logo
Persian or Arabian Gulf? A brief history

Persian or Arabian Gulf? A brief history

Middle East Eye08-05-2025

Not content with trying to rename one body of water, Donald Trump may be planning to rename another.
Fresh from unilaterally changing the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, the US president has now turned his attention to a naming dispute in the Middle East: the Persian Gulf or Arabian Gulf?
Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he would make a decision during an upcoming trip to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE on how the US would refer to the sea going forward.
It followed reports citing US officials that Washington was set to begin using Gulf of Arabia or Arabian Gulf, rather than Persian Gulf.
Trump would not the first to insert the word Arabia into the name: every country in the Gulf Cooperation Council - Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE - uses the term Arabian.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
But the internationally recognised name, used by the International Hydrographic Organization, the global body for marine navigation, and the United Nations, is the Persian Gulf.
The debate around the name has been a source of geopolitical tension between Iran and its neighbours across the Gulf for more than six decades.
Middle East Eye takes a look at the history of the naming dispute.
'Persian Gulf' used for more than 2,500 years
The body of water between Iran and the Arabian peninsula that connects the Gulf of Oman and the Shatt al Arab river delta has been known by a number of names throughout history.
The oldest and most frequently recurring name is the Persian Gulf - or some iteration of it.
In April 2006, the UN's group of experts on geographical names met to discuss the validity of the term Persian Gulf, producing an eight page document.
It found that during the Achaemenid Persian empire, between 559 and 330 BCE, the name Pars Sea was widely used in written texts, denoting Persian influence over the area.
In that period, both the names Persian and Arabian Gulf appear in texts. However, the latter referred to an area that roughly equated to the Red Sea.
The world maps of the Greek historians and geographers Hecataeus (472 to 509 BCE) and Herodotus (425-484 BCE) both referred to the Red Sea as the Arabian Gulf.
Several Greek and Roman geographers thereafter, including Ptolemy in the second century, referred to the Persian Gulf or Persian Sea.
While no Greek manuscripts of Ptolemy's atlas Cosmographia survive, reconstructions of his maps from the 13th century onwards consistently refer to Sinus Persicus (Persian Gulf in Greek).
A 1467 reconstruction of Ptolemy's Map VI from "Cosmographia" shows Sinus Persicus (Persian Gulf) and Sinus Arabicus (Red Sea) (Wikimedia)
After the spread of Islam in the seventh century, many Arabic speaking communities moved from the coasts of the Red Sea to the areas around the Iranian plateau.
As they moved into the Persian world, Arab geographers continued to refer to the Persian Gulf.
UN experts analysed more than 30 books by Muslim geographers, scholars and scientists, all of which refer to the Persian Gulf or Sea. They include the works of Ibn Khordadbeh, Estakhri, al-Tabari, Mohammad Ibn Omar and dozens of others.
During the Islamic Golden age, scholars such as al-Masudi and Ibn Khaldun referred in Arabic to Khalij Fars (Persian Gulf), while Estakhri and al-Muqaddasi used Bahr Fars (Persian Sea).
'Britain Sea' fails to catch on
In the 16th century, Portugal briefly captured Hormuz island in the Persian Gulf.
Around that time, Portuguese maps and letters show references to Mare de Persia, Persico Sinus, mar Persiano, Persischer Golf and other iterations referencing Persia.
The UN's working group found that in a total of 6,000 historical maps dating up to 1890, just a handful refer to the body of water as the Basra Gulf, Qatif Gulf or Arabic Gulf. The first two names refer respectively to the major Iraqi city and the eastern province in modern-day Saudi Arabia.
The experts wrote: 'It is obvious that the promotional use by the Arabs of the three aforementioned maps, whose identity and originality are not clear, in comparison with 6,000 maps and more than 200 historical and tourism books from Irastus to Herodotus to Estakhri and Ibn Houghal, who have all called the water body Persian Gulf, shall lack any value.'
In the 18th and 19th centuries, when Britain expanded its global influence and dominance around the Indian Ocean, it also referred widely to the Persian Sea.
The UN experts found at least 16 official British maps from the period that used the term.
Britain tried to seize control over the body of water in the late 1830s. Consequently, in 1840, London's Times Journal referred to the Gulf as 'Britain Sea' - a name that never caught on.
A rare map from 1626 refers to the Persian Gulf as the "Sea of Qatif" (Wikimedia)
Following the Iranian nationalisation of the British-owned Anglo-Persian oil company in 1950, relations between Iran and the UK rapidly declined.
It was in that context that British sources began to rename the Gulf.
Charles Belgrave, a UK official with a focus on the Persian Gulf area, published a book in 1955 that first referenced the 'Arabian Gulf'.
In the 1960s, Iran and Egypt fell out over the Iranian Shah's support of Israel, while pan-Arab and Arab nationalist sentiments spread through large parts of the region.
Amid that backdrop, the name Arabian Gulf was increasingly catching on in Arab circles.
Following the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979 and the increasing divergence between Iran and its neighbours across the Gulf, tension over the name intensified.
Iran seeks to ban use of 'Arabian Gulf'
Since the turn of the millenium, Iran has strongly fought back against any efforts to use alternative names.
In 2004, National Geographic provoked an Iranian backlash after printing the word 'Arabian Gulf' in parentheses under Persian Gulf. The magazine and its journalists were subsequently banned by Tehran.
Two years later, the Economist was banned from the country after it simply used 'the Gulf', leaving out the word Persian. 'The Gulf' has become a common term used by many media outlets since.
A dangerous mind: The legacy of Bijan Jazani and Iran's 1975 Evin executions Read More »
The fallout has gone both ways: in 2010, the Islamic Solidarity Games, run by Saudi Arabia but due to have been held in Iran, were called off because logos and medals were to bear the name 'Persian Gulf'.
That same year, Iran warned that any foreign airlines that failed to use the term Persian Gulf would not be allowed to use Iranian airspace.
It followed an incident during which a Greek flight attendant was deported from Iran after a dispute broke out with passengers over his use of Arabian Gulf.
In 2012, Google Maps decided to avoid naming the body of water altogether - leaving the name blank. Iran threatened to sue Google over the move. As of today, Google Maps uses both Persian and Arabian Gulf.
To emphasise the importance of the matter, Iran has established Persian National Gulf Day, which occurs on 29 or 30 April each year and involves ceremonies centred around the coastal cities.
That date was chosen as it marks the anniversary of when Abbas the Great, the fifth Safavid shah, drove the Portuguese out of the Strait of Hormuz in 1622.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced
Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced

