Thailand And Cambodia Truce Talks Due But Strikes Continue
At least 35 people have been killed and more than 200,000 displaced since Thursday as the countries fight over a smattering of contested ancient temples.
In an effort initiated by US President Donald Trump, Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet will meet at 3:00 pm (0700 GMT) in Kuala Lumpur. China is also expected to send a delegation.
Ahead of the talks, Thailand and Cambodia traded fresh fire and accusations.
"This is the fifth day that Thailand has invaded Cambodia's territory with heavy weapons and with the deployment of a lot of troops to grab Cambodia's land," said defence ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata.
The previous night, Thailand's military said Cambodian snipers were camping in one of the contested temples, and accused Phnom Penh of surging troops along the border and hammering Thai territory with rockets.
It said fighting was ongoing at seven areas along the rural border region, marked by a ridge of hills surrounded by wild jungle and agricultural land where locals farm rubber and rice.
"The situation remains highly tense, and it is anticipated that Cambodia may be preparing for a major military operation prior to entering negotiations," the Thai military statement read.
On Saturday, Trump said he made a late-night call to both leaders, who had agreed to "quickly work out" a truce.
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said the summit -- which will be mediated by Malaysian leader Anwar Ibrahim -- was also organised "with the participation of China" -- a key trade and political ally.
"The purpose of this meeting is to achieve an immediate ceasefire, which was initiated by President Donald Trump and agreed to by both prime ministers of Cambodia and Thailand," Hun Manet said.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that US officials "are on the ground in Malaysia to assist these peace efforts", while Anwar told domestic media he would focus on securing an "immediate ceasefire".
Thai King Maha Vajiralongkorn marked his 73rd birthday on Monday, but a notice in the country's Royal Gazette said his public celebrations scheduled for Bangkok's Grand Palace have been cancelled amid the strife.
Both Thailand and Cambodia have agreed in principle to a truce -- but accused each other of undermining armistice efforts and of firing first.
Trump has threatened both countries with eye-watering levies in his global tariff blitz unless they agree to independent trade deals.
"When all is done, and Peace is at hand, I look forward to concluding our Trading Agreements with both!" he wrote on social media.
But each side has also blamed the other for undermining peace efforts.
The Thai foreign ministry accused Cambodian forces of firing shells into civilian homes in Surin province.
"Any cessation of hostilities cannot be reached while Cambodia is severely lacking in good faith," the ministry said.
Meanwhile, Cambodia's defence ministry accused Thailand of "deliberate and coordinated acts of aggression".
Thailand says eight of its soldiers and 14 civilians have been killed, while Cambodia has confirmed eight civilian and five military deaths.
The Thai military said it had returned the bodies of 12 Cambodian soldiers killed in combat.
The conflict has forced more than 138,000 people from Thailand's border regions, and 80,000 have been driven from their homes in Cambodia.
The Cambodian government has also accused Thai forces of using cluster munitions, while Bangkok has accused Phnom Penh of targeting hospitals.
With the conflict enflaming nationalist sentiments, Thailand issued a warning to its citizens to "refrain from any kind of violence, whether in speech or action" against Cambodian migrants living in the country. Thailand and and Cambodia have exchanged five days of fire in a deadly territorial dispute AFP Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet (C) will meet Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai to discuss a ceasefire AFP Each side has blamed the other for undermining peace efforts AFP At least 35 people have been killed and more than 200,000 displaced AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Trump's EPA to roll back cornerstone of climate action – DW – 07/31/2025
The US Environmental Protection Agency under President Donald Trump is pushing to reverse a 2009 landmark declaration that deemed CO2 and other greenhouse gases harmful to people's health. What's at stake? US President Donald Trump's administration is forging ahead with a plan to revoke a scientific finding that's long been the cornerstone of US climate action. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled the move at a car dealership in the US state of Indiana, hailing it as "the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States" and the "death of the Green New Scam." At the heart of the rollback is the Obama-era 2009 endangerment finding, grounded in the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. EPA. That ruling established the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants — a legal foundation for US efforts to curb emissions. If the endangerment finding is thrown out, the EPA would lose its ability to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases, a move experts warn would represent a "radical pivot in American climate and energy policy." "It represents a complete US step away from renewable energy and energy efficiency in favor of full embrace of expanded production and use of fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas," Barry Rabe, environmental and public policy professor at the University of Michigan, told DW. The second Trump administration is acting more aggressively in just about everything than the first, Michael Gerrard, professor at Columbia Law School, told DW. It is closely following the blueprint of Project 2025, a roadmap developed by conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation. The 900-page document suggested an "update" of the endangerment finding. The finding is the basis for rules regulating climate pollution established under the Obama and Biden administrations. Rules on power plants, vehicles, airplanes, and landfills could now be repealed, said Jason Rylander, legal director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute. At the same time, climate change continues to intensify across the US, fueling extreme heat, wildfires, floods, and billion-dollar weather disasters. "Climate change isn't going away. We are rapidly accelerating past 1.5 degrees. There will be additional public health and environmental harms that will result from that," Rylander said. The EPA has formally drawn up a proposal, which is now open for public comment until September. The agency will then review and respond to the feedback before issuing a final ruling, expected by the end of the year. There will then likely be lawsuits. "Groups like mine will certainly sue," Rylander said. The cases will first go to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and could then be appealed to the US Supreme Court. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It could take years for the case to reach the Supreme Court. But once the EPA issues its final decision, the endangerment finding will be revoked, Gerrard explained. "It stays revoked unless a court overturns it." The endangerment finding is based on decades of scientific conclusions from credible global sources about the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and public health. Rylander said the EPA was "slicing and dicing the statute to try to come up with some sort of loopholes," and that none of the arguments brought forward "really passed the laugh test." Still, with a six-to-three conservative majority, the US Supreme Court has repeatedly chipped away at federal climate regulations in recent years. "So, it is possible that the Supreme Court will uphold this," said Gerrard, who is also director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video One argument the agency is using to reverse the finding is that its economic and political significance is so great that it requires explicit authorization from Congress. And while the EPA under Obama and Biden assumed it was enough to show that greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans endanger the climate, the Trump administration wants to evaluate each gas individually and by sector. "And they are saying each chunk, like carbon dioxide from US power plants alone, has to endanger the climate," Gerrard said, adding that this is much harder to establish. "So, a court that is hostile to climate regulation might follow that approach and agree with the Trump EPA and say that the endangerment finding is not valid." The EPA proposal also argues the 2009 finding failed to consider the benefits of CO2 emissions alongside their costs. Rylander called this "a fallacious argument," comparing it to deciding whether a species is endangered under the Endangered Species Act. "That's not an economic decision. It's a question of science," he said, adding that it's the same with pollutants, like CO2. "Do they cause public health harm or do they not?" Rabe said a reversal would cause "a chilling effect on many existing federal policies for greenhouse gas emissions." Still, the EPA would retain authority to regulate other pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, mercury, and coal ash from coal-fired power plants. "And many states are working to address pollution from cars and power plants, and they would do that under state law," said Rylander, adding that "US efforts to decarbonize will still continue." However, Gerrard said, "the best tool they have would be gone."
Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
End Of $800 Duty-Free Rule Sends Shockwaves Through US Small Businesses
President Donald Trump on Tuesday unleashed a new wave of tariffs targeting countries that have failed to finalize bilateral trade deals with the U.S., signaling a dramatic escalation of his second-term trade agenda. The White House announced a sweeping series of import duties, some taking effect as early as Aug. 1, that are expected to hit key sectors like manufacturing, electronics and retail. Among the most consequential measures is the end of the de minimis exemption, a long-standing rule that allows goods valued under $800 to enter the US duty-free. According to Wired, the exemption will be fully revoked for all countries starting Aug. 29, dealing a blow to small businesses and e-commerce platforms that rely on low-cost international shipments. "This is going to hit every small importer hard -- from Etsy resellers to small-scale manufacturers," said a compliance officer with a major logistics firm, as reported by Reuters. The move is widely expected to increase shipping costs, customs delays and administrative burdens for U.S. retailers and consumers alike. In addition, the Trump administration announced new 50% tariffs on copper and copper alloy products, citing national security concerns under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. The tariffs will apply to imports from major producers including China, Brazil and South Korea. These metals are crucial for U.S. construction, electrical systems, and green energy technologies. According to AP News, more than a dozen countries -- including India, Turkey and Vietnam -- will now face tariffs between 25% and 30%, after failing to sign new bilateral trade agreements with the U.S. by the administration's Aug. 1 deadline. Trump's trade team framed the actions as part of a broader campaign to reset the global trading system. In a press release, Treasury Secretary Jacob Bessent said the U.S. is "enforcing fair trade standards globally" and warned that "countries that want access to the U.S. market