&w=3840&q=100)
SC reserves verdict on plea for delimitation exercise in AP, Telangana
The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its verdict on a plea seeking directions to the Centre for holding the delimitation exercise to increase the assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh reserved its decision on a plea filed by K Purushottam Reddy who contended that holding delimitation exercise only in Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and excluding Andhra Pradesh and Telangana was unconstitutional.
The petitioner's counsel said he was seeking parity with UT of Jammu and Kashmir and delimitation exercise be taken in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.
Additional solicitor general K M Nataraj, appearing for the Centre, referred to Section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act and said the delimitation process could be undertaken only after the 2026 census concluded.
He said delimitation was a humongous exercise and couldn't be undertaken overnight.
Nataraj said the delimitation exercise in J-K was in the case of Union Territory and couldn't be equated with the state.
The counsel for the petitioner opposed the distinction being drawn between the UT and a state and contended that Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Nagaland were included in the prior delimitation notification issued by the Centre, but not Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, though the northeastern states were also governed by Article 170 of the Constitution.
The bench asked him whether it was his argument that as and when the power was exercised by the Centre under the Delimitation Act, it must apply to all states uniformly.
He said states would also include Union Territories also as far as notification for delimitation was concerned and referred to Section 2(f) of the Delimitation Act.
"States of AP and Telangana which came into existence around five years before J-K notification were not included. In subsequent notification, the northeastern states were also omitted. Reason given for exclusion was not Article 170. I am submitting that their exclusion from the delimitation exercise was wrong," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Avengers' in anti-Trump protest: Jimmy Kimmel, Kerry Washington, Ayo Edebiri, Mark Ruffalo, and more Hollywood stars join ‘No Kings' protest
Major protests are being staged across America hours before President Trump's military parade marking the U.S. Army's 250th Anniversary. The event, set to take place in Washington, also happens to fall on the 47th President's birthday. The administration has been under fire lately over its handling of immigration, with California burning for days. Now, celebrities have stepped in and taken to the streets in what's being called the 'No Kings' protest. Jimmy Kimmel, Kerry Washington, and Ayo Edebiri are just a few of the big names joining the fight, pushing back against the President's 'aggressive immigration raids and his growing use of executive powers,' moves many are calling dangerously authoritarian. Also read: 'No Kings' protests spread across US as Trump gets military parade Jimmy Kimmel marched with his parents in the South Bay Area in Northern California. The talk show host, who has never shied away from criticising Trump and has been a vocal supporter of the Democratic Party for years, posted a photo on Instagram saying he felt grateful to see so many Americans come together peacefully. 'I met many people who love this country and still believe it to be a force for good. The most important words ever spoken are 'Love one another.' It really is as simple as that.' Kimmel, protesting from San Francisco, added, 'I know how fortunate I am to have been born into a family that taught me to care about others and that the most important words ever spoken are 'Love one another.' It really is as simple as that.' A post shared by Jimmy Kimmel (@jimmykimmel) Mark Ruffalo spoke to MSNBC, leading the protest from New York. When the reporter questioned why people are protesting out in the rain, he replied, 'Because we see our democracy is in real trouble.' Adding that they don't see hope for a powerful opposition that can stand against the current administration, the Hulk actor said, 'We're disgusted and we're scared, and we know that the only way to fight this now is for the people to come together,' citing trampling of rights, the Constitution, kidnapping of immigrants, etc. Later, while speaking to Entertainment Weekly, the Hollywood A-lister even called the fellow protesters real-life Avengers. 