cities as part of President Donald Trump's extensive crackdown on illegal immigration. The Republican president has vowed to arrest and deport undocumented migrants in record numbers. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement action. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and massed outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were believed to be held. Impromptu demonstrations had also erupted at some of the raid locations earlier in the day. One organized labor executive, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, was injured and detained by ICE at one site, according to an SEIU statement. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." No details about the nature or severity of Huerta's injury were given. It was not clear whether he was charged with a crime. ICE did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for information about its enforcement actions or Huerta's detention. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement condemning the immigration raids, saying, "these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city."

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

time2 hours ago

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store