High stakes for South Africa's Ramaphosa's Trump meeting – DW – 05/20/2025
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa is meeting Donald Trump in Washington on Wednesday. New trade agreements are on the agenda, but can the two nations reset their strained relationship?
South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa, is in the United States, where he is scheduled to meet US President Donald Trump on May 21, in a crucial face-to-face talk that will set the tone for future relations between the two countries.
It will be the first time Trump has hosted an African leader at the White House since he took office in January. Trump never visited Africa during his first term. On the other hand, Ramaphosa's last working visit to Washington was in 2022 when former US President Joe Biden was still in office.
But since early 2025, relations between the United States and South Africa have deteriorated rapidly, driven by ideological differences, geopolitical alliances, and domestic policy conflicts.
"The president's visit to the US provides a platform to reset the strategic relationship between the two countries," the South African presidency said in a statement.
However, some analysts have warned that Ramaphosa's three-day visit is unlikely to be easy, with fears it could turn hostile or confrontational.
No land confiscation in South Africa: DW's Dianne Hawker
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"The objective is to try to clean up South Africa's image and remove the perception that Trump is putting forward about South Africa as a country where a genocide against white Afrikaaners is taking place," Fredson Guilengue from the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation in Johannesburg told DW.
Refuting Trump's claims of 'genocide' against white South Africans
Ramaphosa's trip comes just days after the US welcomed a group of white South African "refugees" who President Donald Trump claimed were being persecuted in South Africa because of their race, and facing "genocide". They flew to the US on a special relocation plan and will be allowed to settle there.
Ramaphosa's government denies the allegations and says white people, who own more than 70% of the land in South Africa, despite making up just 7% of the population, are not discriminated against.
The US has welcomed white South African farmers as "refugees:" Trump insists they are fleeing persecution in South Africa Image: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
Ramaphosa will also seek to present a new trade framework that is going to govern trade between the two countries, especially in the post-AGOA period, Guilengue said.
The Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), is a trade agreement between the US and eligible sub-Saharan African countries. Expiring on October 1, 2025, it allows African nations to export products to the US duty-free, and the idea is that it help the African continent in its development agenda.
A new US-South Africa trade deal?
Trump's recent trade tariffs signaled the end of the AGOA. South Africa's automotive industry, for instance, will suffer substantially from Trump's tariffs because of the high level of exports to the US, and it is hoped that Ramaphosa will be able to change the situation.
Tensions also rose because of Trump's recent trade policies, which hit South Africa hard, but also because of the cuts in US aid for development projects.
The relationship was already strained after South Africa filed a case against Israel in the International Court of Justice in The Hague, alleging that the Israeli military was committing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
Another aspect of the breakdown of relations is South Africa's role within BRICS. "It threatens Americans globally and South Africa as one of the active members of the BRICS group is not seen positively by the US," Guilengue added.
BRICS is an intergovernmental organization comprising 10 countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates.
BRICS leaders discuss dollar alternative
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
South Africans skeptical
Given the tense geopolitical climate, how do South Africans view Ramaphosa's trip? "There is that minor segment in South African society that believes that it is important that Ramaphosa uses this opportunity to redress South Africa's independence, it has the right to choose partners with whom to work and define its own diplomacy", Guilengue said.
He added that a larger segment of society was very skeptical about the presidents' meeting, knowing Trump's way of dealing with his opponents, pointing to the humiliation that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy experienced in the Oval Office in February.
Despite hosting the Ukrainian President Zelenskyy in April, Ramaphosa has not been critical of Russia's war in Ukraine Image: Phill Magakoe/AFP
The South African presidency in Pretoria confirmed that Trump had initiated the invitation for Ramaphosa. Guilengue stressed that the US president might still recognize South Africa as its largest trading partner on the African continent.
South Africa's role as G20-leader
For Daniel Silke, a political analyst and the director of the Political Futures Consultancy based in the legislative capital of South Africa Cape Town, an important factor is South Africa's leadership of the G20 this year.
"The G20 — despite comments from the US and attempts to withdraw from global organizations and bodies — remains one of the most important of these bodies", Silke told DW.
