Puerto Rico's government sues private power company as chronic outages damage appliances
The civil lawsuit by the consumer affairs department says the Luma company, which oversees power transmission and distribution in Puerto Rico, was 'negligent' and is responsible for damages caused to consumer appliances by outages and power fluctuations.
It said the department has the authority to take cases to court to protect those affected by the company's 'inefficiency and lack of adequate service.'
The action was filed against the company as a whole since the law exempts Luma's employees and contractors from claims filed by customers under an immunity granted in 2021 by Puerto Rico's Energy Bureau.
The suit cited a recent Luma statement at a public hearing that the company has rejected 1,828 claims. 'It's time for Luma to be fully accountable to Puerto Rican consumers,' it said.
Luma said in a brief statement that it would treat the lawsuit with the seriousness and responsibility it deserves.
'Our commitment is to continue working for the benefit of our customers, despite the significant challenges we face in operating a fragile and deteriorating electrical system, which for years has lacked the necessary maintenance and investment,' it said.
The outages have damaged thousands of appliances ranging from air conditioners to refrigerators on the island of 3.2 million people with a 40% poverty rate.
The lawsuit comes months after Puerto Rico's governor promised to cancel Luma's contract, warning it would be a long and complex process.
Anger against Luma has been growing ever since it signed a contract with Puerto Rico's government in 2020.
Outages remain common after Hurricane Maria razed Puerto Rico's electric grid when it hit the island as a powerful Category 4 storm in September 2017. But the grid was already frail following a lack of investment and maintenance for decades by Puerto Rico's Electric Power Authority, which is struggling to restructure $9 billion in debt.
Two island-wide blackouts hit the island in recent months, including on New Year's Eve and during Easter Week.
The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside The Puerto Rico Land Grab: Millionaires Race To Beat Tax Deadline, Locals Sound Alarm
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Puerto Rico has become one of the most coveted destinations for high-net-worth individuals seeking aggressive tax breaks — and the effects are reshaping the island's real estate market and affordability landscape, according to the New York Post. The legislation, signed into law in 2019 and extended through 2055, offers qualified residents a 4% corporate tax rate and exempts them from U.S. federal capital gains tax, provided they spend at least 183 days a year on the island. "Ninety-nine percent of my clients are coming here for the tax advantages," San Juan-based Luxury Realtor Christian Kleiner told the Post. Don't Miss: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it— $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. According to Kleiner, more than 3,500 wealthy individuals — many in finance, cryptocurrency, and tech — have moved to the U.S. territory to take advantage of Act 60. A Race for Tax Relief Hedge fund billionaire John Paulson and cryptocurrency investor Michael Terpin were among the earliest adopters of the program, the Post reported. For others, Puerto Rico has become a full-time business base. TransPerfect CEO Phil Shawe moved to San Juan in 2018 after a bitter legal battle in Delaware. He now resides in the Condado area, just minutes from his company's Hato Rey headquarters. "The infrastructure reminded me more of Florida than I expected," Shawe told the Post, citing Puerto Rico's U.S. legal protections and executive-friendly climate as major draws. Trending: This AI-Powered Trading Platform Has 5,000+ Users, 27 Pending Patents, and a $43.97M Valuation — Real Estate Booms, Locals Priced Out Home values in Puerto Rico rose 11.6% year-over-year in Q1 2025, the highest rate in the nation, according to data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The spike in home values follows a 22% surge in the final quarter of 2024, the largest annual gain recorded by the FHFA since its inception in 1995. Short-Term Rentals Surge Short-term vacation rentals have boomed, with listings on platforms such as Airbnb (NASDAQ:ABNB) and Expedia Group (NASDAQ:EXPE) Vrbo growing from 1,000 in 2014 to over 25,000 in 2023, according to a 2024 report by the Hispanic Federation. A 2024 report from the Center for a New Economy found that a 10 percentage-point increase in short-term rentals as a share of housing units in a census tract is linked to a 23% rise in home prices and a 7% increase in median rents — even after accounting for local factors. "With so much to offer visitors, tourism will always be an important part of Puerto Rico's economy. However, it cannot come at the expense of Puerto Rico's residents and communities. Lawmakers in Puerto Rico are responsible for balancing the opportunities created by short-term rentals with their primary duty to protect the rights and needs of communities," said Frankie Miranda, president and CEO of the Hispanic group has recommended that vacation rentals register as businesses and that the current 7% room tax be raised to between 9% and 11%. A Global Shift in Wealth Migration Puerto Rico's transformation is part of a broader trend. According to the Henley Private Wealth Migration Report 2025, a record-breaking 142,000 millionaires are expected to relocate internationally this year — the largest movement of high-net-worth individuals since tracking began. The United Arab Emirates, U.S., and Singapore are the top destinations for these individuals, while the UK and China are expected to see the largest outflows. Within the U.S., Scottsdale, Arizona, has emerged as a surprise frontrunner. The Phoenix suburb saw a 125% surge in millionaire residents between 2014 and 2024, overtaking Austin as the country's fastest-growing wealth hub, according to the firm. Read Next: With Point, you can Image: Shutterstock This article Inside The Puerto Rico Land Grab: Millionaires Race To Beat Tax Deadline, Locals Sound Alarm originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fed gets fresh legal headache with lawsuit seeking to make FOMC rate meetings public
