logo
Why Stars Like Nadal And Brady Are Betting On E1's Electric Raceboat

Why Stars Like Nadal And Brady Are Betting On E1's Electric Raceboat

Forbes07-07-2025
Rafael Nadal and Will Smith with Rodi Basso at the Lake Como GP
Rafael Nadal. Tom Brady. LeBron James. Will Smith. Steve Aoki.
What do they have in common? Some are the greatest athletes. Others, iconic names in global entertainment. But they also all own teams in one of motorsport's boldest frontiers: E1, the world's first all-electric hydrofoil powerboat championship.
At first glance, it may seem like a fever dream. Sci-fi speedboats gliding above the water, backed by a rotating cast of celebrities. But underneath the sheen of star-studded ownership is a championship that is quietly rewriting the playbook of what sport is.
Co-founded by former Formula 1 engineer Rodi Basso and motorsport entrepreneur Alejandro Agag, the sport was built with an aim to electrify the marine industry. But in its mission, it has also made inclusion a non-negotiable with each team fielding a male and female pilot in their lineup.
Sure, it's another racing league. But in many ways it's also a case study in how visibility, values, and velocity can fuse into a new kind of sporting empire. The question is: how did a startup series about electric boats become a magnet for celebrity investors and why are so many of them buying in now?
Rafael Nadal with Team Rafa pilots (Cris Lazzaraga and Tom Chiappe)
Why Celebrities Over Corporate Investment?
In new sporting ventures, the phone calls always go to the usual suspects: brands, manufacturers and corporations. But E1 directed that energy elsewhere.
'The reason why we went to talents in sports and entertainment is because the OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) in the marine industry don't really see a sport platform as a marketing tool,' said Basso who is now serving as the CEO.
As an engineer by trade, Basso sees the world through a lens of efficiency, not just in the boat's performance, but in how the championship breaks into public consciousness.
He said, 'As a young organization, one of the first KPI (key performance indicator) you need to pursue is the media reach and by joining forces with talents, we can claim to have 1.1 billion followers in digital channels…so it's a massive advantage.'
But how were celebrities convinced by a venture that, at first glance, perhaps looked more like a tech experiment than a sports franchise? The answer lies in three things: purpose, proximity and potential.
It's purpose being a motorsport series that happens to be developing sustainable technologies and having gender parity embedded in its very structure.
Proximity because many of its investors already live the coastal lifestyle the sport embodies. 'They are all very passionate about living the life of the coastal areas," said Basso. 'They all have boats, and they all go to amazing places of the world, and they want to make sure that, also their future generation, their kids can enjoy that in the future.'
And potential because an early-stage league backed by Saudi's Public Investment Fund and led by former engineers, people who have worked in motorsport, and entrepreneurs hints at serious financial upside. It looks viable. As of now, two E1 teams have been trading their license at already five times their original value.
A Championship Built For Parity
In motorsport, gender inclusion is often a retroactive fix. E1, however, built it into its architecture. Not as mere tokenism but with conviction.
'I absolutely refrain from calling inclusivity a strategy," said Basso. "Because when you call it strategy, it means that there will be some managers with a checklist trying to tick boxes and make it look like it's working or something. We don't. We mentioned this, but we don't claim it too much, because this is just our natural belief in how an organization should work.'
Mashael Alobaidan after winning the Dubrovnik GP
One of the clearest proofs of that conviction is Pilot Mashael Alobaidan. She hails from Saudi Arabia and is currently leading the E1 standings alongside her co-pilot Dani Clos for Aoki Racing Team.
'It's refreshing and it's powerful,' she said. 'We race not as the female pilot or the male pilot but as equals. And that really changes the game. It opens the door for true performance to shine through.'
The RaceBird
Team Rafa
The boat itself, the RaceBird, reflects this philosophy. Sleek, silent and hydrofoiled skimming the sea, designed for finesse not just brute force.
'You need a lot of emotional intelligence,' Basso said. Sensitivity to conditions. A read of the race, not just reaction. And that, he argued, often gives female pilots an edge.
'It's [emotional intelligence] one of the most underrated superpowers an athlete can have,' said Alobaidan. 'Last race, I was fifth…I had two options. It's either I give up or I say, 'You know what? Keep on pushing.' Keep on pushing every lap until you overcome and overtake.''
E1's insistence on visibility is personal for her too. 'I received many messages from young not only girls but boys as well in Saudi,' she said.
'Winning in Jeddah and just on that podium…looking at the amount of Saudis and young kids and the way they look at Team Aoki and how their eyes sparkled really touched me.'
'It's really important aspect of what I do in life is to inspire the young generation because we are capable. We have the talent, we have the skills… it's just that tiny push for them to see a role model, someone among them, just like them, achieving that, then this is enough for them to go after the dream,' added Alobaidan.
The Future
The E1 grid
With celebrity owners lending their platforms, engineers crafting silent, sustainable speed, and pilots like Mashael Alobaidan turning representation into record-setting performance, the championship is carving out space in an industry often stubborn to change.
'E1 is a sport with purpose…It's important to say that sustainability is not a stealth communication strategy, but it's a an opportunity for value creation,' said Basso.
The long-term vision is ambitious: grow from nine to twelve teams, expand the calendar to 15 global races, and bring on the league's first female team owner.
E1 isn't just betting on their RaceBirds to drive investment. They're betting on visibility shaping perception. Betting on the right machine. The right mission. The right message. Reimagining the sport as not just a vehicle for entertainment but for impact.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

