What to Know about the Putin-Trump Summit in Alaska
Whether it can lead to a deal to produce peace in Ukraine more than 3 1/2 years after Moscow's invasion remains to be seen.
Here's what to know about the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump, the first summit in four years:
When and where is it taking place?
The summit will take place Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson outside Anchorage, according to a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal planning. It played a key role in the Cold War in monitoring and deterring the Soviet Union.
It's Putin's first trip to the U.S. since 2015 for the U.N. General Assembly in New York. Because the U.S. isn't a member of the International Criminal Court, which in 2023 issued a warrant for Putin on war crimes accusations, it's under no obligation to arrest him.
Is Zelenskyy going?
Both countries confirmed a meeting between only Putin and Trump, despite initial suggestions that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy might take part. The Kremlin has long pushed back against Putin meeting Zelenskyy -– at least until a peace deal is reached by both sides and is ready to be signed.
Putin said last week he wasn't against meeting Zelenskyy 'but certain conditions need to be created' and were 'still a long way off.' That raised fears about excluding Ukraine from negotiations. Kyiv and its European allies stressed that peace cannot be achieved without Kyiv's involvement.
Zelenskyy was in Berlin for virtual meetings Wednesday with Trump and European leaders to try to ensure Ukraine and its allies are heard before the summit.
The Ukrainian president told the group Putin 'is bluffing' about his military might and the effectiveness of sanctions, and 'is trying to apply pressure … on all sectors of the Ukrainian front' to try to show that Russia is 'capable of occupying all of Ukraine.' In reality, sanctions are 'hitting Russia's war economy hard,' Zelenskyy said.
What's Alaska's role in Russian history?
It will be the first visit by a Russian leader to Alaska, even though it was part of the czarist empire until 1867, the state news agency Tass said.
Alaska was colonized by Russia starting from the 18th century until Czar Alexander II sold it to the United States in 1867 for $7.2 million. When it was found to contain vast resources, it was seen by Russians as a naïve deal that generated remorse.
After the USSR's collapse, Alaska was a subject of nostalgia and jokes for Russians. One popular song in the 1990s went: 'Don't play the fool, America … give back our dear Alaska land.'
Sam Greene of King's College London said on X the symbolism of Alaska as the site of a summit about Ukraine was 'horrendous — as though designed to demonstrate that borders can change, land can be bought and sold.'
What's the agenda?
Trump has appeared increasingly exasperated with Putin over Russia's refusal to halt the bombardment of Ukraine. Kyiv has agreed to a ceasefire, insisting on a truce as a first step toward peace.
Moscow presented ceasefire conditions that are nonstarters for Zelenskyy, such as withdrawing troops from the four regions Russia illegally annexed in 2022, halting mobilization efforts, or freezing Western arms deliveries. For a broader peace, Putin demands Kyiv cede the annexed regions, even though Russia doesn't fully control them, and Crimea, renounce a bid to join NATO, limit the size of its armed forces and recognize Russian as an official language along with Ukrainian.
Zelenskyy insists any peace deals include robust security guarantees to protect Ukraine from future Russian aggression.
Putin has warned Ukraine it will face tougher conditions for peace as Russian troops forge into other regions to build what he described as a 'buffer zone.' Some observers suggested Russia could trade those recent gains for territory under Ukrainian control in the four annexed regions annexed by Moscow.
Zelenskyy said Saturday that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.'
But Trump said Monday: 'There'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody. To the good, for the good of Ukraine. Good stuff, not bad stuff. Also, some bad stuff for both.'
Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region it still controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the Ukrainian categorically rejected. Kyiv won't give up territory it controls, he added, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion.
He said discussions led by the U.S. on ending the war have not addressed key Ukrainian demands, including security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and including Europe in negotiations.
French President Emmanuel Macron said Wednesday that Trump was 'very clear' in a virtual meeting with European leaders and Zelenskyy that the U.S. wants to achieve a ceasefire. Macron added that Trump had been clear that 'territorial issues relating to Ukraine … will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president.'
What are expectations?
Trump said Wednesday there will be unspecified 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to stop the war after the summit.
Putin sees a meeting with Trump as a chance to cement Russia's territorial gains, keep Ukraine out of NATO and prevent it from hosting any Western troops so Moscow can gradually pull the country back into its orbit.
He believes time is on his side as Ukrainian forces are struggling to stem Russian advances along the front amid swarms of Moscow's missiles and drones.
The meeting is a diplomatic coup for Putin, isolated since the invasion. The Kremlin sought to portray renewed U.S. contacts as two superpowers looking to resolve various global problems, with Ukraine being just one.