It is within that context that South Africa becomes elevated in terms of global importance and therefore it is reasonable that both sides meet in Washington, he added.
Ramaphosa might try to convince Trump to join the summit in November in Johannesburg, which the US president plans to boycott.
Silke said Ramaphosa's visit has little to do with the refugee flight of white Afrikaners to the US. The issue will be raised, but will not play a major role in the talks, he noted.
"The US is taking maverick positions on all sorts of issues and Trump, in particular, will criticize a leader one day and will then reach out the hand of friendship if it is beneficial for the US."
The best way to deal with Trump is personally: "This is an issue of personal diplomacy and a personal relationship that needs to be forged even though it might be rocky," Silke explained, adding that in the end, it comes down to doing business. "For all of the chatter about tariffs it looks as the worst tariffs could be negotiated down. South Africa has got leverage on some critical minerals that it could also supply to the US."
Edited by: Chrispin Mwakideu
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Israel, Iran launch new waves of missile attacks – DW – 06/14/2025
Skip next section Iran-Israel crisis: What has happened so far? Here's an overview of what has happened so far in the latest crisis between Israel and Iran. Israel launched attacks on several Iranian nuclear facilities and military sites early Friday. It also carried out targeted assassinations, killing at least six senior nuclear scientists and a number of top officials. Iran says 78 were killed and more than 320 were injured in Israel's attacks, although there is no independent verification of these figures. Israel hit the Natanz nuclear site, where Iran produces most of its nuclear fuel. Natanz also has facilities deep underground and its unclear how much damage Israel's strike actually did. 'Iranian regime is weaker' after Israeli strikes To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Meanwhile, over the course of Friday and early Saturday, Iran launched three waves of long-range missiles at Israel in retaliation.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Berlin, Paris urge restraint as Israel-Iran crisis escalates – DW – 06/14/2025
As the hostilities between Israel and Iran itensify, European leaders have called for calm, warning of the growing risk of a broader regional war. But Europe's role as a key mediator may be over amid stalled diplomacy. The latest flareup intensified Friday when Israel launched a targeted strike on Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, killing several senior military commanders and nuclear scientists. Tehran then retaliated to Israel's large-scale attacks with waves of missile strikes on Friday evening and early on Saturday. The attacks in an already unstable region have caused widespread concern across Europe. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte emphasized the urgency of avoiding further escalation, calling "for many allies — including the United States — to work ... to de-escalate.' Adding, "this was a unilateral action by Israel.' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen echoed the sentiment in a post on X, urging "all parties to act with maximum restraint and work to de-escalate the situation.' Adding that in a call to Israel's President Isaac Herzog late on Friday she "reiterated Israel's right to defend itself and protect its people." Before writing that "at the same time, perserving regional stability is vital." Further calls for restraint Key European powers also appeared to rally behind Israel following its attack and Iran's counterstrikes. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz expressed strong support for Israel's "right to protect its existence and the security of its citizens.' Adding in a post on X that Iran's nuclear program presents "a serious threat to the entire region, and particularly to the state of Israel." A sentiment echoed by French President Emmanuel Macron, who similarly urged restraint while reaffirming Israel's right to self-defense. The French leader has previously described Iran's nuclear capabilities as a significant strategic and security challenge for both France and Europe. This alignment has drawn criticism from some analysts, who argue that Europe's support for Israel may undermine its credibility as a neutral mediator. "European capitals such as Berlin and Paris have come out in support of Israel, ignoring this was an unjustified action," Hugh Lovatt, a senior policy fellow with the Middle East and North Africa program at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), told DW. Israel launches strikes on Iran, sparking fears of wider war To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Julien Barnes-Dacey, director of the Middle East program at the ECFR, further warned that Germany and France's alignment with Israel runs the risk of isolating Iran. "If you are an Iranian, you would see this as Europeans siding with Israel in support of military action,' he told DW. Iran, meanwhile, demanded a firmer stance from Europe. Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, in a phone call with his Italian counterpart Antonio Tajani, called on the EU and the broader international community to condemn what Tehran called a "criminal attack.' IAEA report influences Europe European powers — particularly the so-called E3 of Germany, France, and the United Kingdom — position has been influenced in part by a recent resolution from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which found Iran in violation of its nuclear non-proliferation obligations. The resolution, introduced by the E3, has provided political backing for a toucher stance on Iran, reinforcing accusations of non-compliance. As diplomatic efforts to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear deal — formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — continue between the United States and Iran, European powers have found themselves on the sidelines. Talks between the US and Iranian officials have taken place over recent months in Oman and Rome. The sixth round, reportedly scheduled for this weekend, was cancelled on Friday following the latest strikes. "Europe missed an opportunity to use diplomacy before military escalation took over,' Lovatt said. Both he and Barnes-Dacey believe Israel's strike was designed in part to disrupt efforts to revive the US-Iran nuclear talks. Hans Jacob Schindler, senior director at the Counter Extremism Project, told DW that the region is now "in a very dangerous escalation spiral,' with risks of further escalation increasing by the day. "The current assessment is that Israel can only delay Iran's nuclear program,' Lovatt added. With nuclear diplomacy faltering and military confrontation looming, Europe's role as a mediator — once central to the Iran nuclear deal — appears increasingly sidelined.
Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Adversaries Fuel Disinformation About LA Protests
Russia, China and Iran are amplifying disinformation about protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles, researchers said Friday, adding to a surge of domestically generated falsehoods and conspiracy theories. The findings from researchers at the disinformation watchdog NewsGuard illustrate how foreign adversaries of the United States are exploiting deep divisions in American society as a tactic of information warfare. NewsGuard said Russian, Chinese, and Iranian state-affiliated sources have published around 10,000 posts and articles about the demonstrations that recently erupted in Los Angeles, advancing false claims framing the city as "ground zero in an American apocalypse." Seizing on the political rift between President Donald Trump and Governor Gavin Newsom, pro-China accounts on X and Chinese platforms such as Douyin and Weibo have peddled unfounded claims that California was ready to secede from the United States and declare independence. Meanwhile, Tehran-based newspapers have peddled the false claim that popular Iranian singer-songwriter Andranik Madadian had been detained by the National Guard in Los Angeles, in an apparent effort to portray the United States as an authoritarian state. NewsGuard quoted Madadian, better known by his stage name Andy, as denying the claim, stating: "I am fine. Please don't believe these rumors." Russian media and pro-Russian influencers, meanwhile, has embraced right-wing conspiracy theories, including the unfounded claim that the Mexican government was stoking the demonstrations against Trump's immigration policies. "The demonstrations are unfolding at the intersection of multiple vulnerabilities such as eroded trust in institutions, AI chatbots amplifying false claims about the unrest, political polarization, and a rollback of safety and moderation efforts by major platforms," McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with NewsGuard, told AFP. "As a result, foreign actors have a wide-open playing field to flood the zone with falsehoods at a faster rate and fewer barriers compared to previous moments of unrest," she added. The apparent alignment across the three countries was noteworthy, Sadeghi said. "While Russia, China, and Iran regularly push their own unique forms of disinformation, it's less common to see them move in such a coordinated fashion like this," she said. "This time, state media outlets have escalated their messaging to advance their geopolitical interests and deflect attention from their own domestic crises." The disinformation comes on top of false narratives promoted by US-based influencers. In recent days, conservative social media users have circulated two photographs of brick piles they claimed were strategically placed for the California protesters to hurl at police and inflame violence. The photos were cited as proof that the protests were fueled by nonprofit organizations supported by George Soros, the billionaire philanthropist who has long been a bogeyman for the far right. But AFP's fact-checkers found that one photo was lifted from an online marketplace, where a Malaysian hardware dealer uploaded it years ago, while the other was snapped near a construction site in New Jersey. "Every time there's a popular protest, the old clickbaity 'pallets of bricks' hoax shows up right on cue," the Social Media Lab, a research center at the Toronto Metropolitan University, wrote on the platform Bluesky. "The fact that these types of fake images are used isn't a coincidence. It's part of a pernicious (and) persistent narrative that protests against government policies are somehow inauthentic."