The Federal Reserve got a new legal headache Thursday when a money manager sued Chair Jerome Powell and other central bank policymakers in a Washington, D.C., federal court. The lawsuit alleges the Fed is violating a 1976 federal law by keeping its monetary policy meetings behind closed doors. Azoria Capital's lawsuit asks the court to issue a temporary restraining order compelling the Fed's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to open its deliberations to the public starting Tuesday and Wednesday, when central bank policymakers gather in Washington to decide on their next interest rate move. This comes as the Fed is under pressure on several fronts by President Trump, highlighted by an unusual presidential visit to the central bank for a tour of the $2.5 billion refurbishment of its National Mall buildings. Trump and other administration officials have criticized the project for its cost overruns. Azoria Capital, the money manager bringing the new lawsuit against Powell and other members of the FOMC, is led by CEO James Fishback, who is close to the Trump administration and served as an adviser to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Last year, Fishback used Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club as the setting to announce an anti-DEI exchange-traded fund called the Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM), which began trading this month on the New York Stock Exchange. Azoria argues in its suit that "by operating beyond public scrutiny, the FOMC is deliberately undermining the public accountability envisioned by Congress," and that if a firm such as Azoria does not have real-time access to FOMC deliberations, it "cannot fully consider and protect itself against Federal Reserve policy shifts that can create volatility." Azoria also states in its suit that it "is deeply concerned that the FOMC, under Chair Jerome Powell, is maintaining high interest rates to undermine President Donald J. Trump and his economic agenda, to the detriment of American citizens and the American economy" and that the FOMC's current policy stance "appears politically motivated." Fishback made the administration aware of the suit before it was filed, according to a person familiar with the matter. The FOMC has not changed interest rates since Trump took office, as many policymakers argue that more time is needed to assess how Trump's trade policies will affect inflation. Trump has repeatedly hammered Powell and the Fed for this view, arguing that rates should be three percentage points lower. Investors don't expect the Fed to change rates at the meeting on July 29-30, although two Fed governors have said they could support a cut. Read more: What experts say about the possibility of additional rate cuts The Fed's current policy stance, according to Azoria's suit, "raises serious questions about whether politics, not economics, are driving monetary policy. These questions emphasize the need for transparency from the FOMC." The law in question cited by Azoria in its suit is the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976, passed after President Richard Nixon's Watergate scandal roiled Washington and led to calls for increased transparency in the US government. The act requires federal agencies to keep their meetings open to the public. But it also allows for private meetings in cases covered as exemptions, including when the release of that information could be used in financial speculation. The Fed has cited that exemption in justifying why it holds closed meetings when discussing monetary policy. But Azoria says "not all FOMC deliberations inherently trigger financial speculation" and that the law states that to claim one of these exemptions, the agency must vote to invoke it and then, within one day, publish an explanation of why it made that decision. Azoria said the FOMC has "brazenly flouted this mandate" for five decades, holding nothing but closed meetings since 1977. "The FOMC's decades-long policy of blanket secrecy is unlawful." Alexis Keenan contributed to this article. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Associated Press
5 hours ago
- Associated Press
ROSEN, RECOGNIZED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Luminar Technologies, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 27, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Luminar Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAZR) between March 20, 2025 and May 14, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 22, 2025. SO WHAT: If you purchased Luminar securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. What to do next: To join the Luminar class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 22, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Austin Russell ('Russell'), Luminar's President, CEO and Chairman of the Board, was engaged in undisclosed conduct that would make him the subject of an inquiry by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors; (2) this conduct created material risk that Russell would be released form his positions at Luminar; (3) Luminar's loss of Russell as an employee would then create material risk of adversely affecting Luminar's business by making it more difficult to compete with other market participants, manage R&D activities, and retain existing customers or cultivate new ones. Further, negative public perception and negative news related to Russell could adversely affect Luminar's brand relationships with customers, or standing in the industry; (4) accordingly, Luminar had no reasonable basis to provide and/or maintain Luminar's financial guidance; and (5) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Luminar class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] To view the source version of this press release, please visit