Ukraine and its European allies are concerned a summit without Kyiv could allow Putin to get Trump on his side and force Ukraine into concessions.
'Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace,' Zelenskyy said. 'They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work.'
European officials echoed that.
'As we work towards a sustainable and just peace, international law is clear: All temporarily occupied territories belong to Ukraine,' European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said. 'A sustainable peace also means that aggression cannot be rewarded.'
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Sunday he believed Trump was 'making sure that Putin is serious, and if he is not, then it will stop there.'
'If he is serious, then from Friday onwards, the process will continue. Ukraine getting involved, the Europeans being involved,' Rutte added.
Since last week, Putin spoke to Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as well as the leaders of South Africa, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Belarus and Kyrgyzstan, the Kremlin said.
That suggested Putin perhaps wanted to brief Russia's most important allies about a potential settlement, said pro-Kremlin analyst Sergei Markov.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
4 hours ago
- The Diplomat
The Russia-Ukraine War Has Made North Korea More Dangerous
With new weapons, cash, and battleground experience from Ukraine, North Korea has become much more formidable. How should South Korea respond? The war between Russia and Ukraine is taking place in Europe, but its security implications are increasingly being felt in Asia, too. North Korea has benefited tremendously from its decision to supply enormous quantities of ammunition and soldiers to Russia in return for advanced nuclear and missile technology and diplomatic cover. North Korea's involvement in the conflict is transforming it into a much more capable and technologically advanced rogue state in east Asia. This evolving threat may soon prompt South Korea to reassess its security strategies in an increasingly challenging international environment. As Russia's invasion of Ukraine began to turn into a protracted conflict in late 2022, Moscow faced a problem: it was at risk of running low on ammunition and soldiers to send to the front lines. Its diplomatic overtures to North Korea began soon after. In July 2023, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu was warmly received by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in a visit to the North Korean capital, Pyongyang. In a matter of weeks, high-resolution satellite imagery showed what looked like the establishment of a new munitions supply route from North Korea to Russia. Around that time, Russia was using about 5,000 artillery shells per day. Around the time the first North Korean shells would have arrived at the front lines several months later, the rate suddenly increased to an average of 15,000 per day. In September 2023, Kim travelled to Russia for a meeting with President Vladimir Putin, where he was given the red-carpet treatment at a space satellite launch facility. In mid-2024, Putin repaid the favor, making his first visit to Pyongyang in 24 years. He signed a new strategic partnership treaty with North Korea that included mutual defense clauses – each country pledged to provide immediate military assistance if either faced armed aggression. Soon after, a deployment of 11,000 North Korean troops was headed to the front lines to help Russia retake the Russian region of Kursk, part of which had been captured by Ukraine. Now, following another visit by Shoigu to Pyongyang in June of this year, Ukrainian officials say another 25,000-30,000 North Korean soldiers are heading to Russia in the months ahead. North Korea is also sending thousands of builders and deminers to help rebuild the Kursk region. Estimates from a German think tank suggest North Korea has earned anywhere from $1.7 billion to $5.5 billion from selling war materiel to Russia since 2023. The think tank also estimates North Korea may also be receiving up to half a billion U.S. dollars annually from the troop deployments. Russia is also helping North Korea modernize its aging Soviet-era military. For example, Russia appears to have provided assistance to Pyongyang in building a critical new air-defense system, an airborne early warning system, tanks with improved electronic warfare systems, a naval destroyer with supersonic cruise missiles, and air-to-air missiles. In addition, North Korean soldiers have received valuable modern combat experience using artificial intelligence and drones against a highly skilled Ukrainian military. And Russian soldiers have also tested North Korea's weapons in combat, such as ballistic missiles, which will assist in their future research and development. With Russian expertise, North Korea has also made recent progress on technologies associated with launching satellites and intercontinental ballistic missiles, which can deliver numerous miniaturized nuclear warheads. These developments mean South Korea and its allies will need to deal with a much more battle-hardened and technologically advanced North Korean military. Its antiquated systems, historically limited by isolation and a range of international sanctions, are now being rapidly transformed, making it a much more formidable foe. South Korea's new liberal president, Lee Jae Myung, is much less hawkish on North Korea and Russia than his predecessors. Instead, Lee is doing his best to ease tensions with the North. For instance, he recently ordered propaganda speakers to be removed from the North Korean border. Although North Korea also dismantled its own propaganda speakers from the border, it has largely rebuffed other overtures from South Korea. The regime's rapidly expanding Russian ties give it little incentive to resume international talks aimed at reducing sanctions. Lee may soon find the evolving situation across the border requires a much more proactive security policy. South Korea may seek to bolster coordination with its main ally, the United States, and others in the region, such as Australia. For example, joint military exercises between South Korea and the U.S. later this month will specifically focus on the threats posed by the North's advancing missile program, as well as drones, GPS jamming, and cyber attacks. Current South Korean law prohibits it from sending arms to war zones, but Seoul has helped Ukraine indirectly and stepped up its sales of weapons elsewhere in Europe. And though Lee skipped the recent NATO summit – an event that his predecessor had attended three years in a row – he may need to reverse course and continue deepening ties with the bloc if his soft diplomacy approach with the North doesn't bear fruit. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