'Being brave for what we hold dear — our freedoms, our democracy, and each other — it's on us, guys. Literally, together, we're the Avengers now. No one's gonna come and save us, man. Americans unite.' A post shared by MSNBC (@msnbc) Kerry Washington also voiced her support, posting photos of herself at the protest, surrounded by fellow demonstrators. Her message read: '#NoKings, just some QUEENS I found marching, speaking up, and fighting for Democracy.' The Bear star Ayo Edebiri wrote on her Instagram, 'I love you & I have your back! Stay brave!' Also read: Putin, Trump discuss Iran-Israel situation by telephone, Kremlin aide says Glenn Close attended a protest in Bozeman, Montana. Later, took to her Instagram to criticise the shocking killings of Minnesota lawmakers Rep. Melissa Hortman and Sen. John Hoffman, that happened earlier the same day. Close said her heart went out to their families and expressed her frustration: 'One would think that on a day when millions peacefully demonstrate for the America that we know and love, this kind of violence wouldn't happen. But the underbelly of violence, conspiracy, and hidden weapons across this country is surfacing. These people think they can take matters into their own hands and make it harder for us to regain our democracy. But we must not, not, not be afraid. We must not.' The White Lotus fame, Natasha Rothwell, joined the protest, holding up a blunt sign that read: 'You Are Trash.' She captioned her post: NO KINGS. Singer Gracie Abrams shared pictures from the protests on Instagram Stories. One of her signs read: 'Free speech is not an insurrection,' while another picture quoted Desmond Tutu: 'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.' Jane the Virgin star Gina Rodriguez from Woodstock, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia star Mary Elizabeth Ellis from Los Angeles, Anna Kendrick (A Simple Favor), Tessa Thompson (Creed), Evanescence singer Amy Lee, and Morgan Fairchild also took part, sharing their protest moments online.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Mosques cut down on loudspeakers' decibel levels
Azaan, or the Islamic call to prayers, lasts for a few minutes. However, the use of loudspeakers for azaan by mosques has been in the crosshairs of some members of other faiths for a long time. The controversy keeps hitting the headlines, with courts, the Supreme Court, and different high courts laying down guidelines for the use of loudspeakers for religious functions and ordering penalties for violation of the rules. As the latest round of controversy over loudspeakers in mosques rages, several mosques in the city and suburbs have voluntarily brought down the decibel levels to the permissible limit. According to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the permissible noise levels in residential areas are 55 decibels for daytime and 45 decibels for the night. Much before BJP functionary and ex-MP Kirit Somaiya took it up and allegedly put pressure on the police stations to remove loudspeakers from mosques, in 2022, MNS chief Raj Thackeray aggressively opposed the use of loudspeakers for azaan. Jama Masjid Al Shams at Mira was among the first mosques in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) to install the machine to keep the decibel levels of its loudspeakers under the permissible limit. "The machine hardly costs around Rs 1500. Our Masjid trust's office has kept the records of the decibel level of every azaan since the day we installed it in 2022. We were the first to follow the guidelines of the Supreme Court about the noise level. Many other mosques replicated the practice," informs Syed Muzaffar Husain, chief trustee of the Jama Masjid Al Shams and former MLC. Those opposing loudspeakers at religious places cite the January 2025 verdict of the Bombay High Court, which graded the punishment for violation of the guidelines. It mandated the cops to act against the violation in three stages: warning, penalty (Rs 5000 per day), and seizure of the loudspeakers. "Just the other day, the local police visited our mosque and asked us to remove the loudspeakers. We have told them we will follow the guidelines and are soon to set the decibel level to the permissible limit," says Abul Hassan Khan, trustee of Masjid Ajmeri and Madrasa Ali Hassan Ahle Sunnat at Sakinaka. It was at another meeting in Sakinaka again where former minister Arif Naseem Khan announced that a legal team headed by senior counsel Yusuf Muchchala will challenge the state Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) May 11, 2025, circular, which demands religious places to submit property cards and proof of the structures' registration with the Waqf board or charity commission while seeking permission to use the loudspeakers. Neither the Supreme Court nor the Bombay High Court has put this condition in its guidelines for granting permission for loudspeakers. Many have cautioned against the politicisation of the loudspeakers' issue and suggested pragmatism. Shoaib Khatib, trustee of the iconic Jama Masjid of Bombay near Crawford Market, says his mosque follows the permitted decibel level for its loudspeakers. "In any case, loudspeakers are used only for azaan four times a day as there is no use of loudspeakers between 10 pm and 6 am, and the morning azaan is given without the use of a loudspeaker," says Khatib. Businessman V R Sharif is against the use of loudspeakers. "I have told many mosque managements to avoid using loudspeakers, which are a nuisance. Today, everybody carries a mobile phone, which can be used to set the alarm for azaan. We live in a diverse society, and we should not do something which disturbs the peace of our neighbours," suggests Sharif. General Secretary of Mumbai Congress Asif Farooqui slams the tendency to add to the noise. "Everybody knows that loudspeakers add to noise pollution. Nowhere is it written that our prayers will not be accepted if azaan is not amplified through loudspeakers. Move ahead with the times and compete for education and employment, not in creating noise," says Farooqui. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Constitution living document shaped by judicial review: CJI Gavai
1 2 3 Nagpur: Chief Justice of India Justice Bhushan Gavai, delivering an address at Edinburgh Law School on Friday, described the Indian Constitution as a "living, organic, evolving document" that has consistently adapted to the nation's shifting socio-political realities, often through dynamic engagement between Parliament and judiciary. The speech, titled 'Constitution as an Evolving Document', offered a rich historical and legal analysis of constitutional transformation across 75 years of India's democracy. Justice Gavai highlighted that Constitution drafters themselves anticipated the need for change over time. "Dr Ambedkar rightly said we cannot bind future generations to the Constitution we adopt today. It must evolve with time," he said, citing Ambedkar's reply to critics during the Constituent Assembly debates on 25 November 1949. The newly appointed CJI traced how early court rulings prompted immediate constitutional amendments. One such example was the 1951 First Amendment, necessitated by judicial setbacks to backward class reservations and free speech restrictions. This amendment, signed by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, added Article 15(4) to empower the state to provide for marginalised sections and revised Article 19 to allow for speech-related restrictions concerning public order, state security, and international relations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Justice Gavai elaborated on the evolution of the amending power under Article 368. He cited Shankari Prasad (1951) and Sajjan Singh (1965), where Parliament's amending power was upheld, but noted that dissenting opinions — particularly by Justice Mudholkar — laid the groundwork for the Basic Structure Doctrine. This culminated in the historic 1973 Kesavananda Bharati verdict, where a 13-judge bench held that while Parliament could amend the Constitution, it could not alter its fundamental framework. "Justice H R Khanna's balancing view, supported by both sides, became the law," he said. He also referred to the 42nd and 44th amendments, the former inserting "socialist" and "secular" into the Preamble and restricting judicial review, and the latter restoring checks on Emergency powers post-1977. He noted how Minerva Mills reaffirmed judicial review as part of the basic structure. Justice Gavai went on to describe amendments driven by social justice, including Article 16(4A) for reservation in promotions following Indra Sawhney, and Article 21A introduced by the 86th Amendment for free and compulsory education. He spoke on the 10th Schedule to address defections, and 73rd and 74th amendments to empower rural and urban local govts, as envisioned by Mahatma Gandhi. He also referenced the more recent 103rd Amendment providing reservation for economically weaker sections, and the 106th Amendment reserving one-third seats for women in Parliament and state legislatures — though pending implementation post-delimitation. "Every major constitutional moment, whether from social movements, court judgments or political shifts, has contributed to shaping a Constitution that is dynamic, not static," he remarked. The session was attended by Justice Vikram Nath, faculty members, Indian consular officials, and legal scholars. Justice Gavai concluded by stating that the document continues to be relevant because "it breathes through interpretation and legislation. " GFX Key points from CJI Gavai's speech Dr Ambedkar envisioned a flexible framework to serve future generations. Judicial rulings have historically prompted crucial amendments Kesavananda Bharati established Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting Parliament's amending powers Social justice has shaped amendments, including reservations and education rights. Judicial review is a basic feature and cannot be abrogated. Decentralisation through Panchayati Raj and urban governance was a Gandhian ideal. Women's reservation law is a milestone awaiting implementation. Parliament & courts together preserve constitutional balance. Constitution evolves through continuous democratic dialogue Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