Gulf Today

timean hour ago

  • Gulf Today

Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced

Ashley Nunes, Tribune News Service Electric car subsidies are heading for the chopping block. A tax bill recently passed by House Republicans is set to stop billions in taxpayer cash from being spent on electric vehicle purchases. If embraced by the Senate and signed into law by President Donald Trump, the bill would gut long-standing government handouts for going electric. The move comes on the heels of another climate policy embraced by Republicans. Earlier this year, Trump announced plans to roll back burdensome rules that effectively force American consumers to buy electric, rather than gas-fueled, cars. The Environmental Protection Agency has called that move the 'biggest deregulatory action in US history.' Not everyone sees it that way. Jason Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, assailed Trump's efforts, noting that his 'administration's ignorance is trumped only by its malice toward the planet.' Other similarly aligned groups have voiced similar sentiments arguing that ending these rules would 'cost consumers more, because clean energy and cleaner cars are cheaper than sticking with the fossil fuels status quo.' Backtracking on EV purchasing mandates seems to have hit Trump haters particularly hard. That mandate — established by President Joe Biden — would have pushed US automakers to sell more EVs. Millions more. Electric cars currently account for 8% of new auto sales. Biden ordered— by presidential fiat — that figure to climb to 35% by 2032. If you believe the hype, the result would be an electric nirvana, one defined by cleaner air and rampant job creation. I'm not convinced. For one thing, cleaner air courtesy of electrification requires that EVs replace gas-powered autos. They're not. In fact, study after study suggests that the purchase of EVs adds to the number of cars in a household. And two-thirds of households with an EV have another non-EV that is driven more — hardly a recipe for climate success given that EVs must be driven (a lot) to deliver climate benefits. Fewer miles driven in an EV also challenges the economic efficiency of the billions Washington spends annually to subsidise their purchase. Claims of job creation thanks to EVs are even more questionable. These claims are predicated around notions of aggressive consumer demand that drives increased EV manufacturing. This in turn creates jobs. A recent Princeton University study noted, 'Announced manufacturing capacity additions and expansions would nearly double US capacity to produce electric vehicles by 2030 and are well sized to meet expected demand for made-in-USA vehicles.' Jobs would be created if there were demand for EVs. Except that's not what's happening. Rather, consumer interest in EVs has effectively cratered. In 2024, 1.3 million EVs were sold in the United States, up from 1.2 million in 2023. This paltry increase is even more worrying given drastic price cuts seen in the EV market in 2024. Tesla knocked thousands of dollars off its best-selling Model 3 and Model Y. Ford followed suit by cutting prices on its Mach-e. So did Volkswagen and Hyundai. Despite deep discounts, consumer interest in electrification remains — to put it mildly — tepid at best. So, when people equate electrification with robust job creation, I'm left wondering what they are going on about. Even if jobs were created, EV advocates are coy about how many of those jobs would benefit existing autoworkers. Would all these workers — currently spread across large swaths of the Midwest — be guaranteed jobs on an EV assembly line? If not, how many workers should expect to receive pink slips? For those who do, will they be able to find new jobs that pay as much as their old ones? Touting job creation for political expediency is one thing. Fully recognising its impact on hardworking American families today, another. Some Americans may decry Trump's actions on climate, but they have only themselves to blame. Many of the pro-climate policies enacted, particularly during the Biden era, deliver little in the way of climate benefits (or any benefit for that matter) while making a mockery of the real economic concerns businesses and consumers have about climate action. No more. In justifying climate rollbacks, the president says many of his predecessor's policies have hurt rather than helped the American people. He's right and should be commended for doing something about it.