Japan Today
4 hours ago
- Japan Today
Sexual violence in conflicts worldwide increased by 25% last year, U.N. says
FILE - The UN flag flies on a stormy day at the United Nations during the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 22, 2022. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File) By EDITH M. LEDERER Sexual violence in conflicts worldwide increased by 25% last year, with the highest number of cases in the Central African Republic, Congo, Haiti, Somalia and South Sudan, according to a U.N. report released Thursday. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' annual report said more than 4,600 people survived sexual violence in 2024, with armed groups carrying out the majority of the abuse but some by government forces. He stressed that the U.N.-verified figures don't reflect the global scale and prevalence of these crimes. The report's blacklist names 63 government and non-government parties in a dozen countries suspected of committing or being responsible for rape and other forms of sexual violence in conflict, including Hamas militants, whose attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, sparked the war in Gaza. Over 70% of those listed have appeared on the report's blacklist annex for five years or more without creating steps to prevent the violence, the U.N. chief said. For the first time, the report includes two parties that have been notified the U.N. has 'credible information' that could put them on next year's blacklist if they don't take preventive actions: Israel's military and security forces over allegations of sexual abuse of Palestinians primarily in prisons and detention, and Russian forces and affiliated armed groups against Ukrainian prisoners of war. Israeli U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon, who circulated a letter Tuesday from Guterres about the country's forces being put on notice, said the allegations 'are steeped in biased publications.' 'The U.N. must focus on the shocking war crimes and sexual violence of Hamas and the release of all hostages,' he said. Russia's U.N. mission said it had no comment on the secretary-general's warning. The 34-page report said 'conflict-related sexual violence' refers to rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution, forced pregnancy, forced abortion, forced sterilization, forced marriage and other forms of sexual violence. The majority of victims are women and girls. 'In 2024, proliferating and escalating conflicts were marked by widespread conflict-related sexual violence, amid record levels of displacement and increased militarization,' Guterres said. 'Sexual violence continued to be used as a tactic of war, torture, terrorism and political repression, while multiple and overlapping political, security and humanitarian crises deepened.' The U.N. says women and girls were attacked in their homes, on roads and while trying to earn a living, with victims ranging in age from 1 to 75. Reports of summary executions of victims after rape persisted in Congo and Myanmar, it said. In an increasing number of places, the report said armed groups 'used sexual violence as a tactic to gain and consolidate control over territory and lucrative natural resources.' Women and girls perceived to be associated with rival armed groups were targeted with sexual violence in the Central African Republic, Congo and Haiti, it said. In detention facilities, the report said sexual violence was perpetrated 'including as a form of torture,' reportedly in Israel and the Palestinian territories, Libya, Myanmar, Sudan, Syria, Ukraine and Yemen. 'Most of the reported incidents against men and boys occurred in detention, consistent with previous years, and included rape, threats of rape and the electrocution and beating of genitals,' the report said. The U.N. peacekeeping mission in the Central African Republic documented cases of rape, gang rape, forced marriage and sexual slavery affecting 215 women, 191 girls and seven men. In mineral-rich eastern Congo, the peacekeeping mission documented nearly 800 cases last year including including rape, gang rape, sexual slavery and forced marriage, 'often accompanied by extreme physical violence,' the report said. The number of cases involving the M23 rebel group, now controlling the main city Goma, rose from 43 in 2022 to 152 in 2024, it said. In Sudan, where civil war is raging, the report said groups providing services to victims of sexual violence recorded 221 rape cases against 147 girls and 74 boys, 'with 16% of survivors under five years of age, including four one-year-olds.' © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
The Diplomat
6 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Trump Is Pushing India-US Ties to the Brink for Personal Gain