☕️🥐FC Ptit Déj: Ligue 1 stadium rankings, FC 26 Career Mode news
☕️🥐FC Ptit Déj: Ligue 1 stadium rankings, FC 26 Career Mode news

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

☕️🥐FC Ptit Déj: Ligue 1 stadium rankings, FC 26 Career Mode news

FC 26: New Features in Career Mode 🎮 While waiting to unveil the new facets of Ultimate Team, Electronic Arts has detailed the new features of the highly acclaimed Career Mode in EA FC 26. Ligue 1 Stadium Ranking 🏟️ a website specializing in stadiums, has established a ranking of the stadiums that will host Ligue 1 matches for the 2025-26 season. The Vélodrome is the big winner of this top 18. Flashback of the Day 📸 Announced with insistence at Liverpool, Alexander Isak could meet an old acquaintance from the Dutch championship. At the time (February 2019), a certain Slot was assistant coach at AZ Alkmaar and Isak was at Willem II. OM Presents its Star Signing 🎬 The most expensive recruit in the history of Olympique de Marseille (35 million euros) told the story of his arrival on the Canebière. Piece. Yesterday's Must-See Stories 🔍 - Ligue 1: a week with a European focus for elite clubs - The ultimate XI of Brazilians who have played in L1 - Who will be the penalty taker at Real Madrid this season? This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇫🇷 here. 📸 AFP

Fantasy Premier League: The players to avoid selecting for Gameweek One
Fantasy Premier League: The players to avoid selecting for Gameweek One

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Fantasy Premier League: The players to avoid selecting for Gameweek One