Israel has sold record amount of debt in US since war on Gaza erupted: Report
Israel has sold record amount of debt in US since war on Gaza erupted: Report

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israel has sold record amount of debt in US since war on Gaza erupted: Report

Israel has sold a record amount of debt in the US since its war on Gaza erupted on 7 October 2023, according to a report by Bloomberg on Friday. The government of Israel's US-based bond broker, Israel Bonds, says it has sold $5bn worth of debt in the last twenty months. The level of bond issuance is more than double that raised by Israel Bonds, in similar time periods previously. Israel's war on Gaza started after the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel killed around 1,200 people. Israel responded by pummelling the Gaza Strip and invading it. More than 54,000 people, mainly women and children, have been killed in the Israeli attacks, and the population is facing "imminent famine", the United Nations says. Israel Bonds is affiliated with Israel's finance ministry and sells bonds inside the US to both retail and institutional investors. The starting price for non-tradable retail Israeli bonds is as low as $36. A five-year Israeli bond has a yield between 4.86 percent and 5.44 percent, according to the Bloomberg report. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Along with its war on Gaza, Israel fought a devastating war with Hezbollah in Lebanon and launched widespread strikes on Syria. In 2024, it engaged in two rounds of direct missile and drone attacks with Iran. Israel's financing needs have soared as it looks to fund its military. Local Israeli creditors, including deep-pocketed institutional ones, account for about 80 percent of the government's lending overall. That leaves just twenty percent to come from international debt sales and what Israel Bonds sells in the US. According to the group, local US governments at the state and county level are big buyers in places like New York, Texas, Ohio, and Illinois. Palm Beach County in Florida became one of the world's largest investors in Israeli Bonds in 2024, with about $700m of its $4.67bn portfolio invested there. Israel has faced widespread criticism for its war on Gaza. The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes. Meanwhile, public opinion on Israel has turned sharply negative from France to Japan. However, in March 2024, Israel saw strong demand for its debt among international investors. It sold $8bn in international bonds. Israel enjoys investment-grade ratings from major credit ratings agencies.

Trump-Musk fight creates unprecedented elite power struggle in the US
Trump-Musk fight creates unprecedented elite power struggle in the US

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Trump-Musk fight creates unprecedented elite power struggle in the US

