Exchange student sues Bay Area nonprofit alleging she was placed in home of an abusive ‘predator'
The lawsuit, filed on Aug. 11, alleges that San Rafael-based Cultural Home International, or CHI, committed fraud, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty by placing Claudia Gutierrez in the home of John and Roberta Woods for her educational year abroad in New Hampshire.
The suit also names Bishop Brady High School, located in Concord, N.H., claiming it failed to properly vet the host family and monitor the teen during her stay, according to the civil allegations filed in Merrimack Superior Court.
'Bishop Brady and CHI instead served Claudia up to a home she believed had a husband and wife living in it — John and Robert Woods — but which, in fact, housed only John Woods, an elderly predator with a criminal record,' according to the suit.
Roberta Woods reportedly was living in San Diego and had been for some time, Gutierrez's lawyers said.
Neither CHI nor the school responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit.
Officials from the Diocese of Manchester, which oversees the high school, said they had not yet seen the lawsuit.
'Protecting the safety of children and young people is one of the highest priorities of the Diocese of Manchester and its schools,' officials said in a statement. 'As we were just made aware of this suit and have not been served, we are unable to comment without the opportunity for further review.'
John Woods, 78, was arrested after Gutierrez called her parents in Spain in March 2022, leaving disturbing messages reportedly while still under the influence of 'clandestine drugging,' prompting them to have friends take her to the hospital, according to her co-counsel, Matin Emouna.
An examination found she had been sexually assaulted and drugged with Ambien.
In October 2024, Woods was convicted of aggravated sexual assault, facilitated by an intoxicating substance, with a maximum 20-year sentence.
Cultural Home International, founded in 1980, brings young people from around the world to the United States for educational, cultural, travel or work experiences, including home stays for high school and university students.
It is an official J-1 visa sponsor, which provides nonimmigrant visas to individuals participating in an international exchange program in the U.S.
In Gutierrez's case, CHI arranged enrollment at Bishop Brady and the home stay, and according to the lawsuit, the organization assured her family they had checked backgrounds and references and had conducted a visit to the Woods' home.
'At the time of the sexual abuse and assaults described in this complaint, CHI charged Claudia and her family thousands of dollars for the privilege of participating in this cultural exchange program and residing in New Hampshire with a host family, in an allegedly comfortable and nurturing home environment,' her attorneys claimed in the lawsuit. 'CHI owed and agreed that it owed Claudia a duty to do everything within its power to protect her from sexual abuse by a properly vetted family.'
The claims against Bishop Brady were similar, alleging the private high school charged the family $19,000 for the academic year, $5,000 more than local students, while promising to vet the host family and then failing to monitor and supervise her while she was living in the home.
The lawsuit alleges Gutierrez complained of dizziness and at one point passed out in the Woods' home and she had been absent or tardy 'a notable number of times' from school, but neither the school nor CHI intervened or inquired about her symptoms.
Both John and Roberta Woods were also named in the lawsuit, the husband for the injuries caused to the victim as well as emotional distress, and his wife for negligence in presenting a safety risk to a foreign exchange student.
Messages left for Roberta Woods regarding the lawsuit were not returned.
The suit claims Gutierrez continues to suffer from physical and emotional issues, including nightmares, severe anxiety, depression, vomiting and other issues. She is asking for compensatory and enhanced compensatory damages, punitive damages, interest, attorney fees and any other relief deemed 'just and equitable.'
Emouna said he believes there are more cases like Claudia's in the international exchange industry in the United States, with organizations failing to property vet where the young people live, opening the door to predators.
'I thought this was an isolated incident,' he said. 'I think there's a bigger problem at large.'
In Gutierrez's case, the Marin County nonprofit literally showed the 16-year-old girl pictures of a 'beautiful family' in New Hampshire, smiling grandparents with grandchildren on their laps and another of a two-story, white house, the grandpa waving as he stands next to an American flag hanging out front.