A new season of Fantasy Premier League is upon us, with players new to the Premier League and those who have moved clubs among the hottest properties. However, for every prime FPL target, there is also a long list of possible signings who should be avoided — either because they are unlikely starters for their clubs or offer little in fantasy points terms. Which of the hundreds of available assets should be nowhere near your Gameweek One squad? The Athletic has got you covered! Each season, I run a single FPL team where, each gameweek, a panel vote on the transfer and captaincy decisions. It used to be run by 50 managers but now a group of 100 people contribute. This pre-season, I've collated their first drafts for a series on my YouTube channel, comparing player ownership within that pool to ownership across the millions worldwide who play FPL, and have created a shortlist of those options who are in over 10 per cent of the experts' teams. Advertisement There were several highly-owned players in the game overall who had little to no representation among their squads. The headline name here is Newcastle striker Alexander Isak (£10.5m), who is owned by around one-third of managers overall but was a differential among my panel. As we all know, the Swedish striker wants to leave Newcastle, with Liverpool bidding for him, and his situation has a chance of lingering on until the opening weekend of the season, from August 15 to 18, when the transfer window will still have more than two weeks to run. Add into the mix a tough run of opening fixtures for Eddie Howe and company and it's ultimately best to avoid Isak, despite his 29 goal involvements in 2024-25. Meanwhile, Jarrod Bowen (£8.0m) of West Ham, formerly a midfielder in the game, has been reclassified as a forward for this season, which seemingly hasn't dented his appeal, with the England international racking up an ownership of nearly 20 per cent of FPL managers as things stand. But Bowen will receive fewer points for each goal he scores this season in his new position, which could hinder his output, despite West Ham starting their season with a trip to one of the promoted sides, Sunderland. As one of the most supported clubs globally, any new faces at Manchester United are generally heavily backed in FPL, with this summer's midfield arrivals Bryan Mbeumo (£8.0m) and Matheus Cunha (£8.0m) no exceptions at 17% and 11% ownership respectively. However, none of my 100 experts selected this duo in their Gameweek One squads following an underwhelming 2024-25 campaign for United, despite a change of position for Cunha from forward to midfielder. There's plenty of competition for places in the United attack and it's not exactly clear the role each player will be given by coach Ruben Amorim, with both having been talismans for Brentford and Wolves respectively last season. We can't expect the same level of returns from them at a new team and in a different system, and with captain Bruno Fernandes (£9.0m) set to hog set-piece duties, including penalties, the routes to points for both Mbeumo and Cunha will be more limited. Advertisement Fernandes is also an avoid at the start of the season due to a price hike and a deeper-lying position in United's new-look midfield almost guaranteed. Then there's the fact they play Arsenal and Manchester City during the first four gameweeks. New Liverpool right-back Jeremie Frimpong (£6.0m) is the second-most-owned defender in the game at the time of writing, having been acquired by almost 27 per cent of managers. However, he faces stiff competition for minutes from Conor Bradley (£5.0m), so his starting position is far from guaranteed. I definitely prefer their defensive team-mate Virgil van Dijk (£6.0m) at the same price point as Frimpong, and the expert managers agree with me. Arsenal's new signing Viktor Gyokeres (£9.0m) has been hot property since his addition to the game, with 24 per cent of managers snapping him up. However, there are no guarantees he starts over Kai Havertz (£7.5m) up front when Mikel Arteta's team travel to Old Trafford in Gameweek One. Gyokeres is certainly one to keep an eye on for potential addition from Gameweek Two onwards, especially with promoted Leeds visiting the Emirates Stadium in that round. He may be on Arsenal's penalties, too. Tottenham Hotspur striker Dominic Solanke (£7.5m) has been a popular acquisition in early drafts, mine included. The impending departure of Son Heung-min (£8.5m) could see Solanke on penalties this season but he missed both games of Spurs' Asian tour with an ankle injury. Plenty of FPL managers will be keeping an eye on his availability across the remainder of pre-season, with an opener at home against promoted Burnley kicking off a favourable run of early fixtures. Indeed, Spurs' start to the season has helped entice 26 per cent of managers to select their new midfield recruit Mohammed Kudus (£6.5m), who looks to be great value at first glance. However, I'm yet to be convinced to invest in him, given he managed just nine goal involvements in 31 starts last time around for West Ham. Better-value picks should emerge around that price point. Advertisement Up at Manchester City, Omar Marmoush (£8.5m) is among their most-owned attacking players for Gameweek One, alongside newcomer and fellow midfielder Rayan Cherki (£6.5m). However, with strength and depth once again in forward areas for the deposed four-in-a-row champions, it's difficult to pinpoint exactly what minutes their assets will see because of manager Pep Guardiola's infamous rotation. It's thought that Phil Foden (£8.0m) is fully fit and set to capitalise on the summer departure of Kevin De Bruyne from City's midfield, but I'd stick with forward Erling Haaland (£14.0m) if you are intent on a City attacking player for Gameweek One. Speaking of rotation and new signings at City, Rayan Ait-Nouri (£6.0m) has been selected by around a quarter of managers since joining from Wolves, but again this is a risky pick. Clean sheets could be hard to come by for City in the opening three gameweeks, with trips to Wolves and Brighton either side of a home game against a bolstered Spurs now under Thomas Frank's management. The theme continues when it comes to picking a City goalkeeper, with new arrival James Trafford (£5.0m) providing competition for Ederson (£5.5m). It's certainly enticing that we could have a top six goalkeeper for £5m in the game, but we would need clarity from Guardiola over who is his number one before investing in Trafford. One player who made my first draft despite being a massive rotation risk is Everton forward Beto (£5.5m), thanks to an enticing price point. Everton have solid opening fixtures, plus that new stadium to entertain their fans in, which means the stars could align for Beto early on. There's hope he plays in a front two alongside new signing Thierno Barry (£6.0m), but they could well share minutes under David Moyes. With plenty of managers eyeing up a Gameweek One Bench Boost, any starting forwards with good fixtures around this price could be hard to ignore. Will the punt be worth it? (Top photo of Alexander Isak;)

'28 Years Later' Is Now Streaming. Is It as Good as the Original?
'28 Years Later' Is Now Streaming. Is It as Good as the Original?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'28 Years Later' Is Now Streaming. Is It as Good as the Original?