It is hard to find a historic or contemporary precedent for the battle raging between Donald Trump, the president of the United States, and Elon Musk, the world's richest man. There may be a couple of examples that come close, but nothing that quite captures the current moment. For instance, in 2017, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman rounded up his profligate cousins and businessmen at the Riyadh Ritz-Carlton for a royal shakedown. They got into line quickly. And almost two decades before, Russian President Vladimir Putin managed to bend the oligarchs who got rich off post-Soviet capitalism to his will. On its surface, the Trump-Musk feud seems to be over policy. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The Tesla chief and former head of DOGE attacked Trump's tax bill this week as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk was channelling the concerns of deficit hawks in the US, who worry the bill will add trillions to the US debt pile at a time when the dollar has weakened and demand for more US debt is looking stretched. Trump, who has positioned the bill as a do-or-die piece of legislation, said on Thursday during a meeting in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, that 'I'd rather have Elon criticise me than the bill,' adding later, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' Then it got nasty. Within hours, Musk was on X calling for Trump's impeachment, to be replaced by Vice President JD Vance. The vice president himself was catapulted to power in part by Peter Thiel, a billionaire tech entrepreneur who mentored and groomed Vance's career in politics. He threatened to form a new political party and stop ferrying Nasa astronauts into space. He said Trump would have lost the US presidential election without his endorsement. And for good measure, insinuated that Trump was linked to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Trump fired back. He suggested Musk was attacking the bill, not out of patriotic fervour, but because he had snatched away perks for electric vehicles from which Tesla benefits. 'Elon was wearing thin,' Trump said. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump said in another post on Thursday night, threatening to leverage the power of the presidency against Musk's business empire, which includes Tesla and SpaceX. Tesla shares dropped about 14 percent on Thursday amid the spat. According to Bloomberg's billionaires index, Musk's net worth plunged $34bn that day. Tesla was trading up around five percent on Friday. Silicon Valley vs 'America First' nationalists The Trump-Musk feud is a decidedly American affair - partly performative, very populist, and made for social media. And on that note, Musk has been posting on X, the social media platform he bought before the US election, and Trump has been posting on Truth Social - owned by Trump Media & Technology Group - that was purposely built as a right-leaning competitor to X before Musk bought it. Of course, the US is no stranger to elite power struggles capturing the public's attention, particularly during its rambunctious, early years as a republic. Aaron Burr, a former vice president, famously killed Alexander Hamilton, the one-time treasury secretary, in a dual in 1804. A century later, Teddy Roosevelt rode a populist 'trust busting' wave that pitted him against the gilded elite, making men like JD Rockefeller his foe. But the Trump-Musk feud has key differences. JD Vance's mentor co-founded company that helps Israel generate 'kill lists' of Palestinians in Gaza Read More » The two men had forged an unprecedented alliance that, to a point, symbolised a broader one between Silicon Valley tech entrepreneurs and crypto bros on one side, and working-class "America First" nationalists on the other. While some media reports say that allies of the two men are urging both to reconcile, the standard bearers of "America First" nationalism appear to be egging Trump on and savouring Musk's fall from grace. Steve Bannon, a former Trump advisor whose podcast WarRoom advocates for "America First" positions, called on Trump to seize Musk's company SpaceX and examine the billionaire's immigration status. Musk was born in South Africa. Bannon himself was critical of Trump's tax bill, but he was one of the few supporters who called for tax hikes on the wealthy. 'You're going to have a few of the tech bros and the crypto crowd stick with Elon because you have the cult of Elon. But MAGA will 100% back Trump. You aren't going to have a person in MAGA who will buy a Tesla,' Bannon said. But Musk donated over $250m to Trump's 2024 campaign and has made clear he has no qualms about deploying his cash against those who turn on him within the Republican Party. On Thursday night, Musk wrote, 'some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years…' Do Musk and Trump have options? Trump has a history of engaging in brutal public spats, only to mend fences later. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vance both lambasted Trump during his 2016 run for the White House. But the key difference here is that neither of these men had the deep pockets of the world's richest man to endure a battle with the president. To an extent, Musk is a country unto himself. His technology, like Starlink, is hovering over battlefields in Ukraine, while his company ferries Nasa astronauts into space. The knowledge he has gained of Trump's family and the inner workings of the White House would make him a valuable catch for any foreign leader, including US allies. More broadly speaking, the feud is likely to reaffirm a perception among American friends and foes that something within the US system is cracking. In less than one day, the president of the US threatened on social media to use the power of his office against a comrade-turned-foe, while the world's richest man called for his impeachment. Elon Musk: How a tech nerd became Trump's 'first buddy' Read More » Many observers said the bonhomie between Trump and his former 'first buddy' was bound to implode eventually, given both men's power and outsized egos. Musk also felt his investment in Trump's campaign wasn't paying off, reports suggest. In May, The Wall Street Journal reported that Musk tried to block OpenAI from building one of the world's largest artificial intelligence data centres in Abu Dhabi. Trump and his aides rejected Musk's bid to cancel the deal in favour of his AI company. On Wednesday, Jared Isaacman, a tech billionaire friend of Musk, suggested Trump pulled his nomination to run Nasa because of his ties to Musk. Things could get ugly if the feud refuses to die down, and the president has several institutions that could be weaponised against Musk and his businesses. Trump has not been shy about using state leverage to settle old scores since his return to power. However, Musk has pockets deep enough to make mid-term elections an uphill battle for Trump and his loyalists. If the gloves come off, the world will have a front row seat to an unprecedented battle between the world's most powerful politician and the world's richest man, as it all plays out in real time on social media.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store