'That family was nonexistent,' Emouna said. 'This guy was a predator. He did it on purpose.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's federal law-enforcement crackdown ripples through D.C. neighborhoods
WASHINGTON — The main drag in Washington's Columbia Heights neighborhood is typically crammed with people peddling pupusas, fresh fruit, souvenirs and clothing. On Tuesday, though, things felt different: The white tents that bulge with food and merchandise were scarcer than usual. 'Everything has stopped over the last week,' said Yassin Yahyaoui, who sells jewelry and glass figurines. Most of his customers and fellow vendors, he said, have 'just disappeared' — particularly if they speak Spanish. The abnormally quiet street was further proof of how President Trump's decision to flood the nation's capital with federal law enforcement and immigration agents has rippled through the city. Although troop deployments and foot patrols in downtown areas and around the National Mall have garnered the most attention, life in historically diverse neighborhoods such as Columbia Heights is being reshaped as well. The White House has credited Trump's crackdown with hundreds of arrests, while local officials have criticized the aggressive intervention in the city's affairs. The confrontation escalated Tuesday as the top federal prosecutor in the District of Columbia opened an investigation into whether police officials have falsified crime data, according to a person familiar with the situation who wasn't authorized to comment publicly. The inquiry could be used to bolster Trump's claims that the city is suffering from a 'crime emergency' despite statistics showing improvements. The mayor's office and the Police Department declined to comment. Blocks away from where Yahyaoui had set up shop, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and local police stopped a moped driver delivering pizza. The agents drove unmarked cars and wore tactical vests; one covered his face with a green balaclava. They questioned the driver and required him to present documentation relating to his employment and legal residency status. No arrest was made. The White House said there have been 465 arrests since Aug. 7, when the federal operation began, including 206 people who were in the country illegally. The Trump administration has ramped up immigration enforcement and the president signed an executive order on Aug. 11 to put the Police Department under federal control for 30 days; extending that would require congressional approval. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said Trump was 'unapologetically standing up for the safety of law-abiding American citizens.' Glorida Gomez, who has been working a fruit stand in Columbia Heights for more than a decade, said business is worse now than during the COVID-19 pandemic. She said many vendors stopped coming because they were afraid of encountering federal agents. Customers seem less willing to spend money too. Reina Sosa, another vendor, said that 'they're saving it in case something happens,' like getting detained by immigration enforcement. Ana Lemus, who also sells fruit, said that 'we need more humanity on that part of the government.' 'Remember that these are people being affected,' she said. 'The government is supposed to protect members of the community, not attack or discriminate against them.' Bystanders have recorded some arrests on video. On Saturday morning, Christian Enrique Carias Torres was detained in another part of the city during a scuffle with ICE agents, and the video ricocheted around social media. An FBI agent's affidavit said Carias Torres kicked one of the agents in the leg and another was injured when he fell during the struggle and struck his head on the pavement. A stun gun was used to subdue Carias Torres, who was charged Tuesday with resisting arrest. An alphabet soup of federal agencies have been circulating in the city. In the Petworth neighborhood, roughly 20 officers from the FBI, Homeland Security, Park Police and U.S. Marshals descended on an apartment building on Tuesday morning. A man extended his hands out a window while officers cuffed him. Yanna Stelle, 19, who witnessed the incident, said she heard the chatter from walkie-talkies as officers moved through the hallways. 'That was too many police first thing in the morning — especially for them to just be doing a warrant,' she said. From his actions and remarks, Trump seems interested in ratcheting up the pressure. His administration has asked Republican-led states to send more National Guard troops. Mississippi, Tennessee, Louisiana, West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio have agreed to deploy a total of 1,100 troops to the city, on top of the 800 from the D.C.-based National Guard. Resistance to that notion is starting to surface, both on the streets and in Congress. On Tuesday, Democratic Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-San José) introduced a bill that would require a report outlining the cost of any National Guard deployment unrelated to a natural disaster, as well as its legal basis. It would also require reporting on any Guard interactions with civilians and other aspects of the operation. Forty-four Democrats have signed on in support, including Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington's nonvoting delegate in the House of Representatives. Although the measure stands little chance of passing while Republicans control the chamber, it's a sign of a wider Democratic response to Trump's unprecedented moves in Washington. 'Are L.A. and D.C. a test run for a broader authoritarian takeover of local communities?' Liccardo asked. He added that the country's founders were suspicious of 'executive control of standing armies.' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said that 'Democrats continue to side with criminals over law-abiding Americans.' It's unclear what kind of help the National Guard will be able to provide when it comes to crime. 'The fact of the matter is that the National Guard are not law-enforcement trained, and they're not going into places where they would be engaged in law enforcement activity,' said Jeff Asher, a crime analyst and consultant at AH Datalytics. 