Upon its release in 2003, Danny Boyle's 28 Days Later instantly and forever rewrote the rules of the zombie genre. After decades of lumbering undead, Boyle introduced us to the fast-moving zombies that would soon proliferate in Zack Snyder's remake of Dawn of the Dead (2004), The Walking Dead, World War Z, and countless less worthy imitators. (Boyle's monsters are technically 'the infected' rather than zombies, having been afflicted with a bloodthirsty rage virus.) Twenty-two years after his first film, which was followed by 2007's unofficial, C-grade sequel 28 Weeks Later, Boyle and original screenwriter Alex Garland are back with 28 Years Later. It's the first in a planned trilogy of films, the second installment of which is set to hit cinemas in January. So, how does this late-era sequel stack up to Boyle's singular original? Can the filmmaker, once again, rewrite the rules of the genre? Nominally, 28 Years Later follows the same structure and formula as the original, though with some small but effective tweaks. In the years since the virus originally spread, the infection has been eradicated from Europe and much of Britain. Only a small pocket of the Scottish Highlands remains quarantined, in which thrives a community which has managed to stay clear of the infected. Twelve-year-old Spike (newcomer Alfie Williams) is one of the village's youngest members. The opening passage of the film finds him embarking, along with his father Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), upon his first trip out of the community and onto 'the mainland,' where the infected still run amok. Though younger than most who trek to the mainland, Jamie is bullish that Spike notch his first kill and, effectively, enter into manhood. The opening passage chronicling Spike and Jamie's journey is a breathlessly paced sequence featuring more zombie action than an entire season of The Walking Dead and at least five white-knuckle moments of unadulterated suspense and fear. Can you remember the last time a horror movie actually made you care about its characters so much that you were hiding behind your hands and humming, 'Oh no, oh no, oh no…'? There are roughly three films' worth of those moments in 28 Years Later, each sweatier than the last. But then, about 40 minutes into the picture, Boyle and Garland pivot the narrative and effectively switch genres, with Spike's ailing mother (an awards-worthy Jodie Comer) taking center stage. Chances are you're aware of this twist, because it's provoked a certain amount of disagreement amongst audience members, but we won't spoil it here if you've managed to avoid it up until now. There's no point in being coy: 28 Years Later is a masterpiece. It's not only the best movie of the summer by a country mile, but one of this year's very finest films. In a season where the major releases have teetered between pleasantly all right and totally joyless, few of them possessing even the slightest hint of originality or risk, it's a pulsating thrill to see a summer blockbuster which functions as a proper, old-fashioned great movie. This is a picture made with great skill and care, but at this point, we should expect that from Danny Boyle. The Oscar-winning British filmmaker of Trainspotting (1996) and Slumdog Millionaire (2008) has never made a boring movie, and he seems to grow more confident with age. He's the consummate filmmaker, one who has remained throughout his career rooted in arthouse, European, and American popcorn influences in equal measure. His films consistently reflect a thrilling the movie functions as a breakneck adventure, an emotional family drama, and a teen coming-of-age story without the disparate genres ever betraying or overtaking each other. Just when you think the movie is settling down, Boyle gives us a naked 'Alpha' zombie (with one notable, swinging appendage) ripping the spines from some unlucky army cadets, or a completely over-the-top zombie baby birthing scene. This is a terrifically weird movie, one of Boyle's most brazenly experimental in years, but its weirdness is also one of its greatest attributes and largely why the whole thing works so effortlessly. Surprisingly, this bears a strong resemblance to Boyle's equally odd and rapturous Millions (2005), a crime caper/domestic drama/religious allegory aimed at a pre-teen audience which is as peculiar as it is beautiful. Garland and Boyle indulge some surprisingly dark horror, but they also aren't afraid to challenge their audience. (What a delight!) The chemistry between Williams and Comer, both of whom give scorching performances, is estimable. Comer, in a precarious balance act, is at once heartbreaking and fearsomely formidable. The final passage, which sees the introduction of a Kurtz-like doctor played by Ralph Fiennes, is vibrantly, unexpectedly affecting. It's also so ghoulish that it verges on very black comedy. Knowing Boyle, that's probably exactly what he intended. Jon Harris' inspired, deeply unsettling editing adds immeasurably to the nightmarish atmosphere, while Anthony Dod Mantle brings a nail-biting immediacy to each scene (the film was shot partially on iPhones). Most notable is the brilliant, unexpected score from Scottish hip-hop group Young Fathers. Their work brings to the film an epically ethereal quality which fits the material like a glove. It's an uncommon type of score for a thriller, but it works beautifully and is one of the best cinematic compositions of this year. With 28 Years Later, Boyle has delivered a perfect follow-up to his original. (The events of the dismal 28 Weeks Later, with which Boyle had little creative involvement, are ignored here.) 28 Days Later, which was being shot when the September 11 attacks occurred, uncannily and perhaps accidentally reflected the world's collective confusion and horror at the time of its release. Years is a much more positive and redemptive film, though it's just as savage in its evisceration of modern social maladies. As much as it's a down-and-dirty horror picture, 28 Years Later functions as a rather heartbreaking rebuke to isolationism and the power of fear. It's a pure Danny Boyle film, one which is entertaining and horrifying and thrilling and, above all, big-hearted. It's a movie which deserves to be seen by all, even those who might not normally watch horror films, so powerful is its construction and impact. Where can I watch 28 Years Later?'28 Years Later' Is Now Streaming. Is It as Good as the Original? first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 30, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store