U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi as he is introduced to the podium at a rally in honor of Modi at NRG Stadium in Houston, Texas, Sep. 22, 2019. U.S. President Donald Trump has almost single-handedly brought the India-U.S. partnership to its lowest point in two decades. On August 6, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods in a bid to punish India for its continued purchase of Russian oil. The move came a few days after he reported his displeasure over India's trade with Russia, claiming that he would substantially raise tariffs on India. This brings the total duty on India to 50 percent. Adding insult to injury, Trump offended many in India with his remarks, saying, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' This trade spat has roiled the India-U.S. relationship, which is arguably at its lowest point thus far in the 21st century. The current tensions appear surprising to many because of the positive trajectory of the India-U.S. partnership in the last couple of decades. However, the relationship is laden with significant fault lines, the chief one being India's ties with Russia. Trump is compounding this fault line for political gain. For Washington, a stronger partnership with India rested on the rationale of leveraging India as a counter to China's rise, and because of that, the divergence on Russia was largely kept aside for a long time. However, the United States today is distracted by the conflicts in Europe and the Middle East. Consequently, countering China in the Indo-Pacific is not the U.S. foreign policy's most predominant and pressing objective for now. If 'countering China,' is not a priority for Washington, then India is not an important partner for the United States. India is neither a critical nor a major trading partner of the U.S., unlike China, which dominates the critical minerals sector. This explains why China has been given a 90-day extension for tariff negotiations, even though it is the largest buyer of Russian oil and gas. Realizing that China has emerged unscathed from Trump's tariffs while the U.S. is heavily dependent on China for critical minerals, the Trump administration has been trying to reach an accommodation with China. Therefore, Chinese containment in the Indo-Pacific appears to be fading away for now – and with it, the need for a robust partnership with India. Due to this, Trump has targeted tariffs on India alone for the purchase of Russian oil and gas. For its part, India has asserted that the demand to halt trade with Russia remains totally unjustified and unreasonable. In 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, the United States itself encouraged India's energy purchases, India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement, 'because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict.' Even today, the U.S. still continues to import fertilizers, chemicals and uranium and palladium from Russia, the MEA pointed out. On the other hand, India has drastically increased its energy purchases from the United States, with crude oil imports surging 51 percent in the first half of 2025. India's liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports from the U.S. have nearly doubled from $1.41 billion in FY2023-24 to $2.46 billion in FY2024-25. In February, Prime Minister Narendra Modi pledged to boost U.S. energy imports to $25 billion from $15 billion in 2024 – and thus reduce the trade deficit, which is a constant concern for Trump. In accordance with that, Indian oil and gas companies are discussing long-term purchases of U.S. oil and gas with their U.S. counterparts. India has been endeavoring to reduce its reliance on Russian energy purchases by increasing its U.S. energy imports. Why, then, did Trump decide to hit India with 50 percent tariffs over the issue of Russian oil? Trump is clearly frustrated that he has been unable to achieve his promise of striking a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. The tariffs on India for Russian oil and gas purchases thus look more like a personalistic attack – Trump's way of acting out his frustration over not achieving his geopolitical goal of halting the Russia-Ukraine war. Indeed, Trump's beloved self-image as the world's biggest dealmaker underlies the current tensions with India. He has made repeated public claims about brokering the India-Pakistan ceasefire post-Operation Sindoor – a claim that India has vehemently denied at all official levels, including Modi himself. Therefore, tariffs may also have an element of punishing India for denying his claims of brokering the ceasefire. On the other hand, Pakistan – which embraced Trump's claim of mediation, even nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize – is enjoying a renewed warmth in its relationship with Washington. The United States has not reached an agreement with India even after five rounds of trade negotiations, despite India's reported willingness to make substantial trade concessions. This suggests that the tariffs were political – or personal, in Trump's case – retaliation rather than economic. India is not the only country to be hit with high tariffs due to Trump's personal grievances. He imposed 50 percent levy on Brazil because of judicial proceedings in the Brazilian Supreme Court in which Trump's ally, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, was charged with staging a coup against current President Lula. Trump has not shied away from threatening tariffs if he finds any country's actions, policies, and statements unacceptable. If compelling India to move away from the purchase of Russian oil and gas was one of the aims of the tariffs, it is unlikely to achieve this. Instead, India is going to double down on its multialignment foreign policy in light of the increased distrust towards the United States. Modi's planned visit to China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit at the end of August, and the upcoming visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India for the annual India-Russia summit at the end of the year, reflect that. The current trade tensions are expected to instill and intensify India's distrust toward the United States. It remains to be seen whether India and the U.S. will be able to contain and then repair the damage inflicted by Trump; trust is hard to build, harder to sustain, and hardest to rebuild once it evaporates.