'So I don't know that it's fair to expect much of it.' Trump declared in a social media post that his initiative has transformed Washington from 'the most unsafe 'city' in the United States' to 'perhaps the safest, and getting better every single hour!' The number of crimes reported in D.C. did drop by about 8% this week as compared with the week before, according to Metropolitan Police data. There was some variation within that data, with crimes such as robberies and car thefts declining while burglaries increased a bit and homicides remained steady. Still, a week is a small sample size — far from enough time for data to show meaningful shifts, Asher said. Referring to the monthlong period that D.C.'s home rule law allows the president to exert control over the Police Department, he said: 'I think 30 days is too short of a period to really say anything.' Brown, Whitehurst and Megerian write for the Associated Press. AP writers Michael Kunzelman, Alanna Durkin Richer, Jacquelyn Martin and Ashraf Khalil contributed to this report.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
25 Investigates: Pushing feds for answers after agents detain Canton mother with green card
25 Investigates is working to get answers from the U.S. government after Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents at Logan International Airport detained a Canton mother who has been living legally in the U.S. Jemmy Jimenez Rosa, 42, returned earlier this month from a family vacation in Mexico with her husband and their three young daughters. She was traveling with a valid U.S. Green Card — one that was just renewed in July. Her family says she was detained on August 11 and has been in custody ever since. 'She's very selfless, constantly trying to help out family, friends. Everything's about the kids,' said her husband, Marcel Rosa. Detained After Family Vacation Marcel Rosa, a U.S. citizen, says he handed over all the passports and his wife's Green Card when they landed at Logan. He says an officer pulled Jemmy aside for additional questioning. She was taken into a room alone. 'I walked in, and my wife's head was just down, and you could tell her whole spirit was just crushed,' he recalled. Rosa says the officer brought up a decades-old marijuana case. At age 20, Jemmy pleaded guilty to misdemeanor possession and served probation. With little explanation, Rosa says he feared the worst. 'I just told my kids, I was like, hey girls… this might be the last time you see your mother,' he said as he was fighting back tears. Jemmy was held at Logan for four days without access to her medication, a phone call, or even a shower, according to her family and their attorney. Rosa says his wife suffers from high blood pressure, is diabetic and takes medication to treat mental health conditions. 'She Gets Sandbagged at the Airport' Boston-based immigration attorney Todd Pomerleau says he had no contact with Jemmy while she was detained at Logan by CBP. 'They would not allow us to see her. They wouldn't allow us to tell her she even had an attorney,' Pomerleau said. 'She has her green card renewed multiple times. She's allowed to travel multiple times, and now she gets sandbagged at the airport.' Legal Breakthrough — But Still No Answers Since last week, 25 Investigates has pressed CBP, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and ICE for answers about Jemmy's detention. Each agency has directed us to another. Meanwhile, this week Pomerleau challenged Jemmy's decades-old conviction in Massachusetts district court, arguing she didn't have proper legal counsel when she entered her plea 22 years ago. A judge and prosecutor agreed. Her case was dismissed. Jemmy's record is now clean. But as of Tuesday, August 19th, she still remains in ICE custody. And the Rosa family still waits for answers. 'All of them wake up in the middle of the night time just saying mommy mommy mommy,' Rosa said. 'We just want her free.' What's Next Pomerleau has sued the federal government, alleging a lack of due process in Jemmy's detention. She has since been transferred to an ICE detention facility in Maine, where she is now able to communicate with her family and her attorney. The agency told Pomerleau they could not hold any female detainees in Massachusetts. 25 Investigates asked CBP about the conditions Jemmy was allegedly held in. We also asked how many people are currently detained at Logan. We will update this story when we get a response. A bond hearing is scheduled for August 28 related to Jemmy's detention. Pomerleau says he is working to expedite that. 25 Investigates has also reached out directly to ICE leadership, including U.S. Border Czar Tom Homan, for comment. We are still waiting for a response. The family has launched a GoFundMe to help cover legal and unexpected expenses. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Lawyer argues Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued Tuesday. Nineteen children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. The families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. In one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?' The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. Meta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any products. Linsley said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts is restricted for minors, under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022. 'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley said. The families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.' She also argued that the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. "The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all," Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.' The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such strategies. 'With Instagram's blessing and assistance, sellers of assault weapons can inundate teens with content that promotes crime, exalts the lone gunman, exploits tropes of misogyny and revenge, and directs them where to buy their Call of Duty-tested weapon of choice,' the lawsuit says. 'Parents don't stand a chance.' 'Not Instagram, not Meta, but marketing agencies provide advice on how to be in compliance with Meta's policies," Linsley argued. Last month, lawyers for Activision argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his attack.