must play by our rules," as quoted by Barron's. The crackdown is also targeting a practice known as transshipment, in which exporters route goods through third-party countries to disguise their true origin and evade tariffs. According to The Washington Post, the administration has announced new enforcement rules requiring enhanced origin verification for any product deemed at risk of transshipment abuse. Those rules go into effect in mid-August. Trade experts warn that the cumulative effect of these new measures could be severe. According to the Tax Foundation, the total volume of U.S. tariffs under Trump's second term is now on track to exceed those imposed during the height of the 2018–2019 trade war. A Yale Budget Lab analysis released in mid-July described the current U.S. tariff regime as "the most economically consequential and legally aggressive" in decades. Notably, a separate set of tariffs imposed earlier this year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) was recently struck down by a federal court, which ruled that the president had exceeded his authority. According to Wikipedia, oral arguments in the appeal of V.O.S. Selections v. United States were scheduled for July 31, with a final ruling expected later this summer. If upheld, the decision could sharply limit the administration's ability to unilaterally impose future duties. Congress is also weighing its response. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are backing the Trade Review Act of 2025, which would require Congressional approval for any new tariff that remains in effect for more than 60 days. The bill has drawn support from small business groups, though the White House has threatened a veto. Details on the proposed law can be found on Wikipedia. Some signs of diplomatic progress have emerged. As reported by Investor's Business Daily, the U.S. and China reached a limited trade truce in June that included Chinese commitments on rare earth exports and opioid enforcement. However, the agreement expires Aug. 12, and the next round of negotiations remains uncertain. Back on Main Street, the latest moves have stoked anxiety among small business owners already struggling with inflation, supply chain instability, and rising borrowing costs. Industry groups have been quick to sound the alarm. The National Retail Federation warned that revoking the de minimis exemption will "punish U.S. consumers and small businesses," adding that the policy change amounts to a hidden tax on everyday goods, as reported by Reuters. Meanwhile, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has urged the administration to "reconsider actions that risk destabilizing global supply chains." Whether the strategy succeeds in bringing trade partners to the table—or plunges the country into another prolonged trade war—will likely depend on what happens in the next few weeks.
Local Germany
7 hours ago
- Local Germany
What Americans need to know about studying in Germany
Germany is a popular choice for aspiring learners from abroad – not least because it offers free or low-cost tuition fees to both domestic and international students. In the 2023/2024 winter semester, around 469,485 international students were registered in Germany, according to statistics compiled by the Wissenschaft Weltoffen. The Bundesrepublik is also home to some of the world's top universities. According to an international university ranking for 2025 by Times Higher Education, the Technical University of Munich (TUM) ranked 26th in the world, while Heidelberg University took the 47th spot. Add to that a solid jobs market with opportunities for English speakers, it's no wonder that Americans are hopping over the Atlantic for a few years or longer. This longing to move among some US citizens and residents has intensified since Donald Trump was re-elected as US President. With the crackdown on immigration, turbulent politics and the rising cost of living showing no signs of dampening down, it's no wonder that many Americans are eyeing Germany to continue their education. READ ALSO: 'I will never move back' - How do Americans in Germany feel about Trump win? Here's what any Americans thinking about applying to study in Germany need to know: You don't have to pay tuition fees (in many cases) When deciding on where to study in Germany, you'll no doubt be thinking about the subject you want to specialise in, where you'd like to live and, of course, how much it's going to cost. In the United States, the cost of going to college depends on factors such as whether it's a public or private institution, and where it's situated. Students on average have to shell out around 38,270 US Dollars per year for their tuition, as well as other expenses like books and supplies, according to recent statistics on education. In Germany, you'll be glad to hear that it's a lot less expensive. In fact, at public universities, you don't even have to pay any tuition fees. Keep in mind, though, that students usually have to pay a Semesterbeitrag (semester fee) which covers administrative costs and other services. This could be anywhere from around €100 to €400, and often includes a public transport ticket. Advertisement Many of these also offer courses in English. If you're up to the job, you can also apply for a course in German, although a B2 level German language certificate will likely be required. Note that non-native English speakers will likely need to show proof of their English language skills. Public universities that provide free tuition and programmes in English include: Berlin's Free University, the University of Hamburg, the University of Göttlingen and University of Freiburg among others. A few universities, such as the Technical University of Munich, have different fee rules for international students so make sure you read the small print. READ ALSO: What international students should know about scholarships in Germany The 'best' universities in Germany for 2025 Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Julian Stratenschulte Even private university tuition in Germany is relatively affordable Budding students in the US may find that one of Germany's many accredited private universities are a better choice for them. That could be down to several reasons such as their varied selection of courses or because there are more English-language opportunities. Some private universities include: Bucerius Law School in Hamburg, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management and Bard College Berlin. There are also some private practical and technical schools - often with Hochschule in the name - offering English-language programmes. Fees are set at the discretion of the university but can be anywhere around €5,000-€7,000 per semester which is lower than many other countries (including the US). Advertisement You'll need a student residence permit As an American, you can enjoy visa-free travel to Germany. Citizens of countries including the US, UK, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Japan are allowed to spend 90 days in the EU in every 180 without needing a visa (although bear in mind that you'll have to get familiar with the EU's new Exit and Entry System rules known as EES). However, Americans do need a student residence permit to attend university. After you've arrived in Germany and registered your address, you'll need to get an appointment at the local immigration office (Ausländerbehörde) – and make sure you have your documents ready to go! CHECKLIST: How to move to Germany as an American The most important one for students is your certificate confirming your enrolment to an accredited study programme in Germany. Bring that along with an application form, biometric pictures and a valid passport. You'll also need to meet other requirements such as having health insurance and some money saved (more on that below). Check the requirements of your local authority because you may need other documents such as proof of your rental contract or a letter from your landlord confirming your address. You'll also have to pay the fee for the permit. Some German universities offer support for their students coming from abroad, including helping them prepare residence permit applications. Advertisement Get familiar with key rules Americans coming to Germany – like other internationals – have to prove that they have enough money to support themselves. This often needs to be stored in a so-called 'blocked account' ( Sperrkonto ), which is a a special type of bank account for international students and other visa applicants. According to the latest figures, internationals starting university generally need a total of €11,904 per year in their account. This amounts to €992 per month for living expenses. Alternatively, some students lean on parental support to prove their financial stability. In this case, you can skip setting up the blocked account and instead provide a guarantee letter ( Verpflichtungserklärung ) from a guardian in which they confirm that they take full financial responsibility for you. The guarantor will need to provide a bank statement or other proof that they have enough money to do so. It is also a requirement in Germany for everyone, including students coming from abroad, to have health insurance. Depending on your age and other factors, you may qualify for public health insurance. Students over 30 generally have to take out private insurance. On average, the cost of student health insurance in Germany is between €130 and €150 per month, according to estimates from October 2024. READ ALSO: How much money do international students need to study in Germany? Be aware of the semester dates and deadlines If you're applying for university in Germany, you need to know when the semesters run, and the deadlines for joining classes. In Germany the academic year is split into two: The winter semester is from October to March and the summer semester runs from April to September. The semesters include a lecture-free period, known as a Semesterferien , when exams are typically scheduled. The deadlines can vary depending on the institution, but many schools have an application deadline around July 15th for courses starting in the autumn/winter period, and around January 15th for courses starting in the spring/summer period. A woman works on her laptop. Photo: Pixabay You can work part-time Students in Germany regularly find a part-time job to boost their bank account. International students, such as those from the US, are allowed to work up to 140 full days or 280 half-days per year without extra approval from authorities. A simpler way to think about it is that students from non-EU countries are allowed to work up to 20 hours per week. During the semester break there are no limits on the number of hours that students can work. READ ALSO: Weimar to Heidelberg - The best German university towns for foreign students Advertisement Many students opt for a minijob, which allows them to earn extra cash without paying full social security contributions. These can be found at bars and cafes, for example. From January 2025, students can earn up to €556 per month in a minijob, working around 43.3 hours per month at the new minimum wage. That works out at around 11 hours per week, which is below the 20 permitted for international students. Alternatively, depending on your industry, there may also be 'working student' ( Werkstudent ) jobs to be found. These jobs can be especially convenient for those on a student residence permit, because they are designed to be aligned with the working time limits mentioned above. They are also intended to let students get their foot in the door and gain some entry-level experience before graduating. Are you an American who has studied in Germany? Share in the comments about how you've found the experience – and any tips.
